Lies of Hillary Clinton

[The Rabbi]

...

1. "I did not solicit any e-mails from Sidney Blumenthal." Lie

2. "I had no classified information on my server." Lie

3. "I used a private server for convenience." Lie

4. "I had only one mobile device." Lie

There are more...but you get the point. The Hildabeast is toast.

How does one 'solicit' an email? What does that mean? Where exactly does this gem of a quote (1.) come from? Is it taken completely out of context or worse -- is it fabricated?

(2.) Who determines what is classified?

(3.) Cannot prove otherwise. This one is nuts

(4.) Huh? For use? For business? Context please and full quote

You'r not very good at this.
1. Solicit an email means to send or communicate hoping to get communication back. She did in fact do that.
2. The agency generating the information determines whether it is classified and at what level
3. IT is already proven. She had more than one mobile device
Hillary Clinton also used an iPad for e-mails undercutting her single-device defense - The Washington Post

 

[WelfareQueen]

They're already shitting their pants over Hillary! I can smell the fear.

 

[daws101]

what are you guys gonna bitch about after you loose yet another election?

 

[Eaglewings]

They're already shitting their pants over Hillary! I can smell the fear.

Your the ones so caught up with Hillary, why are you all so obsessed and worried about her? If she did something illegal then what ever happens happens.

 

[WelfareQueen]

what are you guys gonna bitch about after you loose yet another election?

You must be confused. The GOP just killed your team in the last election. Don't you Dims pay attention?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Here is a pretty definitive account of...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...

Read more at: Hillary Clinton s E-mails -- No Subpoena She Broke the Law Regardless National Review Online

Mod Edit: You can't post the entire article and you've been here long enough to know that.

quote from the article:
"a string of misrepresentations in defense of her improper e-mail practices"

notice phraseology .

Misrepresentations according to whom? Who decides what is the proper and improper email practice of a Cabinet level Secretary?

Oh I see...

The USMB members have things all screwed up yet again.

quote:

Blumenthal told the committee the emails were unsolicited, but Republicans say a number of the emails Clinton did not turn over suggests they were, including responses where she encouraged her old friend to continue writing.

“These new messages in many instances were Clinton’s responses, which clearly show she was soliciting and regularly corresponding with Sidney Blumenthal — who was passing unvetted intelligence information about Libya from a source with a financial interest in the country,” the panel statement continues. “It just so happens these emails directly contradict her public statement that the messages from Blumenthal were unsolicited.”

Democrats on the panel, however, have challenged that assertion and questioned Gowdy’s definition of “unsolicited,” arguing that simply a response to an email does not constitute solicitation.


Read more: State Dept. Hillary Clinton didn t turn over all Libya emails - Rachael Bade - POLITICO​

 

[kaz]

Thank you for the National Review hit list. Hilarious!

I am certain you can find the factual errors in the article then. Please provide links when you do.

Please provide "credible" proof that those lies are true.

you mean...
Please provide credible proof of the actual quotes in full context

Would any of them make any difference to you if they were true? Would any of them bother you at all? Or would you just not care and blow it off? Why should anyone bother if you don't care anyway?

 

[kaz]

what are you guys gonna bitch about after you loose yet another election?

You must be confused. The GOP just killed your team in the last election. Don't you Dims pay attention?

You have to wonder when Republicans control both houses and they say that shit what planet they live on

 

[amrchaos]

amrchaos

Yes
she had a private email acct and lied about it.

Clinton lied about having a private email account? To whom?

To rabbi.
I think that is what he is saying.
Anyway, I want to know how many lies the right claim are out there.

 

[daws101]

what are you guys gonna bitch about after you loose yet another election?

You must be confused. The GOP just killed your team in the last election. Don't you Dims pay attention?

You have to wonder when Republicans control both houses and they say that shit what planet they live on

That control is only temporary .
The gop plays it like it's the second coming of ronald Reagan.
Talk about desperate.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

...

1. "I did not solicit any e-mails from Sidney Blumenthal." Lie

2. "I had no classified information on my server." Lie

3. "I used a private server for convenience." Lie

4. "I had only one mobile device." Lie

There are more...but you get the point. The Hildabeast is toast.

How does one 'solicit' an email? What does that mean? Where exactly does this gem of a quote (1.) come from? Is it taken completely out of context or worse -- is it fabricated?

(2.) Who determines what is classified?

(3.) Cannot prove otherwise. This one is nuts

(4.) Huh? For use? For business? Context please and full quote

You'r not very good at this.
1. Solicit an email means to send or communicate hoping to get communication back. She did in fact do that.
2. The agency generating the information determines whether it is classified and at what level
3. IT is already proven. She had more than one mobile device
Hillary Clinton also used an iPad for e-mails undercutting her single-device defense - The Washington Post

1. I see where a right wing Congressman said when she replied that constituted a solicitation.

2: The agency does? Not the head of an agency?

3. In what context? wtf are you talking about? I thought the original issue was Clinton sharing a common frustration of "having to juggle multiple phones"

the last one smells more of a gotcha report than actual news or scandal

 

[Jackson]

CLINTON LIES


She proclaimed that she broke no rules by using a personal server and other e-mail chicanery. The Washington Post’s Fact Checker column gave her “three Pinocchios” (out of a possible four) on those claims.

Hillary insisted she had only used “one device” for e-mail, when we now know that’s not true. Perhaps under oath she would clarify that she meant “one device at a time.”

The most discussed deception came in an exchange about her e-mails. Clinton declared emphatically that, “You know, you’re starting with so many assumptions that are – I’ve never had a subpoena. . . . Let’s take a deep breath here.” Representative Trey Gowdy (R., S.C.), chair of the committee investigating the Obama administration’s response to the Benghazi attack, promptly produced a copy of the subpoena.

It was a strangely forgiving argument from a reporter who made his career by exposing presidential deceit. And while it’s certainly true Bill put Hillary in some awkward predicaments, his philandering doesn’t explain why she lied on issues ranging from her cattle futures windfall to her stealth server.

Read more at: Hillary Clinton Lies Habitually but Badly National Review Online

Chelsea Clinton wasjogging around the World Trade Centeron 9/11. Immensely insensitive to those who actually were affected by this horrific attack, Hillary later admitted that Chelsea was actually safely in her Union Square apartment at the time of the attack.

She landed under sniper fire in Bosnia. In trueBrian Williams-esque form, to listen to Hillary’s account, she was ducking and running in a dramatic M*A*S*H type arrival scene in fear for her life. In actuality, she and Chelsea can be seen on videowalking across the Bosnian tarmac… smiling and greeting well wishers. But hey, anybody could misremember deadly sniper fire, right?

She was named after Sir Edmund Hillary, one of the first two men to climb Mt. Everest. This one’s just embarrassing. Sir Hillary didn’t actually climb Mt. Everest (AKA, achieve any fame worth naming a child after) untilHillary Clinton was 6 years old. Ouch. So either Hillary’s mom was lying about her namesake Hillary’s entire life, or she waited until Hillary was 6 to name her, or Hillary just, you know, misspoke. Again.

Her familywas dead brokewhen they left the White House. They only made $12 MILLION the year after Bill Clinton’s Presidency. I guess when you’re used to living off the taxpayer’s billions funding your vacations, private airfare and security, food, housing, and all, a measly few millions could be a rough adjustment, huh?

She claims to have beeninstrumental in the Northern Ireland peace process. Except those who actuallywereat the negotiating table say Hillary wasnowhere to be seen…

She’sjust like you. No, really. Because every woman in America has one child who’s always attended private schools, was married to a President, had a personal chef, flies in a environment polluting personal jet, and makes about$200K for every speaking engagement. Duh.

Benghazi –it was a disgusting video! The worst of the worst. We know for a fact, based on State Department documents, that not only was Benghazi a terrorist attack, but Hillaryknew it was a terrorist attackwhich had absolutely nothing to do with a YouTube video. Not only did she lie about Benghazi, she failed to act in response to the attack, and4 American liveswere lost in the conflict.


Read more:The Top 7 Hillary Clinton Lies That The Liberal Media s Trying To Hide... Louder With Crowder

 

[kaz]

what are you guys gonna bitch about after you loose yet another election?

You must be confused. The GOP just killed your team in the last election. Don't you Dims pay attention?

You have to wonder when Republicans control both houses and they say that shit what planet they live on

That control is only temporary .
The gop plays it like it's the second coming of ronald Reagan.
Talk about desperate.

That opinion, right or wrong, doesn't support your implying it already happened

 

[NYcarbineer]

Do the Republicans plan on nominating someone with no lies on their rap sheet,

or in all fairness can we dismiss this 'lie' thing as one big wash?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

...

1. "I did not solicit any e-mails from Sidney Blumenthal." Lie

2. "I had no classified information on my server." Lie

3. "I used a private server for convenience." Lie

4. "I had only one mobile device." Lie

There are more...but you get the point. The Hildabeast is toast.

How does one 'solicit' an email? What does that mean? Where exactly does this gem of a quote (1.) come from? Is it taken completely out of context or worse -- is it fabricated?

(2.) Who determines what is classified?

(3.) Cannot prove otherwise. This one is nuts

(4.) Huh? For use? For business? Context please and full quote

Frankly, I don't give a shit if you believe me or not. The facts are out there. Use google. It's your friend.

So because something can be found on Google, it's a proven fact or just a suggested fact?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

yawn...

personal attacks as a campaign strategy? and the "Lies" thing is the one that puts most of America to sleep

LOL, you oppose that, do you? Funny, I never see dante mentioning this standard to Democrats. Is it just a new one for dante and he hasn't had a chance to mention it yet?

A campaign strategy of personal attacks is a sign of desperation

 

[amrchaos]

To be honest, this is all tied to Benghazi. You have hammered away at Hillary concerning her time at State that you guys just created armor for her.

 

[S.J.]

Dante and the other libs think that talking in circles and splitting hairs by issuing challenges like "what is classified" and "what constitutes solicitation" somehow gets her off the hook for breaking the law.

 

[kaz]

yawn...

personal attacks as a campaign strategy? and the "Lies" thing is the one that puts most of America to sleep

LOL, you oppose that, do you? Funny, I never see dante mentioning this standard to Democrats. Is it just a new one for dante and he hasn't had a chance to mention it yet?

A campaign strategy of personal attacks is a sign of desperation

You say that, yet you vote for Obama, Obama, Kerry, Gore, ... and back Pelosi and Reid. Listen to any of their speeches, it's all personal attacks on Republicans. Jesus Man, look what your party does to Cruz, Palin, Trump, Bachman, Thomas, Rice, Chaney ... Bush. And you think this is a standard you actually follow? Grow up

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Thank you for the National Review hit list. Hilarious!

I am certain you can find the factual errors in the article then. Please provide links when you do.

Please provide "credible" proof that those lies are true.

you mean...
Please provide credible proof of the actual quotes in full context

Would any of them make any difference to you if they were true? Would any of them bother you at all? Or would you just not care and blow it off? Why should anyone bother if you don't care anyway?

Of course. Maybe, it depends. If they were minor, or crazed bullshit like calling Bush a liar, yes. Why, because when one posts shit as factual they are never really taken seriously at all. Do you want to be taken seriously, or...

or are you one who comes here only to vent and shout?