Delta4Embassy
Gold Member
- Dec 12, 2013
- 25,744
- 3,045
Saying someone hasn't got a clue, is a stupid head and the like really doesn't say anything but you can't prove the assertion. And are too lazy to try.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The one that can not prove an assertion would be you. people do not get concealed carry permits to hunt humans you dumb ass.Saying someone hasn't got a clue, is a stupid head and the like really doesn't say anything but you can't prove the assertion. And are too lazy to try.
People carry for self defense not on the off chance they can go hunting people you retard.No it is not. You are beyond stupid.Firearms owners do NOT spend time imaging killing people you retard.Felt it necessary to make fun of gun owners. People who spend an inordinant amount of time imagining the need to kill other people SHOULD be made fun of.
Are if their weps are for self-defense. Or they're carrying concealed. That's exactly what they're thinking about.
So the concealed weapon's being carried around on the offchance the opportunity to hunt presents itself? Not in case a person threatens them they can deal with it via force or deadly force?
You did not say this?No it is not. You are beyond stupid.Firearms owners do NOT spend time imaging killing people you retard.Of course, you felt it necessary to demonstrate how incapable you are of offering an intelligent response.
Felt it necessary to make fun of gun owners. People who spend an inordinant amount of time imagining the need to kill other people SHOULD be made fun of.
Are if their weps are for self-defense. Or they're carrying concealed. That's exactly what they're thinking about.
So the concealed weapon's being carried around on the offchance the opportunity to hunt presents itself? Not in case a person threatens them they can deal with it via force or deadly force?
You did not say this?No it is not. You are beyond stupid.Firearms owners do NOT spend time imaging killing people you retard.Felt it necessary to make fun of gun owners. People who spend an inordinant amount of time imagining the need to kill other people SHOULD be made fun of.
Are if their weps are for self-defense. Or they're carrying concealed. That's exactly what they're thinking about.
So the concealed weapon's being carried around on the offchance the opportunity to hunt presents itself? Not in case a person threatens them they can deal with it via force or deadly force?
No it is not. You are beyond stupid.Firearms owners do NOT spend time imaging killing people you retard.Of course, you felt it necessary to demonstrate how incapable you are of offering an intelligent response.
Felt it necessary to make fun of gun owners. People who spend an inordinant amount of time imagining the need to kill other people SHOULD be made fun of.
Are if their weps are for self-defense. Or they're carrying concealed. That's exactly what they're thinking about.
So the concealed weapon's being carried around on the offchance the opportunity to hunt presents itself? Not in case a person threatens them they can deal with it via force or deadly force?
Let me get this straight.Well, I thought at least Conservatives on this board would at least be jumping for joy here.
In February, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Peruta v. County of San Diego, that California's concealed carry laws violated the Constitution. Today the same three judge panel stopped California Law enforcement authorities from filing further appeals. That means the law is effectively dead.
Law-abiding Californians may not need to justify their need to carry concealed weapons, after the same three-judge panel that struck down restrictions on the permits earlier this year ruled Wednesday that it is too late for new opponents to join the fight against the ruling.
The decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals would bar other law enforcement officials, including state Attorney General Kamala Harris, from appealing its ruling in a case originally brought by an independent journalist who sued the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department over its policy of requiring a specific reason for being allowed to carry a concealed weapon in public.
New court decision likely ends California s restrictions on conceal-carry permits Fox News
Let me get this straight.Well, I thought at least Conservatives on this board would at least be jumping for joy here.
Little Templar posts an article about the courts and California's unconstitutional gun laws.
And then he starts complaining about conservatives, even though they did nothing?
These liberal fanatics seem to have become completely unhinged by their electoral rejection by the American people on Nov. 4.
Well since they were NOT part of the case they have no standing.BTW, how can a court stop any of the parties to one of its cases, from appealing its decision?
So the concealed weapon's being carried around on the offchance the opportunity to hunt presents itself? Not in case a person threatens them they can deal with it via force or deadly force?
Perhaps you need to be educated about why people carry in the first place:
Teenager stops home burglary - 19 Action News Cleveland OH News Weather Sports
UPDATE Man Shot and Killed by Homeowner in Home Invasion Name Released
District Attorney Colorado Springs burglary shooting was justified News FOX21News.com
Police say man dumped at northwest Dallas gas station was shot while committing robbery Dallas Morning News
State attorney Man who killed biker justified News - Home
Intruder dead in Bellevue apartment shooting Local News - KETV Home
http://www.post-gazette.com/news/st...ith-robbers-near-Capitol/stories/201410150166
Man pulls 13-inch knife during fight at Northeast Philadelphia Pathmark gets shot
Single customer wins shootout with four armed robbers in Texas bar Hot Air
Turlock woman turns the table on robber
CPD Mother opens fire on armed robbery suspects at downtown Cha - Live5News.com Charleston SC News Weather Sports
Video Marathon Gas Clerk Shoots Kills 2 of 3 Armed Robbers
That all happened since September.
Of course there are some headhunters; most people carry hoping they never have to use the weapon.No it is not. You are beyond stupid.Firearms owners do NOT spend time imaging killing people you retard.Of course, you felt it necessary to demonstrate how incapable you are of offering an intelligent response.
Felt it necessary to make fun of gun owners. People who spend an inordinant amount of time imagining the need to kill other people SHOULD be made fun of.
Are if their weps are for self-defense. Or they're carrying concealed. That's exactly what they're thinking about.
So the concealed weapon's being carried around on the offchance the opportunity to hunt presents itself? Not in case a person threatens them they can deal with it via force or deadly force?
New court decision could end California s restrictions on conceal-carry permits Fox News
A procedural decision in a landmark Second Amendment case could spell the end for California laws restricting the issuance of permits to carry concealed handguns.
The decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals would bar other law enforcement officials, including state Attorney General Kamala Harris, from gaining "intervener status" to join in further challenges of its ruling in a case originally brought by an independent journalist who sued the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department over its policy of requiring a specific reason for being allowed to carry a concealed weapon in public.
San Diego County Sheriff Bill Gore has said he will not fight the ruling, meaning there is no one with standing left to challenge the decision made in February.