Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[
again, this is another case of you guys creating a monster and then complaining about it when it rampages across the village.
The WEST created Al Qaeda by arming people to fight the Russians in Afghanistan. the West created ISIS by invading Iraq. The west created this joker by overthrowing Qadafi. And of course, the West creates a general animus in the whole region by supporting the Zionist Entity.
But then when a terrorist incident happens, we all get weepy that we are the "victims" here.
We have a Commerce Clause; why shouldn't "well regulated", conflict of interest protocols apply?Except this guy wasn't "imported". He was born in the UK. Yes, the west instigating a civil war in his ancestral land probably radicalized him, or maybe he was just mentally ill.
Irrelevant Stalin, you lied that Trump wants to "round up Muslims." Again, stopping the immigration of ALL people from openly terrorist states is not "rounding up" anyone. You are simply lying, as you fascists do incessantly.
[
We have a Commerce Clause; why shouldn't "well regulated", conflict of interest protocols apply?
You are confusing immigration with tourism. Not enough drugs involved to distinguish the difference?[
We have a Commerce Clause; why shouldn't "well regulated", conflict of interest protocols apply?
What does the Commerce Clause have to do with immigration, Beavis?
You're once again too stoned to put together a coherent post.
You are confusing immigration with tourism. Not enough drugs involved to distinguish the difference?[
We have a Commerce Clause; why shouldn't "well regulated", conflict of interest protocols apply?
What does the Commerce Clause have to do with immigration, Beavis?
You're once again too stoned to put together a coherent post.
You have to prove immigration, not tourism. Our Commerce Clause covers tourism.You are confusing immigration with tourism. Not enough drugs involved to distinguish the difference?[
We have a Commerce Clause; why shouldn't "well regulated", conflict of interest protocols apply?
What does the Commerce Clause have to do with immigration, Beavis?
You're once again too stoned to put together a coherent post.
What the hell are you babbling about, Cheech?
Nobody can do anything about a suicide bomber. Even the bomber at the Boston Marathon , his roommate had no idea about his dark side.This ding-bat from BBC news claims that Eurpoean's are just going to have to learn to live with terrorism. Whatever you do don't mention the fucking obvious that immigration is one of the roots of the problem. Don't mention that "no go zones" are part of the problem. Please don't hurt anyone's little feelings. Poor Muslim terrorist. They have feelings to ya know. BULLSHIT! Acceptance of Islamic terrorism as the new norm is defeatism.
BBC Anchor Believes Europeans Have To Just 'Get Used To' Terror Attacks
[
You have to prove immigration, not tourism. Our Commerce Clause covers tourism.
View attachment 128888Nobody can do anything about a suicide bomber. Even the bomber at the Boston Marathon's roommate had no idea about his dark side.This ding-bat from BBC news claims that Eurpoean's are just going to have to learn to live with terrorism. Whatever you do don't mention the fucking obvious that immigration is one of the roots of the problem. Don't mention that "no go zones" are part of the problem. Please don't hurt anyone's little feelings. Poor Muslim terrorist. They have feelings to ya know. BULLSHIT! Acceptance of Islamic terrorism as the new norm is defeatism.
BBC Anchor Believes Europeans Have To Just 'Get Used To' Terror Attacks
You gullible twits believed everything your pussy grabber told you even that he's going to stop terrorism.
So far he's 0-his presidency with EVERYTHING.
You short bus morons just never learn.
Yes, I do. Dope-less wonder.[
You have to prove immigration, not tourism. Our Commerce Clause covers tourism.
I have to prove WHAT about immigration, Spicolli?
You have not a hint of a clue what the Commerce Clause is or what it covers, you doped out moron.
What part of this argument, do you not understand?Yes, I do. Dope-less wonder.[
You have to prove immigration, not tourism. Our Commerce Clause covers tourism.
I have to prove WHAT about immigration, Spicolli?
You have not a hint of a clue what the Commerce Clause is or what it covers, you doped out moron.
You have to prove immigration, not tourism. Our Commerce Clause covers tourism.
You are incoherent. Go away. Try again when you are sober.
Liberal's are too PC to fight a real war on terrorism.
The right wing is just, too "chicken" to enact real times of war Tax Rates of the Other Peoples' TAX monies; so the left can Actually, take the right wing seriously.Liberal's are too PC to fight a real war on terrorism.
In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people, personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore, we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.
lol. We have a Commerce Clause not a Terror Clause.Liberal's are too PC to fight a real war on terrorism.
Besides, the leftists are on the side of the terrorists.
I'm just saying.
This ding-bat from BBC news claims that Eurpoean's are just going to have to learn to live with terrorism. Whatever you do don't mention the fucking obvious that immigration is one of the roots of the problem. Don't mention that "no go zones" are part of the problem. Please don't hurt anyone's little feelings. Poor Muslim terrorist. They have feelings to ya know. BULLSHIT! Acceptance of Islamic terrorism as the new norm is defeatism.
BBC Anchor Believes Europeans Have To Just 'Get Used To' Terror Attacks
You don't seem to mind the "live with it "
Attitude when it comes to a mass shooting vs calls for gun control!
lol. We have a Commerce Clause not a Terror Clause.
Attention deficits instead of attention surpluses, "dope-less" wonder?lol. We have a Commerce Clause not a Terror Clause.
You have a bong, not a brain...
{The Congress shall have Power [...] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;}
Has not a fucking thing to do with immigration, you drooling retard.
Attention deficits instead of attention surpluses, "dope-less" wonder?lol. We have a Commerce Clause not a Terror Clause.
You have a bong, not a brain...
{The Congress shall have Power [...] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;}
Has not a fucking thing to do with immigration, you drooling retard.
You have to prove immigration, not tourism. Our Commerce Clause covers tourism.
Because it is a form of Commerce not Immigration dear. I thought it was obvious, "dope-less wonder".Attention deficits instead of attention surpluses, "dope-less" wonder?lol. We have a Commerce Clause not a Terror Clause.
You have a bong, not a brain...
{The Congress shall have Power [...] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;}
Has not a fucking thing to do with immigration, you drooling retard.
You have to prove immigration, not tourism. Our Commerce Clause covers tourism.
You are unable to form a complete sentence.
How does the Commerce Clause cover tourism retard?
