Lawyer: FBI's Seth Rich Docs Show Robbery Narrative 'Failing Apart'

[colfax_m]

Actually, it was the Democrats who decided in advance that Mr. Rich was whacked by a couple of anonymous fellows who decided to commit a botched robbery and the matter should be dropped.

Not the Republicans.

The botched robbery was the most likely explanation and the matter was not "dropped", it was properly investigated by police who didn't have a political motive.

 

[colfax_m]

If the Seth Rich murder is solved even with nefarious intentions by the investigators....thats a good thing.

They people we are talking about are not trying to solve the murder.

 

[Turtlesoup]

They dont want the actual murderer to go to prison for life? How so?

They're only interested in Seth Rich because they can blame him for a felony that was committed by Russians of all people.

Seth Rich isn't a person to them, he's a tool.

What are you babbling about---Rich released the Hillairy/Brazil emails from the DNC costing evil witch Hilliary the election----no one "betrays" Hilliary and lives. Likely FBI weapon used in the murder....same weapon reported stolen by the FBI just a couple miles away from the assassination with the FBI snagged lying and changing the times claimed it was stolen from one of their agents vehicles---now the FBI gets "to investigate" this murder...the same FBI who has been snagged destroying evidence against the Clintons and lying to cover for the Clintons...

 

[Polishprince]

No it wouldn't be.

That would be whistleblowing.

After all, the emails were incriminating to the DNC, showing what pieces of shit they were, and it would be alerting the people.

They weren't national secrets or anything.

Seth Rich did not own the emails from the DNC, therefore his taking and distributing them would be illegal.

Mr. Rich worked for the DNC, so he may have had legitimate access to the emails for all you know. So it wouldn't be "illegal" at all. Just a whistleblower, which is patriotic.

Julian Assange has confessed that Mr. Rich worked for him.

If it was just a "felony" as you are inferring, Hillary Clinton would have just had him busted, not whacked.

 

[colfax_m]

No it wouldn't be.

That would be whistleblowing.

After all, the emails were incriminating to the DNC, showing what pieces of shit they were, and it would be alerting the people.

They weren't national secrets or anything.

Seth Rich did not own the emails from the DNC, therefore his taking and distributing them would be illegal.

Mr. Rich worked for the DNC, so he may have had legitimate access to the emails for all you know. So it wouldn't be "illegal" at all. Just a whistleblower, which is patriotic.

Julian Assange has confessed that Mr. Rich worked for him.

If it was just a "felony" as you are inferring, Hillary Clinton would have just had him busted, not whacked.

Assange did not confess that Mr. Rich did anything.

Rich did not have legitimate access to the emails and even if he did, he did not have the authorization to copy those emails and disseminate them. That would be quite illegal.

Since Rich did no such thing, Clinton didn't have him busted or whacked.

 

[ColonelAngus]

If the Seth Rich murder is solved even with nefarious intentions by the investigators....thats a good thing.

They people we are talking about are not trying to solve the murder.

How could someone get a political win without solving the murder?

 

[ColonelAngus]

No it wouldn't be.

That would be whistleblowing.

After all, the emails were incriminating to the DNC, showing what pieces of shit they were, and it would be alerting the people.

They weren't national secrets or anything.

Seth Rich did not own the emails from the DNC, therefore his taking and distributing them would be illegal.

Mr. Rich worked for the DNC, so he may have had legitimate access to the emails for all you know. So it wouldn't be "illegal" at all. Just a whistleblower, which is patriotic.

Julian Assange has confessed that Mr. Rich worked for him.

If it was just a "felony" as you are inferring, Hillary Clinton would have just had him busted, not whacked.

Assange did not confess that Mr. Rich did anything.

Rich did not have legitimate access to the emails and even if he did, he did not have the authorization to copy those emails and disseminate them. That would be quite illegal.

Since Rich did no such thing, Clinton didn't have him busted or whacked.

How do you know?

 

[Doc7505]

FBI: Someone Could’ve Paid For Seth Rich’s Murder,
Releases ‘Seth Rich Files’
FBI: Someone could’ve paid for Seth Rich’s murder, releases ‘Seth Rich files’ | One America News Network (oann.com)
25 Apr 2021 ~~ By OAN Newsroom
The FBI released the records of murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich, which the agency had previously claimed didn’t exist. The FBI documents, released over the weekend, appear to show that an undisclosed entity either wanted to pay or actually paid a lot of money to get Seth Rich killed.
The files show that top DOJ officials met in 2018 to discuss Rich’s murder and investigators found no suspicious conduct by Rich before he died.
Rich was shot dead in front of his Washington D.C. home in 2016.
~Snip~
The FBI also noted, someone took Rich’s laptop after his murder, but it’s unclear if any files were deleted from it.
Attorneys are now demanding the FBI hand over more than 1,000 remaining federal documents related to Rich’s murder investigation, but it remains to be seen whether or not the Bureau will comply.


Comment:
Noteworthy, the whole Trump Admin cadre was removed and replaced by Chyna Joey Xi' handlers, with just one exception.
FBI Director Christopher Wray was re-affirmed as he did a great job in Democrats' view.
Reality proves my own theory every time!
IF the PM/DSA Democrat Left call it conspiracy theor and censor it, it's True.
There is factual evidence here that has been hidden from the public.Today censorship and PM/DSA operation are our biggest threat.
The FBI has become the most corrupt law enforcement agency in the world. If there is a revue of Policing, it should begin with the FBI. They've become the corrupt puppets of the PM/DSA Democratic Commie Party

 

[colfax_m]

How do you know?

For Assange, I've heard his statement. He admitted nothing, just provided enough fodder for the idiots to believe as if he did.

Second, Rich's position in the DNC was not a secret. He was working in voter outreach. He was not in any way running the organization's network and did not have access to everyone's emails.

 

[ColonelAngus]

How do you know?

For Assange, I've heard his statement. He admitted nothing, just provided enough fodder for the idiots to believe as if he did.

Second, Rich's position in the DNC was not a secret. He was working in voter outreach. He was not in any way running the organization's network and did not have access to everyone's emails.

This is how you know Seth was not hit?

The investigation said it was a robbery. How is it a robbery if nothing was stolen?

 

[Turtlesoup]

How do you know?

For Assange, I've heard his statement. He admitted nothing, just provided enough fodder for the idiots to believe as if he did.

Second, Rich's position in the DNC was not a secret. He was working in voter outreach. He was not in any way running the organization's network and did not have access to everyone's emails.

That is an ignorant claim----RICH's job was specifically the COMPUTERS....

 

[colfax_m]

This is how you know Seth was not hit?

The investigation said it was a robbery. How is it a robbery if nothing was stolen?

Lots of reasons. For starters, there's no reason for him to be "hit". Second, assassins don't leave people alive. Seth Rich was still alive when paramedics arrived.

The belief is that it was an attempted robbery but went bad. Seth Rich fought back. There was signs of a scuffle. At that point, the robbers might have just wanted to get away rather than take items off of him that would either delay their get away or otherwise connect them to the shooting.

 

[colfax_m]

That is an ignorant claim----RICH's job was specifically the COMPUTERS....

You sound like my grandma. "He works with computers" is about as nuanced as she gets. You realize people "work with computers" in different ways, right?

 

[ColonelAngus]

Its odd that no one in the DNC nor his family want his killer identified and prosecuted.

 

[ColonelAngus]

If the Seth Rich murder is solved even with nefarious intentions by the investigators....thats a good thing.

They people we are talking about are not trying to solve the murder.

You must be against this investigation...because it is a politically motivated investigation.

MSN

 

[colfax_m]

You must be against this investigation...because it is a politically motivated investigation.

It's not.

 

[Batcat]

The Deep State has too much power. Too bad Trump couldn't drain that swamp.

The political establishment and the Deep State will go after Trump until they finally destroy him. His example will convince anyone who wants to fight the corruption in the Swamp to avoid running for president.

We are led to believe that we live in a free nations but a truly free nation has a rule of law that apples equally to all.

In a truly free nation the FBI would turn over every leaf to find Seth Rich’s killer. If they uncovered a murder by a VIP or a political party they would indict and prosecute if at all possible. No politician could tell them to back off the investigation. The FBI would be like Elliot Ness and his Untouchables during the days of Prohibition.

 

[ColonelAngus]

You must be against this investigation...because it is a politically motivated investigation.

It's not.

Sure it is. Its 100% a political decision by the Biden DOJ.

Now I see where you are coming from.

It seems as though you are a political creature and that is the primary basis for your opinions.

You really shouldnt.

 

[colfax_m]

Sure it is. Its 100% a political decision by the Biden DOJ.

Nope. It's investigating whether the police department is behaving properly.

"Garland, speaking at the Justice Department's headquarters, referred to Taylor during his announcement of the investigation, which he said "will assess whether (Louisville Metro Police Department) engages in a pattern or practice of using unreasonable force, including with respect to people involved in peaceful expressive activities."
"It will determine whether LMPD engages in unconstitutional stops, searches and seizures, as well as whether the department unlawfully executes search warrants on private homes," he said, adding that "it will also assess whether LMPD engages in discriminatory conduct on the basis of race, or fails to perform public services that comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Investigation will include comprehensive review of the Louisville police department policies and training."

Not political. This is part of the DoJ's job.
Garland announces Justice Department investigation into the Louisville Police Department - CNNPolitics

 

[Magnus]

I thought your trumptards didn't trust the FBI. Didn't your fuhrer call the FBI "Scum"?

But now, it is ok to believe their report? LOL. And you trumptards wonder why the world laughs at you!