Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not an opinion. It's a fact.Altered out of context video. The Biden thing is nothing more than tRumpling spin.
Nice opinion - bullshit, but nice opinion.
There was nothing 'altered' - Biden bragged how he blackmailed the Ukraine P.M. because he wanted to make people believe he could be tough on foreign policy...however, there is a difference between being 'tough on foreign policy' and 'blackmail'.
The 'biden thing' was not brought up by Trump, you retard. It was brought up by Hillary Clinton in 2016 to ensure Biden did not enter the race, and it was resurrected by the Lib media who knew this would be an issue in the general election so went on the attack to distract from Biden giving a video-confession of blackmail...
...and it worked, as you proved stupid enough not to know the past , where it came from, or to see how you are being manipulated again.
It turns out the whistleblower NEVER heard ANYTHING first hand. EVERYTHING he claims to know came from second hand sources.Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
And what do you suggest we do if it turns out the whistleblower is wrong and falsifying information? Should the whistleblower faces any form of charges if their complaint is found to contain false information?
Another LIB face plant.
tRump could have a corpse at his feet and a bloody knife in his hand and still not get convicted by Moscow Mitch's meatpuppets.Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
Since January 2017, you people have made anything and everything about Impeachment. The problem is that the leaders on your side are pussies and are afraid to bring Impeachment against Trump. Shit or get off the pot.
They're not "afraid" to bring impeachment per se, they collectively realize that without irrefutable, smoking gun evidence there isn't any chance that impeachment will lead to a conviction in the Senate. In the meantime impeachment TALK is a nice political tool since completely safe seat douche bags-D like Pelosi can take on the role of saying NO, while other dickweeds-D in more competitive districts can pound the table and "demand justice".
In other words, they can have their cake and eat it too without all the political risk that actually bringing articles of impeachment entails.
In the meantime the mindless drones in that make up the "base" are too distracted by arguments regarding what are "impeachable offenses" to notice they're being manipulated.
My advice to the seditious Obama mole when his name is revealed: 'Pack light' and I hope you like to eat fucking VN boiled chicken feet for the rest of your life.It turns out the whistleblower NEVER heard ANYTHING first hand. EVERYTHING he claims to know came from second hand sources.Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
And what do you suggest we do if it turns out the whistleblower is wrong and falsifying information? Should the whistleblower faces any form of charges if their complaint is found to contain false information?
Another LIB face plant.
You don't know how the whistleblower acquired his/her knowledge, but you do know the ICIG - a Trump appointee - found it credible.
opinions = bullshitNobody tried to claim any different.the link says OPINION
hahahahahahahahahahahhahahaha
We aren't conservatives, after all.
opinions = bullshitThe opinion of a law professor. Plus you give good ratings to the opinion of USMB nicknames who love Trump.the link says OPINION
hahahahahahahahahahahhahahaha
By the way, is bribery impeachable? You didn't say.
Biden is the one who took bribes, shit for brains.Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
Why should we give a shit about stuff that is SOP for Dims?Trump has done a lot that could get him impeached but it always comes down to republicans not caring about any of it. They have sent Trump the message loud and clear that he is to be considered above the law.
Oh, you don't have to tell me what your opinions are worth, I already know.opinions = bullshitNobody tried to claim any different.the link says OPINION
hahahahahahahahahahahhahahaha
We aren't conservatives, after all.
.....unless you have facts to back up your hypothesis, it's crapOh, you don't have to tell me what your opinions are worth, I already know.opinions = bullshitNobody tried to claim any different.the link says OPINION
hahahahahahahahahahahhahahaha
We aren't conservatives, after all.
"But if"...Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
Well, we KNOW Biden did it, because we have him admitting it on video...
So, according to your post, Biden could actually be impeached before even being sworn in (assuming the idiot could actually win the election)...
Your posting history is easily viewable by every member kiddo......unless you have facts to back up your hypothesis, it's crapOh, you don't have to tell me what your opinions are worth, I already know.opinions = bullshitNobody tried to claim any different.the link says OPINION
hahahahahahahahahahahhahahaha
We aren't conservatives, after all.
One cannot be impeached without taking office, moron. Plus Biden didn't target his political rival, and Obama was the President."But if"...Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
Well, we KNOW Biden did it, because we have him admitting it on video...
So, according to your post, Biden could actually be impeached before even being sworn in (assuming the idiot could actually win the election)...
And no, your "funny" rating can't get Biden impeached either.
My advice to the seditious Obama mole when his name is revealed: 'Pack light' and I hope you like to eat fucking VN boiled chicken feet for the rest of your life.It turns out the whistleblower NEVER heard ANYTHING first hand. EVERYTHING he claims to know came from second hand sources.Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
And what do you suggest we do if it turns out the whistleblower is wrong and falsifying information? Should the whistleblower faces any form of charges if their complaint is found to contain false information?
Another LIB face plant.
You don't know how the whistleblower acquired his/her knowledge, but you do know the ICIG - a Trump appointee - found it credible.
BTW Trump KNOWS who you are!
I always back up my stuff with factsYour posting history is easily viewable by every member kiddo......unless you have facts to back up your hypothesis, it's crapOh, you don't have to tell me what your opinions are worth, I already know.opinions = bullshitNobody tried to claim any different.the link says OPINION
hahahahahahahahahahahhahahaha
We aren't conservatives, after all.
and another thing:Your posting history is easily viewable by every member kiddo......unless you have facts to back up your hypothesis, it's crapOh, you don't have to tell me what your opinions are worth, I already know.opinions = bullshitNobody tried to claim any different.the link says OPINION
hahahahahahahahahahahhahahaha
We aren't conservatives, after all.
Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
It's not an opinion. It's a fact.Altered out of context video. The Biden thing is nothing more than tRumpling spin.
Nice opinion - bullshit, but nice opinion.
There was nothing 'altered' - Biden bragged how he blackmailed the Ukraine P.M. because he wanted to make people believe he could be tough on foreign policy...however, there is a difference between being 'tough on foreign policy' and 'blackmail'.
The 'biden thing' was not brought up by Trump, you retard. It was brought up by Hillary Clinton in 2016 to ensure Biden did not enter the race, and it was resurrected by the Lib media who knew this would be an issue in the general election so went on the attack to distract from Biden giving a video-confession of blackmail...
...and it worked, as you proved stupid enough not to know the past , where it came from, or to see how you are being manipulated again.
I know you tRumplings have problems telling the difference but trust me on this, there is one.
Trump has done a lot that could get him impeached but it always comes down to republicans not caring about any of it. They have sent Trump the message loud and clear that he is to be considered above the law.
