Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because we allow the business to exist in the first place, and we pay for what the business could not be a business without, including the bloody roads to get there. We have every right to set the rules, and we do. Now I know that you being a child means you don't like rules, but that can't be helped.Why does government have any legitimate right to force anyone to do business with another?
What part of getting married at a public courthouse is Holy? And why is the proposal any less of a sin than the wedding?Tell us, if one of the men had bought standard flowers, and mentioned to her that he was going to ask his partner to marry him with them, would she have been right to refuse to sell them?The florist didn't refuse to sell flowers...she refused to cater a homo wedding.
There's a difference.
Why is that different? In either case it's not a legitimate use of government force to compel them to do business
Because if they had just come in to buy a bouquet, that's a different thing than requiring the florist to provide flowers, knowingly, for a ritual that the florist considers sacrilegious.
No.
But if they asked the florist to specially prepare flowers meant to be used in a ceremony that was considered by the florist to be sacrilegious, yes.
See, asking someone to marry you isn't a sacrament.
Marriage is. And as such, being forced to design/provide/deliver materials to be used in a ceremony that is a vile sacrilege of one of the most holy rituals Christians participate in...is a violation of our right to religious freedom.
Because we allow the business to exist in the first place, and we pay for what the business could not be a business without, including the bloody roads to get there. We have every right to set the rules, and we do. Now I know that you being a child means you don't like rules, but that can't be helped.Why does government have any legitimate right to force anyone to do business with another?
Making a cake is not a Christian sacrament, moron.What part of getting married at a public courthouse is Holy? And why is the proposal any less of a sin than the wedding?Tell us, if one of the men had bought standard flowers, and mentioned to her that he was going to ask his partner to marry him with them, would she have been right to refuse to sell them?Why is that different? In either case it's not a legitimate use of government force to compel them to do business
Because if they had just come in to buy a bouquet, that's a different thing than requiring the florist to provide flowers, knowingly, for a ritual that the florist considers sacrilegious.
No.
But if they asked the florist to specially prepare flowers meant to be used in a ceremony that was considered by the florist to be sacrilegious, yes.
See, asking someone to marry you isn't a sacrament.
Marriage is. And as such, being forced to design/provide/deliver materials to be used in a ceremony that is a vile sacrilege of one of the most holy rituals Christians participate in...is a violation of our right to religious freedom.
It's not holy at all when faggots do it.
However the ceremony is considered a sacrament to Christians, and is why the consider it a sacrilege when faggots celebrate it in their special wag.
Because we allow the business to exist in the first placeWhy does government have any legitimate right to force anyone to do business with another?
Tell us, if one of the men had bought standard flowers, and mentioned to her that he was going to ask his partner to marry him with them, would she have been right to refuse to sell them?The florist didn't refuse to sell flowers...she refused to cater a homo wedding.
There's a difference.
Why is that different? In either case it's not a legitimate use of government force to compel them to do business
Because if they had just come in to buy a bouquet, that's a different thing than requiring the florist to provide flowers, knowingly, for a ritual that the florist considers sacrilegious.
No.
But if they asked the florist to specially prepare flowers meant to be used in a ceremony that was considered by the florist to be sacrilegious, yes.
See, asking someone to marry you isn't a sacrament.
Marriage is. And as such, being forced to design/provide/deliver materials to be used in a ceremony that is a vile sacrilege of one of the most holy rituals Christians participate in...is a violation of our right to religious freedom.
That seems like a completely arbitrary standard. What difference does it make if you are asked to sell work you did do or will do? Why does government have any legitimate right to force anyone to do business with another?
That is correct. In this society you can start a business because we allow you to. And learn how to quote properly, that isn't it.Because we allow the business to exist in the first placeWhy does government have any legitimate right to force anyone to do business with another?
We "allow" it to exist? Once again you make clear you are an authoritarian leftist, there is zero liberal about you
That is correct. In this society you can start a business because we allow you to. And learn how to quote properly, that isn't it.Because we allow the business to exist in the first placeWhy does government have any legitimate right to force anyone to do business with another?
We "allow" it to exist? Once again you make clear you are an authoritarian leftist, there is zero liberal about you
Well your argument died, about six decades ago. Hopefully you know that?I'm arguing from the standpoint that the state cannot force a person to commit sacrilege or be shut down.
Society, kiddos. The royal we, all 320 million of us.That is correct. In this society you can start a business because we allow you to. And learn how to quote properly, that isn't it.Because we allow the business to exist in the first placeWhy does government have any legitimate right to force anyone to do business with another?
We "allow" it to exist? Once again you make clear you are an authoritarian leftist, there is zero liberal about you
Who the hell is *we*, you mentally ill fascist?
you don't like rules, but that can't be helped.
What part of getting married at a public courthouse is Holy? And why is the proposal any less of a sin than the wedding?Tell us, if one of the men had bought standard flowers, and mentioned to her that he was going to ask his partner to marry him with them, would she have been right to refuse to sell them?Why is that different? In either case it's not a legitimate use of government force to compel them to do business
Because if they had just come in to buy a bouquet, that's a different thing than requiring the florist to provide flowers, knowingly, for a ritual that the florist considers sacrilegious.
No.
But if they asked the florist to specially prepare flowers meant to be used in a ceremony that was considered by the florist to be sacrilegious, yes.
See, asking someone to marry you isn't a sacrament.
Marriage is. And as such, being forced to design/provide/deliver materials to be used in a ceremony that is a vile sacrilege of one of the most holy rituals Christians participate in...is a violation of our right to religious freedom.
It's not holy at all when faggots do it.
However the ceremony is considered a sacrament to Christians, and is why the consider it a sacrilege when faggots celebrate it in their special wag.
Well your argument died, about six decades ago. Hopefully you know that?I'm arguing from the standpoint that the state cannot force a person to commit sacrilege or be shut down.
What part of getting married at a public courthouse is Holy? And why is the proposal any less of a sin than the wedding?Tell us, if one of the men had bought standard flowers, and mentioned to her that he was going to ask his partner to marry him with them, would she have been right to refuse to sell them?Because if they had just come in to buy a bouquet, that's a different thing than requiring the florist to provide flowers, knowingly, for a ritual that the florist considers sacrilegious.
No.
But if they asked the florist to specially prepare flowers meant to be used in a ceremony that was considered by the florist to be sacrilegious, yes.
See, asking someone to marry you isn't a sacrament.
Marriage is. And as such, being forced to design/provide/deliver materials to be used in a ceremony that is a vile sacrilege of one of the most holy rituals Christians participate in...is a violation of our right to religious freedom.
It's not holy at all when faggots do it.
However the ceremony is considered a sacrament to Christians, and is why the consider it a sacrilege when faggots celebrate it in their special wag.
Bad news on that, most Christians don't care
More drama queen than all of Castro Street.you don't like rules, but that can't be helped.
Yes, that's so true about liberals, we don't like rules. If we're not hurting anyone, we should be able to dance naked in our back yard and throw candy corns in the air and try to catch them in our mouths, it's up to us. You would know nothing about that. You are obsessed with government running around with guns peeking in windows and eavesdropping on conversations stepping in and stopping anyone who dares to think differently than you do or do anything you don't approve of or force them to do what you don't approve of them not doing
Sweetcheeks, no less than the Supreme Court said what you believe is BS, a very long time ago. Would you like to read the case?Well your argument died, about six decades ago. Hopefully you know that?I'm arguing from the standpoint that the state cannot force a person to commit sacrilege or be shut down.
No, my argument is perfect, and you're about the third incarnation of the same lunatic extremist queerbo I've cycled through.
What part of getting married at a public courthouse is Holy? And why is the proposal any less of a sin than the wedding?Tell us, if one of the men had bought standard flowers, and mentioned to her that he was going to ask his partner to marry him with them, would she have been right to refuse to sell them?
No.
But if they asked the florist to specially prepare flowers meant to be used in a ceremony that was considered by the florist to be sacrilegious, yes.
See, asking someone to marry you isn't a sacrament.
Marriage is. And as such, being forced to design/provide/deliver materials to be used in a ceremony that is a vile sacrilege of one of the most holy rituals Christians participate in...is a violation of our right to religious freedom.
It's not holy at all when faggots do it.
However the ceremony is considered a sacrament to Christians, and is why the consider it a sacrilege when faggots celebrate it in their special wag.
Bad news on that, most Christians don't care
I think they do care, but it isn't something you can really do much about.
Except to refuse to participate in the travesty the faggots have made of our sacred ceremonies.
That is correct. In this society you can start a business because we allow you to. And learn how to quote properly, that isn't it.Because we allow the business to exist in the first placeWhy does government have any legitimate right to force anyone to do business with another?
We "allow" it to exist? Once again you make clear you are an authoritarian leftist, there is zero liberal about you
Marriage hasn't been sacred, ever. Your faith may tell you that but they were also the ones raping all the children so there you go...What part of getting married at a public courthouse is Holy? And why is the proposal any less of a sin than the wedding?Tell us, if one of the men had bought standard flowers, and mentioned to her that he was going to ask his partner to marry him with them, would she have been right to refuse to sell them?
No.
But if they asked the florist to specially prepare flowers meant to be used in a ceremony that was considered by the florist to be sacrilegious, yes.
See, asking someone to marry you isn't a sacrament.
Marriage is. And as such, being forced to design/provide/deliver materials to be used in a ceremony that is a vile sacrilege of one of the most holy rituals Christians participate in...is a violation of our right to religious freedom.
It's not holy at all when faggots do it.
However the ceremony is considered a sacrament to Christians, and is why the consider it a sacrilege when faggots celebrate it in their special wag.
Bad news on that, most Christians don't care
I think they do care, but it isn't something you can really do much about.
Except to refuse to participate in the travesty the faggots have made of our sacred ceremonies.
Sweetcheeks, no less than the Supreme Court said what you believe is BS, a very long time ago. Would you like to read the case?Well your argument died, about six decades ago. Hopefully you know that?I'm arguing from the standpoint that the state cannot force a person to commit sacrilege or be shut down.
No, my argument is perfect, and you're about the third incarnation of the same lunatic extremist queerbo I've cycled through.
