Man-made heat put in oceans has doubled since 1997, study finds

[Old Rocks]

There is absolutely no proof of that.

You global warming nutters are foolish.

Based on sst(ocean temperature) from buoies, ships and satellite you're very wrong. What do you get the idea that we don't have teh data since the late 1990's to make this study???

You anti-science nutters are far more foolish.

Lmao so the ocean now is only 18 years old and that represents a trend?

Instead of laughing your silly ass off, maybe your time would be better spent actually researching the subject. Obviously you have never done so.

 

[Old Rocks]

This just in:

GLOBAL WARMING SCIENTISTS FIND EVIDENCE OF GLOBAL WARMING, GET TO KEEP JOBS!

Details after these messages.....

Predfan too fucking stupid to actually research the subject. There, see, every bit as informative as your post.

 

[IanC]

Ian, why does your graph of OHC from Levitus 2009 look so different of every other graph I can find from Levitus 2009?

this is the first point I would like to make on OHC. the models run ridiculously hot. the graph above is wrong. the model trend line and the observation trend line do not intersect, the model is already higher in 2003 and has diverged wildly ever since.

This last one directly from the Levitus paper at Global ocean heat content 1955–2008 in light of recently revealed instrumentation problems - Levitus - 2009 - Geophysical Research Letters - Wiley Online Library

So... why is that Ian?

Poor crick is having another graph reading moment.

 

[jc456]

There is absolutely no proof of that.

You global warming nutters are foolish.

Based on sst(ocean temperature) from buoies, ships and satellite you're very wrong. What do you get the idea that we don't have teh data since the late 1990's to make this study???

You anti-science nutters are far more foolish.

You are anti-science, but you're not intelligent enough to know it.

You're also naive.

The thing is, I've seen your two posts so far, and you haven't made any claims at all. All you've done is try and put down an argument by making some snide remarks.

Is this right wing "science", just say whatever you think will put people down?

well the OP has no facts in it, so how does one argue against fiction when fiction merely gets rewritten over and over and over?

 

[jc456]

There is absolutely no proof of that.

You global warming nutters are foolish.

Mathew gave you an article from a peer reviewed scientific journal. You gave us flap yap with zero to back it up. Given prior posts, less than nothing to back it up.

Can you pull one excerpt out that is proof?

What is man made heat anyway? Do you have a definition to post up?

 

[jc456]

are we finally doomed?

b/c we were doomed back in the 70's
then doomed in the 90's by the 00's

I mean really, if 3rd times a charm, you guys are on your 3rd, 3rd, 3rd charm.

Ice is still there, cat-5 hurricanes are not normal, more polar bears, NYC is not under water, etc, etc.

Quite the dumb fuck, aren't you. Get all your science from the National Enquirer. Instead of posting shit, why don't you actually read what the scientists are saying. It is in peer reviewed journals, not yellow rags. And start giving specifics, instead of generalities. Like how were we doomed in the '70's.

Peer reviewed journals has been discussed forever in this forum. They are messed up and you know it. To make a claim about peer reviewed is funny in today's climate science world. The peers are not objective and will always rule out opposition work. That is why blogs were started to get the papers and the facts out. So, thanks for the info, but it's bullshit.

 

[cnm]

ummm....you didnt link either

I linked in every post. You did not.

 

[Two Thumbs]

are we finally doomed?

b/c we were doomed back in the 70's
then doomed in the 90's by the 00's

I mean really, if 3rd times a charm, you guys are on your 3rd, 3rd, 3rd charm.

Ice is still there, cat-5 hurricanes are not normal, more polar bears, NYC is not under water, etc, etc.

Quite the dumb fuck, aren't you. Get all your science from the National Enquirer. Instead of posting shit, why don't you actually read what the scientists are saying. It is in peer reviewed journals, not yellow rags. And start giving specifics, instead of generalities. Like how were we doomed in the '70's.

Google

take your fucking pick

"Scientist" who are never wrong, said we were going into an Ice Age.

now please give them all your money and leave mine the fuck alone.

In other news; T-rex walked upright and dragged it tail
no wait
T-rex ran leaned forward, balanced by his tail
no wait
T-rex walked
and
T-rex was not a predator
not wait
T-rex ran and was a predator

 

[Weatherman2020]

Man-made heat put in oceans has doubled since 1997, study finds

January 18, 2016 by By Seth Borenstein

The amount of man-made heat energy absorbed by the seas has doubled since 1997, a new study says.

Scientists have long known that more than 90 percent of the heat energy from man-made global warming goes into the world's oceans instead of the ground. And they've seen ocean heat content rise in recent years. But the new study, using ocean-observing data that goes back to the British research ship Challenger in the 1870s and including high-tech modern underwater monitors and computer models, tracked how much man-made heat has been buried in the oceans in the past 150 years.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2016-01-man-made-oceans.html#jCp


Confirming what the warmers have been saying for the past half 2/3rds of a decade. The oceans are taking most of the energy!!!

Please enlighten us how you have segregated manmade heat from the solar energy conversion rate of 4.26 million metric tons per second.
Please present this.

 

[cnm]

"Scientist" who are never wrong, said we were going into an Ice Age.

The majority of scientific papers said the trend was to warming. That you are dumb enough to be sucked in by sensationalist journalists' pieces is no one's fault but your own.

What were climate scientists predicting in the 1970s?

http://www.skepticalscience.com

​

 

[80zephyr]

"Scientist" who are never wrong, said we were going into an Ice Age.

The majority of scientific papers said the trend was to warming. That you are dumb enough to be sucked in by sensationalist journalists' pieces is no one's fault but your own.

What were climate scientists predicting in the 1970s?

http://www.skepticalscience.com

​

You posted:

That you are dumb enough to be sucked in by sensationalist journalists' pieces is no one's fault but your own.

Hmmm. Do you know what the National Science Board is?

Here, let me help:

National Science Board - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Do you know what they were saying in the 1970's?

Global cooling - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So, it wasn't journalist's pieces that were sensationalist. It was the governments own science board.

Mark

 

[cnm]

Gods.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_cooling

wiki/Global_cooling

This hypothesis had little support in the scientific community, but gained temporary popular attention due to a combination of a slight downward trend of temperatures from the 1940s to the early 1970s and press reports that did not accurately reflect the full scope of the scientific climate literature, which showed a larger and faster-growing body of literature projecting future warming due to greenhouse gas emissions.​

 

[cnm]

What is it with rightards?

1972 and 1974 National Science Board

wiki/Global_cooling

The National Science Board's Patterns and Perspectives in Environmental Science report of 1972 discussed the cyclical behavior of climate, and the understanding at the time that the planet was entering a phase of cooling after a warm period. "Judging from the record of the past interglacial ages, the present time of high temperatures should be drawing to an end, to be followed by a long period of considerably colder temperatures leading into the next glacial age some 20,000 years from now."[34] But it also continued; "However, it is possible, or even likely, that human interference has already altered the environment so much that the climatic pattern of the near future will follow a different path."[34]​

 

[CrusaderFrank]

How else can they make it the Pause disappear?

They could say the Sun, Moon or Mars absorbed it and the 2+2=5 AGWCult would readily believe it

 

[Wyatt earp]

How else can they make it the Pause disappear?

They could say the Sun, Moon or Mars absorbed it and the 2+2=5 AGWCult would readily believe it

But but But Frank I thought the science was settled?

 

[PredFan]

This just in:

GLOBAL WARMING SCIENTISTS FIND EVIDENCE OF GLOBAL WARMING, GET TO KEEP JOBS!

Details after these messages.....

Predfan too fucking stupid to actually research the subject. There, see, every bit as informative as your post.

Better go put some ointment on that burn.

 

[jon_berzerk]

--LOL

more mythery from the faithful global warmists

--LOL

 

[jon_berzerk]

How else can they make it the Pause disappear?

They could say the Sun, Moon or Mars absorbed it and the 2+2=5 AGWCult would readily believe it

But but But Frank I thought the science was settled?

you know the flat earthers believe in global warming --LOL

 

[Billy_Bob]

Man-made heat put in oceans has doubled since 1997, study finds

January 18, 2016 by By Seth Borenstein

The amount of man-made heat energy absorbed by the seas has doubled since 1997, a new study says.

Scientists have long known that more than 90 percent of the heat energy from man-made global warming goes into the world's oceans instead of the ground. And they've seen ocean heat content rise in recent years. But the new study, using ocean-observing data that goes back to the British research ship Challenger in the 1870s and including high-tech modern underwater monitors and computer models, tracked how much man-made heat has been buried in the oceans in the past 150 years.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2016-01-man-made-oceans.html#jCp


Confirming what the warmers have been saying for the past half 2/3rds of a decade. The oceans are taking most of the energy!!!

Lets look at Seth's paper for a moment..

HE provides no evidence for his mathematical models output. NO verification was done. The model has not been tested by others and his work can not be replicated.

HE changes the spatial resolution in his graphing just like Mann did where the end of the graph is in 5 year incremental averages while the majority of the graph is in 1,000 year averages. The old Michale Mann parlor trick to CREATE A HOCKEY STICK where NONE IS PRESENT....

This paper has the horse shit smell... I am going to dig deeper but just a cursory look tells me its crap.. And he used the ADJUSTED data from NOAA...

What has happened to real scientists, using real data,producing their work-data-math and being accountable for their work? And of course the lame stream media sucks up the crap and spreads it like the dutiful morons they are.. No ethics or integrity anywhere to be seen...

 

[cnm]

you know the flat earthers believe in global warming

All the government agencies of the US, the DoD, the Pentagon, the vast majority of the governments of the world, flat earthers every one. Still, a handful of plucky scientists funded by petroleum dollars will save us.

Hallelujah, brothers.