Liberals have become so radicalized they have now become what they use to hate

[Pogo]

If you were asking where Bartlett got it, you should have said that. Your post sounds like you're asking or a link to the quote. It still sounds like that. Google before you ask. Then address what you found. Don't waste people's time because you're too lazy to do that. I'm not bickering with you anymore sweetie. Have a good one.

I had already researched the quote before I asked. And none of you pea brains can come up with a source. Bartlett is NOT a source. He is merely being a puppet like Rottweiler.

You are too stupid to even understand what constitutes a sourced quote.

I will give an example...your Churchill quote is a sourced quote. We know when he said it and to whom. It was not a debate on socialism or capitalism, but how to structure England's peacetime military.

It was said on October 22, 1945 during a debate on DEMOBILISATION on the floor of the House of Commons.

As usual, you defeat your own argument. You proclaim that "Bartlett is not a source" (as if you are somehow important enough to decide that for others) - and then you turn around and claim that millbanksystems.com is somehow a "source".

News flash genius, mill fucking banksystems.com is not a source. It is a WordPress (free tool) blog...

Maybe you should have read the whole thing, Buttsoiler...

>> This site has been produced from digitised editions of Commons and Lords Hansard, the Official Report of debates in Parliament. This was part of a project led by the Commons and Lords libraries.

There's the Hansard text itself by volume, Lords sittings, Commons sittings and Westminster Hall sittings as well as Written Answers, Written Statements, Lords reports and Grand Committee reports. This site also includes extracted lists of People who are recorded as having spoken, Constituencies, Offices, Acts, Bills and Divisions.

If you have any questions or comments about this website, please contact [email protected].

Information presented here is generated from the publicly available XML files. The source code used to create this website is available on Github or via the link on the credits page. <<
-- from the site's index page​

 

[P@triot]

I had already researched the quote before I asked. And none of you pea brains can come up with a source. Bartlett is NOT a source. He is merely being a puppet like Rottweiler.

You are too stupid to even understand what constitutes a sourced quote.

I will give an example...your Churchill quote is a sourced quote. We know when he said it and to whom. It was not a debate on socialism or capitalism, but how to structure England's peacetime military.

It was said on October 22, 1945 during a debate on DEMOBILISATION on the floor of the House of Commons.

As usual, you defeat your own argument. You proclaim that "Bartlett is not a source" (as if you are somehow important enough to decide that for others) - and then you turn around and claim that millbanksystems.com is somehow a "source".

News flash genius, mill fucking banksystems.com is not a source. It is a WordPress (free tool) blog...

SO...tell me: When did LBJ say that, and to whom?

Documentation required. Put up or STFU.

You first big-man with the big-mouth! When did Winston Churchill say that and to whom? You can't use an obscure blog asshat - so millbanksystems doesn't count junior. It's almost as big of a joke as you are.

Come on big mouth - show us something. The fact that you had to go to some obscure blog built from the basement of some pimpled-faced liberal's parents shows what a clueless hack you really are.

 

[P@triot]

I tried to listen to it. The dude ( Norton?) has a pretty annoying delivery. I suppose he thinks using that whiny mamby-pamby voice is effective.

I don't see where anyone suggested burning books or even banning them.

I was hoping the audio would present some examples of liberals repressing someone....so I could connect the source with the OP's claims.

The idea that liberals in America are repressing speech is not supported by evidence...and is certainly not substantiated by the audio presented here.

Not sure what Mac was drawn to so deeply in that audio. It sure has his dander up, though.

First you admit you didn't listen to it - then you claim there was (and I quote) "no evidence".

Folks...you can't make this stuff up! Vintage liberal response here...

(Hint - it's FULL of evidence if you actually listen)

No asshole.. I listened to a couple of minutes. It was annoying. The dude was reading an article. I got tired of listening to his whining.

By the way. The term is "used to". Dumbass.

Finally, Norton is not a liberal.

Well, if the left-leaning Jim Norton recognizing how unhinged liberals have become in this country wasn't enough for you, how about the radical progressive Michael Bloomberg?

“Today, on many college campuses, it is liberals trying to repress conservative ideas—even as conservative faculty members are at risk of becoming an endangered species,” Bloomberg said.

According to the Washington Free Beacon, Bloomberg lashed out at liberals, calling some of their actions a form of censorship. He cited a statistic from Harvard that 96 percent of faculty donated to President Obama’s re-election campaign.

“Ninty-six percent,” Bloomberg said, as he was interrupted by applause. “There was more disagreement among the old Soviet Politburo than there was among Ivy League donors.”

He added that they were guilty of "CENSORSHIP" and modern day "MCCARTHYISM".

Michael Bloomberg's Surprise Warning to Liberals

(Since LoneLaugher already admitted he is too lazy and partisan to listen to something, I don't expect him to even watch the CNN video, much less read the article. But for the rest of you...enjoy an unbelievable indictment on liberalism coming from one of the most radical liberals in America).

 

[P@triot]

Remember when Reid and Obama were furious at the idea of the "nuclear option" in the Senate while Republican's were in charge? And then, like good little Communists, they pushed it through to ensure their radical agenda could not be disrupted? Well, now they are doing the same thing with political contributions. While Obama sucked up hundreds of millions from Hollywood liberals, Reid has been sucking up hundreds of millions from Tom Steyer. Just like it was clear they wanted to protect their power with the "nuclear option", it is clear they want to protect their incumbent seats with this bill. Harry Reid is the most despicable, power-hungry, lying liberal that the U.S. ever had the nightmare to have to enure.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has promised the Senate will take up a proposed constitutional amendment this year that would radically alter the First Amendment.

The Senate resolution would allow Congress to limit fundraising and spending on election campaigns and independent political speech. Reid and others insist restricting the amount of money that may be raised and spent on political speech is not the same as limiting speech. That’s like saying that limiting the amount of newsprint a newspaper can buy does not limit its speech.

Harry Reid Attacks Your Free Speech

 

[Pogo]

I had already researched the quote before I asked. And none of you pea brains can come up with a source. Bartlett is NOT a source. He is merely being a puppet like Rottweiler.

You are too stupid to even understand what constitutes a sourced quote.

I will give an example...your Churchill quote is a sourced quote. We know when he said it and to whom. It was not a debate on socialism or capitalism, but how to structure England's peacetime military.

It was said on October 22, 1945 during a debate on DEMOBILISATION on the floor of the House of Commons.

As usual, you defeat your own argument. You proclaim that "Bartlett is not a source" (as if you are somehow important enough to decide that for others) - and then you turn around and claim that millbanksystems.com is somehow a "source".

News flash genius, mill fucking banksystems.com is not a source. It is a WordPress (free tool) blog...

SO...tell me: When did LBJ say that, and to whom?

Documentation required. Put up or STFU.

???

 

[Bfgrn]

As usual, you defeat your own argument. You proclaim that "Bartlett is not a source" (as if you are somehow important enough to decide that for others) - and then you turn around and claim that millbanksystems.com is somehow a "source".

News flash genius, mill fucking banksystems.com is not a source. It is a WordPress (free tool) blog...

SO...tell me: When did LBJ say that, and to whom?

Documentation required. Put up or STFU.

You first big-man with the big-mouth! When did Winston Churchill say that and to whom? You can't use an obscure blog asshat - so millbanksystems doesn't count junior. It's almost as big of a joke as you are.

Come on big mouth - show us something. The fact that you had to go to some obscure blog built from the basement of some pimpled-faced liberal's parents shows what a clueless hack you really are.

HANSARD 1803-2005

This site has been produced from digitised editions of Commons and Lords Hansard, the Official Report of debates in Parliament. This was part of a project led by the Commons and Lords libraries.

There's the Hansard text itself by volume, Lords sittings, Commons sittings and Westminster Hall sittings as well as Written Answers, Written Statements, Lords reports and Grand Committee reports. This site also includes extracted lists of People who are recorded as having spoken, Constituencies, Offices, Acts, Bills and Divisions.

If you have any questions or comments about this website, please contact [email protected].

Information presented here is generated from the publicly available XML files. The source code used to create this website is available on Github or via the link on the credits page.

Material on this site remains under Parliamentary Copyright.

 

[Pogo]

Stop it you meanie. You're making Buttsoiler cry.