Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you get a free tin foil hat when entering this thread?
Still bitterly clinging to the failed idea that "it's just two guys' opinions".More hate and fear? Posting one Prof's opinion and one Congressman's suggestion as evidence of anything greater than the opinion of two people is ridiculous. If you wanted your thread to be substantive, you might have expanded the scope to include signing statements; and "I'm the Decider" comments made by President G.W. Bush, such arrogance has never been part of President Obama's rhetoric.
You might have included a number of examples of President Obama's use of executive power not used by the aforementioned George W. and other occupants of the Oval Office.
As it stands, you're (IMO) a bitter, angry, highly partisan and ignorant gun lover who doesn't give a damn for anyone but themselves. A callous conservative who wouldn't give up one round of ammunition even if he knew doing so would end the carnage of gun violence in America.
Yeah, I do laugh out loud at you. .
OK, let's be real and look at how Obie has (ab)used executive power, as compared to Reagan.Well Rangle's idea is simply nuts. However, Obama hasn't issued as many EO's as GWB or Reagan* but that doesn't excuse him for being simply overzealous. And to be real, it depends on how the EO is used.
* Executive Orders Disposition Tables Index
A/O October 4th, Obama has 163, GWB had 290 and Reagan had 380.
Also, I think the thread's title is an over-statement. I'm darn sure, based on Obama's performance, that many Dems don't want a Obama dictartorship. They just want 2016 to come quickly so Hillary can replace "O".
For example, how many times did Reagan just make up bankruptcy law out of whole cloth, so he could use the Treasury to pay off his political allies?
If you reread my post, I did mention how the EO was used. The link I supplied gives you the ability to see what EO's were used. Some EO's are more profound than other's. Thus the provided link and the comment about the usage of types of eO's used. I'm not defending anyone nor am I accusing anyone. I'm simply stating facts along with what my theory is regarding most liberal's view of Obama (excluding the hyper liberals of course). Most of the liberals I know are embarrassed and are grinding their teeth over the developments with ACA.
Rangel calls for Obama to rule by decree
Charlie Rangel Wants Presidential Executive Orders for ?Everything? | Politicker
Professor calls for unlimited terms for Obama...i.e. President for life.
End presidential term limits - The Washington Post
And Obama has long used executive power to just ignore Congressionally passed laws or to use regs to implement laws Congress never passed and the libtards love it. They eat it all up.
People, this country will not tolerate a President for Life like Chavez and if this course is continued we will have a shooting war, and I guarantee the libtards will have their asses handed to their survivors in a dump truck.
Well Rangle's idea is simply nuts. However, Obama hasn't issued as many EO's as GWB or Reagan* but that doesn't excuse him for being simply overzealous. And to be real, it depends on how the EO is used.
* Executive Orders Disposition Tables Index
A/O October 4th, Obama has 163, GWB had 290 and Reagan had 380.
Also, I think the thread's title is an over-statement. I'm darn sure, based on Obama's performance, that many Dems don't want a Obama dictartorship. They just want 2016 to come quickly so Hillary can replace "O".
For me the issue about Obama's EO's isn't their number so much as the scope of powers he claims for himself, EO 13603 being a prime example.
Rangel calls for Obama to rule by decree
Charlie Rangel Wants Presidential Executive Orders for ?Everything? | Politicker
Professor calls for unlimited terms for Obama...i.e. President for life.
End presidential term limits - The Washington Post
And Obama has long used executive power to just ignore Congressionally passed laws or to use regs to implement laws Congress never passed and the libtards love it. They eat it all up.
People, this country will not tolerate a President for Life like Chavez and if this course is continued we will have a shooting war, and I guarantee the libtards will have their asses handed to their survivors in a dump truck.
More hate and fear? Posting one Prof's opinion and one Congressman's suggestion as evidence of anything greater than the opinion of two people is ridiculous.
That is a blatant lie and you know it. For the press to run this profs opinion is a very bad sign as that means that they don't think it too kooky to publish, and Rangles people have done their polling and breeze testing way before he ever said this openly.
You are either stupid, or niave or sinister, and my money is on the latter of the two.
Damn! They are on to us! Comrads! To the barracades! Prepare your Molotov cocktails! Raise the red bannar! The time is NOW!
First we're coming for your gun, then we brainwash your children.
First we're coming for your gun, then we brainwash your children.
Do you still have your gun?
Not offended at all. Just making a valid comparison.OK, let's be real and look at how Obie has (ab)used executive power, as compared to Reagan.
For example, how many times did Reagan just make up bankruptcy law out of whole cloth, so he could use the Treasury to pay off his political allies?
If you reread my post, I did mention how the EO was used. The link I supplied gives you the ability to see what EO's were used. Some EO's are more profound than other's. Thus the provided link and the comment about the usage of types of eO's used. I'm not defending anyone nor am I accusing anyone. I'm simply stating facts along with what my theory is regarding most liberal's view of Obama (excluding the hyper liberals of course). Most of the liberals I know are embarrassed and are grinding their teeth over the developments with ACA.
She was offended you used facts with her; that is an insult to most libtards these days.
Do you get a free tin foil hat when entering this thread?
Do you get a free Obamaphone for posting you stupid crap everywhere?
I realize you don't give a shyte about our Republic, but some of us have made a solemn oath to defend it.
So piss off.
OK, let's be real and look at how Obie has (ab)used executive power, as compared to Reagan.
For example, how many times did Reagan just make up bankruptcy law out of whole cloth, so he could use the Treasury to pay off his political allies?
If you reread my post, I did mention how the EO was used. The link I supplied gives you the ability to see what EO's were used. Some EO's are more profound than other's. Thus the provided link and the comment about the usage of types of eO's used. I'm not defending anyone nor am I accusing anyone. I'm simply stating facts along with what my theory is regarding most liberal's view of Obama (excluding the hyper liberals of course). Most of the liberals I know are embarrassed and are grinding their teeth over the developments with ACA.
She was offended you used facts with her; that is an insult to most libtards these days.
First we're coming for your gun, then we brainwash your children.
Do you still have your gun?
No, they made us turn them in.
Rangel calls for Obama to rule by decree
Charlie Rangel Wants Presidential Executive Orders for ?Everything? | Politicker
Professor calls for unlimited terms for Obama...i.e. President for life.
End presidential term limits - The Washington Post
And Obama has long used executive power to just ignore Congressionally passed laws or to use regs to implement laws Congress never passed and the libtards love it. They eat it all up.
People, this country will not tolerate a President for Life like Chavez and if this course is continued we will have a shooting war, and I guarantee the libtards will have their asses handed to their survivors in a dump truck.
Not offended at all. Just making a valid comparison.If you reread my post, I did mention how the EO was used. The link I supplied gives you the ability to see what EO's were used. Some EO's are more profound than other's. Thus the provided link and the comment about the usage of types of eO's used. I'm not defending anyone nor am I accusing anyone. I'm simply stating facts along with what my theory is regarding most liberal's view of Obama (excluding the hyper liberals of course). Most of the liberals I know are embarrassed and are grinding their teeth over the developments with ACA.
She was offended you used facts with her; that is an insult to most libtards these days.
I don't like the overuse or abuse of EOs either.
But to put the blatant overreach of the current administration on a par with any other in recent history -democrat or republican alike- is absurd, IMO.
What this thread demonstrates is the politically tea bagged do not own enough guns (we all know Obama grabs them as fast as they can buy them), baggers need to go out and buy more guns and ammo. That is the only way they will prevent Obama from becoming a dictator.Do you get a free tin foil hat when entering this thread?
