March for Our Lives Funded Through 501c4 Dark Money

Yes...they were. Denied tax exempt status.

Not a single tea party group was denied tax exempt status.

Right, after waiting for over a year. Meanwhile leftwing groups were approved in a matter of a few weeks.

You're peddling horsehit, as usual.

You guys keep repeating that same tired old bullshit, but it doesn't change how the law works.

It doesn't matter how long it took for them to be certified, they don't have to wait for certification.
From your liberal Bible...WaPo...
IRS admits targeting conservatives for tax scrutiny in 2012 election

You're still not grasping the whole "reading" thing.
Glad you agree that today’s rally is nothing more that an event designed by political operatives for the 2018 mid-terms.
 
Notice that it only took a couple of weeks for them to get their 501(c)(4) designation, while the tea party groups were waiting for over a year.

March For Our Lives, a demonstration involving survivors of the Parkland school shooting that will take place Saturday in Washington, D.C., and across the country, registered a 501(c)(4) nonprofit advocacy organization that is not required to disclose its donors.

The March for Our Lives Action Fund, a 501(c)(4) “social welfare” nonprofit organization, was registered on March 8 with the D.C. Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, records show. The action fund lists its business address in Encino, Calif., and its agent as CT Corporation System, a D.C.-based firm that offers agent, incorporation, and corporate business compliance services.

Jeri Rhodes, an associate executive secretary for finance and administration at the Friends Committee on National Legislation, a group that “lobbies Congress and the administration to advance peace, justice, opportunity, and environmental stewardship,” is also listed as the action fund’s executing officer and governor on its registration. Rhodes previously served as chief financial officer for Greenpeace.
Plenty of "shadow money" going to the NRA. I see no problem.
 
Lakhota sure laughs a lot. I wonder if all redskins are as stupid as her.

Not all that hard to understand why her people never had a word for wheel until normal people arrived here.
 
:lol:

Actually, unless people have a particularly shady reason for donating, I don't think whether or not they're anonymous makes much of a difference.

If you take a look at all of those groups, you'll see that none of them lacked donations.

As for the 501c4 funding this protest, what makes you think their application has already been approved?
ROFL! The CEO of Mozilla had to step down because he donated money to a group that supports traditional marriage.

Looking at the experience of TEA groups shows that it made raising money very difficult for them. Why do you suppose they sued the IRS?

You're just plain full of shit and an apologist for government tyranny.

They sued the IRS because it was politically advantageous for them to do so - so they could tell people like you to get upset about it.

See, it worked. You swallowed their bullshit whole, and they got exactly what they wanted.
You're just a sleazy dishonest douchebag. I won't even bother with a substantive response to that swill.

:lol:

Don't cry, it'll be alright.
Anyone who believes in justice is crying.

Nope, only little bitches are crying.

Do you need a tissue? You seem upset.
 
Not a single tea party group was denied tax exempt status.

Right, after waiting for over a year. Meanwhile leftwing groups were approved in a matter of a few weeks.

You're peddling horsehit, as usual.

You guys keep repeating that same tired old bullshit, but it doesn't change how the law works.

It doesn't matter how long it took for them to be certified, they don't have to wait for certification.
From your liberal Bible...WaPo...
IRS admits targeting conservatives for tax scrutiny in 2012 election

You're still not grasping the whole "reading" thing.
Your not making the whole “truth thing.” Nice try.

:lol:
 
March for our lives is funded through a 501c4 that doesn’t disclose donors. Smelling Soros again.
'March For Our Lives' Now Operating Under Liberal Dark Money Nonprofit Advocacy Group
Hey Shit for brains!

The NRA is a 501c4 political organization handing out 10's of millions of dollars blackmailing lawmakers to do their benefactors bidding while their busy making the guns and making a "killing". You've had too damn much hypocrite pie today...push your fat ass back from the table!
So you hate the constitution
So you hate the constitution
And you are that dense that you came to that nonsensical conclusion from what I wrote in response to the OP's ludicrous 501c4 comment? Seek some help for that cogitative dissonance thingy you're burdened with.
 
:lol:

You don't understand how 501c4 groups work.

They don't need to wait for their application to be approved - as soon as they file, they can start accepting donations.

That's why all that nonsense that you guys kept screaming about years ago was bullshit - none of those "tea party" groups were prevented from operating.
Yes...they were. Denied tax exempt status.

Not a single tea party group was denied tax exempt status.

Right, after waiting for over a year. Meanwhile leftwing groups were approved in a matter of a few weeks.

You're peddling horsehit, as usual.

You guys keep repeating that same tired old bullshit, but it doesn't change how the law works.

It doesn't matter how long it took for them to be certified, they don't have to wait for certification.

We have explained exactly how the law works. The bottom line is that the IRS persecuted TEA party groups. That simply can't credibly be denied.

Yes, donors do have to wait for a group to be certified, moron.

:lol:

No, donors don't have to wait for a group to be certified.

Take, for example, the group funding the march today. They're not "certified", and yet they've gotten plenty of donations.
 
Lakhota sure laughs a lot. I wonder if all redskins are as stupid as her.

Not all that hard to understand why her people never had a word for wheel until normal people arrived here.
You make heap big funny...:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 
Yes...they were. Denied tax exempt status.

Not a single tea party group was denied tax exempt status.

Right, after waiting for over a year. Meanwhile leftwing groups were approved in a matter of a few weeks.

You're peddling horsehit, as usual.

You guys keep repeating that same tired old bullshit, but it doesn't change how the law works.

It doesn't matter how long it took for them to be certified, they don't have to wait for certification.

We have explained exactly how the law works. The bottom line is that the IRS persecuted TEA party groups. That simply can't credibly be denied.

Yes, donors do have to wait for a group to be certified, moron.

:lol:

No, donors don't have to wait for a group to be certified.

Take, for example, the group funding the march today. They're not "certified", and yet they've gotten plenty of donations.
Why did they have to hide those donations via the tax code?
 
ROFL! The CEO of Mozilla had to step down because he donated money to a group that supports traditional marriage.

Looking at the experience of TEA groups shows that it made raising money very difficult for them. Why do you suppose they sued the IRS?

You're just plain full of shit and an apologist for government tyranny.

They sued the IRS because it was politically advantageous for them to do so - so they could tell people like you to get upset about it.

See, it worked. You swallowed their bullshit whole, and they got exactly what they wanted.
You're just a sleazy dishonest douchebag. I won't even bother with a substantive response to that swill.

:lol:

Don't cry, it'll be alright.
Anyone who believes in justice is crying.

Nope, only little bitches are crying.

Do you need a tissue? You seem upset.
It's nice to know that you approve of the party in power using the government to persecute its political opponents.

How does it feel to know that you are a Stalinist douchebag?
 
Yes...they were. Denied tax exempt status.

Not a single tea party group was denied tax exempt status.

Right, after waiting for over a year. Meanwhile leftwing groups were approved in a matter of a few weeks.

You're peddling horsehit, as usual.

You guys keep repeating that same tired old bullshit, but it doesn't change how the law works.

It doesn't matter how long it took for them to be certified, they don't have to wait for certification.

We have explained exactly how the law works. The bottom line is that the IRS persecuted TEA party groups. That simply can't credibly be denied.

Yes, donors do have to wait for a group to be certified, moron.

:lol:

No, donors don't have to wait for a group to be certified.

Take, for example, the group funding the march today. They're not "certified", and yet they've gotten plenty of donations.

They have to wait if they want to be certain their donation will remain anonymous.

Do you actually believe you're fooling anyone?
 
Not a single tea party group was denied tax exempt status.

Right, after waiting for over a year. Meanwhile leftwing groups were approved in a matter of a few weeks.

You're peddling horsehit, as usual.

You guys keep repeating that same tired old bullshit, but it doesn't change how the law works.

It doesn't matter how long it took for them to be certified, they don't have to wait for certification.

We have explained exactly how the law works. The bottom line is that the IRS persecuted TEA party groups. That simply can't credibly be denied.

Yes, donors do have to wait for a group to be certified, moron.

:lol:

No, donors don't have to wait for a group to be certified.

Take, for example, the group funding the march today. They're not "certified", and yet they've gotten plenty of donations.
Why did they have to hide those donations via the tax code?

They're not "hiding" anything - they're following the law as set by Citizen's United, and the example set by thousands of conservative groups over the last ten years.
 
ROFL! The CEO of Mozilla had to step down because he donated money to a group that supports traditional marriage.

Looking at the experience of TEA groups shows that it made raising money very difficult for them. Why do you suppose they sued the IRS?

You're just plain full of shit and an apologist for government tyranny.

They sued the IRS because it was politically advantageous for them to do so - so they could tell people like you to get upset about it.

See, it worked. You swallowed their bullshit whole, and they got exactly what they wanted.
You're just a sleazy dishonest douchebag. I won't even bother with a substantive response to that swill.

:lol:

Don't cry, it'll be alright.
Anyone who believes in justice is crying.

Nope, only little bitches are crying.

Do you need a tissue? You seem upset.
The crying is taking place in Washington DC where Democrats are using a tragedy to organize for 2018mid-terms. DNC is dipping ballots into the blood of Parkland victims.
 
Lakhota sure laughs a lot. I wonder if all redskins are as stupid as her.

Not all that hard to understand why her people never had a word for wheel until normal people arrived here.
White men are responsible for almost every important invention in history.
 
Right, after waiting for over a year. Meanwhile leftwing groups were approved in a matter of a few weeks.

You're peddling horsehit, as usual.

You guys keep repeating that same tired old bullshit, but it doesn't change how the law works.

It doesn't matter how long it took for them to be certified, they don't have to wait for certification.

We have explained exactly how the law works. The bottom line is that the IRS persecuted TEA party groups. That simply can't credibly be denied.

Yes, donors do have to wait for a group to be certified, moron.

:lol:

No, donors don't have to wait for a group to be certified.

Take, for example, the group funding the march today. They're not "certified", and yet they've gotten plenty of donations.
Why did they have to hide those donations via the tax code?

They're not "hiding" anything - they're following the law as set by Citizen's United, and the example set by thousands of conservative groups over the last ten years.
Why not show the donors to promote the wide spread support? Unless Soros and other hacks are big financial backers. Wonder if Russian groups donated?
 
Not a single tea party group was denied tax exempt status.

Right, after waiting for over a year. Meanwhile leftwing groups were approved in a matter of a few weeks.

You're peddling horsehit, as usual.

You guys keep repeating that same tired old bullshit, but it doesn't change how the law works.

It doesn't matter how long it took for them to be certified, they don't have to wait for certification.

We have explained exactly how the law works. The bottom line is that the IRS persecuted TEA party groups. That simply can't credibly be denied.

Yes, donors do have to wait for a group to be certified, moron.

:lol:

No, donors don't have to wait for a group to be certified.

Take, for example, the group funding the march today. They're not "certified", and yet they've gotten plenty of donations.

They have to wait if they want to be certain their donation will remain anonymous.

Do you actually believe you're fooling anyone?

Yes, I suppose that's possible - if a donor was so ashamed of what he was supporting and didn't want anyone to find out, I suppose they might be too afraid to donate prior to "certification".

But it's pretty doubtful that anyone was so afraid, since no conservative 501c4 has ever been denied certification.
 
Even though it will be a complete waste of time, because of rule 1 and 2, ...

Regressive liberal ROE


1. Demand a link or an explanation of the truth they are objecting to.

2. Promptly reject all explanations as right wing lies. Smoke spin deflect


I'll give it a go.

There is NO way in hell a few highschool kids had the contacts, ability or money to organize this:

4A833B8700000578-5539363-image-a-199_1521911759061.jpg



4A82960C00000578-5539363-image-a-158_1521907882551.jpg

If you think they did, then you are blind. The cowardly gun hating democrats are behind this all.

All they needed were rooms for themselves, money for stage the entertainers were free. Do you think they paid all those people to show up?
Classic deflection! How come you didn't address the fact that I said they didn't have the money or contacts or abilities to ORGANIZE this?

Ever heard of "Facebook"? Or "Twitter"?

No? How 'bout "the internets"?
isn't facebook the one where they give private information out to the left and the left loves them but if the right gets it, suddenly they suck?

that facebook?

Dunno. I don't do it myself for exactly that reason.
But it is an effective tool to ORGANIZE people --- which was the actual quote I quoted which was the actual point.

Imagine that --- actually answering the question asked. How revolutionary.
you've seldom done it man. you get your shots in and go LOOK HERE I GOT A SHOT IN!!!! and dance around like someone shoved a quarter up your ass.

then you wonder why people don't take you seriously?

let someone shove a roll of susan b anthonys up your ass and shit out a $20, then they'll take you seriously.
 

Forum List

Back
Top