Liberal PC Defeatist Attitude on Terrorism: Well, We Just Have to Live With It

its been that way since around 1791......

Well, no, it hasn't. In fact, for most of our history, the courts have ruled that cities and states have the right to make gun laws because of the whole "Well-regulated Militia" thing.
well yea it does.....people have owned guns since day one here.....you just wont agree joe because you are an anti gun person.....so of course to people with your mindset the second amendment only applies to an organized militia....
 
[

Well, no, it hasn't. In fact, for most of our history, the courts have ruled that cities and states have the right to make gun laws because of the whole "Well-regulated Militia" thing.

Izzatrite Stalin?

Let's see the case law on this. You have a reputation for lying, so don't expect anyone to take your word for it.

Interesting side note.

After the shoot out at the OK Corral, the Earps and Doc Holiday were arrested and tried for the murder of Billy Clanton, Frank and Tom McLaury.

The Earps were acquitted of all charges, HOWEVER the presiding Judge, Peace Spicer found that the actions of the Earps in prohibiting firearms in the city of Tombstone was UNCONSTITUTIONAL and the cause of the altercation. Spicer noted that the "illegal and unconstitutional actions to disarm the Cowboys directly led to the violence of the events when they rightfully refused to disarm."

Now Spicer desperately wanted Arizona to become a state, and viewed the unconstitutional acts of the Earps as an impediment to his aspirations. Even so, the one well known case where this was tested upheld the right of "honest men" to bear arms.
 
[
That is true.....during what Administration......?

Hey stalker, you marked my post that stated 4 of the 9-11 terrorists were from Yemen as "funny." What was funny about it? No doubt you were dancing in the streets when the Towers fell, is that why you think Yemen terrorist are funny? I mean, you're a Nazi pile of shit, but even so...
 
Liberal PC Defeatist Attitude on Terrorism: Well, We Just Have to Live With It

Hmmm,

And yet it was Republicans who let Bin Laden go and a "liberal" who took Bin Laden out.

upload_2017-5-26_10-50-43.png
 
The pattern is clear. Muslims are a patient people. They come saying they are seeking freedom and opportunity. They come as refugees. The children that are born in the west and raised in the mosques are sent home for training. They come back as murderous terrorists. But, they are British, American, French, German. No they aren't they are raised to infiltrate these countries and the floodgates are open.
 
[

So again, absolutely ZERO terrorists have come from the countries that Biff wants to ban. If he wanted to ban terrorists, he should ban people from Saudi Arabia, that's where the 9/11 guys came from.

That of course is a direct lie, as is virtually everything you post - FASCIST...

In fact 4 of the 9-11 terrorists were from Yemen, who is part of the travel ban.

But beyond your lies is your demagoguery in claiming a "round up." You scumbag Nazis love to float lies like this because you think it makes the object of your hatred and helps you to promote your pro-terrorist agenda. I understand, you seek to promote terrorism so that the American people will be open to the authoritarian police state you and the fascist democratic party seek to establish.
Means nothing:

The attackers were Islamic terrorists from Saudi Arabia and several other Arab nations.

An executive Order from our Commander in Chief, must be General, in nature, not Common.
 
its been that way since around 1791......

Well, no, it hasn't. In fact, for most of our history, the courts have ruled that cities and states have the right to make gun laws because of the whole "Well-regulated Militia" thing.
well yea it does.....people have owned guns since day one here.....you just wont agree joe because you are an anti gun person.....so of course to people with your mindset the second amendment only applies to an organized militia....
It specifically applies to well regulated militia, not the unorganized militia.
 
This ding-bat from BBC news claims that Eurpoean's are just going to have to learn to live with terrorism. Whatever you do don't mention the fucking obvious that immigration is one of the roots of the problem. Don't mention that "no go zones" are part of the problem. Please don't hurt anyone's little feelings. Poor Muslim terrorist. They have feelings to ya know. BULLSHIT! Acceptance of Islamic terrorism as the new norm is defeatism.
BBC Anchor Believes Europeans Have To Just 'Get Used To' Terror Attacks

It's the "part and parcel" of any big city.
 
The pattern is clear. Muslims are a patient people. They come saying they are seeking freedom and opportunity. They come as refugees. The children that are born in the west and raised in the mosques are sent home for training. They come back as murderous terrorists. But, they are British, American, French, German. No they aren't they are raised to infiltrate these countries and the floodgates are open.
The Ministry of Truth, is looking for new recruits.
 
The pattern is clear. Muslims are a patient people. They come saying they are seeking freedom and opportunity. They come as refugees. The children that are born in the west and raised in the mosques are sent home for training. They come back as murderous terrorists. But, they are British, American, French, German. No they aren't they are raised to infiltrate these countries and the floodgates are open.
The Ministry of Truth, is looking for new recruits.
See DNC website for application.
 
its been that way since around 1791......

Well, no, it hasn't. In fact, for most of our history, the courts have ruled that cities and states have the right to make gun laws because of the whole "Well-regulated Militia" thing.
well yea it does.....people have owned guns since day one here.....you just wont agree joe because you are an anti gun person.....so of course to people with your mindset the second amendment only applies to an organized militia....
It specifically applies to well regulated militia, not the unorganized militia.
yes it does.....so who are the "people" in the second part?...."the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
 
And?

Notice that even the sleazy rag the Guardian notes ", he used his experience of the construction trade, and his money, "

bin Laden was the Saudi rich kid sticking his nose into it, he was never part of the Mujahadeen and certainly not a leader, nor was he funded by the USA, as you fascist love to lie.

Yeah, actually, he was. In fact, the problem was, the CIA preferred to deal with Arab volunteers over Afghan Tribesmen, mostly because their motivations were easier to understand. They were Muslims who wanted to kill infidels, as opposed to the Tribesmen who had their own agendas and rivalries and might support the Soviets one week and the Muhajadeen the next.
 
In fact 4 of the 9-11 terrorists were from Yemen, who is part of the travel ban.

Um, no, they weren't.

September 11th Hijackers Fast Facts - CNN.com

Hijackers by Nationality:
Egypt
Mohamed Atta

Lebanon
Ziad Jarrah

Saudi Arabia
Ahmed al Ghamdi
Hamza al Ghamdi
Saeed al Ghamdi
Hani Hanjour
Nawaf al Hazmi
Salem al Hazmi
Ahmad al Haznawi
Ahmed al Nami
Khalid al Mihdhar
Majed Moqed
Abdul Aziz al Omari
Mohand al Shehri
Wail al Shehri
Waleed al Shehri
Satam al Suqami

United Arab Emirates
Fayez Banihammad
Marwan al Shehhi

None of them came from a country that Trump put a Travel ban on.
 
well yea it does.....people have owned guns since day one here.....you just wont agree joe because you are an anti gun person.....so of course to people with your mindset the second amendment only applies to an organized militia....

People bled people to cure diseases on day one, that didn't make it a good idea. People owned slaves from day one, that didn't make it a good idea.

"We've always done it that way" is never a good argument. Ever.
 
its been that way since around 1791......

Well, no, it hasn't. In fact, for most of our history, the courts have ruled that cities and states have the right to make gun laws because of the whole "Well-regulated Militia" thing.
well yea it does.....people have owned guns since day one here.....you just wont agree joe because you are an anti gun person.....so of course to people with your mindset the second amendment only applies to an organized militia....
It specifically applies to well regulated militia, not the unorganized militia.
yes it does.....so who are the "people" in the second part?...."the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
did you know, that nobody should Ever take the right wing seriously about the law or economics?

the second clause of our second amendment, is simply that, a clause; it is Not, a Constitution unto itself. it is merely a second clause that must follow the first clause, of our Second Article of Amendment.
 
well yea it does.....people have owned guns since day one here.....you just wont agree joe because you are an anti gun person.....so of course to people with your mindset the second amendment only applies to an organized militia....

People bled people to cure diseases on day one, that didn't make it a good idea. People owned slaves from day one, that didn't make it a good idea.

"We've always done it that way" is never a good argument. Ever.
thats your answer?.....weak joe,weak....
 
its been that way since around 1791......

Well, no, it hasn't. In fact, for most of our history, the courts have ruled that cities and states have the right to make gun laws because of the whole "Well-regulated Militia" thing.
well yea it does.....people have owned guns since day one here.....you just wont agree joe because you are an anti gun person.....so of course to people with your mindset the second amendment only applies to an organized militia....
It specifically applies to well regulated militia, not the unorganized militia.
yes it does.....so who are the "people" in the second part?...."the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed"
did you know, that nobody should Ever take the right wing seriously about the law or economics?

the second clause of our second amendment, is simply that, a clause; it is Not, a Constitution unto itself. it is merely a second clause that must follow the first clause, of our Second Article of Amendment.
how come every time i ask you anti gun people who the people are in the second half of that amendment,i get a run around answer?....daniel...who are the PEOPLE mentioned in the second half?...
 

Forum List

Back
Top