Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
No you do not. Richard Lindzen has talked to me and explained his more than 220 scientific papers on this topic. You came at this as a true believer in alarmism. That is all it amounts to. Supposedly we should be frightened on your say so. no thanks. I study the scientists and the science.No, I have scientific organizations all over the planet while you have paid for climate skeptics.
Like dick lindzen.
Yeah, mean temps over time.First of all, those are mean temperatures. This is done by using mathematics and does not explain the severe high temperatures per year. If you study this, I will help you. It happened in 1913.
He could even publish his paper on atmospheric temps due to inaccuracies.No you do not. Richard Lindzen has talked to me and explained his more than 220 scientific papers on this topic. You came at this as a true believer in alarmism. That is all it amounts to. Supposedly we should be frightened on your say so. no thanks. I study the scientists and the science.
Wikipedia knows who to smear.He could even publish his paper on atmospheric temps due to inaccuracies.
Contrary to the IPCC's assessment in 2001, Lindzen said that climate models are inadequate. Despite accepted errors in their models, e.g., treatment of clouds, modelers still thought their climate predictions were valid.[50] Lindzen has stated that due to the non-linear effects of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, CO2 levels are now around 30% higher than pre-industrial levels but temperatures have responded by about 75% 0.6 °C (1.08 °F) of the expected value for a doubling of CO2. The IPCC (2007) estimates that the expected rise in temperature due to a doubling of CO2 to be about 3 °C (5.4 °F), ± 1.5°. Lindzen has given estimates of the Earth's climate sensitivity to be 0.5 °C based on ERBE data.[51] These estimates were criticized by Kevin E. Trenberth and others,[52] and Lindzen accepted that his paper included "some stupid mistakes". When interviewed, he said "It was just embarrassing", and added that "The technical details of satellite measurements are really sort of grotesque." Lindzen and Choi revised their paper and submitted it to PNAS.[53] The four reviewers of the paper, two of whom had been selected by Lindzen, strongly criticized the paper and PNAS rejected it for publication.[54] Lindzen and Choi then succeeded in getting a little known Korean journal to publish it as a 2011 paper.[53][55] Andrew Dessler published a paper which found errors in Lindzen and Choi 2011, and concluded that the observations it had presented "are not in fundamental disagreement with mainstream climate models, nor do they provide evidence that clouds are causing climate change. Suggestions that significant revisions to mainstream climate science are required are therefore not supported.
I come at this with scientific climate consensus on the subject.No you do not. Richard Lindzen has talked to me and explained his more than 220 scientific papers on this topic. You came at this as a true believer in alarmism. That is all it amounts to. Supposedly we should be frightened on your say so. no thanks. I study the scientists and the science.
That is nothing. We read debunked claims daily by the Alarmists. Notice they are not scientists but left wing authors of bullshit.Dick Lindzen is what? A debunked old guy.
Video from PragerU makes several incorrect and misleading claims about climate change
judithcurry.com
Hilarious lasty.Wikipedia knows who to smear.
Who pays Richard Lindzen? How much?No, I have scientific organizations all over the planet while you have paid for climate skeptics.
Like dick lindzen.
Just seeing that you will fall for any garbage you hear from the ruling class. You are a good fascist.Hilarious lasty.
Why are you taking time away from the Big Squeal? Those alternative facts have to come out...
Why do you deny scientific facts?That is nothing. We read debunked claims daily by the Alarmists. Notice they are not scientists but left wing authors of bullshit.
Let me pose this to you. If you truly believe you live on a soon to burn planet, would you lie for money? Lindzen told me in person that he never at any time took pay from the energy industry to promote his views. nor promote their views.
Climate Etc.
Controversy surrounding the Sun’s role in climate change
Posted on September 10, 2023 by curryja | 103 comments
by Dr. Willie Soon, Dr. Ronan Connolly & Dr. Michael Connolly
Gavin Schmidt at realclimate.org attempts to dismiss our recent papers, including pseudo-scientific takedowns. This post takes a deep dive into the controversies.
Continue reading →
Hilarious!!!Just seeing that you will fall for any garbage you hear from the ruling class. You are a good fascist.
You are the one denying them.Why do you deny scientific facts?
Does it matter, you are the stupid fuck that listens to them.Hilarious!!!
The ruling class? Is that the immumanti? Or the buildaburgers?
Why is dick lindzen on all the wingnut websites? Is he a just useful idiot for the conservative noise machine.Who pays Richard Lindzen? How much?
He denies being paid.
There are thousands of scientists who do not believe the alarmists at all.
Hilarious.You are the one denying them.
HilariousDoes it matter, you are the stupid fuck that listens to them.
Yes, and then there is the cited judy.Wait, you can't name any scientists. But you spin on a dime and try pinning me down on organizations. How about Dr. Richard Lindzen who is this nations top rated climate scientist. Then Dr. Judith Curry. Do you ever pay attention to those two?
Judith is a place for the voice of this planets finest of all climate specialists.
Is author Keith Kloor peddling disinformation?
