Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
gun nutz will be gun nutz
Sent from my VS415PP using Tapatalk
So Dot, tell us.
When you open fire on a target you intend to hit, do you fire your pistol from inside your pocket? Doesn't that make it kind of hard to aim? I mean if you're going to open fire on something with the intention of hitting it, one does need to aim. Right?
----------------------
Do you acknowledge that the guy didn't open fire on anyone?
what. Is there any other kind of firing n00b?
Sent from my VS415PP using Tapatalk
Don't blame Dot Com , he ? Just read the title of the article and copied it, doubtful he? even read the article and understood what actually happened.
There is a world of difference between an accidental discharge and opening fire on someone. Your thread title is misleading and pure hyperbole
And to be clear, you agree the guy shouldn't have had a gun on campus since they have a no gun policy?
He is just exercising his second amendment rights to protect himself from cannonballs .......you can't be too safe
Your pretense that people are not attacked at or on their way to or on their from, what should normally be considered safe places is as dishonest as the thread title.
Perhaps someone should take a gun safety course so they can learn the difference between opening fire on a group and an accidental discharge of a gun. For the record the permit holder should be required to retake the course .
As has been established he didn't open fire on them I would more than welcome them adding a fine to his punishment and some form of community service.Perhaps someone should take a gun safety course so they can learn the difference between opening fire on a group and an accidental discharge of a gun. For the record the permit holder should be required to retake the course .
Too mild a punishment
He should be forced to write..."I will not open fire on children" 100 times
As has been established he didn't open fire on them I would more than welcome them adding a fine to his punishment and some form of community service.Perhaps someone should take a gun safety course so they can learn the difference between opening fire on a group and an accidental discharge of a gun. For the record the permit holder should be required to retake the course .
Too mild a punishment
He should be forced to write..."I will not open fire on children" 100 times
If you wish to continue down your road of idiocy do it by yourself I have better things to do.As has been established he didn't open fire on them I would more than welcome them adding a fine to his punishment and some form of community service.Perhaps someone should take a gun safety course so they can learn the difference between opening fire on a group and an accidental discharge of a gun. For the record the permit holder should be required to retake the course .
Too mild a punishment
He should be forced to write..."I will not open fire on children" 100 times
You are so gullible...
ALL gun nuts claim it was an accident when they OPEN FIRE on defenseless children
If you wish to continue down your road of idiocy do it by yourself I have better things to do.As has been established he didn't open fire on them I would more than welcome them adding a fine to his punishment and some form of community service.Perhaps someone should take a gun safety course so they can learn the difference between opening fire on a group and an accidental discharge of a gun. For the record the permit holder should be required to retake the course .
Too mild a punishment
He should be forced to write..."I will not open fire on children" 100 times
You are so gullible...
ALL gun nuts claim it was an accident when they OPEN FIRE on defenseless children
is there? what's the difference to the person that gets shot?
There is a world of difference between an accidental discharge and opening fire on someone. Your thread title is misleading and pure hyperbole
you could drown from those splashes. self-defense.Don't blame Dot Com , he ? Just read the title of the article and copied it, doubtful he? even read the article and understood what actually happened.
There is a world of difference between an accidental discharge and opening fire on someone. Your thread title is misleading and pure hyperbole
And to be clear, you agree the guy shouldn't have had a gun on campus since they have a no gun policy?
He is just exercising his second amendment rights to protect himself from cannonballs .......you can't be too safe
Your pretense that people are not attacked at or on their way to or on their from, what should normally be considered safe places is as dishonest as the thread title.
Kids and pools can be pretty obnoxious......you can't be too safe
Hey you little fucker....you splash me once more and I'll shoot your little ass
What part of the 2nd Amendment didn't apply to him?