London terrorists, Palestinian terrorists, what's the difference? Nothing

[P F Tinmore]

London terrorists, Palestinian terrorists, what's the difference?

The Palestinian's actions are defensive.

The London attacks are aggressive.

No one is attacking the Palestinians. They aren't defending against attacks. They are defending against "oppression and occupation".

Occupation is aggression, it is an attack. Now, I am against violence as a means to achieve freedom, but I find it absurd that the Palestinians are criticized for using violence, something that people under occupation have always done.

Nobody cares about your opinion and what you "find".

Until you openly condemn the barbaric actions of the Palestinians as what they are, savagery and terrorism against innocent civilians, with no justification whatsoever, you remain as morally bankrupt as the rest of the terrorist ass kissers.

Being under occupation has been justification enough for every other population that has been occupied militarily. Why should not the Palestinians be justified in resisting military occupation? The savages are those that employ military occupation, like the Nazis, Israelis etc.

So the Palestinians are justified to drive over and stab any Israeli civilian they can get their hands on? Maybe you can help Tinmore explain to us how you intentionally defensively drive over a lady standing at a bus stop.

With idiots like you as their propagandists and supporters do the Palestinians need any enemies?

How can you justify dropping a bomb on a family home?

 

[montelatici]

London terrorists, Palestinian terrorists, what's the difference?

The Palestinian's actions are defensive.

The London attacks are aggressive.

No one is attacking the Palestinians. They aren't defending against attacks. They are defending against "oppression and occupation".

Occupation is aggression, it is an attack. Now, I am against violence as a means to achieve freedom, but I find it absurd that the Palestinians are criticized for using violence, something that people under occupation have always done.

Nobody cares about your opinion and what you "find".

Until you openly condemn the barbaric actions of the Palestinians as what they are, savagery and terrorism against innocent civilians, with no justification whatsoever, you remain as morally bankrupt as the rest of the terrorist ass kissers.

Being under occupation has been justification enough for every other population that has been occupied militarily. Why should not the Palestinians be justified in resisting military occupation? The savages are those that employ military occupation, like the Nazis, Israelis etc.

So the Palestinians are justified to drive over and stab any Israeli civilian they can get their hands on? Maybe you can help Tinmore explain to us how you intentionally defensively drive over a lady standing at a bus stop.

With idiots like you as their propagandists and supporters do the Palestinians need any enemies?

The ANC bombed shopping centers and killed more white civilians than the Palestinians have killed Israeli Jew civilians. The ANC now is the ruling party in South Africa, and Mandela and others who directed the resistance are considered founding fathers and heroes. Why should the Palestinians be judged differently? More to the point, savage murdering terrorists like Begin are considered heroes by Israeli Jews. You are terrorist lover, as long as the terrorist is a Jew.

 

[Hollie]

No one is attacking the Palestinians. They aren't defending against attacks. They are defending against "oppression and occupation".

Occupation is aggression, it is an attack. Now, I am against violence as a means to achieve freedom, but I find it absurd that the Palestinians are criticized for using violence, something that people under occupation have always done.

Nobody cares about your opinion and what you "find".

Until you openly condemn the barbaric actions of the Palestinians as what they are, savagery and terrorism against innocent civilians, with no justification whatsoever, you remain as morally bankrupt as the rest of the terrorist ass kissers.

Being under occupation has been justification enough for every other population that has been occupied militarily. Why should not the Palestinians be justified in resisting military occupation? The savages are those that employ military occupation, like the Nazis, Israelis etc.

So the Palestinians are justified to drive over and stab any Israeli civilian they can get their hands on? Maybe you can help Tinmore explain to us how you intentionally defensively drive over a lady standing at a bus stop.

With idiots like you as their propagandists and supporters do the Palestinians need any enemies?

The ANC bombed shopping centers and killed more white civilians than the Palestinians have killed Israeli Jew civilians. The ANC now is the ruling party in South Africa, and Mandela and others who directed the resistance are considered founding fathers and heroes. Why should the Palestinians be judged differently? More to the point, savage murdering terrorists like Begin are considered heroes by Israeli Jews. You are terrorist lover, as long as the terrorist is a Jew.

That's another of your pointless attempts at comparison. The Israeli resistance is directed at a virulently hateful and retrograde Islamic Death Cult.

 

[Roudy]

No one is attacking the Palestinians. They aren't defending against attacks. They are defending against "oppression and occupation".

Occupation is aggression, it is an attack. Now, I am against violence as a means to achieve freedom, but I find it absurd that the Palestinians are criticized for using violence, something that people under occupation have always done.

Nobody cares about your opinion and what you "find".

Until you openly condemn the barbaric actions of the Palestinians as what they are, savagery and terrorism against innocent civilians, with no justification whatsoever, you remain as morally bankrupt as the rest of the terrorist ass kissers.

Being under occupation has been justification enough for every other population that has been occupied militarily. Why should not the Palestinians be justified in resisting military occupation? The savages are those that employ military occupation, like the Nazis, Israelis etc.

So the Palestinians are justified to drive over and stab any Israeli civilian they can get their hands on? Maybe you can help Tinmore explain to us how you intentionally defensively drive over a lady standing at a bus stop.

With idiots like you as their propagandists and supporters do the Palestinians need any enemies?

The ANC bombed shopping centers and killed more white civilians than the Palestinians have killed Israeli Jew civilians. The ANC now is the ruling party in South Africa, and Mandela and others who directed the resistance are considered founding fathers and heroes. Why should the Palestinians be judged differently? More to the point, savage murdering terrorists like Begin are considered heroes by Israeli Jews. You are terrorist lover, as long as the terrorist is a Jew.

Yah yah yah, and the US and allies also bombed Dresden to ashes, and so on and so forth. What the fuck does that have to do wi the price of tea in Taiwan?

Bottom line, both the Palestinians and ISIS want to establish their shithole "Islamic Caliphates" and are using the exact same terrorist methodology in achieving these goals. The ISIS animals and Palestinian terrorist animals both believe that they the victims not the aggressors, just like you morons! What a surprise.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Occupation is aggression, it is an attack. Now, I am against violence as a means to achieve freedom, but I find it absurd that the Palestinians are criticized for using violence, something that people under occupation have always done.

Nobody cares about your opinion and what you "find".

Until you openly condemn the barbaric actions of the Palestinians as what they are, savagery and terrorism against innocent civilians, with no justification whatsoever, you remain as morally bankrupt as the rest of the terrorist ass kissers.

Being under occupation has been justification enough for every other population that has been occupied militarily. Why should not the Palestinians be justified in resisting military occupation? The savages are those that employ military occupation, like the Nazis, Israelis etc.

So the Palestinians are justified to drive over and stab any Israeli civilian they can get their hands on? Maybe you can help Tinmore explain to us how you intentionally defensively drive over a lady standing at a bus stop.

With idiots like you as their propagandists and supporters do the Palestinians need any enemies?

The ANC bombed shopping centers and killed more white civilians than the Palestinians have killed Israeli Jew civilians. The ANC now is the ruling party in South Africa, and Mandela and others who directed the resistance are considered founding fathers and heroes. Why should the Palestinians be judged differently? More to the point, savage murdering terrorists like Begin are considered heroes by Israeli Jews. You are terrorist lover, as long as the terrorist is a Jew.

Yah yah yah, and the US and allies also bombed Dresden to ashes, and so on and so forth. What the fuck does that have to do wi the price of tea in Taiwan?

Bottom line, both the Palestinians and ISIS want to establish their shithole "Islamic Caliphates" and are using the exact same terrorist methodology in achieving these goals. The ISIS animals and Palestinian terrorist animals both believe that they the victims not the aggressors, just like you morons! What a surprise.

You need to read up. And get off that Israeli propaganda horsecrap. It will rot your mind.

 

[Roudy]

Nobody cares about your opinion and what you "find".

Until you openly condemn the barbaric actions of the Palestinians as what they are, savagery and terrorism against innocent civilians, with no justification whatsoever, you remain as morally bankrupt as the rest of the terrorist ass kissers.

Being under occupation has been justification enough for every other population that has been occupied militarily. Why should not the Palestinians be justified in resisting military occupation? The savages are those that employ military occupation, like the Nazis, Israelis etc.

So the Palestinians are justified to drive over and stab any Israeli civilian they can get their hands on? Maybe you can help Tinmore explain to us how you intentionally defensively drive over a lady standing at a bus stop.

With idiots like you as their propagandists and supporters do the Palestinians need any enemies?

The ANC bombed shopping centers and killed more white civilians than the Palestinians have killed Israeli Jew civilians. The ANC now is the ruling party in South Africa, and Mandela and others who directed the resistance are considered founding fathers and heroes. Why should the Palestinians be judged differently? More to the point, savage murdering terrorists like Begin are considered heroes by Israeli Jews. You are terrorist lover, as long as the terrorist is a Jew.

Yah yah yah, and the US and allies also bombed Dresden to ashes, and so on and so forth. What the fuck does that have to do wi the price of tea in Taiwan?

Bottom line, both the Palestinians and ISIS want to establish their shithole "Islamic Caliphates" and are using the exact same terrorist methodology in achieving these goals. The ISIS animals and Palestinian terrorist animals both believe that they the victims not the aggressors, just like you morons! What a surprise.

You need to read up. And get off that Israeli propaganda horsecrap. It will rot your mind.

Is there is special driver's ed course one can take in Muslim societies that teach you "how to drive over people at bus stops 'defensively'"? Please send us the brochure.

 

[montelatici]

Occupation is aggression, it is an attack. Now, I am against violence as a means to achieve freedom, but I find it absurd that the Palestinians are criticized for using violence, something that people under occupation have always done.

Nobody cares about your opinion and what you "find".

Until you openly condemn the barbaric actions of the Palestinians as what they are, savagery and terrorism against innocent civilians, with no justification whatsoever, you remain as morally bankrupt as the rest of the terrorist ass kissers.

Being under occupation has been justification enough for every other population that has been occupied militarily. Why should not the Palestinians be justified in resisting military occupation? The savages are those that employ military occupation, like the Nazis, Israelis etc.

So the Palestinians are justified to drive over and stab any Israeli civilian they can get their hands on? Maybe you can help Tinmore explain to us how you intentionally defensively drive over a lady standing at a bus stop.

With idiots like you as their propagandists and supporters do the Palestinians need any enemies?

The ANC bombed shopping centers and killed more white civilians than the Palestinians have killed Israeli Jew civilians. The ANC now is the ruling party in South Africa, and Mandela and others who directed the resistance are considered founding fathers and heroes. Why should the Palestinians be judged differently? More to the point, savage murdering terrorists like Begin are considered heroes by Israeli Jews. You are terrorist lover, as long as the terrorist is a Jew.

Yah yah yah, and the US and allies also bombed Dresden to ashes, and so on and so forth. What the fuck does that have to do wi the price of tea in Taiwan?

Bottom line, both the Palestinians and ISIS want to establish their shithole "Islamic Caliphates" and are using the exact same terrorist methodology in achieving these goals. The ISIS animals and Palestinian terrorist animals both believe that they the victims not the aggressors, just like you morons! What a surprise.

You mean, just like the Jewish terrorist animals established Israel.

 

[Roudy]

Nobody cares about your opinion and what you "find".

Until you openly condemn the barbaric actions of the Palestinians as what they are, savagery and terrorism against innocent civilians, with no justification whatsoever, you remain as morally bankrupt as the rest of the terrorist ass kissers.

Being under occupation has been justification enough for every other population that has been occupied militarily. Why should not the Palestinians be justified in resisting military occupation? The savages are those that employ military occupation, like the Nazis, Israelis etc.

So the Palestinians are justified to drive over and stab any Israeli civilian they can get their hands on? Maybe you can help Tinmore explain to us how you intentionally defensively drive over a lady standing at a bus stop.

With idiots like you as their propagandists and supporters do the Palestinians need any enemies?

The ANC bombed shopping centers and killed more white civilians than the Palestinians have killed Israeli Jew civilians. The ANC now is the ruling party in South Africa, and Mandela and others who directed the resistance are considered founding fathers and heroes. Why should the Palestinians be judged differently? More to the point, savage murdering terrorists like Begin are considered heroes by Israeli Jews. You are terrorist lover, as long as the terrorist is a Jew.

Yah yah yah, and the US and allies also bombed Dresden to ashes, and so on and so forth. What the fuck does that have to do wi the price of tea in Taiwan?

Bottom line, both the Palestinians and ISIS want to establish their shithole "Islamic Caliphates" and are using the exact same terrorist methodology in achieving these goals. The ISIS animals and Palestinian terrorist animals both believe that they the victims not the aggressors, just like you morons! What a surprise.

You mean, just like the Jewish terrorist animals established Israel.

View attachment 131822

Jihadi propagandist spouts off topic bullshit once again. How fulla shit are you?

 

[montelatici]

Being under occupation has been justification enough for every other population that has been occupied militarily. Why should not the Palestinians be justified in resisting military occupation? The savages are those that employ military occupation, like the Nazis, Israelis etc.

So the Palestinians are justified to drive over and stab any Israeli civilian they can get their hands on? Maybe you can help Tinmore explain to us how you intentionally defensively drive over a lady standing at a bus stop.

With idiots like you as their propagandists and supporters do the Palestinians need any enemies?

The ANC bombed shopping centers and killed more white civilians than the Palestinians have killed Israeli Jew civilians. The ANC now is the ruling party in South Africa, and Mandela and others who directed the resistance are considered founding fathers and heroes. Why should the Palestinians be judged differently? More to the point, savage murdering terrorists like Begin are considered heroes by Israeli Jews. You are terrorist lover, as long as the terrorist is a Jew.

Yah yah yah, and the US and allies also bombed Dresden to ashes, and so on and so forth. What the fuck does that have to do wi the price of tea in Taiwan?

Bottom line, both the Palestinians and ISIS want to establish their shithole "Islamic Caliphates" and are using the exact same terrorist methodology in achieving these goals. The ISIS animals and Palestinian terrorist animals both believe that they the victims not the aggressors, just like you morons! What a surprise.

You mean, just like the Jewish terrorist animals established Israel.

View attachment 131822

Jihadi propagandist spouts off topic bullshit once again. How fulla shit are you?

Just facts, juxtaposed against your propaganda. I am a proud Christian. Maybe a Crusader, never a Jihadi. Get it?

 

[Roudy]

So the Palestinians are justified to drive over and stab any Israeli civilian they can get their hands on? Maybe you can help Tinmore explain to us how you intentionally defensively drive over a lady standing at a bus stop.

With idiots like you as their propagandists and supporters do the Palestinians need any enemies?

The ANC bombed shopping centers and killed more white civilians than the Palestinians have killed Israeli Jew civilians. The ANC now is the ruling party in South Africa, and Mandela and others who directed the resistance are considered founding fathers and heroes. Why should the Palestinians be judged differently? More to the point, savage murdering terrorists like Begin are considered heroes by Israeli Jews. You are terrorist lover, as long as the terrorist is a Jew.

Yah yah yah, and the US and allies also bombed Dresden to ashes, and so on and so forth. What the fuck does that have to do wi the price of tea in Taiwan?

Bottom line, both the Palestinians and ISIS want to establish their shithole "Islamic Caliphates" and are using the exact same terrorist methodology in achieving these goals. The ISIS animals and Palestinian terrorist animals both believe that they the victims not the aggressors, just like you morons! What a surprise.

You mean, just like the Jewish terrorist animals established Israel.

View attachment 131822

Jihadi propagandist spouts off topic bullshit once again. How fulla shit are you?

Just facts, juxtaposed against your propaganda. I am a proud Christian. Maybe a Crusader, never a Jihadi. Get it?

Stick to the topic Internet crusader jihadi terrorist ass kisser. Better yet, show us how you can drive over an old woman at a bus stop, "defensively" as the Palestinian and ISIS animals do. Which is why there's no difference between the two.

 

[montelatici]

The ANC bombed shopping centers and killed more white civilians than the Palestinians have killed Israeli Jew civilians. The ANC now is the ruling party in South Africa, and Mandela and others who directed the resistance are considered founding fathers and heroes. Why should the Palestinians be judged differently? More to the point, savage murdering terrorists like Begin are considered heroes by Israeli Jews. You are terrorist lover, as long as the terrorist is a Jew.

Yah yah yah, and the US and allies also bombed Dresden to ashes, and so on and so forth. What the fuck does that have to do wi the price of tea in Taiwan?

Bottom line, both the Palestinians and ISIS want to establish their shithole "Islamic Caliphates" and are using the exact same terrorist methodology in achieving these goals. The ISIS animals and Palestinian terrorist animals both believe that they the victims not the aggressors, just like you morons! What a surprise.

You mean, just like the Jewish terrorist animals established Israel.

View attachment 131822

Jihadi propagandist spouts off topic bullshit once again. How fulla shit are you?

Just facts, juxtaposed against your propaganda. I am a proud Christian. Maybe a Crusader, never a Jihadi. Get it?

Stick to the topic Internet crusader jihadi terrorist ass kisser. Better yet, show us how you can drive over an old woman at a bus stop, "defensively" as the Palestinian and ISIS animals do. Which is why there's no difference between the two.

While I am against any killing, even for national liberation. To single out the Palestinians, an occupied people, when other national liberation organizations used the same tactics, is absurd. The French Resistance, the Partisans throughout Europe, the ANC freedom fighters, the Algerian FLN, and many others were far more violent than the Palestinians. Just because Jews are the military occupiers doesn't change their status as military occupiers. The white South Africans, the French in Algeria, etc. were no different than the current Jewish occupiers.

 

[Roudy]

Yah yah yah, and the US and allies also bombed Dresden to ashes, and so on and so forth. What the fuck does that have to do wi the price of tea in Taiwan?

Bottom line, both the Palestinians and ISIS want to establish their shithole "Islamic Caliphates" and are using the exact same terrorist methodology in achieving these goals. The ISIS animals and Palestinian terrorist animals both believe that they the victims not the aggressors, just like you morons! What a surprise.

You mean, just like the Jewish terrorist animals established Israel.

View attachment 131822

Jihadi propagandist spouts off topic bullshit once again. How fulla shit are you?

Just facts, juxtaposed against your propaganda. I am a proud Christian. Maybe a Crusader, never a Jihadi. Get it?

Stick to the topic Internet crusader jihadi terrorist ass kisser. Better yet, show us how you can drive over an old woman at a bus stop, "defensively" as the Palestinian and ISIS animals do. Which is why there's no difference between the two.

While I am against any killing, even for national liberation. To single out the Palestinians, an occupied people, when other national liberation organizations used the same tactics, is absurd. The French Resistance, the Partisans throughout Europe, the ANC freedom fighters, the Algerian FLN, and many others were far more violent than the Palestinians. Just because Jews are the military occupiers doesn't change their status as military occupiers. The white South Africans, the French in Algeria, etc. were no different than the current Jewish occupiers.

So according to donkey breath here, it's absurd to single out people that drive over and stab innocent civilians?

 

[montelatici]

You mean, just like the Jewish terrorist animals established Israel.

View attachment 131822

Jihadi propagandist spouts off topic bullshit once again. How fulla shit are you?

Just facts, juxtaposed against your propaganda. I am a proud Christian. Maybe a Crusader, never a Jihadi. Get it?

Stick to the topic Internet crusader jihadi terrorist ass kisser. Better yet, show us how you can drive over an old woman at a bus stop, "defensively" as the Palestinian and ISIS animals do. Which is why there's no difference between the two.

While I am against any killing, even for national liberation. To single out the Palestinians, an occupied people, when other national liberation organizations used the same tactics, is absurd. The French Resistance, the Partisans throughout Europe, the ANC freedom fighters, the Algerian FLN, and many others were far more violent than the Palestinians. Just because Jews are the military occupiers doesn't change their status as military occupiers. The white South Africans, the French in Algeria, etc. were no different than the current Jewish occupiers.

So according to donkey breath here, it's absurd to single out people that drive over and stab innocent civilians?

Whether the ANC bombed shopping centers filled with whites, or the Algerians bombed French cafes in Algiers, doesn't change the fact that occupied people, unfortunately, do whatever they can to resist oppression. The Palestinians are resisting a foreign military occupation, if they had better weapons they would do things differently.

But even the Algerians did whatever they could to attack the oppressor. Do you think the colonizing Jews in Palestine deserve to be treated differently by the oppressed than the colonizing French in Algeria, for some reason.

 

[Roudy]

Jihadi propagandist spouts off topic bullshit once again. How fulla shit are you?

Just facts, juxtaposed against your propaganda. I am a proud Christian. Maybe a Crusader, never a Jihadi. Get it?

Stick to the topic Internet crusader jihadi terrorist ass kisser. Better yet, show us how you can drive over an old woman at a bus stop, "defensively" as the Palestinian and ISIS animals do. Which is why there's no difference between the two.

While I am against any killing, even for national liberation. To single out the Palestinians, an occupied people, when other national liberation organizations used the same tactics, is absurd. The French Resistance, the Partisans throughout Europe, the ANC freedom fighters, the Algerian FLN, and many others were far more violent than the Palestinians. Just because Jews are the military occupiers doesn't change their status as military occupiers. The white South Africans, the French in Algeria, etc. were no different than the current Jewish occupiers.

So according to donkey breath here, it's absurd to single out people that drive over and stab innocent civilians?

Whether the ANC bombed shopping centers filled with whites, or the Algerians bombed French cafes in Algiers, doesn't change the fact that occupied people, unfortunately, do whatever they can to resist oppression. The Palestinians are resisting a foreign military occupation, if they had better weapons they would do things differently.

But even the Algerians did whatever they could to attack the oppressor. Do you think the colonizing Jews in Palestine deserve to be treated differently by the oppressed than the colonizing French in Algeria, for some reason.

Notice how these dirtbag garbages of humanity bend over backwards trying defend the totally defenseless. It is truly astounding that in this day and age, such demented people still exist.

 

[montelatici]

Just facts, juxtaposed against your propaganda. I am a proud Christian. Maybe a Crusader, never a Jihadi. Get it?

Stick to the topic Internet crusader jihadi terrorist ass kisser. Better yet, show us how you can drive over an old woman at a bus stop, "defensively" as the Palestinian and ISIS animals do. Which is why there's no difference between the two.

While I am against any killing, even for national liberation. To single out the Palestinians, an occupied people, when other national liberation organizations used the same tactics, is absurd. The French Resistance, the Partisans throughout Europe, the ANC freedom fighters, the Algerian FLN, and many others were far more violent than the Palestinians. Just because Jews are the military occupiers doesn't change their status as military occupiers. The white South Africans, the French in Algeria, etc. were no different than the current Jewish occupiers.

So according to donkey breath here, it's absurd to single out people that drive over and stab innocent civilians?

So the

Whether the ANC bombed shopping centers filled with whites, or the Algerians bombed French cafes in Algiers, doesn't change the fact that occupied people, unfortunately, do whatever they can to resist oppression. The Palestinians are resisting a foreign military occupation, if they had better weapons they would do things differently.

But even the Algerians did whatever they could to attack the oppressor. Do you think the colonizing Jews in Palestine deserve to be treated differently by the oppressed than the colonizing French in Algeria, for some reason.

Notice how these dirtbag garbages of humanity bend over backwards trying defend the totally defenseless. It is truly astounding that in this day and age, such demented people still exist.

So the Israelis with nukes are defenseless. Amazing how some Jews can be so demented.

 

[Roudy]

Stick to the topic Internet crusader jihadi terrorist ass kisser. Better yet, show us how you can drive over an old woman at a bus stop, "defensively" as the Palestinian and ISIS animals do. Which is why there's no difference between the two.

While I am against any killing, even for national liberation. To single out the Palestinians, an occupied people, when other national liberation organizations used the same tactics, is absurd. The French Resistance, the Partisans throughout Europe, the ANC freedom fighters, the Algerian FLN, and many others were far more violent than the Palestinians. Just because Jews are the military occupiers doesn't change their status as military occupiers. The white South Africans, the French in Algeria, etc. were no different than the current Jewish occupiers.

So according to donkey breath here, it's absurd to single out people that drive over and stab innocent civilians?

So the

Whether the ANC bombed shopping centers filled with whites, or the Algerians bombed French cafes in Algiers, doesn't change the fact that occupied people, unfortunately, And old do whatever they can to resist oppression. The Palestinians are resisting a foreign military occupation, if they had better weapons they would do things differently.

But even the Algerians did whatever they could to attack the oppressor. Do you think the colonizing Jews in Palestine deserve to be treated differently by the oppressed than the colonizing French in Algeria, for some reason.

Notice how these dirtbag garbages of humanity bend over backwards trying defend the totally defenseless. It is truly astounding that in this day and age, such demented people still exist.

So the Israelis with nukes are defenseless. Amazing how some Jews can be so demented.

So do the British have nuclear weapons, dipshit.
And yet, an old woman at an Israeli bus stop, and Londoners having a good time, both of which are driven over by sane insane Islamist animals, are yes, totally defenseless. See how totally demented and fucked up you are?

 

[Sixties Fan]

 

[Sixties Fan]

Jihadi propagandist spouts off topic bullshit once again. How fulla shit are you?

Just facts, juxtaposed against your propaganda. I am a proud Christian. Maybe a Crusader, never a Jihadi. Get it?

Stick to the topic Internet crusader jihadi terrorist ass kisser. Better yet, show us how you can drive over an old woman at a bus stop, "defensively" as the Palestinian and ISIS animals do. Which is why there's no difference between the two.

While I am against any killing, even for national liberation. To single out the Palestinians, an occupied people, when other national liberation organizations used the same tactics, is absurd. The French Resistance, the Partisans throughout Europe, the ANC freedom fighters, the Algerian FLN, and many others were far more violent than the Palestinians. Just because Jews are the military occupiers doesn't change their status as military occupiers. The white South Africans, the French in Algeria, etc. were no different than the current Jewish occupiers.

So according to donkey breath here, it's absurd to single out people that drive over and stab innocent civilians?

Whether the ANC bombed shopping centers filled with whites, or the Algerians bombed French cafes in Algiers, doesn't change the fact that occupied people, unfortunately, do whatever they can to resist oppression. The Palestinians are resisting a foreign military occupation, if they had better weapons they would do things differently.

But even the Algerians did whatever they could to attack the oppressor. Do you think the colonizing Jews in Palestine deserve to be treated differently by the oppressed than the colonizing French in Algeria, for some reason.

The Jews are the colonized ones. And you do know it, Habibi.

The Jews, on their Ancient Jewish Homeland, are doing exactly what every other indigenous people on their own land has ever done. DEFEND THEMSELVES and keep the invading colonizers away.
The Kurds defended themselves against Sadam Hussein and now ISIL.

Arabs/Muslims are the invaders since the 7th Century, and you do know that very well.
They have been kicked out from Spain and other parts of Europe.
Northern Africa never got to be rid of them.

Muslims do not like it when they lose land or wars, or anything else.

ESPECIALLY to their "lowly" Jews, who were nothing but a punching bag to Muslims for 1300 years before the recreation of the State of Israel on Jewish ancient land.

And you continue to think that you can fool others with your revisionist garbage.

Raise your hands those who take Monte's words as nothing but the truth !!!

 

[Roudy]

At this rate they will fall short of their intended goals! Mohammad is not a happy camper now. Something has to be done, perhaps they should have some PCP when they're breaking fast?

What is obvious however, is both the Palestinian terrorists and the ISIS terrorists are infected with the same Ramadan virus.

 

[montelatici]

Just facts, juxtaposed against your propaganda. I am a proud Christian. Maybe a Crusader, never a Jihadi. Get it?

Stick to the topic Internet crusader jihadi terrorist ass kisser. Better yet, show us how you can drive over an old woman at a bus stop, "defensively" as the Palestinian and ISIS animals do. Which is why there's no difference between the two.

While I am against any killing, even for national liberation. To single out the Palestinians, an occupied people, when other national liberation organizations used the same tactics, is absurd. The French Resistance, the Partisans throughout Europe, the ANC freedom fighters, the Algerian FLN, and many others were far more violent than the Palestinians. Just because Jews are the military occupiers doesn't change their status as military occupiers. The white South Africans, the French in Algeria, etc. were no different than the current Jewish occupiers.

So according to donkey breath here, it's absurd to single out people that drive over and stab innocent civilians?

Whether the ANC bombed shopping centers filled with whites, or the Algerians bombed French cafes in Algiers, doesn't change the fact that occupied people, unfortunately, do whatever they can to resist oppression. The Palestinians are resisting a foreign military occupation, if they had better weapons they would do things differently.

But even the Algerians did whatever they could to attack the oppressor. Do you think the colonizing Jews in Palestine deserve to be treated differently by the oppressed than the colonizing French in Algeria, for some reason.

The Jews are the colonized ones. And you do know it, Habibi.

The Jews, on their Ancient Jewish Homeland, are doing exactly what every other indigenous people on their own land has ever done. DEFEND THEMSELVES and keep the invading colonizers away.
The Kurds defended themselves against Sadam Hussein and now ISIL.

Arabs/Muslims are the invaders since the 7th Century, and you do know that very well.
They have been kicked out from Spain and other parts of Europe.
Northern Africa never got to be rid of them.

Muslims do not like it when they lose land or wars, or anything else.

ESPECIALLY to their "lowly" Jews, who were nothing but a punching bag to Muslims for 1300 years before the recreation of the State of Israel on Jewish ancient land.

And you continue to think that you can fool others with your revisionist garbage.

Raise your hands those who take Monte's words as nothing but the truth !!!

The Jews were Europeans, from another continent. They were of course colonizers. But don't take it from me, they said it clearly themselves, even in the New York Times.

"An article about a Conference of Zionists published on July 20, 1899 in the New York Times expresses that the Zionists “will colonize Palestine.”
The straightforward and comfortable manner with which the colonization is pursued is indicative how, before having to be concerned with the image of Zionism and public relations, Zionist leaders depicted their movement as a colonial mission during a time in which European nations were colonial powers."

Zionists plan to colonize Palestine in 1899 NY Times

uly 25, 1926

2SHARES
London (Jul. 23)

(Jewish Telegraphic Agency)


"Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committee"

“Due to the success of our colonization work in Palestine proper, it is possible that eventually our colonization work will be extended beyond the frontiers of Transjordania. It is true that the Palestine government has not taken a clear stand in regard to its economic policy, but well founded demands have every prospect of being agreed to. A great deal has been achieved during the last months,” Dr. Weizmann said.

Successful Jewish Colonization Will Extend Beyond Palestine Frontier, Weizmann Tells Actions Committ


Europeans are not the indigenous people of Palestine. The indigenous people of Palestine are people that have always lived in Palestine. The Arabians were not settler colonists no more than the Crusaders were. They conquered to rule (and tax) the native people. How many people do you think the Arabian desert could support in those days?

Changing religion from Judaism to Christianity, as the indigenous Jews (and Samaritans and Pagans) of Palestine did after Christianity became the Roman State religion, , does not change their ancestry. They remain the indigenous people though they follow Christianity and Islam. The Zionists were Europeans.

And for the coup de grace, here is something from a site that cannot possibly be anti-Israel called eretzyisroel.org.

"Native Population almost wholly descended from Jews who had been forcibly converted to Christianity, and later Islam, not Arab in origin
In Palestine the "small" number of Arab invaders who had been imported by the Arabian conquerors were wiped out by disease. Thus the "myth" of the "Palestinian Arab" descending "from the Arab conquerors" appears to be factually incorrect for all but perhaps a few. Supporting Hogarth, Hitti, and Lewis, the Reverend Parkes found thatDuring the first century after the Arab conquest the caliph and governors of Syria and The Land [Palestine] ruled almost entirely over Christian and Jewish subjects. Apart from the bedouin [nomads], in the earliest days the only Arabs west of the Jordan (not all of whom were themselves Muslims) were the garnisons... "

Native Population almost wholly descended from Jews who had been forcibly converted