Bush92
GHBush1992
- May 23, 2014
- 34,808
- 10,715
- 1,400
- Thread starter
- #161
So you agree that most liberals support his point of view about the United States role in global geopolitics and that the attacks of 9-11 were what America deserves because of our evil presence around the globe?He absolutely has the right to free speech so long as it does not present a clear and present danger. But the fact remains,the content of his speech represents a HUGE swath of the left of the American political spectrum.When someone engages in cheap debate tactics.....they will likely get the same in return.
Earmuffs.
Again, when he alleges that we (liberals) thought that the 9/11/01 deaths are a "good thing", it crosses the line between the usual moronic banter here (from both sides).Ward Churchill 9 11 Victims Were Little Eichmanns That Got What They Had Coming Liberal Quote Database
Recently Megan Kelly interviewed former professor and liberal darling Ward Churchill who infamously said that the attacks on the twin towers were acceptable actions. Liberal blogosphere and web sites have been coming to his defense. Also, note the other stories on the tabs to the right on the page I posted. All straight from talking points of Democrats. Nawwww, the Democrats haven't went too far left. Nawwww the socialist haven't taken over the party.
The Justice of Roosting Chickens Ward Churchill Speaks Democracy Now
Here is another leftist site that advocates for Churchill. This mans views would easily fit with the opinions of the lefty bloggers on this board.
Siding with Ward Churchill is ANTI-AMERICAN. He hates America. Standing with him, supporting him in any way is Hating America.
The Constitution stands with Ward Churchill's right to free speech. Why do you hate the constitution?
Please quote this "huge swath" of liberal USMB posters who showed any support for this man's positions--not his right to say them which you agree he has.