Lawyer for deputy clerk claims Kim Davis altered forms

Ky. clerk Kim Davis interfered with judge's order, attorney says

Um shit head...the thug in the robe aka JUDGE had already ordered the forms to have her name marked off so they were already altered you incompetent fool. Funny how there is 1 set of rules for the thug in the robe and another for Kim. The hypocrisy is astounding. Personally I think she should fire the little bastard.

Provide a link to the alleged order.

You won't find a link, however, because no such order exists.

In the order that released Kim Davis from custody, there was a footnote. In that footnote, the judge mentioned that the deputy clerks had altered the form to replace "Kim Davis" with "Rowan County" in the place where the name of the county clerk was usually stated.

Mentioning what the deputy clerks had already done in a footnote is not the same thing as ordering the forms to be altered.

Kim Davis was released and ordered not to interfere with her deputy clerks.

Kim Davis was not acting under the authority of any court order when she made additional alterations to the marriage license form upon her return to work. I don't know if doing so would constitute prohibited interference. I don't think her recent attempts to spoil the licenses renders them invalid. If the persons who obtained the newly altered licenses believe otherwise, they can complain to the court. Kim Davis can't fire her deputy clerk or otherwise retaliate against him for complying with the court's directive.
 
Um shit head...the thug in the robe aka JUDGE had already ordered the forms to have her name marked off so they were already altered you incompetent fool.

No he didn't. He ordered Ms. Davis to not interfere with the issuance of Civil Marriage licenses, he did not order a change to the license.

V. Conclusion

District courts are directed to balance four factors when analyzing a motion for preliminary injunction. In this case, all four factors weigh in favor of granting the requested relief. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth herein,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 2) against Defendant Kim Davis, in her official capacity as Rowan County Clerk, is hereby granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Kim Davis, in her official capacity as Rowan County Clerk, is hereby preliminarily enjoined from applying her “no marriage licenses” policy to future marriage license requests submitted by Plaintiffs. This 12th day of August, 2015.​

http://www.aclu-ky.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Bunning-Rowan-Ruling-81215.pdf


>>>>
 
He allowed and ordered the forms altered to omit her name. Simple as that. Can't whine about something HE had done and ordered and allowed. That prick lawyer can whine about something else. This won't end till either Kentucky ends the marriage business so faggots can't harass people like Kim or the legislature changes the law for religious exemptions.
 
Poor Odium.

His world is all atumble- what with homosexuals no longer being arrested or beaten up, blacks being able to vote, women having jobs and being allowed to drive......
 
He allowed and ordered the forms altered to omit her name. Simple as that.

Then support your claim.

I provided the court order in the case that required Ms. Davis to cease her action of not issuing any licenses. There was no order by the Judge defining what was to be (or not be) on the licenses.

Feel free to prove your claim. Or maybe you are just disappointed to have your premise killed in the 3rd post.


>>>>
 
He allowed and ordered the forms altered to omit her name. Simple as that. Can't whine about something HE had done and ordered and allowed. That prick lawyer can whine about something else. This won't end till either Kentucky ends the marriage business so faggots can't harass people like Kim or the legislature changes the law for religious exemptions.

'harrass' as in asking that a government official do her job.

Personally I hope Kentucky allows anyone to write their own marriage licenses in crayon or whatever other implement Davis and her ilk can handle, and then deliver them to the clerks and let them figure out how to register the marriages in the future.

Of course Davis is still going to hell for not following the law as the New Testament tells Christians to do- but that is not our concern.
 
He allowed and ordered the forms altered to omit her name. Simple as that. Can't whine about something HE had done and ordered and allowed. That prick lawyer can whine about something else. This won't end till either Kentucky ends the marriage business so faggots can't harass people like Kim or the legislature changes the law for religious exemptions.
You're as ridiculous as you are ignorant and wrong.
 
He allowed and ordered the forms altered to omit her name. Simple as that. Can't whine about something HE had done and ordered and allowed. That prick lawyer can whine about something else. This won't end till either Kentucky ends the marriage business so faggots can't harass people like Kim or the legislature changes the law for religious exemptions.

Prove your allegation. Provide a link to the order. Specifically, what language did the judge use when he made this alleged order?
 
He allowed and ordered the forms altered to omit her name. Simple as that.

Then support your claim.

I provided the court order in the case that required Ms. Davis to cease her action of not issuing any licenses. There was no order by the Judge defining what was to be (or not be) on the licenses.

Feel free to prove your claim. Or maybe you are just disappointed to have your premise killed in the 3rd post.


>>>>
Yeah but you raised another problem. Rowan County is a PLACE not a PERSON. If the document calls for a PERSONS signature and it says Rowan County that MAY not be legal.
 
He allowed and ordered the forms altered to omit her name. Simple as that.

Then support your claim.

I provided the court order in the case that required Ms. Davis to cease her action of not issuing any licenses. There was no order by the Judge defining what was to be (or not be) on the licenses.

Feel free to prove your claim. Or maybe you are just disappointed to have your premise killed in the 3rd post.


>>>>
Yeah but you raised another problem. Rowan County is a PLACE not a PERSON. If the document calls for a PERSONS signature and it says Rowan County that MAY not be legal.


Kentucky law provides that the County Clerk or Deputy County Clerk sign the document. Brian Mason is a Deputy County Clerk and therefore can "sign" the Marriage License.


>>>>
 
He allowed and ordered the forms altered to omit her name. Simple as that.

Then support your claim.

I provided the court order in the case that required Ms. Davis to cease her action of not issuing any licenses. There was no order by the Judge defining what was to be (or not be) on the licenses.

Feel free to prove your claim. Or maybe you are just disappointed to have your premise killed in the 3rd post.


>>>>
Yeah but you raised another problem. Rowan County is a PLACE not a PERSON. If the document calls for a PERSONS signature and it says Rowan County that MAY not be legal.


Kentucky law provides that the County Clerk or Deputy County Clerk sign the document. Brian Mason is a Deputy County Clerk and therefore can "sign" the Marriage License.


>>>>
Then the NAME on that document would be Brian Mason NOT Rowan County.
 
Poor Odium.

His world is all atumble- what with homosexuals no longer being arrested or beaten up, blacks being able to vote, women having jobs and being allowed to drive......
So much stupidity and ignorance and hidden thoughts from you in one post. Impressive.
 
Then the NAME on that document would be Brian Mason NOT Rowan County.

enhanced-buzz-wide-18262-1441396144-7.jpg




The "Recorders Name" would be Brian Mason, yes that is true? It shows who issued the license. So?

Above is the licenses issued while she was confined. Now, if she has modified the license in an attempt to invalidate those that have been issued since she returned, then she would be in violation of the Judges order not to interfere.


>>>>
 
Last edited:
Ky. clerk Kim Davis interfered with judge's order, attorney says

Um shit head...the thug in the robe aka JUDGE had already ordered the forms to have her name marked off so they were already altered you incompetent fool. Funny how there is 1 set of rules for the thug in the robe and another for Kim. The hypocrisy is astounding. Personally I think she should fire the little bastard.

They are still issued by the county. She can remove her name as clerk but she has not right to remove the county of her office.
 
Ky. clerk Kim Davis interfered with judge's order, attorney says

Um shit head...the thug in the robe aka JUDGE had already ordered the forms to have her name marked off so they were already altered you incompetent fool. Funny how there is 1 set of rules for the thug in the robe and another for Kim. The hypocrisy is astounding. Personally I think she should fire the little bastard.

They are still issued by the county. She can remove her name as clerk but she has not right to remove the county of her office.
She is elected official until legislature does something about it she must do what she must do to not have her rights violated. Thug in robe can OK them altering the forms then she can IF she actually did.
 
Thug in robe can OK them altering the forms then she can IF she actually did.

The Judge didn't order any alteration of the forms. He ordered Ms. Davis to not interfere with the issuance of Civil Marriage licenses, he did not order a change to the license.

V. Conclusion

District courts are directed to balance four factors when analyzing a motion for preliminary injunction. In this case, all four factors weigh in favor of granting the requested relief. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth herein,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 2) against Defendant Kim Davis, in her official capacity as Rowan County Clerk, is hereby granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Kim Davis, in her official capacity as Rowan County Clerk, is hereby preliminarily enjoined from applying her “no marriage licenses” policy to future marriage license requests submitted by Plaintiffs. This 12th day of August, 2015.​

http://www.aclu-ky.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Bunning-Rowan-Ruling-81215.pdf


>>>>
 
Ky. clerk Kim Davis interfered with judge's order, attorney says

Um shit head...the thug in the robe aka JUDGE had already ordered the forms to have her name marked off so they were already altered you incompetent fool. Funny how there is 1 set of rules for the thug in the robe and another for Kim. The hypocrisy is astounding. Personally I think she should fire the little bastard.

They are still issued by the county. She can remove her name as clerk but she has not right to remove the county of her office.
She is elected official until legislature does something about it she must do what she must do to not have her rights violated. Thug in robe can OK them altering the forms then she can IF she actually did.

County of issue and a clerks name

She cant remove the county, just let others issue and sign the licenses
 
Kim Davis can resign her position, and there's nothing in God's law preventing her from doing that.

Christians are going to have to learn that we aren't in charge any more. Our country will slip into the darkness of unbelief as so many European countries have done.
 
Kim Davis can resign her position, and there's nothing in God's law preventing her from doing that.

Christians are going to have to learn that we aren't in charge any more. Our country will slip into the darkness of unbelief as so many European countries have done.
Give the degenerates an inch they will take a mile.
 

Forum List

Back
Top