- Thread starter
- #61
I'll take that as a compliment rdea...... Uummmm, what was your name again?[/QUOTE]limited is your effort.I would say limited is an understatement considering it appears your opinion on this is politically based.^^^^ Ringel05 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^QUOTE="iamwhatiseem, post: 23467397, member: 24610"]Personally, in my limited reading on the subject, solar is a better solution.
Per acre, solar delivers just over 10 times the energy as the best wind farms.
A study of 1,100 wind farms shows that the actual power density they deliver is literally 100 times lower than what they were supposed to deliver.
Which means, of course, the science the companies used to sell the idea to governments was junk science.
IMO - the energy and dollars that have been spent on wind would have been better spent on solar.
Just my limited opinion.![]()
It tells me a lot that where once upon a time when you could go online and check real time energy output that is no longer possible for the majority of wind and solar plants.