It’s in the transcriptsGonna need a link to the testimony.
The fact you dembots don’t even know he testified is comical
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s in the transcriptsGonna need a link to the testimony.
Called to testify against Teump.It’s in the transcripts
The fact you dembots don’t even know he testified is comical
Um yes he testified
James didn't prosecute Trump's real estate dealings. She prosecuted him for falsifying his business records.I don’t claim to know the ins and outs of real estate dealings, but the judge did ask if this kind of case had ever been prosecuted before, which would seem to indicate that this practice is somewhat common in the real estate world.
If it is, and nobody else has been prosecuted for it, then it raises another question about why they went after trump (we know why, they told us why)
I know he testified. It was in my link.It’s in the transcripts
The fact you dembots don’t even know he testified is comical
And the law is very clear that submitting false statements -- as Trump demonstrably did -- is a felony.James didn't prosecute Trump's real estate dealings. She prosecuted him for falsifying his business records.
Not in this case. Trump cooked the books in order to get sweetheart deals, not to hide another crime like he did in his hush money case.And the law is very clear that submitting false statements -- as Trump demonstrably did -- is a felony.
Yes, in this case. It's the basis of the entire case. I'm not arguing against anything you sayNot in this case. Trump cooked the books in order to get sweetheart deals, not to hide another crime like he did in his hush money case.
Too deep would just mean less of a fine, not exoneration.No, the question is, will this ruling be overturned because James tried to dig too deep?
In this case?!? HahaCalled to testify against Teump.
Went to jail for.perjuring himself.
See post 183I know he testified. It was in my link.
Gonna need a link to those transcripts where he says what you claimed.
No question.No, the question is, will this ruling be overturned because James tried to dig too deep?
Fraud was the business model of the Trump Organization.Yes, in this case. It's the basis of the entire case. I'm not arguing against anything you say
He committed felony fraud for decades to secure more favorable loan and insurance rates.
He submitted false financial statements to lenders.
And , likely, money laundering.Fraud was the business model of the Trump Organization.
No better washing machine than prime real estate in NYCAnd , likely, money laundering.
That was Trump’s testimony, not Weisselberg’s.See post 183
There is a hyperlink in there to the full transcriptThat was Trump’s testimony, not Weisselberg’s.
In the link, Trump blames everyone else. Says he had no idea.
Yep.In this case?!? Haha
Hahah no he didn’t. Stop lyingYep.
He went to jail for perjuring himself, in his testimony.
All to cover for the orange slob.
The old man went to Riker's for trump again, in hopes of tasting some more of that sweet trump honey.
He sure did.Hahah no he didn’t. Stop lying