Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The only time the "consummation of marriage" matters is if the state believes someone used a marriage to commit fraud.The same way the state proves an individual is gay. They have to take the persons word for it.
Point out where they are trying to do so in this country.
Thanks.
That's funny, coming from a conspiracy theory nutbag, such as yourself.
So the baker has a right to refuse service to gay couples but social media doesn’t have a right I refuse service to people who attack, harass and engage in toxic behavior on their websites.LOL. First of all I'm a lapsed Catholic at best. I don't agree with the baker, I agree with the baker's right to free exercise.
Even the baker is willing to compromise, saying he doesn't deny anyone point of sale items to anyone.
The left is the group with the tribalism issue, not the right. You guys lost the "live and let live" high ground decades ago and keep digging yourself deeper holes.
The only time the "consummation of marriage" matters is if the state believes someone used a marriage to commit fraud.
To prove fraud in this case, the state has the burden to prove the marriage wasn't consummated.
"We did. We don't have to tell you anything else." Case closed.
So the point, even if it exists, is moot.
It's different when they do it.So the baker has a right to refuse service to gay couples but social media doesn’t have a right I refuse service to people who attack, harass and engage in toxic behavior on their websites.
So the baker has a right to refuse service to gay couples but social media doesn’t have a right I refuse service to people who attack, harass and engage in toxic behavior on their websites.
LOL. The white grievance is precious. Likening themselves to blacks in the 1960's who were refused service at white restaurants.Top Chef star Brittanny Anderson's co-owned restaurant canceled reservation for Christian group’s private event citing staff ‘dignity’ and the group’s opposition to same-sex marriage and abortion rights
Conservative organization denied reservation at Richmond restaurant
Brittanny Anderson restaurant canceled reservation for Christian group
A conservative Christian group has had their reservation canceled by a Virginia restaurant after it emerged that the group opposed same-sex marriage and abortion rights.
Metzger Bar and Butchery in Richmond, Virginia canceled the Christian organization's booking citing that staff would be made 'uncomfortable' and 'unsafe' by their presence in the establishment.
The conservative Christian group, the Family Foundation, said they were left annoyed by the last minute cancelation and that it was a 'double standard of the left'. The German themed restaurant is co-owned by TV chef Brittanny Anderson who is known for her shows 'Top Chef' and 'Chopped'. The Family Foundation was planning to host a gathering of their supporters at a private room in the restaurant to deliver and update on the group's work. The organization said that around an hour and a half prior to their booking, the restaurant's owners phoned them to cancel the booking. Victoria Cobb, the president of the Family Foundation, described the incident in a blog post, writing that the group wanted to know why the booking had been canceled at the last minute. The group claims that an employee had researched the Family Foundation, and that the staff were refusing to serve them.
Cobb likened her group's experience of being refused service to eateries that refused to serve black customers before the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
She said: 'Welcome to the double standard of the left.'
The Family Group is a non-profit Christian organization based in Virginia that says it advocates for 'policies based on Biblical principles'. The faith-based organization has opposed LGBTQ+ rights and abortion rights.
Shortly after the incident, Metzger Bar and Butchery released a statement on their Instagram page explaining that their staff would be made 'uncomfortable' and 'unsafe' by the group's presence.
'Metzger Bar and Butchery has always prided itself on being an inclusive environment for people to dine in,' they said.
The establishment said they discovered that the Family Foundation was 'a group of donors to a political organization that seeks to deprive women and LGBTQ+ persons of their basic human rights in Virginia.'
They added that many of their staff are 'women and/or members of the LGBTQ+ community. All of our staff are people with rights who deserve dignity and a safe work environment.'
Sounds like she needs some unflattering Yelp reviews.
Just checked, Yelp is blocking reviews.
OK then, just don't eat there.....Shady part of town anyway.
Well...there's no threat of bodily harm or injury to these "Christians"...like there was to blacks back then.
Well it is a German restaurant.Deviant scum; glad they didn't make a dime off decent people. These morons obviously never saw all the interviews with faggots who worked at Chick Fila and liked working there when the faggot gangs tried to ruin their business. Don't know anybody who ever liked working in a shithole run by snotty bitchy little faggots.
Odd, your ilk was all in with "Fuck you, bake that cake".....Pepperidge Farms remembers.LOL. The white grievance is precious. Likening themselves to blacks in the 1960's who were refused service at white restaurants.
So the owner had to make a decision because the backlash to letting these "Christians" dine there would have probably been bigger than just denying them the reservation.
Someone has gay fantasies on the mind.Deviant scum; glad they didn't make a dime off decent people. These morons obviously never saw all the interviews with faggots who worked at Chick Fila and liked working there when the faggot gangs tried to ruin their business. Don't know anybody who ever liked working in a shithole run by snotty bitchy little faggots.
So the baker has a right to refuse service to gay couples but social media doesn’t have a right I refuse service to people who attack, harass and engage in toxic behavior on their websites.
The First amendment can't apply to social media. If you want to force them to do what you want, you'll need to pass a law.Maybe now they do, but I would support a law declaring the 1st amendment applies to certain social media.
The first amendment already applies to social media. The first amendment stops government from telling social media companies that they have to publish speech they don’t want to publish.Maybe now they do, but I would support a law declaring the 1st amendment applies to certain social media.
And people were being banned for saying reality based things like "a man can't become a woman".
Just because you SJW snowflakes can't handle that.
The First amendment can't apply to social media. If you want to force them to do what you want, you'll need to pass a law.
The first amendment already applies to social media. The first amendment stops government from telling social media companies that they have to publish speech they don’t want to publish.
