Listen to the exact words in the exact books Democrats want in our public school libraries

[jknowgood]

Names of these books?

Why you want a copy for yourself?

 

[MinTrut]

No elected Democrat has spoken out about this, which can only lead to the assumption that they approve of it.

Do y'all not read?

This is G-rated compared to what's in most middle school liberries.

 

[candycorn]

Names of these books?

They were written by Bill O'Reilly

Bill O’Reilly Wrote & Narrated A Book With “Numerous Sex Scenes” – And John Oliver Found It For Us

“That is a man describing a woman's orgasm who has clearly never seen a woman's orgasm.”

decider.com

 

[Foxfyre]

You have to know that there is something very deeply fucked-up—mentally, morally, and spiritually—about any creature that believes that it is in any way anywhere close to acceptable to expose children to this sort of material…

Kennedy read from "All Boys Aren't Blue" and "Gender Queer," two books that have become key flash points in the debate about "book bans." He recited:​

• All Boys Aren't Blue: "I put some lube on and got him on his knees, and I began to slide into him from behind. I pulled out of him and kissed him while he masturbated. He asked me to turn over while he slipped a condom on himself. This was my a** and I was struggling to imagine someone inside me. He got on top and slowly inserted himself into me. It was the worst pain I think I have ever felt in my life. Eventually, I felt a mix of pleasure with the pain."
• Gender Queer: "I got a new strap-on harness today. I can’t wait to put it on you. It will fit my favorite dildo perfectly. You will look so hot. I can’t wait to have your c**k in my mouth. I’m going to give you the b***job of your life, then I want you inside of me."

GOP senator masterfully proves why sexually explicit books don't belong in schools, forcing Dem to make key admission | Blaze Media

Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) went viral on Tuesday for reading R-rated excerpts from sexually graphic books. At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on so-called "book bans" and censorship, Kennedy masterfully proved why some books just don't belong on school library shelves. Kennedy showed that...

www.theblaze.com

I don't know what happens to good people who are able to totally discard all common sense and what values they held in order to condone anything like that as appropriate for children. It is evil.

Once they reach the natural stage in physical development, all kids are curious about sex and/or what they are feeling in that regard. And they should be informed by their parents or a proper appropriate sex education class what they will need to know re a healthy sex life and also the consequences and risks of engaging in it too early.

Pornography is absolutely not necessary to teach that.

 

[Foxfyre]

You can't order the banning books that I might want my child to read. If you don't want your child reading The Color Purple, tell them they can't read it. But the book stays in the library.

NO BANNING OF BOOKS.

There is some material that has absolutely no value being in a school library. It is not banning books to choose what is and is not appropriate for school children to have access/to read in the classroom or school library. I don't know how you do it in Canada. In America that has been the rule for public education since there has been public education.

 

[candycorn]

You realize all of you on the left who have commented in this thread so far have done nothing but prove the OP's point. The Democratic Party will not speak out about this.

Why?

Can't speak for the Democratic party.

I can speak for me. Is this a huge problem? With salacious images on every screen they touch, every TV show they see, every movie they watch (and that is just the virtual world they are exposed to--let alone reality)...are you really thinking that inappropriate words in books is a huge issue?

As for the politics of the matter; the standard bearer for the GOP paid a porn star for sex. I'm not sure but wasn't that much more impactful than a book a kid might or might not check out from a library in a school. I mean here is the leader of the nation behaving in such a way that is not only immoral; he turns around and lies about having done it. Gee...and you think the Democrats are the smut peddlers?

 

[MinTrut]

They're probably inappropriate for kindergarten but seniors in high school are probably already doing similar things.

I get the feeling these people have never spent any time in libraries, in school or free-standing.

My middle school library had shelves of material vastly racier than these excerpts.

 

[MinTrut]

You grew up quite the same way I did in terms of going to the library. But things are different today. Children don’t go places by themselves because it’s not safe, for little ones to be about on their own. Especially in cities. Children today are taken everywhere practically until they’re teenagers.

The idea the libraries were ever making inappropriate material available to young children is ridiculous.

As is the idea that there's one standard for inappropriate.

The art section in middle school libraries is packed with super-realistic full frontal nudity and scenes of rape and torture for instance.

And that's the tame stuff.

 

[MinTrut]

So you are ok with Christian books in the library, right? I mean this stuff is sick and everybody knows it, but at least be consistent with you nonsense.

The Bible is filled with far more disturbing perversion - and extreme violence - so I'm all for it personally.

 

[MinTrut]

In a public school library? Absolutely some books should be banned. If we can't agree that the books that the Sen. read from are bad for children, then you people are sicker than I thought.

Do you think the Bible should be banned?

 

[MinTrut]

It is telling that it i the same filth that oppose any Christian content in schools, that also are supporting of pushing sick, fucked-up sexual deviancy on children in these same schools.

Isaiah 5:20 is very relevant here.

The Bible is available in school libraries, as is a huge amount of religious material.

Do you think the Bible and religious material should be banned?

 

[MinTrut]

I have seen with my own eyes the material some school libraries are making available to ALL children in the school and some of it is ridiculously inappropriate for children. You won't find any link anywhere that will change my mind about that.

Hmm.

So you too want to see the Bible and related religious material banned?

 

[Votar Roja]

No elected Democrat has spoken out about this, which can only lead to the assumption that they approve of it.

The filthy vermin in the democrat party are waging a war on children

 

[MinTrut]

You have to know that there is something very deeply fucked-up—mentally, morally, and spiritually—about any creature that believes that it is in any way anywhere close to acceptable to expose children to this sort of material…

Kennedy read from "All Boys Aren't Blue" and "Gender Queer," two books that have become key flash points in the debate about "book bans." He recited:​

• All Boys Aren't Blue: "I put some lube on and got him on his knees, and I began to slide into him from behind. I pulled out of him and kissed him while he masturbated. He asked me to turn over while he slipped a condom on himself. This was my a** and I was struggling to imagine someone inside me. He got on top and slowly inserted himself into me. It was the worst pain I think I have ever felt in my life. Eventually, I felt a mix of pleasure with the pain."
• Gender Queer: "I got a new strap-on harness today. I can’t wait to put it on you. It will fit my favorite dildo perfectly. You will look so hot. I can’t wait to have your c**k in my mouth. I’m going to give you the b***job of your life, then I want you inside of me."

GOP senator masterfully proves why sexually explicit books don't belong in schools, forcing Dem to make key admission | Blaze Media

Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) went viral on Tuesday for reading R-rated excerpts from sexually graphic books. At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on so-called "book bans" and censorship, Kennedy masterfully proved why some books just don't belong on school library shelves. Kennedy showed that...

www.theblaze.com

There's FAR worse than this.

In one book, a father offers his daughters to rapists, and in that same book, a father tries to horribly, graphically murder his son.

And that's just the tip of this perverse book's depraved iceberg - there are HUNDREDS of equally or more disturbing examples.

Should this book be banned?

 

[Votar Roja]

The Bible is available in school libraries, as is a huge amount of religious material.

Do you think the Bible and religious material should be banned?

Ladies and Gentlemen, behold the American Democrat, defending the sexualization of children and defending pornography in elementary schools, and somehow comparing it to the Bible.

This is the disgusting evil that good Americans must vote against and Vote Red in 2024

 

[MinTrut]

Anyone that would, should be executed.

ANOTHER conservative who wants the Bible banned!

I'm genuinely shocked.

But it is one super-kinky collection; 50 Shades of BDSM.

 

[MinTrut]

I don't know what happens to good people who are able to totally discard all common sense and what values they held in order to condone anything like that as appropriate for children. It is evil.

Once they reach the natural stage in physical development, all kids are curious about sex and/or what they are feeling in that regard. And they should be informed by their parents or a proper appropriate sex education class what they will need to know re a healthy sex life and also the consequences and risks of engaging in it too early.

Pornography is absolutely not necessary to teach that.

So the Bible AND Shakespeare AND numerous other works must be banned...

Maybe it would be easier to ask what you DON'T want banned?

 

[MinTrut]

There is some material that has absolutely no value being in a school library. It is not banning books to choose what is and is not appropriate for school children to have access/to read in the classroom or school library. I don't know how you do it in Canada. In America that has been the rule for public education since there has been public education.

So no Alice Walker...

The list of literary masters shrinks further.

 

[Votar Roja]

ANOTHER conservative who wants the Bible banned!

I'm genuinely shocked.

But it is one super-kinky collection; 50 Shades of BDSM.

Ladies and Gentlemen, behold the American Democrat, defending the sexualization of children and defending pornography in elementary schools, and somehow comparing it to the Bible.

This is the disgusting evil that good Americans must vote against and Vote Red in 2024

 

[MinTrut]

Can't speak for the Democratic party.

I can speak for me. Is this a huge problem? With salacious images on every screen they touch, every TV show they see, every movie they watch (and that is just the virtual world they are exposed to--let alone reality)...are you really thinking that inappropriate words in books is a huge issue?

As for the politics of the matter; the standard bearer for the GOP paid a porn star for sex. I'm not sure but wasn't that much more impactful than a book a kid might or might not check out from a library in a school. I mean here is the leader of the nation behaving in such a way that is not only immoral; he turns around and lies about having done it. Gee...and you think the Democrats are the smut peddlers?

But see the difference between you and the ConservaTaliban that wants to ban anything it doesn't see fitting its agenda is that I'm guessing you don't want The Art of the Deal banned.