Left vs Right

[Marŝi tra la Cindro]

The question of Democrat or Republican comes down to one basic choice: Do you want to live in a hedonist atheist/materialist corporate society run by jews against your interests, or do you want to live in a Zionist theocratic corporate society run by jews against your interests? The libertarian outcome is identical to the Republican one and communism provides a third option of living in an austere atheist/materialist slave state run by jews against your interests. Only fascism represents the freedom to pursue the interests of your own people with the tools necessary to defend against jewish takeover.

 

[danielpalos]

Do you agree or disagree with the assessment featured?

The Interpretation of (Left) Dreams

“Why do we dream? Freud’s answer is deceptively simple: the ultimate function of the dream is to enable the dreamer to stay asleep.” Slavoj Zizek (2006)


Traditional Left Ideology sets out a vision of how the world ‘ought to be.’ The Left’s view can be summed up as the belief that social justice is the primary requirement for improving the world, and that this better future entails the pursuit of equality in various forms. The Left ideologist believes that it is both ethical and moral to attempt to approach equality in terms of civil rights and material wealth.


But if the Left focuses on ‘what could be,’ the Right focuses on ‘what is.’ If the Left operates where people ‘could be,’ the Right operates where people ‘are’ or at least, where they believe themselves to be. The Right does not aim to change human social reality but rather to celebrate, and to even maximize it.



I don't subscribe to left/right pardigm - FYI. I'm libertarian. I think it could be interesting to have a discussion-

What we ought to be doing with our form of Constitutional Government:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

You know The Thing!

Only right wingers don't care about our supreme law of the land. Why complain about less fortunate illegals, right wingers? Only practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God), do that.

What kind of an idiot would praise "supreme law" and then in the same sentence, support "illegals"?

I think we just found out.

lol. Right wingers are worse. They are illegal but only blame the less fortunate like practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God) are wont to do.

 

[Votto]

Do you agree or disagree with the assessment featured?

The Interpretation of (Left) Dreams

“Why do we dream? Freud’s answer is deceptively simple: the ultimate function of the dream is to enable the dreamer to stay asleep.” Slavoj Zizek (2006)


Traditional Left Ideology sets out a vision of how the world ‘ought to be.’ The Left’s view can be summed up as the belief that social justice is the primary requirement for improving the world, and that this better future entails the pursuit of equality in various forms. The Left ideologist believes that it is both ethical and moral to attempt to approach equality in terms of civil rights and material wealth.


But if the Left focuses on ‘what could be,’ the Right focuses on ‘what is.’ If the Left operates where people ‘could be,’ the Right operates where people ‘are’ or at least, where they believe themselves to be. The Right does not aim to change human social reality but rather to celebrate, and to even maximize it.



I don't subscribe to left/right pardigm - FYI. I'm libertarian. I think it could be interesting to have a discussion-

What we ought to be doing with our form of Constitutional Government:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Only a moral people can be a free people. The Founding Fathers emerged from a people seeking religious freedom, which is why they established a government that succeeded that gave people their freedom.

After all, a nation full of jail birds cannot have their freedom. All that can be done is build a wall around them and hire a warden to supervise them. And this is basically what the Left and secularism has done to society, a bunch of morons burning down their own cities to "protest" as they loot them.

But this is the utopia the Left envisions for us. As I have always said, the perfect Leftist utopia is a jail cell. All your food and shelter and clothing are free, and you are the most safe locked away in a jail cell by yourself. The perk being, every day is gay pride day.

 

[danielpalos]

Do you agree or disagree with the assessment featured?

The Interpretation of (Left) Dreams

“Why do we dream? Freud’s answer is deceptively simple: the ultimate function of the dream is to enable the dreamer to stay asleep.” Slavoj Zizek (2006)


Traditional Left Ideology sets out a vision of how the world ‘ought to be.’ The Left’s view can be summed up as the belief that social justice is the primary requirement for improving the world, and that this better future entails the pursuit of equality in various forms. The Left ideologist believes that it is both ethical and moral to attempt to approach equality in terms of civil rights and material wealth.


But if the Left focuses on ‘what could be,’ the Right focuses on ‘what is.’ If the Left operates where people ‘could be,’ the Right operates where people ‘are’ or at least, where they believe themselves to be. The Right does not aim to change human social reality but rather to celebrate, and to even maximize it.



I don't subscribe to left/right pardigm - FYI. I'm libertarian. I think it could be interesting to have a discussion-

Leftism is merely empowering government to try and control what is perceived as bad behavior.

The opposite are those who want to allow people the option of making bad decisions and simply learning to better govern themselves instead of government doing it for them.

The need for both being a civil society. But as Ben Franklin aptly stated, once the moral fiber of society wanes then a despotic government will rise up to contain it, being no other option to maintain a civil society.

And that is what I see happening. Mass shootings emerged in the 1960's, as well as many other societal ills that have increasingly demanded a rise of big government. This is largely, in my opinion, the result of increased secularism. People are simply encouraged to govern their own moral behavior due to their faith, and recognize future penalties from a higher power for not being moral. Conversely, the secularist acts as they please with the notion that if no one ever finds out about their amoral behavior or is willing to stop them, why not just do as you please, especially knowing that if they get caught and punished that punishment is temporal.

Studies have shown that those that believe in a hell, for example, have a lower incidence of crime. And those of faith lead the way for those giving their money and time the charity and those in need. Conversely, Leftists just sit around trying to convince us to vote for people to force them to pay higher taxes, in the hopes that some of that money may find its way to those in need. Why they just don't roll up their sleeves and give their own time and money to those in need is but a mystery. Perhaps just laziness with very little motivation is the reason.

Original sinners like to just make up their own facts. Burning people at the stake was done in the past and not for free market capitalism purposes.

 

[Marŝi tra la Cindro]

Do you agree or disagree with the assessment featured?

The Interpretation of (Left) Dreams

“Why do we dream? Freud’s answer is deceptively simple: the ultimate function of the dream is to enable the dreamer to stay asleep.” Slavoj Zizek (2006)


Traditional Left Ideology sets out a vision of how the world ‘ought to be.’ The Left’s view can be summed up as the belief that social justice is the primary requirement for improving the world, and that this better future entails the pursuit of equality in various forms. The Left ideologist believes that it is both ethical and moral to attempt to approach equality in terms of civil rights and material wealth.


But if the Left focuses on ‘what could be,’ the Right focuses on ‘what is.’ If the Left operates where people ‘could be,’ the Right operates where people ‘are’ or at least, where they believe themselves to be. The Right does not aim to change human social reality but rather to celebrate, and to even maximize it.



I don't subscribe to left/right pardigm - FYI. I'm libertarian. I think it could be interesting to have a discussion-

What we ought to be doing with our form of Constitutional Government:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

You know The Thing!

Only right wingers don't care about our supreme law of the land. Why complain about less fortunate illegals, right wingers? Only practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God), do that.

What kind of an idiot would praise "supreme law" and then in the same sentence, support "illegals"?

I think we just found out.

lol. Right wingers are worse. They are illegal but only blame the less fortunate like practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God) are wont to do.

There is no formal right wing in America. Neither Republicans nor conservatives are right wing in any meaningful sense. Many right wing organizations and ideas are borderline if not outright illegal here.

 

[danielpalos]

Do you agree or disagree with the assessment featured?

The Interpretation of (Left) Dreams

“Why do we dream? Freud’s answer is deceptively simple: the ultimate function of the dream is to enable the dreamer to stay asleep.” Slavoj Zizek (2006)


Traditional Left Ideology sets out a vision of how the world ‘ought to be.’ The Left’s view can be summed up as the belief that social justice is the primary requirement for improving the world, and that this better future entails the pursuit of equality in various forms. The Left ideologist believes that it is both ethical and moral to attempt to approach equality in terms of civil rights and material wealth.


But if the Left focuses on ‘what could be,’ the Right focuses on ‘what is.’ If the Left operates where people ‘could be,’ the Right operates where people ‘are’ or at least, where they believe themselves to be. The Right does not aim to change human social reality but rather to celebrate, and to even maximize it.



I don't subscribe to left/right pardigm - FYI. I'm libertarian. I think it could be interesting to have a discussion-

What we ought to be doing with our form of Constitutional Government:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Only a moral people can be a free people. The Founding Fathers emerged from a people seeking religious freedom, which is why they established a government that succeeded that gave people their freedom.

After all, a nation full of jail birds cannot have their freedom. All that can be done is build a wall around them and hire a warden to supervise them. And this is basically what the Left and secularism has done to society, a bunch of morons burning down their own cities to "protest" as they loot them.

But this is the utopia the Left envisions for us. As I have always said, the perfect Leftist utopia is a jail cell. All your food and shelter and clothing are free, and you are the most safe locked away in a jail cell by yourself. The perk being, every day is gay pride day.

Is that why the right wing levied war against the Union to keep slavery and enacted black codes to limit freedom of those people and Poor laws to limit the freedom of the Poor?

 

[Gdjjr]

Do you agree or disagree with the assessment featured?

The Interpretation of (Left) Dreams

“Why do we dream? Freud’s answer is deceptively simple: the ultimate function of the dream is to enable the dreamer to stay asleep.” Slavoj Zizek (2006)


Traditional Left Ideology sets out a vision of how the world ‘ought to be.’ The Left’s view can be summed up as the belief that social justice is the primary requirement for improving the world, and that this better future entails the pursuit of equality in various forms. The Left ideologist believes that it is both ethical and moral to attempt to approach equality in terms of civil rights and material wealth.


But if the Left focuses on ‘what could be,’ the Right focuses on ‘what is.’ If the Left operates where people ‘could be,’ the Right operates where people ‘are’ or at least, where they believe themselves to be. The Right does not aim to change human social reality but rather to celebrate, and to even maximize it.



I don't subscribe to left/right pardigm - FYI. I'm libertarian. I think it could be interesting to have a discussion-

Leftism is merely empowering government to try and control what is perceived as bad behavior.

The opposite are those who want to allow people the option of making bad decisions and simply learning to better govern themselves instead of government doing it for them.

The need for both being a civil society. But as Ben Franklin aptly stated, once the moral fiber of society wanes then a despotic government will rise up to contain it, being no other option to maintain a civil society.

And that is what I see happening. Mass shootings emerged in the 1960's, as well as many other societal ills that have increasingly demanded a rise of big government. This is largely, in my opinion, the result of increased secularism. People are simply encouraged to govern their own moral behavior due to their faith, and recognize future penalties from a higher power for not being moral. Conversely, the secularist acts as they please with the notion that if no one ever finds out about their amoral behavior or is willing to stop them, why not just do as you please, especially knowing that if they get caught and punished that punishment is temporal.

Studies have shown that those that believe in a hell, for example, have a lower incidence of crime. And those of faith lead the way for those giving their money and time the charity and those in need. Conversely, Leftists just sit around trying to convince us to vote for people to force them to pay higher taxes, in the hopes that some of that money may find its way to those in need. Why they just don't roll up their sleeves and give their own time and money to those in need is but a mystery. Perhaps just laziness with very little motivation is the reason.

That's a pretty fair assessment- but, what is, like me, one believes life is what you make it? Heaven and Hell is mythical, but, can be achieved here in life- "heave ain't walking streets paved with gold and hell ain't a mountain of fire- my front tracks are headed for a cold water well, my back tracks are covered with snow, sometimes it's heaven, sometimes it's hell, and sometimes I don't even know"

 

[danielpalos]

Do you agree or disagree with the assessment featured?

The Interpretation of (Left) Dreams

“Why do we dream? Freud’s answer is deceptively simple: the ultimate function of the dream is to enable the dreamer to stay asleep.” Slavoj Zizek (2006)


Traditional Left Ideology sets out a vision of how the world ‘ought to be.’ The Left’s view can be summed up as the belief that social justice is the primary requirement for improving the world, and that this better future entails the pursuit of equality in various forms. The Left ideologist believes that it is both ethical and moral to attempt to approach equality in terms of civil rights and material wealth.


But if the Left focuses on ‘what could be,’ the Right focuses on ‘what is.’ If the Left operates where people ‘could be,’ the Right operates where people ‘are’ or at least, where they believe themselves to be. The Right does not aim to change human social reality but rather to celebrate, and to even maximize it.



I don't subscribe to left/right pardigm - FYI. I'm libertarian. I think it could be interesting to have a discussion-

What we ought to be doing with our form of Constitutional Government:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

You know The Thing!

Only right wingers don't care about our supreme law of the land. Why complain about less fortunate illegals, right wingers? Only practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God), do that.

What kind of an idiot would praise "supreme law" and then in the same sentence, support "illegals"?

I think we just found out.

lol. Right wingers are worse. They are illegal but only blame the less fortunate like practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God) are wont to do.

There is no formal right wing in America. Neither Republicans nor conservatives are right wing in any meaningful sense. Many right wing organizations and ideas are borderline if not outright illegal here.

In right wing fantasy and Parler, you are Always right.

 

[Gdjjr]

The question of Democrat or Republican comes down to one basic choice:

Not really?It begs the question why only 2 choices.

 

[22lcidw]

But if the Left focuses on ‘what could be,’ the Right focuses on ‘what is.’ If the Left operates where people ‘could be,’ the Right operates where people ‘are’ or at least, where they believe themselves to be. The Right does not aim to change human social reality but rather to celebrate, and to even maximize it.

What is, is an extra-Constitutional warfare-State and alleged wars right wingers still think they can win with tax cut economics.

Do you see the Prog employees who are privileged spouting they will take a reduction of salaries, benefits and pensions for the cause? Check it out. They ain't doing it. Their patriotism ends rather quickly.

 

[Gdjjr]

Is that why the right wing levied war against the Union

The right wing? Really? Of what?

 

[Marŝi tra la Cindro]

In right wing fantasy and Parler, you are Always right.

What do you think "right wing" means? What distinguishes it from the left? Trickle-down economics? Small government? Foreign wars for foreign parasites? What if I told you none of those positions are relevant to rightist thought?

 

[Votto]

Do you agree or disagree with the assessment featured?

The Interpretation of (Left) Dreams

“Why do we dream? Freud’s answer is deceptively simple: the ultimate function of the dream is to enable the dreamer to stay asleep.” Slavoj Zizek (2006)


Traditional Left Ideology sets out a vision of how the world ‘ought to be.’ The Left’s view can be summed up as the belief that social justice is the primary requirement for improving the world, and that this better future entails the pursuit of equality in various forms. The Left ideologist believes that it is both ethical and moral to attempt to approach equality in terms of civil rights and material wealth.


But if the Left focuses on ‘what could be,’ the Right focuses on ‘what is.’ If the Left operates where people ‘could be,’ the Right operates where people ‘are’ or at least, where they believe themselves to be. The Right does not aim to change human social reality but rather to celebrate, and to even maximize it.



I don't subscribe to left/right pardigm - FYI. I'm libertarian. I think it could be interesting to have a discussion-

Leftism is merely empowering government to try and control what is perceived as bad behavior.

The opposite are those who want to allow people the option of making bad decisions and simply learning to better govern themselves instead of government doing it for them.

The need for both being a civil society. But as Ben Franklin aptly stated, once the moral fiber of society wanes then a despotic government will rise up to contain it, being no other option to maintain a civil society.

And that is what I see happening. Mass shootings emerged in the 1960's, as well as many other societal ills that have increasingly demanded a rise of big government. This is largely, in my opinion, the result of increased secularism. People are simply encouraged to govern their own moral behavior due to their faith, and recognize future penalties from a higher power for not being moral. Conversely, the secularist acts as they please with the notion that if no one ever finds out about their amoral behavior or is willing to stop them, why not just do as you please, especially knowing that if they get caught and punished that punishment is temporal.

Studies have shown that those that believe in a hell, for example, have a lower incidence of crime. And those of faith lead the way for those giving their money and time the charity and those in need. Conversely, Leftists just sit around trying to convince us to vote for people to force them to pay higher taxes, in the hopes that some of that money may find its way to those in need. Why they just don't roll up their sleeves and give their own time and money to those in need is but a mystery. Perhaps just laziness with very little motivation is the reason.

Original sinners like to just make up their own facts. Burning people at the stake was done in the past and not for free market capitalism purposes.

What you speak of was the theocracy of the Catholic church. Here was a society who could not read and were not taught Biblical teachings correctly. In fact, the state is the number one murderer and enslaver of any human organization, and when sinful man does these things in the name of God, it only gets worse. Thanks to the Guttenberg Press, and Martin Luther, people began to see for themselves what the Biblical teachings really were. After all, Jesus explicitly said that his kingdom was not of this world. No world government can properly represent him.

The Founding Fathers realized this and came from a society where the state spoke from the pulpit. This they were adamantly opposed to, and rightfully so. This is why we have religious freedom today instead of the state demanding we adhere to a state run church.

 

[danielpalos]

But if the Left focuses on ‘what could be,’ the Right focuses on ‘what is.’ If the Left operates where people ‘could be,’ the Right operates where people ‘are’ or at least, where they believe themselves to be. The Right does not aim to change human social reality but rather to celebrate, and to even maximize it.

What is, is an extra-Constitutional warfare-State and alleged wars right wingers still think they can win with tax cut economics.

Do you see the Prog employees who are privileged spouting they will take a reduction of salaries, benefits and pensions for the cause? Check it out. They ain't doing it. Their patriotism ends rather quickly.

What patriotism. The left don't want to support right wing socialism on a national or international basis.

 

[danielpalos]

Is that why the right wing levied war against the Union

The right wing? Really? Of what?

In the US. Right wingers don't care about actual and express laws, they merely like to blame the Poor.

 

[Votto]

In right wing fantasy and Parler, you are Always right.

What do you think "right wing" means? What distinguishes it from the left? Trickle-down economics? Small government? Foreign wars for foreign parasites? What if I told you none of those positions are relevant to rightist thought?

My guess is most Left wingers thinks right wing means racist and corporate dictator.

But to be fair, the terms left and right have been so bastardized over the years that they basically are meaningless

After all, we were all raised with the false political spectrum of the former USSSR being left and the Nazi regime being on the far right. Well what is the spectrum measuring, especially since the Nazi regime were self described socialists?

But most have bought into the lie, which is that true evil comes from centralized all powerful government.

 

[danielpalos]

In right wing fantasy and Parler, you are Always right.

What do you think "right wing" means? What distinguishes it from the left? Trickle-down economics? Small government? Foreign wars for foreign parasites? What if I told you none of those positions are relevant to rightist thought?

The left is and should be for this:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

 

[Marŝi tra la Cindro]

What you speak of was the theocracy of the Catholic church. Here was a society who could not read and were not taught Biblical teachings correctly. In fact, the state is the number one murderer and enslaver of any human organization, and when sinful man does these things in the name of God, it only gets worse. Thanks to the Guttenberg Press, and Martin Luther, people began to see for themselves what the Biblical teachings really were. After all, Jesus explicitly said that his kingdom was not of this world. No world government can properly represent him.

The Founding Fathers realized this and came from a society where the state spoke from the pulpit. This they were adamantly opposed to, and rightfully so. This is why we have religious freedom today instead of the state demanding we adhere to a state run church.

The Catholic Church wrote the Bible according to their originally oral teachings. How were they not teaching the Bible correctly? Especially compared to Martin Luther, who removed whatever verses and books didn't line up with his beliefs?

The left is and should be for this:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

You're right there. That is a leftist screed. So what is the right?

 

[Votto]

But if the Left focuses on ‘what could be,’ the Right focuses on ‘what is.’ If the Left operates where people ‘could be,’ the Right operates where people ‘are’ or at least, where they believe themselves to be. The Right does not aim to change human social reality but rather to celebrate, and to even maximize it.

What is, is an extra-Constitutional warfare-State and alleged wars right wingers still think they can win with tax cut economics.

Do you see the Prog employees who are privileged spouting they will take a reduction of salaries, benefits and pensions for the cause? Check it out. They ain't doing it. Their patriotism ends rather quickly.

What patriotism. The left don't want to support right wing socialism on a national or international basis.

But we just got done seeing the Left protest Trump as Hitler, while in the same breath protesting that we should surrender all our guns to him.

Where is the disconnect do you reckon?

 

[verker]

Do you agree or disagree with the assessment featured?

I don't subscribe to left/right pardigm - FYI. I'm libertarian. I think it could be interesting to have a discussion-

I'm the traditional conservative and i'm find most right inspire music tune in fair !!!