Obama was/is an idealist, he tried to apply that idealism to his foreign policy, the good guy approach and expected everyone to respond in kind, they didn't. One of the biggest complaints I read from Obama foreign policy apologists is he never could understand why his foreign counterparts weren't as "wise" as he thought himself to be. Rump's foreign policy approach looks to be even worse so that's not a good comparison, Rump is just clueless not idealistic.As usual you find a couple of examples to bolster your fantasy as well as incorrectly assuming I meant he should have sent in troops in a couple of specific areas. You do realize that global politics is global and not confined to the ME? Right? Do you honestly believe that the only show of strength is to send in troops or bomb?I have low confidence in Trump but then again I have low confidence in every politician...... in every country...... worldwide.......
Actually most of our significant adversaries were ecstatic under Obama's speak softly but carry a wet noodle policy as it allowed them to make inroads into sphere's of influence that were once exclusively ours.
The drones used to attack command and control were "wet noodles"?
Would you'd have preferred sending our troops into harms way knowing that suicide bombers, IED's and turncoats within our allies forces killed and maimed thousands of our troops in Iraq?
While Obama did have some limited successes even many of his foreign policy apologists state that over all his FP approach was a failure. The surge, the so called Arab Spring, the Crimea, Chinese influence expansion into Africa, Russian expansion into Syria and most importantly his laudable but completely stupid attempt to put a kinder, gentler face on Machiavelian world politics, to change it into something more closely resembling his ideology. The problem with that is everyone else has to play along and that didn't happen, China, Iran and Russia all saw it as weakness and took advantage while our allies who were giving positive lip service to his approach but were deeply concerned behind closed doors.
Stop being an ideologue and look at reality for once in your life.
Ah ha, the Realpolitik. First, let's define it:
"a system of politics or principles based on practical rather than moral or ideological considerations."
For the moment can we can agree with this limited but not comprehensive definition?
Given the failures in Vietnam, and in Iraq, is it practical to once again put our treasure and blood on the line in the ME? Or in Korea or Asia in general?
Trump's bombastic, atavistic and inconsistent foreign policy does not reflect the Realpolitik; Obama's did. One more very critical thing - Obama made mistakes and learned from them; Trump makes mistakes and blames others for them.
I never once called for boots on the ground in areas that were not of strategic importance to us and even advised against going into Iraq as well as secretly backing Assad and Qaddafi because there were a small group of us who knew a power vacuum would be created and the resultant probability of radicals taking over and seriously destabilizing the region. We were shut out due to political considerations, ya can't have the US seen to be backing dictators no matter what the cost.........