Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
Since January 2017, you people have made anything and everything about Impeachment. The problem is that the leaders on your side are pussies and are afraid to bring Impeachment against Trump. Shit or get off the pot.
They're not "afraid" to bring impeachment per se, they collectively realize that without irrefutable, smoking gun evidence there isn't any chance that impeachment will lead to a conviction in the Senate. In the meantime impeachment TALK is a nice political tool since completely safe seat douche bags-D like Pelosi can take on the role of saying NO, while other dickweeds-D in more competitive districts can pound the table and "demand justice".
In other words, they can have their cake and eat it too without all the political risk that actually bringing articles of impeachment entails.
In the meantime the mindless drones in that make up the "base" are too distracted by arguments regarding what are "impeachable offenses" to notice they're being manipulated.
Bang the drum slowly. They have never accepted Election consequences. They did this with Bush and now Trump. They only accept Elections when they win.
One cannot be impeached without taking office, moron. Plus Biden didn't target his political rival, and Obama was the President."But if"...Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
Well, we KNOW Biden did it, because we have him admitting it on video...
So, according to your post, Biden could actually be impeached before even being sworn in (assuming the idiot could actually win the election)...
And no, your "funny" rating can't get Biden impeached either.
"But if"...Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
Well, we KNOW Biden did it, because we have him admitting it on video...
So, according to your post, Biden could actually be impeached before even being sworn in (assuming the idiot could actually win the election)...
Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
Since January 2017, you people have made anything and everything about Impeachment. The problem is that the leaders on your side are pussies and are afraid to bring Impeachment against Trump. Shit or get off the pot.
They're not "afraid" to bring impeachment per se, they collectively realize that without irrefutable, smoking gun evidence there isn't any chance that impeachment will lead to a conviction in the Senate. In the meantime impeachment TALK is a nice political tool since completely safe seat douche bags-D like Pelosi can take on the role of saying NO, while other dickweeds-D in more competitive districts can pound the table and "demand justice".
In other words, they can have their cake and eat it too without all the political risk that actually bringing articles of impeachment entails.
In the meantime the mindless drones in that make up the "base" are too distracted by arguments regarding what are "impeachable offenses" to notice they're being manipulated.
Bang the drum slowly. They have never accepted Election consequences. They did this with Bush and now Trump. They only accept Elections when they win.
Republicans pull the same bullshit when they lose too, their base requires such pointless antics just like the Democrat base does.
Granted the Democrats have been doing a lot more of the sore loser routine for the last 10 years but on the other hand, they've been losing more often than the Republicans have.
Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
all this may be interesting,,, but it is neither nefarious nor illegal
if it were, you would have seen in the mueller report a line or two about Horny Bill Clinton getting a 500K payday from the kremlin while the uranium one deal was under consideration
Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
He could also be impeached for murder, taking the tags off someone else's mattress,, and drunk driving, but he never did any of those things either!
Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
He could also be impeached for murder, taking the tags off someone else's mattress,, and drunk driving, but he never did any of those things either!
Did he get it secondhand from the Ukrainian leader? If so, Trump's in trouble.It turned out the whistleblower got his information second hand.
Perfect story for the NYT.
You want our money going to corrupt countries ?Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
neither can you impeach trump. you can't. you can say that until your fking ears fall off, but you can't. all you can do is incorrectly state day after day your TDS, and I'll laugh every day!!!One cannot be impeached without taking office, moron. Plus Biden didn't target his political rival, and Obama was the President."But if"...Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
Well, we KNOW Biden did it, because we have him admitting it on video...
So, according to your post, Biden could actually be impeached before even being sworn in (assuming the idiot could actually win the election)...
And no, your "funny" rating can't get Biden impeached either.
It turns out the whistleblower NEVER heard ANYTHING first hand. EVERYTHING he claims to know came from second hand sources.Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
And what do you suggest we do if it turns out the whistleblower is wrong and falsifying information? Should the whistleblower faces any form of charges if their complaint is found to contain false information?
I just explained why in the post you quoted. There is no chance of a conviction in the Senate no matter what.tRump could have a corpse at his feet and a bloody knife in his hand and still not get convicted by Moscow Mitch's meatpuppets.Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
Since January 2017, you people have made anything and everything about Impeachment. The problem is that the leaders on your side are pussies and are afraid to bring Impeachment against Trump. Shit or get off the pot.
They're not "afraid" to bring impeachment per se, they collectively realize that without irrefutable, smoking gun evidence there isn't any chance that impeachment will lead to a conviction in the Senate. In the meantime impeachment TALK is a nice political tool since completely safe seat douche bags-D like Pelosi can take on the role of saying NO, while other dickweeds-D in more competitive districts can pound the table and "demand justice".
In other words, they can have their cake and eat it too without all the political risk that actually bringing articles of impeachment entails.
In the meantime the mindless drones in that make up the "base" are too distracted by arguments regarding what are "impeachable offenses" to notice they're being manipulated.
Pelosi and company would still be afraid to bring Impeachment. They just like the constant Impeachment talk.
That's nice kid, but what does it have to do with my post?tRump could have a corpse at his feet and a bloody knife in his hand and still not get convicted by Moscow Mitch's meatpuppets.Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
Since January 2017, you people have made anything and everything about Impeachment. The problem is that the leaders on your side are pussies and are afraid to bring Impeachment against Trump. Shit or get off the pot.
They're not "afraid" to bring impeachment per se, they collectively realize that without irrefutable, smoking gun evidence there isn't any chance that impeachment will lead to a conviction in the Senate. In the meantime impeachment TALK is a nice political tool since completely safe seat douche bags-D like Pelosi can take on the role of saying NO, while other dickweeds-D in more competitive districts can pound the table and "demand justice".
In other words, they can have their cake and eat it too without all the political risk that actually bringing articles of impeachment entails.
In the meantime the mindless drones in that make up the "base" are too distracted by arguments regarding what are "impeachable offenses" to notice they're being manipulated.
Spoken like a true partisan lemming...
Meanwhile back on Earth, the dickweeds-D and the dickweeds-R continue their bi-partisan conspiracy to rape, pillage and burn while the partisan pinheads argue over which Political Crime Family has cuter uniforms.
"I'm fed up with party politics, tired of the whole Republicans versus Democrats thing. Because there's no real difference; they're all Mr. Potato-Head candidates. Basically, the operative word is party. Behind closed doors, they just have a good time. What do you think the Secretary of Defense means when he says, "I think there's an open bar somewhere"?" -- Tom Dobbs, Man of the Year
Without a phone call transcript, we won't know with 100% whether bribery occurred or not in President Trump's phone call to Ukraine.
But if it turns out Trump used military aid as a bargaining tool to get Joe Biden investigated, this law professor says:
Opinion | Under the Constitution, Trump's Ukraine call is grounds for impeachmentThe Constitution provides for impeachment in cases of “treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” Trump’s alleged attempt to strongarm Ukraine into smearing a political opponent fits well within this framework. Using the office of the president for personal political benefit comports with both the standard understandings of bribery and the broader category of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Bribery is a deeply pernicious form of public corruption, and legal standards spelling out the offense often define it as a quid pro quo — that is, where both sides exchange something of value.
And what do you suggest we do if it turns out the whistleblower is wrong and falsifying information? Should the whistleblower faces any form of charges if their complaint is found to contain false information?
