Liberal PC Defeatist Attitude on Terrorism: Well, We Just Have to Live With It

lol. We have a Commerce Clause not a Terror Clause.

You have a bong, not a brain...

{The Congress shall have Power [...] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;}

Has not a fucking thing to do with immigration, you drooling retard.
Attention deficits instead of attention surpluses, "dope-less" wonder?

You have to prove immigration, not tourism. Our Commerce Clause covers tourism.

You are unable to form a complete sentence.

How does the Commerce Clause cover tourism retard?
Because it is a form of Commerce not Immigration dear. I thought it was obvious, "dope-less wonder".


First off stupid, refugees are not tourists. You are too fucking stupid to grasp that the application to enter the country very clearly states the reason. Secondly, we do not buy or sell tourists, so again the commerce clause has no bearing on it.
 
lol. We have a Commerce Clause not a Terror Clause.

You have a bong, not a brain...

{The Congress shall have Power [...] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;}

Has not a fucking thing to do with immigration, you drooling retard.
Attention deficits instead of attention surpluses, "dope-less" wonder?

You have to prove immigration, not tourism. Our Commerce Clause covers tourism.

You are unable to form a complete sentence.

How does the Commerce Clause cover tourism retard?
Because it is a form of Commerce not Immigration dear. I thought it was obvious, "dope-less wonder".


First off stupid, refugees are not tourists. You are too fucking stupid to grasp that the application to enter the country very clearly states the reason. Secondly, we do not buy or sell tourists, so again the commerce clause has no bearing on it.
special pleading is a form of red herring specialization. not All Persons entering the US, are refugees that are sponsored by our Government.
 
You have a bong, not a brain...

{The Congress shall have Power [...] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;}

Has not a fucking thing to do with immigration, you drooling retard.
Attention deficits instead of attention surpluses, "dope-less" wonder?

You have to prove immigration, not tourism. Our Commerce Clause covers tourism.

You are unable to form a complete sentence.

How does the Commerce Clause cover tourism retard?
Because it is a form of Commerce not Immigration dear. I thought it was obvious, "dope-less wonder".


First off stupid, refugees are not tourists. You are too fucking stupid to grasp that the application to enter the country very clearly states the reason. Secondly, we do not buy or sell tourists, so again the commerce clause has no bearing on it.
special pleading is a form of red herring specialization. not All Persons entering the US, are refugees that are sponsored by our Government.

So what?

Again, you are babbling with zero grasp of the topic. I suspect you are a troll.
 
Appease, Apologize, Repeat. The only people you hold accountable in your post are the gun manufacturers and The West. You can choose to live with terrorism. In fact, Democrats should take Kerry's "Learn to Live With Terrorism" slogan and have it be a key message in '18 and '20.

again, go back, read what I said, and then have someone help you with the big words.

We have a terrorism problem because we've created and enabled a terrorism problem. Terrorists don't form out of the mud, they are created by dumb policies.
 
The Militia Amendment has nothing to do with gun ownership.
the second amendment has a hell of a lot to do with gun ownership....

if that were the case, it wouldn't have taken the Courts until 2010 to decide the awful Heller decision.
 
Irrelevant Stalin, you lied that Trump wants to "round up Muslims." Again, stopping the immigration of ALL people from openly terrorist states is not "rounding up" anyone. You are simply lying, as you fascists do incessantly.

So again, absolutely ZERO terrorists have come from the countries that Biff wants to ban. If he wanted to ban terrorists, he should ban people from Saudi Arabia, that's where the 9/11 guys came from.
 
Attention deficits instead of attention surpluses, "dope-less" wonder?

You have to prove immigration, not tourism. Our Commerce Clause covers tourism.

You are unable to form a complete sentence.

How does the Commerce Clause cover tourism retard?
Because it is a form of Commerce not Immigration dear. I thought it was obvious, "dope-less wonder".


First off stupid, refugees are not tourists. You are too fucking stupid to grasp that the application to enter the country very clearly states the reason. Secondly, we do not buy or sell tourists, so again the commerce clause has no bearing on it.
special pleading is a form of red herring specialization. not All Persons entering the US, are refugees that are sponsored by our Government.

So what?

Again, you are babbling with zero grasp of the topic. I suspect you are a troll.
I suspect you Only speak, Anglo-Saxon and not English.

You have to prove immigration, not tourism. Our Commerce Clause covers tourism.

Our immigration clause Only covers immigration.
 
That is such a lame fucking lie, Stalin.

The Afghan Muhjad had dick to do with Al Qaeda.

You don't even have your own hate speech down, Moron. You are supposed to claim we created the Taliban, you drooling retard. That too is a lie, but at least is of the same region. Al Qaeda is just fucking stupid.

Guy, do some research...

Here's an article from 1999, before 9/11, that laid it out pretty good.

Frankenstein the CIA created

Bin Laden arrived in Afghanistan from Saudi Arabia in 1979, aged 22. Though he saw a considerable amount of combat - around the eastern city of Jalalabad in March 1989 and, earlier, around the border town of Khost - his speciality was logistics.

From his base in the Pakistani city of Peshawar, he used his experience of the construction trade, and his money, to build a series of bases where the mujahideen could be trained by their Pakistani, American and, if some recent press reports are to be believed, British advisers.
 
Liberal PC Defeatist Attitude on Terrorism: Well, We Just Have to Live With It

Hmmm,

And yet it was Republicans who let Bin Laden go and a "liberal" who took Bin Laden out.
 
its been that way since around 1791......

Well, no, it hasn't. In fact, for most of our history, the courts have ruled that cities and states have the right to make gun laws because of the whole "Well-regulated Militia" thing.
 
This ding-bat from BBC news claims that Eurpoean's are just going to have to learn to live with terrorism. Whatever you do don't mention the fucking obvious that immigration is one of the roots of the problem. Don't mention that "no go zones" are part of the problem. Please don't hurt anyone's little feelings. Poor Muslim terrorist. They have feelings to ya know. BULLSHIT! Acceptance of Islamic terrorism as the new norm is defeatism.

So what's the alternative, going all batshit crazy and rounding up all the Muslims?

the thing is, this Suspect was born in the UK. In fact, most of the guys who carry out these things are born in the countries they attack.

I also think it's kind of silly to get all upset about something like this being carried out by a Muslim but not by a white supremacist.
First line...correct.
 
Liberal PC Defeatist Attitude on Terrorism: Well, We Just Have to Live With It

Hmmm,

And yet it was Republicans who let Bin Laden go and a "liberal" who took Bin Laden out.
It was SEAL Team 6 that took Bin Laden out.
 
This ding-bat from BBC news claims that Eurpoean's are just going to have to learn to live with terrorism. Whatever you do don't mention the fucking obvious that immigration is one of the roots of the problem. Don't mention that "no go zones" are part of the problem. Please don't hurt anyone's little feelings. Poor Muslim terrorist. They have feelings to ya know. BULLSHIT! Acceptance of Islamic terrorism as the new norm is defeatism.
BBC Anchor Believes Europeans Have To Just 'Get Used To' Terror Attacks

Most of the lone wolves are born in the countries where they carry out their attacks, the immigration thing is a red herring that makes people feel good temporarily. The hard truth about this is that you can't stop all these attacks. You can put more and more resources into stopping them before they happen but criminals find a way out of the prison. There is no defense against a person deciding in their head one day they are going to drive a semi down a crowded street anywhere in the world and run people over. Or some nutjob with an arsenal who goes to shoot up a mall alone or with a group.

Reality sometimes in hard. Flailing your arms and crying "it's the other political party in OUR country that is the problem" isn't solving anything, it is just making the terrorists more effective.
The immigration is the problem dumbassed liberal. If they can't get from point "A" to point "B" then they can't be a threat to the people in that community. Not to bright are you?
 
We profile white supremecists and heavily monitor their activity. You Liberals applauded Obama's DHS calling returning white soldiers from war a threat yet assailed Bush for wanting to tap conversations of calls from suspected Muslim terrorists originating overseas.

Um, yeah... oneof those things is unconstitutional.... that's why we were against it.

Now. to the point, here's the thing. Terrorism is not an existential threat to the United States or the United Kingdom or the European Union. Yes, these stories are horrible when 22 people die in a bombing, but we have 100 people a day who die of gunshot wounds in this country and we still don't ban guns.
Freedom has a price. Everyone should conceal carry. Would separate the men from loud mouthed crybaby liberal's.
 
This ding-bat from BBC news claims that Eurpoean's are just going to have to learn to live with terrorism. Whatever you do don't mention the fucking obvious that immigration is one of the roots of the problem. Don't mention that "no go zones" are part of the problem. Please don't hurt anyone's little feelings. Poor Muslim terrorist. They have feelings to ya know. BULLSHIT! Acceptance of Islamic terrorism as the new norm is defeatism.
BBC Anchor Believes Europeans Have To Just 'Get Used To' Terror Attacks

Most of the lone wolves are born in the countries where they carry out their attacks, the immigration thing is a red herring that makes people feel good temporarily. The hard truth about this is that you can't stop all these attacks. You can put more and more resources into stopping them before they happen but criminals find a way out of the prison. There is no defense against a person deciding in their head one day they are going to drive a semi down a crowded street anywhere in the world and run people over. Or some nutjob with an arsenal who goes to shoot up a mall alone or with a group.

Reality sometimes in hard. Flailing your arms and crying "it's the other political party in OUR country that is the problem" isn't solving anything, it is just making the terrorists more effective.
The immigration is the problem dumbassed liberal. If they can't get from point "A" to point "B" then they can't be a threat to the people in that community. Not to bright are you?

You're an angry little fella in the morning eh? Have your oatmeal.
I'm someone who can recognize a threat to national security any hour of the day or night.
 
[

So again, absolutely ZERO terrorists have come from the countries that Biff wants to ban. If he wanted to ban terrorists, he should ban people from Saudi Arabia, that's where the 9/11 guys came from.

That of course is a direct lie, as is virtually everything you post - FASCIST...

In fact 4 of the 9-11 terrorists were from Yemen, who is part of the travel ban.

But beyond your lies is your demagoguery in claiming a "round up." You scumbag Nazis love to float lies like this because you think it makes the object of your hatred and helps you to promote your pro-terrorist agenda. I understand, you seek to promote terrorism so that the American people will be open to the authoritarian police state you and the fascist democratic party seek to establish.
 
That is such a lame fucking lie, Stalin.

The Afghan Muhjad had dick to do with Al Qaeda.

You don't even have your own hate speech down, Moron. You are supposed to claim we created the Taliban, you drooling retard. That too is a lie, but at least is of the same region. Al Qaeda is just fucking stupid.

Guy, do some research...

Here's an article from 1999, before 9/11, that laid it out pretty good.

Frankenstein the CIA created

Bin Laden arrived in Afghanistan from Saudi Arabia in 1979, aged 22. Though he saw a considerable amount of combat - around the eastern city of Jalalabad in March 1989 and, earlier, around the border town of Khost - his speciality was logistics.

From his base in the Pakistani city of Peshawar, he used his experience of the construction trade, and his money, to build a series of bases where the mujahideen could be trained by their Pakistani, American and, if some recent press reports are to be believed, British advisers.

And?

Notice that even the sleazy rag the Guardian notes ", he used his experience of the construction trade, and his money, "

bin Laden was the Saudi rich kid sticking his nose into it, he was never part of the Mujahadeen and certainly not a leader, nor was he funded by the USA, as you fascist love to lie.
 

Forum List

Back
Top