Listen up for once, CO2 does NOT govern Climate

[Orangecat]

Who is this "finest of all climate experts"

Not you.

 

[Crick]

The idiots are you stupid Moon Bats that actually believe in that silly ass AGW scam.

Us and very close to every single scientist and science educated person on this whole fucking planet. That makes you the idiotic "moon bat".

There is no scientific proof whatsoever.

That you would make such a claim tells us quite clearly that your comprehension of basic science wouldn't get you out of the 8th grade.

Just one stupid unscientific correlation, lots of fraudulent data and lies and some shit in shit out computer programs by assholes trying to rake in research dollars.

There are mountains and mountains and mountains of evidence that are responsible for the conclusions at which the world's scientists have arrived: AGW is a valid description of the behavior of the Earth's atmopshere.

There may some truth that the climate is going through a tyical post glacier climate fluctuation, like has happen several times before, but it sure as hell is not caused by human activity.

You're a fucking idiot. Go read Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis you ignorant twat.

 

[otto105]

The idiots are you stupid Moon Bats that actually believe in that silly ass AGW scam.

There is no scientific proof whatsoever. Just one stupid unscientific correlation, lots of fraudulent data and lies and some shit in shit out computer programs by assholes trying to rake in research dollars.

There may some truth that the climate is going through a tyical post glacier climate fluctuation, like has happen several times before, but it sure as hell is not caused by human activity.

hilarious

 

[otto105]

A critical review of Steven Koonin’s 'Unsettled' » Yale Climate Connections

 

[Robert W]

A critical review of Steven Koonin’s 'Unsettled' » Yale Climate Connections

I no longer am surprised at the admissions by the doom sayers. Mind you, they are making a huge deal out what amounts to a change of about 1 degree C. And their statements claim we are wrong.

The article above shows how wrong they are.

Read this.
"The blurb on the flap confirms this with its opening sentence: “When it comes to climate change, the media, politicians, and other prominent voices have declared that ‘the science is settled.’”

A bit of fact checking by the author or publisher would have shown that this claim is not true."

So the author of the hit piece against Koonin admits that the science is not settled.

 

[otto105]

I no longer am surprised at the admissions by the doom sayers. Mind you, they are making a huge deal out what amounts to a change of about 1 degree C. And their statements claim we are wrong.

The article above shows how wrong they are.

Read this.
"The blurb on the flap confirms this with its opening sentence: “When it comes to climate change, the media, politicians, and other prominent voices have declared that ‘the science is settled.’”

A bit of fact checking by the author or publisher would have shown that this claim is not true."

So the author of the hit piece against Koonin admits that the science is not settled.

No, the science behind human caused climate change is settled.

Science as a whole is not.


Is that too hard for you to understand?

 

[Robert W]

No, the science behind human caused climate change is settled.

Science as a whole is not.


Is that too hard for you to understand?

You keep getting it wrong.

 

[EMH]

Us and very close to every single scientist and science educated person

Still waiting for you and your "heroes" to explain a map of the Arctic....

The warmers need to explain the Arctic Circle's ice pattern, and how Co2 is responsible...

The map is clear. 7% of Earth ice is on Greenland. Why is there ice on Greenland south of the Arctic Circle, and no ice north of the Arctic Circle on Alaska? Co2 and sun do not explain this. The only explanation is the Greenland is within 600 miles of the pole at the top, and hence...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[EMH]

science behind human caused climate change is settled

Humans cause "warming" when they build urban areas. So essentially you are correct. The data has always "settled" it. There is nothing warming on Earth except the surface of growing urban areas.

Co2 does absolutely nothing.

 

[otto105]

Humans cause "warming" when they build urban areas. So essentially you are correct. The data has always "settled" it. There is nothing warming on Earth except the surface of growing urban areas.

Co2 does absolutely nothing.

Posts an internet scientist.

Hilarious

 

[EMH]

Posts an internet scientist.

Hilarious

Always with idiots it is WHO to PARROT...

All we really need is the DATA.

Highly correlated satellites and balloons show NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE despite rising Co2

THEORY REJECTED

 

[otto105]

Always with idiots it is WHO to PARROT...

All we really need is the DATA.

Highly correlated satellites and balloons show NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE despite rising Co2

THEORY REJECTED

Denier


That has been debunked and yet you still lie about.

Did you go to internet U?

 

[EMH]

Denier


That has been debunked and yet you still lie about.

Did you go to internet U?

That's the DATA. Your side FUDGED IT in 2005.

We do not need 5k liars to parrot, we just need the DATA, and if you had an IQ over 5, you would understand that...

 

[catatomic]

This video is by this planet's finest of all climate experts.
He explains the major errors we have been led to the alarmist camp by.

So everything is basically the same as most of us thought, and we still need to deal with it?

That was my takeaway.

 

[otto105]

That's the DATA. Your side FUDGED IT in 2005.

We do not need 5k liars to parrot, we just need the DATA, and if you had an IQ over 5, you would understand that...

The data showed warming internet climate science degree professor.

 

[EMH]

The data showed warming internet climate science degree professor.

No, you are too stupid to understand the difference between data and FUDGE.

The data showed NO WARMING...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

"satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling"

 

[ReinyDays]

No, the science behind human caused climate change is settled.

Science as a whole is not.


Is that too hard for you to understand?

How are you demonstrating carbon dioxide's extreme reactivity to radiation ... on the order of 100 times that of water with respect to mass ... second, what are the theoretical values and please show your math ... we're not afraid of field tensors around here ...

If the science is settled, then so is the math ... I'd like to see those solutions ...

 

[Robert W]

So everything is basically the same as most of us thought, and we still need to deal with it?

That was my takeaway.

Politically, we face an EV car future that includes, trucks, vans, airplanes, railroad trains all to favor the big boys selling Electricity. We have no infrastructure able to provide all that current to users. But this president demands we go 100 percent electric. So if he wins, we all lose.

 

[Robert W]

No, the science behind human caused climate change is settled.

Science as a whole is not.


Is that too hard for you to understand?

That is a ridiculous comment.

Climate all over Earth is more than likely the most complex and misunderstood topic of the past 25 years.

 

[otto105]

That is a ridiculous comment.

Climate all over Earth is more than likely the most complex and misunderstood topic of the past 25 years.

CO2s effect on our climate is not a mystery.