Libs: If Trump talk owns these violent clashes; Then YOUR side owns dead cops.

[tigerred59]

Sure I did, I see you don't like cops, can't denounce blm

No, you didn't. There's no way a rational person could read this:

"We have MORE cops now than we did 30 years ago, but numbers of deaths of police in the line of duty near a 30 year low. That means that the risk to an individual officer today is lower than it was 30 years ago."

....And call it anti-cop. You didn't read a thing you replied to. Take your beta-blockers, sit on your hemorrhoid donut and break out your reading glasses.

Then try again. This time reading for comprehension.

I see again all you care about is totals and not the life. You fail. Denounce BLM or again you don't care about a cop life

While your touting all these damn charts and numbers, fool....make sure you highlight the fact....ITS WHITE PEOPLE KILLING COPS THE MOST...ITS YOU NUTS, NOT MINORITIES.

BLM violence against cops annunciated loud and clear. Shameful

Perhaps it is shameful. but understandable. It is also irrelevant in regards to Tigerred's premise.

The only reason I am dismissing the cops being killed by liberal rhetoric, is because BLM is not about killing cops, its about cops killing blacks and for that person to counter with cops being killed as a defense.....showing him who's doing the killings, makes my point. Violence against cops is a white thang...they don't like it, than damit stop!! But do not dismiss our plight as fodder for their inability to refrain from violence against cops.

 

[jc456]

What the heck do you expect people to do when it seems cops are out of control and trigger happy? Are the victims of unjustified cop shootings and their supporters supposed to just shut up and let it ride? It isn't "rhetoric" that's getting cops killed. BTW:

Since hitting a peak in the early 1970s with 280 deaths, the number of officer fatalities in the U.S. has been falling. Of the gunfire that killed officers in 2015, the NLEOMF says those 42 deaths "are 26 percent lower than the average of 57 per year for the decade spanning 2000-2009."

Number Of Police Officers Killed By Gunfire Fell 14 Percent In 2015, Study Says

When the number goes over 300 per year, you might have a point...now....you don't!

No, you don't. You are guilty of quote mining. How many lives were saved by better training, tactics and vests? You don't say. I have no problem with cops, like most people. Are you too stupid to understand why that might be?

Liberals refuse to accept responsibility for ANYTHING. It's always somebody else's fault. You go to a rally to stir up shit and cry foul if you get socked. Not long ago everyone would have laughed at such stupidity.

Quote mining?Heh heh heh...On a message board that is quite common I suppose. Looks like I struck gold!

1. We can go on forever speculating about cop's lives being saved by vests and tactics while ignoring the real issue that a lot of bigoted, corrupt cops are causing good cops to be stereotyped along with them. You seem to be too stupid to understand that vests, better training and tactics mean very little to a sniper with a scope training his weapon on a cop issuing a ticket or investigating a traffic accident. If there was a war on cops, the body count would be significantly higher.

2. That catchall moniker, "liberal," is overused and inappropriate. To you anyone who does something you don;t agree with is a "liberal." I doubt if any of the GOP establishment diehards who don't like Trump would
concur with your tunnel vision. Be that as it may, I do feel that attending a Trump rally to disrupt it is not something I would recommend. Those who do so may be among the bravest people I have seen or the most foolhardy. Nevertheless, those patriots bring the dark side of Trump mania to light. The response to them by Trump or his supporters is recorded by the unblinking eye of the camera for all the world to see. Trump's groupies drew first blood. That swooshing sound you hear is not just idle gusts of wind; it is the sound of people withdrawing their votes for a man who cannot handle criticism or opposition well.

Lots of fluff and puff not no real substance there. How many cops have been killed by snipers? That's important to back up if it's a valid point. Yes, you figures ignore every other possible factor. There are nearly a million cops having regular encounters with street tards yet we only see a few, and they get recycled often and freely.

Libs are libs, I'm not sure why you want to run away from it. But going to any rally to stir up shit is only a good idea if you want the ass whooping. And some people do. Imagine the victimhood! He can pass his bloody hankie around the quivering mass of libs in solidarity. It's a bonding experience they will remember long after they've grown up.

You missed my point completely. Any would be=cop hunter would be savvy enough to know that most of them wear bullet proof vests. They aren't going to engage a cop directly just because of that fact... They know their best chance of success would be a head shot or ambush. There have been some of those reported and they have all been successful as far as I know. Still, those are rare occurrences having no reoccurring pattern.


You are rambling and illogical. Any rally held in a public place cannot be shielded from opposition.I agree that disruptions are inherently wrong and anyone engaging in them should be escorted off the premises if all he/she does is vocalize their grievances and aren't violent , no one should lay a hand on them except the cops escorting them out. When anyone strikes someone just for speaking up to protest a statement uttered by a candidate, that is assault.

And most cops killed in this country are killed by white southern men, that is a fact that can not be disputed nor denied.

And yet they don't threaten them

 

[jc456]

No, you didn't. There's no way a rational person could read this:

"We have MORE cops now than we did 30 years ago, but numbers of deaths of police in the line of duty near a 30 year low. That means that the risk to an individual officer today is lower than it was 30 years ago."

....And call it anti-cop. You didn't read a thing you replied to. Take your beta-blockers, sit on your hemorrhoid donut and break out your reading glasses.

Then try again. This time reading for comprehension.

I see again all you care about is totals and not the life. You fail. Denounce BLM or again you don't care about a cop life

While your touting all these damn charts and numbers, fool....make sure you highlight the fact....ITS WHITE PEOPLE KILLING COPS THE MOST...ITS YOU NUTS, NOT MINORITIES.

BLM violence against cops annunciated loud and clear. Shameful

Perhaps it is shameful. but understandable. It is also irrelevant in regards to Tigerred's premise.

The only reason I am dismissing the cops being killed by liberal rhetoric, is because BLM is not about killing cops, its about cops killing blacks and for that person to counter with cops being killed as a defense.....showing him who's doing the killings, makes my point. Violence against cops is a white thang...they don't like it, than damit stop!! But do not dismiss our plight as fodder for their inability to refrain from violence against cops.

Naw, BLM killing cops

 

[tigerred59]

I see again all you care about is totals and not the life. You fail. Denounce BLM or again you don't care about a cop life

While your touting all these damn charts and numbers, fool....make sure you highlight the fact....ITS WHITE PEOPLE KILLING COPS THE MOST...ITS YOU NUTS, NOT MINORITIES.

BLM violence against cops annunciated loud and clear. Shameful

Perhaps it is shameful. but understandable. It is also irrelevant in regards to Tigerred's premise.

The only reason I am dismissing the cops being killed by liberal rhetoric, is because BLM is not about killing cops, its about cops killing blacks and for that person to counter with cops being killed as a defense.....showing him who's doing the killings, makes my point. Violence against cops is a white thang...they don't like it, than damit stop!! But do not dismiss our plight as fodder for their inability to refrain from violence against cops.

Naw, BLM killing cops

Just how are they achieving the feat? Because a unarmed buck naked black man with a priest hat on, will proboally end up dead, just looking at a cop, so do tell how they're doing this and oh, by the, its you hicks killing these cop hicks, not us

 

[jc456]

While your touting all these damn charts and numbers, fool....make sure you highlight the fact....ITS WHITE PEOPLE KILLING COPS THE MOST...ITS YOU NUTS, NOT MINORITIES.

BLM violence against cops annunciated loud and clear. Shameful

Perhaps it is shameful. but understandable. It is also irrelevant in regards to Tigerred's premise.

The only reason I am dismissing the cops being killed by liberal rhetoric, is because BLM is not about killing cops, its about cops killing blacks and for that person to counter with cops being killed as a defense.....showing him who's doing the killings, makes my point. Violence against cops is a white thang...they don't like it, than damit stop!! But do not dismiss our plight as fodder for their inability to refrain from violence against cops.

Naw, BLM killing cops

Just how are they achieving the feat? Because a unarmed buck naked black man with a priest hat on, will proboally end up dead, just looking at a cop, so do tell how they're doing this and oh, by the, its you hicks killing these cop hicks, not us

BLM called for violence against cops

 

[HenryBHough]

Police tend to belong to unions.
Unions tend to support Democrats.
Democrats tend to wish violence, even death, on police.
Problem is not that...rather that too many police haven't worked out the connection and quit paying dues that go toward stuff that endangers them.
It would be wrong for The Democrat Party to think all police are stupid though I will concede the majority seem a little slow in picking up on the connection.

 

[Skylar]

Police tend to belong to unions.

True.

Unions tend to support Democrats.

True.

Democrats tend to wish violence, even death, on police.

Gibberish.

 

[Ame®icano]

He was sucker punched from his right. Just like the pussies that Trump supporters are. Even the video shows the guy punched him you moron.

I'm glad to see that "knockout game" is not reserved exclusively for blacks.

IMO, he was begging for it.

 

[Ame®icano]

When the spitting protester is HIV positive - as so many likely are - then should they not be charged with attempted murder for their actions?

That's exactly right.

Protestors in the designated protest area....usually with a nice buffer zone for safety....should never be harmed.

Protestors who jump in my face yelling 2 inches away and shoving a sign in my face?? Might get their teeth rearranged. Depends on my mood.

WTF is "protester designated area"?

People paid tickets to the event, which was closed to those who didn't have tickets.

I guess next thing lefties will claim that, protesters' rights to get inside, jump on the podium, destroy Trump signs, and scream "fuck Trump" into a camera, are being violated.

 

[JQPublic1]

What the heck do you expect people to do when it seems cops are out of control and trigger happy? Are the victims of unjustified cop shootings and their supporters supposed to just shut up and let it ride? It isn't "rhetoric" that's getting cops killed. BTW:

Since hitting a peak in the early 1970s with 280 deaths, the number of officer fatalities in the U.S. has been falling. Of the gunfire that killed officers in 2015, the NLEOMF says those 42 deaths "are 26 percent lower than the average of 57 per year for the decade spanning 2000-2009."

Number Of Police Officers Killed By Gunfire Fell 14 Percent In 2015, Study Says

When the number goes over 300 per year, you might have a point...now....you don't!

No, you don't. You are guilty of quote mining. How many lives were saved by better training, tactics and vests? You don't say. I have no problem with cops, like most people. Are you too stupid to understand why that might be?

Liberals refuse to accept responsibility for ANYTHING. It's always somebody else's fault. You go to a rally to stir up shit and cry foul if you get socked. Not long ago everyone would have laughed at such stupidity.

Quote mining?Heh heh heh...On a message board that is quite common I suppose. Looks like I struck gold!

1. We can go on forever speculating about cop's lives being saved by vests and tactics while ignoring the real issue that a lot of bigoted, corrupt cops are causing good cops to be stereotyped along with them. You seem to be too stupid to understand that vests, better training and tactics mean very little to a sniper with a scope training his weapon on a cop issuing a ticket or investigating a traffic accident. If there was a war on cops, the body count would be significantly higher.

2. That catchall moniker, "liberal," is overused and inappropriate. To you anyone who does something you don;t agree with is a "liberal." I doubt if any of the GOP establishment diehards who don't like Trump would
concur with your tunnel vision. Be that as it may, I do feel that attending a Trump rally to disrupt it is not something I would recommend. Those who do so may be among the bravest people I have seen or the most foolhardy. Nevertheless, those patriots bring the dark side of Trump mania to light. The response to them by Trump or his supporters is recorded by the unblinking eye of the camera for all the world to see. Trump's groupies drew first blood. That swooshing sound you hear is not just idle gusts of wind; it is the sound of people withdrawing their votes for a man who cannot handle criticism or opposition well.

Lots of fluff and puff not no real substance there. How many cops have been killed by snipers? That's important to back up if it's a valid point. Yes, you figures ignore every other possible factor. There are nearly a million cops having regular encounters with street tards yet we only see a few, and they get recycled often and freely.

Libs are libs, I'm not sure why you want to run away from it. But going to any rally to stir up shit is only a good idea if you want the ass whooping. And some people do. Imagine the victimhood! He can pass his bloody hankie around the quivering mass of libs in solidarity. It's a bonding experience they will remember long after they've grown up.

You missed my point completely. Any would be=cop hunter would be savvy enough to know that most of them wear bullet proof vests. They aren't going to engage a cop directly just because of that fact... They know their best chance of success would be a head shot or ambush. There have been some of those reported and they have all been successful as far as I know. Still, those are rare occurrences having no reoccurring pattern.


You are rambling and illogical. Any rally held in a public place cannot be shielded from opposition.I agree that disruptions are inherently wrong and anyone engaging in them should be escorted off the premises if all he/she does is vocalize their grievances and aren't violent , no one should lay a hand on them except the cops escorting them out. When anyone strikes someone just for speaking up to protest a statement uttered by a candidate, that is assault.

Hr347 look it up jack

I already know that disrupting government events in restricted areas and on public property can end in an arrest for the perpetrators by the Secret Service. That law won't prevent people from attempting to disrupt rallies.

So let the Secret Service handle it. The law doesn't give Trump supporters or civilian authorities the right to do anything but get but of the way when the SS goes after a detractor.

 

[JQPublic1]

BLM violence against cops annunciated loud and clear. Shameful

Perhaps it is shameful. but understandable. It is also irrelevant in regards to Tigerred's premise.

The only reason I am dismissing the cops being killed by liberal rhetoric, is because BLM is not about killing cops, its about cops killing blacks and for that person to counter with cops being killed as a defense.....showing him who's doing the killings, makes my point. Violence against cops is a white thang...they don't like it, than damit stop!! But do not dismiss our plight as fodder for their inability to refrain from violence against cops.

Naw, BLM killing cops

Just how are they achieving the feat? Because a unarmed buck naked black man with a priest hat on, will proboally end up dead, just looking at a cop, so do tell how they're doing this and oh, by the, its you hicks killing these cop hicks, not us

BLM called for violence against cops

Are you insinuating that any hate of cops demonstrated by BLM is groundless. For those who have lost loved ones unjustifiably at the hands of a cop, I can not condemn them for it/ Many White people see Blacks as a monolithic threat out to "get over on Whitey!" Many Black people see cops the same way...as shock troops defending White society against THEM. Why would you expect them to LOVE a para,military force that reflects the same hateful attitudes towards them mirrored by the dominant society? Actually, I am surprised Blacks haven't been more militant iin the face of such pervasive bigotry and wanton murder of their people. Maybe the liberals served as a buffer and gave them hope of a better life here...eventually... If that is TRUE, you had better pray they stay on your imagined Democrat Plantation!

 

[JQPublic1]

Police tend to belong to unions.
Unions tend to support Democrats.
Democrats tend to wish violence, even death, on police.
Problem is not that...rather that too many police haven't worked out the connection and quit paying dues that go toward stuff that endangers them.
It would be wrong for The Democrat Party to think all police are stupid though I will concede the majority seem a little slow in picking up on the connection.

Not all Democrats support liberal agendas. Most middle class Democrats are surprisingly conservative. Conversely, Not all Republicans support conservative agendas sheepishly. Smart People have their own opinions about certain issues regardless of party affiliation and sometimes vote accordingly.... Just ask Justice Roberts!

 

[Iceweasel]

No, you don't. You are guilty of quote mining. How many lives were saved by better training, tactics and vests? You don't say. I have no problem with cops, like most people. Are you too stupid to understand why that might be?

Liberals refuse to accept responsibility for ANYTHING. It's always somebody else's fault. You go to a rally to stir up shit and cry foul if you get socked. Not long ago everyone would have laughed at such stupidity.

Quote mining?Heh heh heh...On a message board that is quite common I suppose. Looks like I struck gold!

1. We can go on forever speculating about cop's lives being saved by vests and tactics while ignoring the real issue that a lot of bigoted, corrupt cops are causing good cops to be stereotyped along with them. You seem to be too stupid to understand that vests, better training and tactics mean very little to a sniper with a scope training his weapon on a cop issuing a ticket or investigating a traffic accident. If there was a war on cops, the body count would be significantly higher.

2. That catchall moniker, "liberal," is overused and inappropriate. To you anyone who does something you don;t agree with is a "liberal." I doubt if any of the GOP establishment diehards who don't like Trump would
concur with your tunnel vision. Be that as it may, I do feel that attending a Trump rally to disrupt it is not something I would recommend. Those who do so may be among the bravest people I have seen or the most foolhardy. Nevertheless, those patriots bring the dark side of Trump mania to light. The response to them by Trump or his supporters is recorded by the unblinking eye of the camera for all the world to see. Trump's groupies drew first blood. That swooshing sound you hear is not just idle gusts of wind; it is the sound of people withdrawing their votes for a man who cannot handle criticism or opposition well.

Lots of fluff and puff not no real substance there. How many cops have been killed by snipers? That's important to back up if it's a valid point. Yes, you figures ignore every other possible factor. There are nearly a million cops having regular encounters with street tards yet we only see a few, and they get recycled often and freely.

Libs are libs, I'm not sure why you want to run away from it. But going to any rally to stir up shit is only a good idea if you want the ass whooping. And some people do. Imagine the victimhood! He can pass his bloody hankie around the quivering mass of libs in solidarity. It's a bonding experience they will remember long after they've grown up.

You missed my point completely. Any would be=cop hunter would be savvy enough to know that most of them wear bullet proof vests. They aren't going to engage a cop directly just because of that fact... They know their best chance of success would be a head shot or ambush. There have been some of those reported and they have all been successful as far as I know. Still, those are rare occurrences having no reoccurring pattern.


You are rambling and illogical. Any rally held in a public place cannot be shielded from opposition.I agree that disruptions are inherently wrong and anyone engaging in them should be escorted off the premises if all he/she does is vocalize their grievances and aren't violent , no one should lay a hand on them except the cops escorting them out. When anyone strikes someone just for speaking up to protest a statement uttered by a candidate, that is assault.

Hr347 look it up jack

I already know that disrupting government events in restricted areas and on public property can end in an arrest for the perpetrators by the Secret Service. That law won't prevent people from attempting to disrupt rallies.

So let the Secret Service handle it. The law doesn't give Trump supporters or civilian authorities the right to do anything but get but of the way when the SS goes after a detractor.

Wrong. You can't shut down someone else's free speech and you can't take over a private event. You're a liar.

 

[Iceweasel]

And most cops killed in this country are killed by white southern men, that is a fact that can not be disputed nor denied.

What's your source? Your ass doesn't count.

 

[Iceweasel]

They cant. I agree....some of Trump's rhetoric has caused some pushing and shoving. Even...GASP....a sucker punch.

The lefts rhetoric is resulting in dozens of dead cops. Hundreds shot who survived. Countless assaulted.

What the heck do you expect people to do when it seems cops are out of control and trigger happy? Are the victims of unjustified cop shootings and their supporters supposed to just shut up and let it ride? It isn't "rhetoric" that's getting cops killed. BTW:

Since hitting a peak in the early 1970s with 280 deaths, the number of officer fatalities in the U.S. has been falling. Of the gunfire that killed officers in 2015, the NLEOMF says those 42 deaths "are 26 percent lower than the average of 57 per year for the decade spanning 2000-2009."

Number Of Police Officers Killed By Gunfire Fell 14 Percent In 2015, Study Says

When the number goes over 300 per year, you might have a point...now....you don't!

No, you don't. You are guilty of quote mining. How many lives were saved by better training, tactics and vests? You don't say. I have no problem with cops, like most people. Are you too stupid to understand why that might be?

Liberals refuse to accept responsibility for ANYTHING. It's always somebody else's fault. You go to a rally to stir up shit and cry foul if you get socked. Not long ago everyone would have laughed at such stupidity.

Quote mining?Heh heh heh...On a message board that is quite common I suppose. Looks like I struck gold!

1. We can go on forever speculating about cop's lives being saved by vests and tactics while ignoring the real issue that a lot of bigoted, corrupt cops are causing good cops to be stereotyped along with them. You seem to be too stupid to understand that vests, better training and tactics mean very little to a sniper with a scope training his weapon on a cop issuing a ticket or investigating a traffic accident. If there was a war on cops, the body count would be significantly higher.

2. That catchall moniker, "liberal," is overused and inappropriate. To you anyone who does something you don;t agree with is a "liberal." I doubt if any of the GOP establishment diehards who don't like Trump would
concur with your tunnel vision. Be that as it may, I do feel that attending a Trump rally to disrupt it is not something I would recommend. Those who do so may be among the bravest people I have seen or the most foolhardy. Nevertheless, those patriots bring the dark side of Trump mania to light. The response to them by Trump or his supporters is recorded by the unblinking eye of the camera for all the world to see. Trump's groupies drew first blood. That swooshing sound you hear is not just idle gusts of wind; it is the sound of people withdrawing their votes for a man who cannot handle criticism or opposition well.

Lots of fluff and puff not no real substance there. How many cops have been killed by snipers? That's important to back up if it's a valid point. Yes, you figures ignore every other possible factor. There are nearly a million cops having regular encounters with street tards yet we only see a few, and they get recycled often and freely.

Libs are libs, I'm not sure why you want to run away from it. But going to any rally to stir up shit is only a good idea if you want the ass whooping. And some people do. Imagine the victimhood! He can pass his bloody hankie around the quivering mass of libs in solidarity. It's a bonding experience they will remember long after they've grown up.

You missed my point completely. Any would be=cop hunter would be savvy enough to know that most of them wear bullet proof vests. They aren't going to engage a cop directly just because of that fact... They know their best chance of success would be a head shot or ambush. There have been some of those reported and they have all been successful as far as I know. Still, those are rare occurrences having no reoccurring pattern.


You are rambling and illogical. Any rally held in a public place cannot be shielded from opposition.I agree that disruptions are inherently wrong and anyone engaging in them should be escorted off the premises if all he/she does is vocalize their grievances and aren't violent , no one should lay a hand on them except the cops escorting them out. When anyone strikes someone just for speaking up to protest a statement uttered by a candidate, that is assault.

I addressed your point, the words are still there. You pulled out figures with total disregard to anything except what you tried to spin. Lots of factors are to be considered in lower cop deaths and it isn't due to a more peaceful malcontent.

I'm rambling and illogical when I say you don't have the right to shut down someone else's speech? You proved you are a dumb asshole.

 

[jc456]

Perhaps it is shameful. but understandable. It is also irrelevant in regards to Tigerred's premise.

The only reason I am dismissing the cops being killed by liberal rhetoric, is because BLM is not about killing cops, its about cops killing blacks and for that person to counter with cops being killed as a defense.....showing him who's doing the killings, makes my point. Violence against cops is a white thang...they don't like it, than damit stop!! But do not dismiss our plight as fodder for their inability to refrain from violence against cops.

Naw, BLM killing cops

Just how are they achieving the feat? Because a unarmed buck naked black man with a priest hat on, will proboally end up dead, just looking at a cop, so do tell how they're doing this and oh, by the, its you hicks killing these cop hicks, not us

BLM called for violence against cops

Are you insinuating that any hate of cops demonstrated by BLM is groundless. For those who have lost loved ones unjustifiably at the hands of a cop, I can not condemn them for it/ Many White people see Blacks as a monolithic threat out to "get over on Whitey!" Many Black people see cops the same way...as shock troops defending White society against THEM. Why would you expect them to LOVE a para,military force that reflects the same hateful attitudes towards them mirrored by the dominant society? Actually, I am surprised Blacks haven't been more militant iin the face of such pervasive bigotry and wanton murder of their people. Maybe the liberals served as a buffer and gave them hope of a better life here...eventually... If that is TRUE, you had better pray they stay on your imagined Democrat Plantation!

yes I am. someone posted up the number of cops and those numbers and the numbers in question are well under .05% of the men in blue. And to threaten violence is disgusting and unamerican.

Well, we just had a new one this week in Chicago, some ham radio fool made a racist comment over the cops two way radio frequencies and yep, here come the BLM members looking for heads. Anyone, ANYONE who believes that a cop over an open airwaves would make such a comment is in la la land. Yet these fools get on TV cause the media outlets are bought out by those who support the BLM. Fk em all. I hate obvious set ups. Anyone thinking anything less is pure stupid and delusional. So go with your delusion.

 

[JQPublic1]

Quote mining?Heh heh heh...On a message board that is quite common I suppose. Looks like I struck gold!

1. We can go on forever speculating about cop's lives being saved by vests and tactics while ignoring the real issue that a lot of bigoted, corrupt cops are causing good cops to be stereotyped along with them. You seem to be too stupid to understand that vests, better training and tactics mean very little to a sniper with a scope training his weapon on a cop issuing a ticket or investigating a traffic accident. If there was a war on cops, the body count would be significantly higher.

2. That catchall moniker, "liberal," is overused and inappropriate. To you anyone who does something you don;t agree with is a "liberal." I doubt if any of the GOP establishment diehards who don't like Trump would
concur with your tunnel vision. Be that as it may, I do feel that attending a Trump rally to disrupt it is not something I would recommend. Those who do so may be among the bravest people I have seen or the most foolhardy. Nevertheless, those patriots bring the dark side of Trump mania to light. The response to them by Trump or his supporters is recorded by the unblinking eye of the camera for all the world to see. Trump's groupies drew first blood. That swooshing sound you hear is not just idle gusts of wind; it is the sound of people withdrawing their votes for a man who cannot handle criticism or opposition well.

Lots of fluff and puff not no real substance there. How many cops have been killed by snipers? That's important to back up if it's a valid point. Yes, you figures ignore every other possible factor. There are nearly a million cops having regular encounters with street tards yet we only see a few, and they get recycled often and freely.

Libs are libs, I'm not sure why you want to run away from it. But going to any rally to stir up shit is only a good idea if you want the ass whooping. And some people do. Imagine the victimhood! He can pass his bloody hankie around the quivering mass of libs in solidarity. It's a bonding experience they will remember long after they've grown up.

You missed my point completely. Any would be=cop hunter would be savvy enough to know that most of them wear bullet proof vests. They aren't going to engage a cop directly just because of that fact... They know their best chance of success would be a head shot or ambush. There have been some of those reported and they have all been successful as far as I know. Still, those are rare occurrences having no reoccurring pattern.


You are rambling and illogical. Any rally held in a public place cannot be shielded from opposition.I agree that disruptions are inherently wrong and anyone engaging in them should be escorted off the premises if all he/she does is vocalize their grievances and aren't violent , no one should lay a hand on them except the cops escorting them out. When anyone strikes someone just for speaking up to protest a statement uttered by a candidate, that is assault.

Hr347 look it up jack

I already know that disrupting government events in restricted areas and on public property can end in an arrest for the perpetrators by the Secret Service. That law won't prevent people from attempting to disrupt rallies.

So let the Secret Service handle it. The law doesn't give Trump supporters or civilian authorities the right to do anything but get but of the way when the SS goes after a detractor.

Wrong. You can't shut down someone else's free speech and you can't take over a private event. You're a liar.

Are you so stupid or drunk? whichever the case, your reading incomprehension is causing you to look like a damn fool. In the post you are responding too I said nothing even close to what you are accusing me of. You seem to agree with me that disrupting a rally has consequences then you call me a liar without any apparent reason. I suggest you read the entire post before you call someone a liar, fool. Your apology is accepted in advance.

 

[JQPublic1]

The only reason I am dismissing the cops being killed by liberal rhetoric, is because BLM is not about killing cops, its about cops killing blacks and for that person to counter with cops being killed as a defense.....showing him who's doing the killings, makes my point. Violence against cops is a white thang...they don't like it, than damit stop!! But do not dismiss our plight as fodder for their inability to refrain from violence against cops.

Naw, BLM killing cops

Just how are they achieving the feat? Because a unarmed buck naked black man with a priest hat on, will proboally end up dead, just looking at a cop, so do tell how they're doing this and oh, by the, its you hicks killing these cop hicks, not us

BLM called for violence against cops

Are you insinuating that any hate of cops demonstrated by BLM is groundless. For those who have lost loved ones unjustifiably at the hands of a cop, I can not condemn them for it/ Many White people see Blacks as a monolithic threat out to "get over on Whitey!" Many Black people see cops the same way...as shock troops defending White society against THEM. Why would you expect them to LOVE a para,military force that reflects the same hateful attitudes towards them mirrored by the dominant society? Actually, I am surprised Blacks haven't been more militant iin the face of such pervasive bigotry and wanton murder of their people. Maybe the liberals served as a buffer and gave them hope of a better life here...eventually... If that is TRUE, you had better pray they stay on your imagined Democrat Plantation!

yes I am. someone posted up the number of cops and those numbers and the numbers in question are well under .05% of the men in blue. And to threaten violence is disgusting and unamerican.

Well, we just had a new one this week in Chicago, some ham radio fool made a racist comment over the cops two way radio frequencies and yep, here come the BLM members looking for heads. Anyone, ANYONE who believes that a cop over an open airwaves would make such a comment is in la la land. Yet these fools get on TV cause the media outlets are bought out by those who support the BLM. Fk em all. I hate obvious set ups. Anyone thinking anything less is pure stupid and delusional. So go with your delusion.

Your anecdote is noteworthy but is hardly credible. Got anymore fairy tales?

 

[Iceweasel]

Lots of fluff and puff not no real substance there. How many cops have been killed by snipers? That's important to back up if it's a valid point. Yes, you figures ignore every other possible factor. There are nearly a million cops having regular encounters with street tards yet we only see a few, and they get recycled often and freely.

Libs are libs, I'm not sure why you want to run away from it. But going to any rally to stir up shit is only a good idea if you want the ass whooping. And some people do. Imagine the victimhood! He can pass his bloody hankie around the quivering mass of libs in solidarity. It's a bonding experience they will remember long after they've grown up.

You missed my point completely. Any would be=cop hunter would be savvy enough to know that most of them wear bullet proof vests. They aren't going to engage a cop directly just because of that fact... They know their best chance of success would be a head shot or ambush. There have been some of those reported and they have all been successful as far as I know. Still, those are rare occurrences having no reoccurring pattern.


You are rambling and illogical. Any rally held in a public place cannot be shielded from opposition.I agree that disruptions are inherently wrong and anyone engaging in them should be escorted off the premises if all he/she does is vocalize their grievances and aren't violent , no one should lay a hand on them except the cops escorting them out. When anyone strikes someone just for speaking up to protest a statement uttered by a candidate, that is assault.

Hr347 look it up jack

I already know that disrupting government events in restricted areas and on public property can end in an arrest for the perpetrators by the Secret Service. That law won't prevent people from attempting to disrupt rallies.

So let the Secret Service handle it. The law doesn't give Trump supporters or civilian authorities the right to do anything but get but of the way when the SS goes after a detractor.

Wrong. You can't shut down someone else's free speech and you can't take over a private event. You're a liar.

Are you so stupid or drunk? whichever the case, your reading incomprehension is causing you to look like a damn fool. In the post you are responding too I said nothing even close to what you are accusing me of. You seem to agree with me that disrupting a rally has consequences then you call me a liar without any apparent reason. I suggest you read the entire post before you call someone a liar, fool. Your apology is accepted in advance.

Hey you puss filled anus, you said "Any rally held in a public place cannot be shielded from opposition."

That's a lie. It's wrong. I disagreed and said why, the words are still there. For you to try to smear your diseased ass on me isn't going work, genius. Fuck off.

 

[JQPublic1]

What the heck do you expect people to do when it seems cops are out of control and trigger happy? Are the victims of unjustified cop shootings and their supporters supposed to just shut up and let it ride? It isn't "rhetoric" that's getting cops killed. BTW:

Since hitting a peak in the early 1970s with 280 deaths, the number of officer fatalities in the U.S. has been falling. Of the gunfire that killed officers in 2015, the NLEOMF says those 42 deaths "are 26 percent lower than the average of 57 per year for the decade spanning 2000-2009."

Number Of Police Officers Killed By Gunfire Fell 14 Percent In 2015, Study Says

When the number goes over 300 per year, you might have a point...now....you don't!

No, you don't. You are guilty of quote mining. How many lives were saved by better training, tactics and vests? You don't say. I have no problem with cops, like most people. Are you too stupid to understand why that might be?

Liberals refuse to accept responsibility for ANYTHING. It's always somebody else's fault. You go to a rally to stir up shit and cry foul if you get socked. Not long ago everyone would have laughed at such stupidity.

Quote mining?Heh heh heh...On a message board that is quite common I suppose. Looks like I struck gold!

1. We can go on forever speculating about cop's lives being saved by vests and tactics while ignoring the real issue that a lot of bigoted, corrupt cops are causing good cops to be stereotyped along with them. You seem to be too stupid to understand that vests, better training and tactics mean very little to a sniper with a scope training his weapon on a cop issuing a ticket or investigating a traffic accident. If there was a war on cops, the body count would be significantly higher.

2. That catchall moniker, "liberal," is overused and inappropriate. To you anyone who does something you don;t agree with is a "liberal." I doubt if any of the GOP establishment diehards who don't like Trump would
concur with your tunnel vision. Be that as it may, I do feel that attending a Trump rally to disrupt it is not something I would recommend. Those who do so may be among the bravest people I have seen or the most foolhardy. Nevertheless, those patriots bring the dark side of Trump mania to light. The response to them by Trump or his supporters is recorded by the unblinking eye of the camera for all the world to see. Trump's groupies drew first blood. That swooshing sound you hear is not just idle gusts of wind; it is the sound of people withdrawing their votes for a man who cannot handle criticism or opposition well.

Lots of fluff and puff not no real substance there. How many cops have been killed by snipers? That's important to back up if it's a valid point. Yes, you figures ignore every other possible factor. There are nearly a million cops having regular encounters with street tards yet we only see a few, and they get recycled often and freely.

Libs are libs, I'm not sure why you want to run away from it. But going to any rally to stir up shit is only a good idea if you want the ass whooping. And some people do. Imagine the victimhood! He can pass his bloody hankie around the quivering mass of libs in solidarity. It's a bonding experience they will remember long after they've grown up.

You missed my point completely. Any would be=cop hunter would be savvy enough to know that most of them wear bullet proof vests. They aren't going to engage a cop directly just because of that fact... They know their best chance of success would be a head shot or ambush. There have been some of those reported and they have all been successful as far as I know. Still, those are rare occurrences having no reoccurring pattern.


You are rambling and illogical. Any rally held in a public place cannot be shielded from opposition.I agree that disruptions are inherently wrong and anyone engaging in them should be escorted off the premises if all he/she does is vocalize their grievances and aren't violent , no one should lay a hand on them except the cops escorting them out. When anyone strikes someone just for speaking up to protest a statement uttered by a candidate, that is assault.

I addressed your point, the words are still there. You pulled out figures with total disregard to anything except what you tried to spin. Lots of factors are to be considered in lower cop deaths and it isn't due to a more peaceful malcontent.

I'm rambling and illogical when I say you don't have the right to shut down someone else's speech? You proved you are a dumb asshole.

You addressed my point? Which one. It is hard to tell exactly what point you are addressing since your rambling jumps from one to the next spontaneously.

I think I see your confusion. Perhaps I wasn't clear when I said any rally held in a public place cannot be shielded from the opposition. That is not a lie. Even with tickets and other controls, detractors still manage to get into those rallies. You can't deny that, can you? We have already seen several incidents where they got in. If they had tickets they must be Republicans who were invited. Remember, dummy, a lot of GOP constituents don't like Trump either. But in any case, HR347 gives the Secret Service extended powers to arrest disruptors in such events. Now move on, you been checked and mated dumbass!