Least we forget, March 1933: The Enabling Act becomes law in Germany

Crepitus

Diamond Member
Mar 28, 2018
75,632
72,657
In March of 1933, the Enabling act was passed in soon to be NAZI Germany, Give the Chief Executive the power to enforce his own laws without checks and balances.

6 Months later Germany was a one party nation.

And you know what happened after that.

The so-called supreme court has just started us down the same path.

Is the world ready for the next Reich?

 
Oh, fuck my life. :auiqs.jpg:

HitlerMemeCompare.jpg
 
In March of 1933, the Enabling act was passed in soon to be NAZI Germany, Give the Chief Executive the power to enforce his own laws without checks and balances.

6 Months later Germany was a one party nation.

And you know what happened after that.

The so-called supreme court has just started us down the same path.

Is the world ready for the next Reich?

~~~~~~
Seems obvious that you're correct. The world is rejecting Joe Biden, Macron and others that would bring us to the same you refer to.
The strangest thing about the latest SCOTUS decision is that the junior SCOTUS Ketanji Jackson a Biden Democrat appointee voted in agreement with majority on the issue you and the Democrat Neo-Marxists are griping about.
Is she a turncoat?
**********​

BTW, you did use your spell check. the proper word is "Lest" not "Least".
 
Last edited:
In March of 1933, the Enabling act was passed in soon to be NAZI Germany, Give the Chief Executive the power to enforce his own laws without checks and balances.

6 Months later Germany was a one party nation.

And you know what happened after that.

The so-called supreme court has just started us down the same path.

Is the world ready for the next Reich?


Hey White 6 does this get a Midol blowtorch or is that just for the obvious women on the board?
 
~~~~~~
Seems obvious that you're correct. The world is rejecting Joe Biden, Macron and others that would bring us to the same you refer to.
The strangest thing about the latest SCOTUS decision is that the junior SCOTUS Ketanji Jackson a Biden Democrat appointee voted in agreement with majority on the issue you and the Democrat Neo-Marxists are griping about.
Is she a turncoat?
**********​

BTW, you did use your spell check. the proper word is "Lest" not "Least".
You moron if it wasnt for the courts in Germany, Hitler would have never existed. End of story.
As far as Jackson goes, she has the right to her professional opinion, which I happen to disagree with. Unlike you morons, we dont call people fake dems or DINO's if they do something we disagree with. You're a moron and a hypocrite.
 
In March of 1933, the Enabling act was passed in soon to be NAZI Germany, Give the Chief Executive the power to enforce his own laws without checks and balances.

6 Months later Germany was a one party nation.

And you know what happened after that.

The so-called supreme court has just started us down the same path.

Is the world ready for the next Reich?


This course was started after the 1980 presidential election when one of the Koch brothers lost as VP candidate for the Libertarian Party.

Since then they've done nothing but try and destroy the US by making the US a place where just about anything goes.

This is just another nail in the coffin.
 
In March of 1933, the Enabling act was passed in soon to be NAZI Germany, Give the Chief Executive the power to enforce his own laws without checks and balances.

6 Months later Germany was a one party nation.

And you know what happened after that.

The so-called supreme court has just started us down the same path.

Is the world ready for the next Reich?

~~~~~~~
Indeed,
"The atmosphere of terror that had followed the Reichstag Fire, and Hindenburg’s and von Papen’s support, made the proposal seem legitimate and, to some, necessary.
The law needed two thirds of the Reichstag to vote for it to pass. The Nazi’s had the support of the DNVP, and had banned the communist party, the KPD, from attending.
The SA and the SS had also been on a month long campaign of violence to scare or imprison other opponents to the party. They had placed many in the first concentration camp , Dachau , which opened just a few days before the vote on the 20 March 1933".

Read more:

What you didn't fill in I will.
President Hindenburg was old and Hitler was Chancellor of Germany. He assumed power and dictatorship in 1934 soon after Hindenberg died.
 
~~~~~~
Seems obvious that you're correct. The world is rejecting Joe Biden, Macron and others that would bring us to the same you refer to.
The strangest thing about the latest SCOTUS decision is that the junior SCOTUS Ketanji Jackson a Biden Democrat appointee voted in agreement with majority on the issue you and the Democrat Neo-Marxists are griping about.
Is she a turncoat?
**********​

BTW, you did use your spell check. the proper word is "Lest" not "Least".
The world is moving to the same things that started the problem-fascism.
 
In March of 1933, the Enabling act was passed in soon to be NAZI Germany, Give the Chief Executive the power to enforce his own laws without checks and balances.

6 Months later Germany was a one party nation.

And you know what happened after that.

The so-called supreme court has just started us down the same path.

Is the world ready for the next Reich?

A study schedule for you De Crepit US ,.
Research
Dear Uncle Adolf was a 33 rd level Freemason
Its implications and links to the US and UK .

Now there's something that sounds preposterous but actually is widely supported --- obviously on the Tabboo list for discussion .
 
The strangest thing about the latest SCOTUS decision is that the junior SCOTUS Ketanji Jackson a Biden Democrat appointee voted in agreement with majority on the issue you and the Democrat Neo-Marxists are griping about.
Why do you fascists continue trying to call people names?

And what you said about Jackson was disingenuous.

Ketanji Brown Jackson Joins Conservative Justices in Upending Hundreds of January 6 Cases​


Ketanji Brown Jackson, the latter of whom wrote a concurring opinion urging the government to keep criminal laws constrained to their actual text.

As Reason's Jacob Sullum outlines, the Supreme Court's decision centered around Joseph Fischer, a former Pennsylvania police officer who was charged with several offenses related to his conduct at the Capitol riot. According to the government, that lawlessness included, among other things, that he "forcibly assaulted a federal officer, entered and remained in a restricted building, and engaged in disorderly and disruptive conduct in the Capitol."

But prosecutors tacked on another charge using the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which criminalizes "alter[ing], destroy[ing], mutilat[ing], or conceal[ing] a record, document, or other object, or attempt[ing] to do so, with the intent to impair the object's integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding," or, per the following provision, "otherwise obstruct[ing], influenc[ing], or imped[ing] any official proceeding." Those convicted face up to 20 years in prison.

Fischer challenged that charge, arguing that the statute as written requires the alleged obstruction in question be tied to the impairment of records, documents, or objects, which would not apply to him. The federal judge who initially evaluated Fischer's petition sided with him; a divided U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit reversed that; and the Supreme Court reversed the reversal.

That Justice Jackson sided with Fischer shouldn't, in theory, come as a surprise. She is the only former public defender on the current Court; in the judiciary broadly, you are far more likely to find former prosecutors on the bench. So it stands to reason that she understands first-hand the downsides of government getting creative with criminal statutes, as prosecutors sometimes do.


Do not take this as Brown-Jackson siding wth insurrectionists.
 
In March of 1933, the Enabling act was passed in soon to be NAZI Germany, Give the Chief Executive the power to enforce his own laws without checks and balances.

6 Months later Germany was a one party nation.

And you know what happened after that.

The so-called supreme court has just started us down the same path.

Is the world ready for the next Reich?

Yeah, this is one of the first things that hit me yesterday.

History doesn't repeat, but it does rhyme.

And half the country is willingly walking right into it. Yesterday's decision removes all doubts.
 
Yeah, this is one of the first things that hit me yesterday.

History doesn't repeat, but it does rhyme.

And half the country is willingly walking right into it. Yesterday's decision removes all doubts.

Maybe America CAN be great again.
 
Yeah, this is one of the first things that hit me yesterday.

History doesn't repeat, but it does rhyme.

And half the country is willingly walking right into it. Yesterday's decision removes all doubts.
Not exactly half the country. 30 percent of the country. The 10-15 percent undecideds must now make up their minds about this. Do they want Trumop in the office with total immunity from the law? Or do they choose to vote for Biden who might be old, but he won't do what Trump will do.
 

Forum List

Back
Top