Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
You don’t get a choice who censors the Internet, dipshit.
What are you babbling about? Topic is government censorship of the Internet and you thinking it’s a great idea if Trump would censor the Internet.You don’t get a choice who censors the Internet, dipshit.
Sure we do. Again, civil liability laws, they'll police themselves...
For instance, courts are going to put that piece of filth Alex Jones in the poor house for all his lies about Sandy Hook. No Presidents needed to be involved. Just jurors with common sense.
What are you babbling about? Topic is government censorship of the Internet and you thinking it’s a great idea if Trump would censor the Internet.
It sounds like a strawman argument here. Your own link states the parameters of what information can get censored and why. Nothing in it states a single person can arbitrarily censor speech.So you’re happy if Trump controls what’s on the Internet. Got it.This government crackdown on human rights the last two months has emboldened the Left. Exhibit 2,538 from the Leftard Atlantic:
“In the great debate of the past two decades about freedom versus control of the network, China was largely right and the United States was largely wrong. Significant monitoring and speech control are inevitable components of a mature and flourishing internet, and governments must play a large role in these practices to ensure that the internet is compatible with a society’s norms and values.”
And your solution would be what?
The thing is, a lot of misinformation gets spread on the internet.
It used to be that when information was disseminated by Newspapers or TV Stations, those people had an obligation to get it right, because they had a lot to lose if they got it wrong in terms of libel lawsuits or lost credibility.
Now any twit with a twitter feed can go out and claim drinking bleach cures Coronavirus, and they are taken seriously by too many people.
Topic is government censorship of the internet. Read the damn article I’m required to post in the OP.You don’t get a choice who censors the Internet, dipshit.
Sure we do. Again, civil liability laws, they'll police themselves...
For instance, courts are going to put that piece of filth Alex Jones in the poor house for all his lies about Sandy Hook. No Presidents needed to be involved. Just jurors with common sense.
It sounds like a strawman argument here. Your own link states the parameters of what information can get censored and why. Nothing in it states a single person can arbitrarily censor speech.So you’re happy if Trump controls what’s on the Internet. Got it.This government crackdown on human rights the last two months has emboldened the Left. Exhibit 2,538 from the Leftard Atlantic:
“In the great debate of the past two decades about freedom versus control of the network, China was largely right and the United States was largely wrong. Significant monitoring and speech control are inevitable components of a mature and flourishing internet, and governments must play a large role in these practices to ensure that the internet is compatible with a society’s norms and values.”
And your solution would be what?
The thing is, a lot of misinformation gets spread on the internet.
It used to be that when information was disseminated by Newspapers or TV Stations, those people had an obligation to get it right, because they had a lot to lose if they got it wrong in terms of libel lawsuits or lost credibility.
Now any twit with a twitter feed can go out and claim drinking bleach cures Coronavirus, and they are taken seriously by too many people.
You think a machine does the censorship? Who created the machine?Nothing in it states a single person can arbitrarily censor speech.
Topic is government censorship of the internet. Read the damn article I’m required to post in the OP.
So tell us why you want Trump determining what should be on the internet.
The government doesn’t have to censor the internet. Their friends at Google and FB do that for them.Topic is government censorship of the internet. Read the damn article I’m required to post in the OP.
So tell us why you want Trump determining what should be on the internet.
Oh, good. The government isn't censoring the internet. So there's that.
But you have a point, I really don't want Trump doing anything with government, given how badly he's fucking everything up. So let's get rid of Trump, and THEN have the government start cracking down on people who publish false information on the internet.
So you’re happy if Trump controls what’s on the Internet. Got it.
Joe, do you agree with Tucker?This government crackdown on human rights the last two months has emboldened the Left. Exhibit 2,538 from the Leftard Atlantic:
“In the great debate of the past two decades about freedom versus control of the network, China was largely right and the United States was largely wrong. Significant monitoring and speech control are inevitable components of a mature and flourishing internet, and governments must play a large role in these practices to ensure that the internet is compatible with a society’s norms and values.”
And your solution would be what?
The thing is, a lot of misinformation gets spread on the internet.
It used to be that when information was disseminated by Newspapers or TV Stations, those people had an obligation to get it right, because they had a lot to lose if they got it wrong in terms of libel lawsuits or lost credibility.
Now any twit with a twitter feed can go out and claim drinking bleach cures Coronavirus, and they are taken seriously by too many people.
Liberals don't care much for the Bill of RightsThis government crackdown on human rights the last two months has emboldened the Left. Exhibit 2,538 from the Leftard Atlantic:
“In the great debate of the past two decades about freedom versus control of the network, China was largely right and the United States was largely wrong. Significant monitoring and speech control are inevitable components of a mature and flourishing internet, and governments must play a large role in these practices to ensure that the internet is compatible with a society’s norms and values.”
Internet Speech Will Never Go Back to Normal
In the debate over freedom versus control of the global network, China was largely correct, and the U.S. was wrong.amp.theatlantic.com
Really? Please explain how fascism is right wing? The fascist regimes in history were all socialist dictatorships. Not too fucking bright are you Mr. Big Thinker?"Fascism" is right wing.
He doesn't, but he sure as fuck would be in favor of Holder and Obama trampling the Bill of Rights because they are liberal Democrats.You don’t get a choice who censors the Internet, dipshit. Now tell us why you want Trump and Falwell censoring the Internet.You condoned government censorship, now tell us why you want Trump and Jerry Falwell determining what can’t be on the Internet.
I'm not sure why you think that these are either/or choices. Is most of your thinking this limited.
This is your Brain on Hate Radio.
Just like the Democratic leaderships efforts to push an agenda with COVID 19 crisis.Talk about "snowflakes"! You guys are so easy (and amusing) to tweek!"Fascism" is right wing.
Fascism is right wing. It is based upon worship of the state. Leftists worship their image of "the people" and sometimes wind up looking very similar to fascists. Authoritarianism can be left or right. Changing the meanings of words seems such a waste of energy. What could be the motive?
No Leftists also worship The State and not the image of the peoples, Leftists think that only The State can decide the correct thing and do NOT trust the peoples to be allowed to make their own decisions etc, Communism is also Totalitarian and Authoritarian, Communist nations are designed around The State with almost total disregard of what the peoples want.
The left of the political spectrum is less freedom...the right is more freedom. Anytime you start talking about central planning from a single national source you are on the left. I reference you the Democratic Party and their efforts at socialism. The Nazi Party, or Nationalist SOCIALIST German Workers Party was on the left. Hmmmm lets see gulags in Soviet Union (communitst), concentration camps Nazi Germany (socialist), concentration camps North Korea (communitst) Pol Pot and the killing fields in Cambodia (communitst) Fascist Itlay (central planning socialism) Eastern Europe during Cold War with their secret police and torture prisons...oh yes...Marxism. Over 100 million dead because of left wing ideologies. Now, to tie this into the original post...this Is why I don't trust Washington DC or the fucking Democratic Party. Wolves in sheep clothing...they are ALL socialist and a direct threat to our freedoms."Fascism" is right wing.
He doesn't, but he sure as fuck would be in favor of Holder and Obama trampling the Bill of Rights because they are liberal Democrats.You don’t get a choice who censors the Internet, dipshit. Now tell us why you want Trump and Falwell censoring the Internet.
