okfine
Diamond Member
- Jun 15, 2019
- 29,551
- 19,149
I bet.Uh no. Sleeping has nothing to do with what I would like to do with her.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I bet.Uh no. Sleeping has nothing to do with what I would like to do with her.
Let her debate the old lady leftist sellout again. Only losing by 80K something votes is actually a positive, bud.She only got 39% of the vote last time. Why would she win this time?
Nothing you post is worth remembering.Calling a female politician a "porn star" is how the left treats women. Remember this, people.
Let her debate the old lady leftist sellout again. Only losing by 80K something votes is actually a positive, bud.
you’re sexual frustration is at a boiling pointI truly had no idea who Laura Loomer is or was.
However, No one seems to know porn stars better than some of you Trumpists.
After all, you voted for the self-professed pussy-grabber.
BTW, how is Stormy this days?
Oh this could age really well. Going to be great for her to run against the bought and paid for old lady again. She had zero experience,. But now she does, sport.Yes, go ahead and tell yourself that losing is a positive. Loomer has zero chance of winning that seat.
Triggered much, faggot.
Struck a nerve, eh Jeffrey?Triggered much, faggot.
She'll get the Islamaphobe vote but that is not as big a bloc as it once was.So what's your point, Muhammad?
Interestingly enough none of you who reject her have anything to say about the truth of her reporting. It's almost as if the truth doesn't matter to you. Take the OP video, for example. Name one thing she alludes to that's not true.She only got 39% of the vote last time. Why would she win this time?
Like SchumerShe should have changed her name before going into politics. The name "Loomer" is a sure target.
It rhymes with a whole bunch of words.
Interestingly enough none of you who reject her have anything to say about the truth of her reporting. It's almost as if the truth doesn't matter to you. Take the OP video, for example. Name one thing she alludes to that's not true.
crickets chirping
From the Right? Most likely.Who is Laura Loomer? Is she a porn star?
Only in the big ass department.She's tenacious. An up-and-coming Donald Trump.
My point is that the lefties on this thread imply that she's some kind of braindead lackey to be marginalized, some kind of kook, when, for example, she's reported on a number of things that Trump got wrong over the years. She supported Trump despite his failings given the alternatives. She's bold and cares about the truth. It's the social and lamestream media establishment that should be marginalized.It doesn't matter what I think about her. This is a heavily Democratic district in a liberal part of Florida which will not elect her. That's the bottom line.
So you decide Loomer is a porn star, because it's how leftist misogynists treat republican women,Your the one running around with porn stars apparently. Good for you!