Liberals Aren’t Liking This Newly-Discovered Photo Of The 1924 Democratic Convention…

[Faun]

When the south was Democrat. Now it's Republican.

Yes, now it's Republican. Have you heard of any burning crosses in the last 40 years? Any lynchings?

Not by Democrats either. Now the right just bitches and moans.



You fuckers make such faithful nazi's, huh?

The right complains about taxes and regulations. The left complains about white people.

So who are the racists?

Idiot.... I'm on the left and I don't complain about anyone because they're white.

Plenty of douche bag Democrats do. They've said white people should be purged from the leadership of the Democrat party. They've said white people should give their houses to black people. They've said all white people are all racists. Yada, yada, yada.

Oh, look, already shifting your position. Need I remind you, you started with, "the left complains about white people."

 

[Faun]

You are always hilariously wrong.

And blindingly oblivious to your bullshit

Oh look another troll comes out of the closet...

Does this mean you're gonna run to mommy again.

 

[Rambunctious]

Does this mean you're gonna run to mommy again.

Have I ran away yet butt licker?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Just when you think PC couldn't get anymore retarded.

Unless, of course, you'd just admit that I am never wrong.

You are always hilariously wrong.

And blindingly oblivious to your bullshit.

Perhaps you'd care to provide the entire post of mine, and try to show where I'm incorrect?

No?

We both know why, don't we.

 

[bripat9643]

The Democrats have never changed....champions of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.....always and forever.


Here....let's prove it together.....at an earlier time....

"The night riders move through the darkness, white against the black road....they go about their business, their horsed draped, guns and bullwhips banging dully against saddles.

....this is the South Carolina of the 1870s, not of the turn of a new millennium, and the night riders are the terror of these times. They roam upcountry, visiting their version of justice on poor blacks and the Republicans that support them, refusing to bow to the requirements of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments."
From the novel "The White Road," by John Connolly



Now....let's see if that has changed: the very personification of the current Democrat Party is a man who was elected by the party, twice, and saved from impeachment by the same party.....and has been a racist his entire life:

That's Bill 'the rapist' Clinton.


The Democrats....from alpha to omega...champions of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.....always and forever.



Democrats have been racists even longer than you've been ugly.

Idiot.

It appears Trump won a lot of the same states that Linconln won.

Not so much in the south, west, or northeast.

But in particular -- the racist south. Was a bunch of racist Democrats -- now it's a bunch of racist Republicans. What hasn't changed along the Bible Belt is that it's always been conservative. That's why it's the rightwing clinging desperately to their confederate legacy.

Virginia voted for Hillary. That means she's a racist, right?

Why would that mean she's a racist??

Apparently your theory is that if a former confederate state votes for you then you are a racist.

 

[bripat9643]

Yes, now it's Republican. Have you heard of any burning crosses in the last 40 years? Any lynchings?

Not by Democrats either. Now the right just bitches and moans.



You fuckers make such faithful nazi's, huh?

The right complains about taxes and regulations. The left complains about white people.

So who are the racists?

Idiot.... I'm on the left and I don't complain about anyone because they're white.

Plenty of douche bag Democrats do. They've said white people should be purged from the leadership of the Democrat party. They've said white people should give their houses to black people. They've said all white people are all racists. Yada, yada, yada.

Oh, look, already shifting your position. Need I remind you, you started with, "the left complains about white people."

Spare me, douche bag. I'm not shifting a thing. You said something stupid. Now you're trying to weasel out of it.

 

[Faun]

Not by Democrats either. Now the right just bitches and moans.



You fuckers make such faithful nazi's, huh?

The right complains about taxes and regulations. The left complains about white people.

So who are the racists?

Idiot.... I'm on the left and I don't complain about anyone because they're white.

You're a nobody and a nothing ....and an ugly fool, to boot.


But the Democrat Party made clear their position on skin color:

1. "The Future of the Obama Coalition
By THOMAS B. EDSALL NOVEMBER 27, 2011 11:34 PM November 27, 2011 11:34 pm
For decades, Democrats have suffered continuous and increasingly severe losses among white voters. But preparations by Democratic operatives for the 2012 election make it clear for the first time that the party will explicitly abandon the white working class."
The Future of the Obama Coalition


And...

2. "But preparations by Democratic operatives for the 2012 election make it clear for the first time that the party will explicitly abandon the white working class.

All pretense of trying to win a majority of the white working class has been effectively jettisoned in favor of cementing a center-left coalition made up, on the one hand, of voters who have gotten ahead on the basis of educational attainment — professors, artists, designers, editors, human resources managers, lawyers, librarians, social workers, teachers and therapists — and a second, substantial constituency of lower-income voters who are disproportionately African-American and Hispanic."
The Future of the Obama Coalition


Oh....and I left out the obvious.....you're a liar.

Oh, nooos .... being called a liar by a liar.

Idiot.... he said the left complains about whites. I'm on the left and I don't.

And the opinion piece you posted didn't complain about them either. You're just not smart enough to understand what you posted.

You're claiming some view of yours represents the Democrat and Liberal elites????


OMG!!!


You're the effluvia on the political landscape....akin to something one would scrape off their shoe.

Spits the hag who just idiotically posted the opinion of someone who didn't say the left complains about whites in a failed attempt to show how the left complains about whites.

 

[Syriusly]

Meanwhile- the KKK was founded by Southern White Christian Conservatives

southern democrats....

The very same Democrats who are personified by Bill 'the rapist' Clinton.
'

The very same Republicans who are personified by Donald 'the rapist' Trump

“And isn’t it funny. I’ve got black accountants at Trump Castle and Trump Plaza. Black guys counting my money! I hate it,” O’Donnell recalled Trump saying. “The only kind of people I want counting my money are short guys that wear yarmulkes every day.”

“I think the guy is lazy,” Trump said of a black employee, according to O’Donnell. “And it’s probably not his fault because laziness is a trait in blacks. It really is, I believe that. It’s not anything they can control.”
Trump Condemned Racism As 'Evil.' Here Are 16 Times He Embraced It. | HuffPost

 

[Faun]

Not by Democrats either. Now the right just bitches and moans.



You fuckers make such faithful nazi's, huh?

The right complains about taxes and regulations. The left complains about white people.

So who are the racists?

Idiot.... I'm on the left and I don't complain about anyone because they're white.

Plenty of douche bag Democrats do. They've said white people should be purged from the leadership of the Democrat party. They've said white people should give their houses to black people. They've said all white people are all racists. Yada, yada, yada.

Oh, look, already shifting your position. Need I remind you, you started with, "the left complains about white people."

Spare me, douche bag. I'm not shifting a thing. You said something stupid. Now you're trying to weasel out of it.

Imbecile, you said, "the left complains about white people."

Now you been forced to rephrase that as some Democrats do. Well shit, some conservatives call for the death of Jews.

 

[Pogo]

When the south was Democrat. Now it's Republican.

The Democrats have never changed....champions of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.....always and forever.


Here....let's prove it together.....at an earlier time....

"The night riders move through the darkness, white against the black road....they go about their business, their horsed draped, guns and bullwhips banging dully against saddles.

....this is the South Carolina of the 1870s, not of the turn of a new millennium, and the night riders are the terror of these times. They roam upcountry, visiting their version of justice on poor blacks and the Republicans that support them, refusing to bow to the requirements of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments."
From the novel "The White Road," by John Connolly



Now....let's see if that has changed: the very personification of the current Democrat Party is a man who was elected by the party, twice, and saved from impeachment by the same party.....and has been a racist his entire life:

That's Bill 'the rapist' Clinton.


The Democrats....from alpha to omega...champions of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.....always and forever.



Democrats have been racists even longer than you've been ugly.

Idiot.

It appears Trump won a lot of the same states that Linconln won.

Not so much in the south, west, or northeast.

But in particular -- the racist south. Was a bunch of racist Democrats -- now it's a bunch of racist Republicans. What hasn't changed along the Bible Belt is that it's always been conservative. That's why it's the rightwing clinging desperately to their confederate legacy.

Virginia voted for Hillary. That means she's a racist, right?

Virginia who?

 

[Faun]

Does this mean you're gonna run to mommy again.

Have I ran away yet butt licker?

Dumbfuck .... I didn't say you "ran away."

Is English your second language?

 

[Faun]

Idiot.

It appears Trump won a lot of the same states that Linconln won.

Not so much in the south, west, or northeast.

But in particular -- the racist south. Was a bunch of racist Democrats -- now it's a bunch of racist Republicans. What hasn't changed along the Bible Belt is that it's always been conservative. That's why it's the rightwing clinging desperately to their confederate legacy.

Virginia voted for Hillary. That means she's a racist, right?

Why would that mean she's a racist??

Apparently your theory is that if a former confederate state votes for you then you are a racist.

Nah, apparently, you're an imbecile as I never said that.

 

[Pogo]

You are always hilariously wrong.

And blindingly oblivious to your bullshit

Oh look another troll comes out of the closet...

Again --- it's not necessary to announce you're here. You just post something, and it shows up with your name on it.

Still digging.

 

[Rambunctious]

Dumbfuck .... I didn't say you "ran away."

Is English your second language?

Good I'm glad to see you back down like the coward you are because I didn't run away boot licker...

 

[Rambunctious]

Again --- it's not necessary to announce you're here. You just post something, and it shows up with your name on it.

Still digging.

Oh look and the other troll is back on shift too! gee what a fun night this will be.

 

[Rambunctious]

All three paid trolls here just for me?

 

[Syriusly]

[.More than 80 percent of Republicans in the House and Senate voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965….[The] record on race, of Thurmond the Republican is pretty good. He was among the first of Southern senators to hire blacks for his staff. He supported blacks for judgeships. He voted for extension of the Voting Rights Act.” Jack Kelly.

Both Republicans and Democrats in 1964 and 1965 voted almost entirely along the lines of the Confederacy- every single Southern Republican voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Of course the big change in GOP direction came in 1964 when the Republicans nominated for President one of only 6 non-Southern Senators to vote against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

And then nominated two more candidates who opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act-
Ronald Reagan
George Bush.

Which is why of course Martin Luther King Jr. in 1964 correctly condemned the GOP

Looking at today's GOP- and substituting Trump for Goldwater- and it still fits perfectly.

MLK Jr.:
The Republican Party geared its appeal and program to racism, reaction, and extremism. All people of goodwill viewed with alarm and concern the frenzied wedding at the Cow Palace of the KKK with the radical right. The “best man” at this ceremony was a senator whose voting record, philosophy, and program were anathema to all the hard-won achievements of the past decade.

Senator Goldwater had neither the concern nor the comprehension necessary to grapple with this problem of poverty in the fashion that the historical moment dictated. On the urgent issue of civil rights, Senator Goldwater represented a philosophy that was morally indefensible and socially suicidal. While not himself a racist, Mr. Goldwater articulated a philosophy which gave aid and comfort to the racist. His candidacy and philosophy would serve as an umbrella under which extremists of all stripes would stand. In the light of these facts and because of my love for America, I had no alternative but to urge every Negro and white person of goodwill to vote against Mr. Goldwater and to withdraw support from any Republican candidate that did not publicly disassociate himself from Senator Goldwater and his philosophy.

 

[Rambunctious]

[.More than 80 percent of Republicans in the House and Senate voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965….[The] record on race, of Thurmond the Republican is pretty good. He was among the first of Southern senators to hire blacks for his staff. He supported blacks for judgeships. He voted for extension of the Voting Rights Act.” Jack Kelly.

Both Republicans and Democrats in 1964 and 1965 voted almost entirely along the lines of the Confederacy- every single Southern Republican voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Of course the big change in GOP direction came in 1964 when the Republicans nominated for President one of only 6 non-Southern Senators to vote against the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

And then nominated two more candidates who opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act-
Ronald Reagan
George Bush.

Which is why of course Martin Luther King Jr. in 1964 correctly condemned the GOP

Looking at today's GOP- and substituting Trump for Goldwater- and it still fits perfectly.

MLK Jr.:
The Republican Party geared its appeal and program to racism, reaction, and extremism. All people of goodwill viewed with alarm and concern the frenzied wedding at the Cow Palace of the KKK with the radical right. The “best man” at this ceremony was a senator whose voting record, philosophy, and program were anathema to all the hard-won achievements of the past decade.

Senator Goldwater had neither the concern nor the comprehension necessary to grapple with this problem of poverty in the fashion that the historical moment dictated. On the urgent issue of civil rights, Senator Goldwater represented a philosophy that was morally indefensible and socially suicidal. While not himself a racist, Mr. Goldwater articulated a philosophy which gave aid and comfort to the racist. His candidacy and philosophy would serve as an umbrella under which extremists of all stripes would stand. In the light of these facts and because of my love for America, I had no alternative but to urge every Negro and white person of goodwill to vote against Mr. Goldwater and to withdraw support from any Republican candidate that did not publicly disassociate himself from Senator Goldwater and his philosophy.

Sorry troll won't sell here

 

[bripat9643]

It appears Trump won a lot of the same states that Linconln won.

Not so much in the south, west, or northeast.

But in particular -- the racist south. Was a bunch of racist Democrats -- now it's a bunch of racist Republicans. What hasn't changed along the Bible Belt is that it's always been conservative. That's why it's the rightwing clinging desperately to their confederate legacy.

Virginia voted for Hillary. That means she's a racist, right?

Why would that mean she's a racist??

Apparently your theory is that if a former confederate state votes for you then you are a racist.

Nah, apparently, you're an imbecile as I never said that.

Sure you did. You said Trump was a racist because former Confederate states voted for him. Since one voted for Hillary, according to your logic she must also be a racist. Of course, no one is surprised that now you are trying to weasel out of the implications of your moron theory.

 

[Pogo]

Just came across this on a random scan:

Amazing how Spandex Creatures think they can slip entire fictions through the cracks.

This one won't take but a moment. The fact is the population of Dixiecrats was TWO -- let's count them together....

1. Strom Thurmond, Gov, SC
2. Fielding Wright, Gov, MS

..... Wright, the VP candidate, served out the rest of his term and left politics, returning to law practice.

That's half the list already.

Thurmond did not leave politics. He ran for Senator in 1954 and had to do so as a write-in candidate.
Why? Because the SC Democratic Party had kicked him off the ballot.

Apparently "open arms" can be purty slippery. Like Spandex.

Hey, there's no rule that says the OP has to have a monopoly on lying but this is pretty tame compared to a political convention moved a thousand miles away featuring a dead man. As far as lying games go, Stuporgurl, you gotta --- up yours.

Democrats opposed:

1. The Emancipation Proclamation

2. The 13th Amendment

3. The 14th Amendment

4. The 15th Amendment

5. The Reconstruction Act of 1867

6. The Civil Rights of 1866

7. The Enforcement Act of 1870

8. The Forced Act of 1871

9. The Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871

10. The Civil Rights Act of 1875

11. The Freeman Bureau

12. The Civil Rights Act of 1957

13. The Civil Rights Act of 1960

14. The United State Civil Rights Commission
The Democrat Party VS the Republican Party: Who is the True Champion of the Ending Slavery, the Civil Rights Movement, and the Black Community


The Democrat Party: champions of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.....always and forever.

When the south was Democrat. Now it's Republican.

The Democrats have never changed....champions of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.....always and forever.


Here....let's prove it together.....at an earlier time....

"The night riders move through the darkness, white against the black road....they go about their business, their horsed draped, guns and bullwhips banging dully against saddles.

....this is the South Carolina of the 1870s, not of the turn of a new millennium, and the night riders are the terror of these times. They roam upcountry, visiting their version of justice on poor blacks and the Republicans that support them, refusing to bow to the requirements of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments."
From the novel "The White Road," by John Connolly

Leave it to a brain circulation cut off by Spandex to think she makes a point by quoting a novel.

Still, this particular fiction's scene does cite a genuinely historical entity. "Night riders", also called "Regulators" or "Slave patrols" were operating since at least the eighteenth century, before there was a country and way before there were any political parties. That's a major part of the element that took over the Klan from its original founders. Again, no political party was required to participate in either.

These "night riders", considered a civic duty of the (white) menfolk, operated primarily to hunt down and return runaway slaves -- and when there weren't any to hunt in that area, to ride around intimidating existing slaves as a way of discouraging runaways and insurrections. So while the Klan brought in costumes and a framework of secret rituals, its activities concerning ex-slaves were already long-established practice.

Slave escapes and insurrections quite naturally had been going on since literally the first African slaves were brought to these shores in the 1530s by a Spanish crew. That group of captives escaped and happily were never caught, presumably joining with, and surviving with the aid of, local Native Americans. Other revolts and escapes occurred, naturally, throughout the infamous history of slavery. The "night riders" were the white establishment's remedy for such escapes; a civil 'security' force. And they had nothing to do with politics.

Is the author of the novel 100% correct or not?


Answer, you dunce.

Whelp --- Fingerboy's not responding so I'll answer for him.
The author of the novel's citation of "night riders" is accurate in that they did exist, for centuries. Which, for those of you in the slow-reader section is what I just described.

Novels, however, are what we call "fiction". Inasmuch as fiction is creative storytelling, it cannot be "correct" or "incorrect".

You must find that concept mind-numbingly deep.