Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or it is in fact a matter of educating the electorate.A campaign strategy of personal attacks is a sign of desperationyawn...
personal attacks as a campaign strategy? and the "Lies" thing is the one that puts most of America to sleep
LOL, you oppose that, do you? Funny, I never see dante mentioning this standard to Democrats. Is it just a new one for dante and he hasn't had a chance to mention it yet?
False , everyone knows that inmate letters are crammed full of "secret" info . As with most everything you post it's irrelevant to the subject .speaking from experience?context! we don't need no stinkin' context!You say that, yet you vote for Obama, Obama, Kerry, Gore, ... and back Pelosi and Reid. Listen to any of their speeches, it's all personal attacks on Republicans. Jesus Man, look what your party does to Cruz, Palin, Trump, Bachman, Thomas, Rice, Chaney ... Bush. And you think this is a standard you actually follow? Grow up
Speeches? Campaign speeches or policy speeches or speeches from the Senate and House floors?
You do know they all have different contexts? Maybe you don't. Maybe your just as ignorant or more so , than your first days at usmb? sad
You mean like a prison letter?
Swish, you didn't get it
Not my problem if your reading comprehension is that of a hydrosphyalicjealousy rears it's misshapen head!or any definitions!!!context! we don't need no stinkin' context!Speeches? Campaign speeches or policy speeches or speeches from the Senate and House floors?
You do know they all have different contexts? Maybe you don't. Maybe your just as ignorant or more so , than your first days at usmb? sad
The circle jerk between you to is getting a little creepy. Maybe you could find a room?
That didn't even make sense for you
My Travels on the Clinton Conspiracy Trail Mother JonesAttacking Clinton is not questioning Democrats. After all there was a true conspiracy to 'get' the Clintons: Arkansas Project and moreHuh?Agreed. Question Democrats? That's ridiculous
Universal translator needed in aisle 7!!!
Um...you don't get that? Seriously?
Who are you quoting and what are you talking about?
You only hear that from Dante because you only attack DemocratsSpeeches? Campaign speeches or policy speeches or speeches from the Senate and House floors?So just to be clear, if I give you a speech from one of those Democrats that is full of personal attacks, you will condemn them for it, correct?
You do know they all have different contexts? Maybe you don't. Maybe your just as ignorant or more so , than your first days at usmb? sad
Why don't you just clarify then? Say what you want to actually hold a Democrat to a standard that you would actually criticize the Democrat
Show what you object to that a Democrat has said about a Republican
Non sequitur.
You said you are against politicians doing personal attacks. I pointed out we only hear from you on that in one direction. Tell me if I show you personal attacks by a Democrat if you will also condemn the Democrat. Simple question. If you want to say you will ... if ... this or that condition is true, fine, tell me what the condition is
Progressives here have had to put up with me challenging them on personal attacks on Republicans
kaz post what you find offensive as a personal attack
A campaign strategy of personal attacks is a sign of desperationyawn...
personal attacks as a campaign strategy? and the "Lies" thing is the one that puts most of America to sleep
LOL, you oppose that, do you? Funny, I never see dante mentioning this standard to Democrats. Is it just a new one for dante and he hasn't had a chance to mention it yet?
False , everyone knows that inmate letters are crammed full of "secret" info . As with most everything you post it's irrelevant to the subject .speaking from experience?context! we don't need no stinkin' context!Speeches? Campaign speeches or policy speeches or speeches from the Senate and House floors?
You do know they all have different contexts? Maybe you don't. Maybe your just as ignorant or more so , than your first days at usmb? sad
You mean like a prison letter?
Swish, you didn't get it
Not my problem if your reading comprehension is that of a hydrosphyalicjealousy rears it's misshapen head!or any definitions!!!context! we don't need no stinkin' context!
The circle jerk between you to is getting a little creepy. Maybe you could find a room?
That didn't even make sense for you
Nope ! I've had a lot of experience with pretentious ass hatsFalse , everyone knows that inmate letters are crammed full of "secret" info . As with most everything you post it's irrelevant to the subject .speaking from experience?context! we don't need no stinkin' context!
You mean like a prison letter?
Swish, you didn't get it
Sounds like if you change false true then you feel me
Jealousy is the basis of the Libertarian idology.Not my problem if your reading comprehension is that of a hydrosphyalicjealousy rears it's misshapen head!or any definitions!!!
The circle jerk between you to is getting a little creepy. Maybe you could find a room?
That didn't even make sense for you
I understood what you wrote perfectly fine, it just didn't make sense.
OK, Holmes, explain it to me. Why would a libertarian be "jealous" he's not in a liberal circle jerk? That makes sense to you? Seriously?
\personal attacks? They have their place I guess, but we are addressing personal attacks as a campaign strategy -- or we wereA campaign strategy of personal attacks is a sign of desperationyawn...
personal attacks as a campaign strategy? and the "Lies" thing is the one that puts most of America to sleep
LOL, you oppose that, do you? Funny, I never see dante mentioning this standard to Democrats. Is it just a new one for dante and he hasn't had a chance to mention it yet?
This is the post, Dante. You still have yet to say you care if Democrats make personal attacks, you just want to play 20 evasive answers
why do uyou always make shit up rather than address specific issues?kaz post what you find offensive as a personal attack
You made the point, Holmes, I only asked you about it. You criticized Republicans for personal attacks. I asked you about Democrats who do personal attacks, you're worse, and your answer has been clearly no, you don't give a shit when Democrats make personal attacks
Nope ! I've had a lot of experience with pretentious ass hatsFalse , everyone knows that inmate letters are crammed full of "secret" info . As with most everything you post it's irrelevant to the subject .speaking from experience?You mean like a prison letter?
Swish, you didn't get it
Sounds like if you change false true then you feel me
Feel me , Holmes,
WTF is that shit?
Jealousy is the basis of the Libertarian idology.Not my problem if your reading comprehension is that of a hydrosphyalicjealousy rears it's misshapen head!The circle jerk between you to is getting a little creepy. Maybe you could find a room?
That didn't even make sense for you
I understood what you wrote perfectly fine, it just didn't make sense.
OK, Holmes, explain it to me. Why would a libertarian be "jealous" he's not in a liberal circle jerk? That makes sense to you? Seriously?
\personal attacks? They have their place I guess, but we are addressing personal attacks as a campaign strategy -- or we wereA campaign strategy of personal attacks is a sign of desperationyawn...
personal attacks as a campaign strategy? and the "Lies" thing is the one that puts most of America to sleep
LOL, you oppose that, do you? Funny, I never see dante mentioning this standard to Democrats. Is it just a new one for dante and he hasn't had a chance to mention it yet?
This is the post, Dante. You still have yet to say you care if Democrats make personal attacks, you just want to play 20 evasive answers
kazyawn...
personal attacks as a campaign strategy? and the "Lies" thing is the one that puts most of America to sleep
What did I make up? That Democrats go ad hominem? Seriously?why do uyou always make shit up rather than address specific issues?kaz post what you find offensive as a personal attack
You made the point, Holmes, I only asked you about it. You criticized Republicans for personal attacks. I asked you about Democrats who do personal attacks, you're worse, and your answer has been clearly no, you don't give a shit when Democrats make personal attacks
That would be you or you wouldn't have made that statementNope ! I've had a lot of experience with pretentious ass hatsFalse , everyone knows that inmate letters are crammed full of "secret" info . As with most everything you post it's irrelevant to the subject .speaking from experience?
Swish, you didn't get it
Sounds like if you change false true then you feel me
Feel me , Holmes,
WTF is that shit?
You said "false" then agreed with everything I said. you sound confused
