Pogo
Diamond Member
- Dec 7, 2012
- 123,708
- 22,748
It's a typo, moron. I quoted exactly what it said. I don't know if Lin Wood made the mistake, or WAPO did. I presume the former. However, it makes little difference. You know exactly what was said. You aren't fooling anyone. The statement is defamatory.Here's the headline of WAPO's third article on Sandmann:The suit quotes all kinds of stuff that is clearly defamatoryNor would I. But it's not necessary to, as I ALREADY TOLD YOU days ago, since all the relevant articles are QUOTED in the narrative of the suit. It's all freely available for anybody to find "evidence". I told you two hundred posts ago to go do that. And you CAN'T.
--- and yet, you can't find it.
Nor can anyone else.
The headline “Marcher’s accost by boys in MAGA caps draws ire.”
That alone is false and defamatory.
Are you going to claim the headline is not a valid quote?
That line isn't even English.
WTF is a "marcher's accost"?
It CAN'T be 'defamatory' if it's not even an English sentence, IDIOT.
And actually, while it looks like a typo it appears to be real, at least based on a pdf copy of what OKTexas linked for me. Of course a pdf isn't the original but if it is faithful to the original, then it has no meaning. If it isn't faithful, then it doesn't say whatever that tried to say.
Personally I doubt it's real. Professional newspapers have proofreaders who would have jumped all over this shit in their sleep. Any good lawyer should too. In fact that's part of what I do IRL.