Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Give me any renown Legal eagle who says what a far majorityFoolardi, why do you ignore the wording of the 14th Amendment.
Either the appellate court or SCOTUS will decide this for you.
Wording ... Pudding.That's why we have Lawyers.To interpretFoolardi, why do you ignore the wording of the 14th Amendment.
Either the appellate court or SCOTUS will decide this for you.
Yep, it is a state law that allows challenges. What CO state law did Trump violate? What qualification to be on the CO ballot does Trump not meet?On September 6, 2023, four Republican and two unaffiliated Colorado voters sued the Colorado Secretary of State and Trump using a state law procedure that allows Colorado voters to challenge qualifications of primary candidates seeking to be on the ballot. After extensive pretrial briefing and disclosures, the district court held a five-day evidentiary hearing beginning on October 30. It issued a decision on November 17. The trial court found that the attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, was an insurrection against the Constitution and that Trump engaged in that insurrection but that Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment did not apply to him.
The Colorado Supreme Court accepted Trump’s and the Anderson Respondents’ applications for review on November 21, heard argument on December 6, and issued its opinion on December 19, holding that Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment disqualified Trump from appearing on Colorado’s primary ballot. The court stayed its order through January 4, the day before the Colorado deadline to certify the ballot, and held: “If review is sought in the Supreme Court before the stay expires, it shall remain in place, and the Secretary will continue to be required to include President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot until the receipt of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court.”
DocumentCloud
www.documentcloud.org
That's what due process looks like.
Why aren't they prosecuting? Oh yeah, they would need evidence for that.The states are NOT prosecuting.
They are blocking ballot access.
Huge difference
No, being on the ballot is based on meeting the requirements to be on the ballot. Link us up to the CO and Maine election statutes for qualifying to be on the ballot and show us which one Trump doesn't meet.Being on the ballot isn’t a right. It’s a privilege based on for one thing, not having given comfort to those who attempted to overthrow an election(aborted coup, since ‘insurrection’ is a no-no). The language is irrelevant. Trump’s actions, lack of actions and words were clear. This is an administrative ruling, akin to losing a business license, and not a criminal action requiring a trial.
Why do you ignore the wording of the 14th?Foolardi, why do you ignore the wording of the 14th Amendment.
Either the appellate court or SCOTUS will decide this for you.
Give me any renown Legal eagle who says what a far majority
of legal scholars have demonstrated.Like Jonathan Turley or
Alan Dershowitz - Defending the Constitution -.
That the 14th Amendment was never meant to include a
President.Because a Potus is not an Official.Like a Military
Officer but one who requires an Election.
Yep, it is a state law that allows challenges. What CO state law did Trump violate? What qualification to be on the CO ballot does Trump not meet?
A CO civil court has no jurisdiction on the 14th Amendment, Simp.
No different than if Arnold Schwarzenegger tried to get on the presidential ballot in Colorado.No, being on the ballot is based on meeting the requirements to be on the ballot. Link us up to the CO and Maine election statutes for qualifying to be on the ballot and show us which one Trump doesn't meet.
No stupid, only one entity has the power to enforce the 14th. Congress.Actually any civil court has the jurisdiction to determine the FACTS of the case before them.
By following the Letter of the Law.Not some Lucy GooseyActually any civil court has the jurisdiction to determine the FACTS of the case before them.
Why " Entity ". Is that what Chucky Schumer's senate isNo stupid, only one entity has the power to enforce the 14th. Congress.
You lose again.
SCOTUS will inform you of their decision. You will abide it.Give me any renown Legal eagle who says what a far majority
of legal scholars have demonstrated.Like Jonathan Turley or
Alan Dershowitz - Defending the Constitution -.
That the 14th Amendment was never meant to include a
President.Because a Potus is not an Official.Like a Military
Officer but one who requires an Election.
Wrong, it's self executing. You can't expect congress to have to rule on whether or not someone running for dog catcher in Dogville meets the requirements.No stupid, only one entity has the power to enforce the 14th. Congress.
You lose again.
Like ... " Though it stings my dignity, I have to abideSCOTUS will inform you of their decision. You will abide it.
The wall of denial erected by The Following is impenetrable. They are trained monkeys who only understand one thing. Keep throwing shit on the wall to obscure the truth, just like their Dear Leader.Being on the ballot isn’t a right. It’s a privilege based on for one thing, not having given comfort to those who attempted to overthrow an election(aborted coup, since ‘insurrection’ is a no-no). The language is irrelevant. Trump’s actions, lack of actions and words were clear. This is an administrative ruling, akin to losing a business license, and not a criminal action requiring a trial.
On September 6, 2023, four Republican and two unaffiliated Colorado voters sued the Colorado Secretary of State and Trump using a state law procedure that allows Colorado voters to challenge qualifications of primary candidates seeking to be on the ballot. After extensive pretrial briefing and disclosures, the district court held a five-day evidentiary hearing beginning on October 30. It issued a decision on November 17. The trial court found that the attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, was an insurrection against the Constitution and that Trump engaged in that insurrection but that Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment did not apply to him.
The Colorado Supreme Court accepted Trump’s and the Anderson Respondents’ applications for review on November 21, heard argument on December 6, and issued its opinion on December 19, holding that Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment disqualified Trump from appearing on Colorado’s primary ballot. The court stayed its order through January 4, the day before the Colorado deadline to certify the ballot, and held: “If review is sought in the Supreme Court before the stay expires, it shall remain in place, and the Secretary will continue to be required to include President Trump’s name on the 2024 presidential primary ballot until the receipt of any order or mandate from the Supreme Court.”
DocumentCloud
That's what due process looks like.
Holy shit you are stupid. WTF does the 14th Amendment of the Constitution have to do with a dog catcher?Wrong, it's self executing. You can't expect congress to have to rule on whether or not someone running for dog catcher in Dogville meets the requirements.
Elections are a State/Local function.
From your link.........
The court adopted the district court's classification of the parties and held that each plaintiff lacked standing; the proper venue for plaintiffs' quo warranto claims was in the District of Columbia, pursuant to D.C. Code 16-3503
The plaintiffs lacked standing because they did not file their case in the proper venue.
SCOTUS will decide, not you.Federal supersedes State.
.
