How disingenuous of the right wing. 10USC311 is about federal supremacy over the militia.
Snowflake - I just quoted it for you. 10 U.S. Code § 311 outlines the "Exchange of defense personnel between United States and friendly foreign countries".
There are no Individual Rights in our Second Article of Amendment.
Every right in the U.S. Constitution is an individual right, snowflake. The second amendment clearly states "...the right if the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed". It does not say "the right of the militia".
 
our federal problem should be solved at the federal borders, not the interior.
It should be enforced at the border and enforced in the interior if and when someone gets passed the border. And that is the exact approach President Trump is taking.
We should be solving our illegal problem via a market friendly visa program, that eliminates incentive for the black market.
 
You're still soooooo confused right now danielpalos - so please I will simplify this for you again. The federal government can grab a wanted criminal anywhere in the U.S. Full, legal authority. And they will do it under the Trump Administration. There is literally nothing you can do about it - so it is senseless for you to sit here whining about legal constitutional government and attempting to pass off your own made up nonsense as "reality". It is what it is. Just accept it.
the party of litigation and no solutions, strikes again?
 
How disingenuous of the right wing. 10USC311 is about federal supremacy over the militia.
Snowflake - I just quoted it for you. 10 U.S. Code § 311 outlines the "Exchange of defense personnel between United States and friendly foreign countries".
There are no Individual Rights in our Second Article of Amendment.
Every right in the U.S. Constitution is an individual right, snowflake. The second amendment clearly states "...the right if the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed". It does not say "the right of the militia".
You don't know what you are talking about, like usual. 10USC311 is about the Militia. Sanctuary Cities are all that stand in the way of DC v Heller being overturned on federal supremacy grounds.
 
How disingenuous of the right wing. 10USC311 is about federal supremacy over the militia.
Snowflake - I just quoted it for you. 10 U.S. Code § 311 outlines the "Exchange of defense personnel between United States and friendly foreign countries".
There are no Individual Rights in our Second Article of Amendment.
Every right in the U.S. Constitution is an individual right, snowflake. The second amendment clearly states "...the right if the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed". It does not say "the right of the militia".
The People are the Militia. You are, well regulated, or you are not.
 
The People are the Militia. You are, well regulated, or you are not.
The part about the militia was the Prefatory Clause. It was the why. The Operative Clause (the what) is that the people have a right to keep and bear arms and it will not be infringed. Sorry...not sorry.
 
The People are the Militia. You are, well regulated, or you are not.
The part about the militia was the Prefatory Clause. It was the why. The Operative Clause (the what) is that the people have a right to keep and bear arms and it will not be infringed. Sorry...not sorry.
The intent and purpose is in the first clause, not the second clause.

It is about the security of a free State and not the concept of natural rights.
 
We should be solving our illegal problem via a market friendly visa program, that eliminates incentive for the black market.
Or better yet - we should be solving our illegals problem by enforcing the law. Gee....what a concept.
Only the national socialist right wing, never gets it.

It is about using capitalism over socialism on a national basis.
 
Only the national socialist right wing, never gets it.
There is no such thing as right-wing socialism, you nitwit.
It is about using capitalism over socialism on a national basis.
No stupid - it's about you desperately trying to pander to a base in hopes of stealing future elections.
I am advocating solving our illegal problem on a permanent basis at our federal borders, with the federal powers already delegated to our federal Congress.
 
So a woman who is being physically abused has no recourse under your logic and therefore must sit and take it?
So you advocate for a woman who is being abused to continue being abused so that she can continue being a criminal herself rather than bringing both herself and her abuser to justice?

Wow. Just.....wow. You are one sick dude. :uhh:
Typical of the regressive and oppressive left.
 
So a woman who is being physically abused has no recourse under your logic and therefore must sit and take it?
So you advocate for a woman who is being abused to continue being abused so that she can continue being a criminal herself rather than bringing both herself and her abuser to justice?

Wow. Just.....wow. You are one sick dude. :uhh:
Typical of the regressive and oppressive left.
is it time for your, therapeutic, full body massage with happy ending?
 
I am advocating solving our illegal problem on a permanent basis at our federal borders, with the federal powers already delegated to our federal Congress.
No you're not. You're advocating for all of Mexico to invade the U.S. and vote Dumbocrat.

It's literally impossible to stop 100% of illegals at the border and any moron would know that. When they do get through - it's the responsibility of ICE to track their ass down and deport them.
 
I am advocating solving our illegal problem on a permanent basis at our federal borders, with the federal powers already delegated to our federal Congress.
No you're not. You're advocating for all of Mexico to invade the U.S. and vote Dumbocrat.

It's literally impossible to stop 100% of illegals at the border and any moron would know that. When they do get through - it's the responsibility of ICE to track their ass down and deport them.
Don't believe in capitalism? A market friendly visa would eliminate any incentive to be illegal.
 
A California judge doesn't want justice served at the courthouse because (and I quote) "stalking undocumented immigrants" at the facilities thwarts people's access to justice. You get that? By serving justice against criminals, she feels that it "thwarts people's access to justice". Sweetie - justice is arresting illegal aliens and prosecuting them. Justice is deporting illegal aliens.
You don't get the concern about victims or witnesses of crime not showing up? I think you've got a problem beyond logic, lack of basic intelligence!
So to be clear if there's a neighborhood full of people who have committed a crime by illegally living in the US and one of them steals one of these illegal's wallets it's then 'not fair' to arrest the victim of the crime for committing their crime? That's pretty fucking stupid.
The point is that you allow crime to increase, if people are afraid to report what they witnessed or that they were a victim of it. GET IT?!?!
There are 100% guaranteed secure anonymous 'tipster' hotlines in every community in the country.
GOT IT!?????
The people who broke the law by entering the country illegally in the first place need to 'deal' with the fucking criminals in their neighborhoods.
 
The point is that you allow crime to increase, if people are afraid to report what they witnessed or that they were a victim of it. GET IT?!?!
Actually....the point is you allow crime to increase when you refuse to enforce the law. Dumb ass.

It takes a seriously ideological idiot to even attempt to make the case that we should tolerate crime, allow an invasion of our country, and not enforce federal law.
 

Forum List

Back
Top