California Girl
Rookie
- Oct 8, 2009
- 50,337
- 10,058
- 0
- Banned
- #141
Be careful CG. The fact that you are there and have access to the local media and are getting a more unfiltered big picture makes you especially 'stupid' and a 'target for insult' in some quarters.
I don't allow President Obama to be taken out of context by those who think it necessary to do that. And I appreciate Mitt being kept in context too.
And in the grand scheme of thing, are either of their views what is really important about the 2012 Olympics?
I know, Foxy... apparently, cheering a country that is not my own means my loyalty to my country is in doubt... regardless of the fact that that country was not competing against my own.
Context is important, we know that... I just wish other posters would learn it.
So much for Olympic unity, huh I cheer the Americans too when they are competing in the Olympics just like I cheer our local sports teams when they are competing at the highschool or college level. It is stupid to think that cheering somebody else when our own teams aren't competing is unloyal. Also stupid is not to appreciate the skill and courage and dedication that allows somebody who is not an American to achieve great things.
It is stupid to hate somebody in politics just because he or she beat our preferred candidate. How much more stupid to hate somebody who beat our guy or gal in a sporting event?
I find this whole conversation rather odd... how could Mitt have been referring to empty seats? He wouldn't have known there were going to be empty seats at the events before the events were held, would he?
It seems to me that the left are just reeking of desperation on this one. Romney was correct in his assessment, and I pointed out the issues that he was right about... but their 'hatred' of Romney blinds them to logic. Very odd indeed.