Mark Judge, Key Witness To Alleged Brett Kavanaugh Assault, Refuses To Testify

[bripat9643]

Of course he doesn't want to testify... it is a lose-lose-lose situation for him. He either takes the chance to get busted for perjury, he goes there and just repeats he doesn't remember anything which hurts Kavanaugh, or he tells the truth and hurts Kavanaugh and his position inside Conservative circles.

So he just sent a letter through his lawyer instead.

The truth doesn't hurt Kavanaugh, moron. The truth is that it never happened, and that is exactly what this "witness" said.

If it never happened then he just has to say under oath it never happened. If he said he doesn't remember, then all he has to do is say under oath that he doesn't remember.

I don't think you get the guy's statement. He literally said he did not put himself into this, someone else did. He is basically saying he does not want to be put under the magnifying glass under oath where there can be no good outcome for him.

No he is not saying that. He said it never happened to his recollection. Why doesn’t this common piece of shit lying bitch testify in public? Because she is part of a smear campaign. She should be subject to a civil suit.

She should be subject to arrest for false accusations of someone committing a crime.

 

[Lewdog]

Of course he doesn't want to testify... it is a lose-lose-lose situation for him. He either takes the chance to get busted for perjury, he goes there and just repeats he doesn't remember anything which hurts Kavanaugh, or he tells the truth and hurts Kavanaugh and his position inside Conservative circles.

So he just sent a letter through his lawyer instead.

The truth doesn't hurt Kavanaugh, moron. The truth is that it never happened, and that is exactly what this "witness" said.

If it never happened then he just has to say under oath it never happened. If he said he doesn't remember, then all he has to do is say under oath that he doesn't remember.

I don't think you get the guy's statement. He literally said he did not put himself into this, someone else did. He is basically saying he does not want to be put under the magnifying glass under oath where there can be no good outcome for him.

No he is not saying that. He said it never happened to his recollection. Why doesn’t this common piece of shit lying bitch testify in public? Because she is part of a smear campaign. She should be subject to a civil suit.

She never said she wouldn't testify in public. She said she wants it to be investigated. Why would she want to get in front of idiots like Hatch who without ever talking to her or hearing her story, already say she is "mixed up?" She wants them to have more FACTS and interviews than just he said/she said... where all the misogynist old white Republicans on the committee are just going to demean her.

 

[bripat9643]

By the way, just what books were written by him when we just found out about this? Please source it for me. It might be a good read.,

He wrote in books about his activities as a kid and being a drunk.

"But Mark Judge, now a writer and filmmaker, wrote in his memoir two decades ago that he spent some of his high school years “completely annihilated” on alcohol and trying to “hook up” with girls."

Kavanaugh High School Pal Writes In Memoir Of Being Wild Drunk With Girls | HuffPost

Again, and I've said this numerous times over the last week. You guys that argue pages and pages in threads here need to take more time to actually research wtf you are arguing about instead of posting first, then reading later. You'll look less foolish.

That does not place him at this party, and you can't prove otherwise. So you are the one who is foolish.

He WON'T say he WASN'T at the party... and he WON'T say Kavanaugh is innocent.

We live in a nation where your innocent until proven guilty. He said he never remembers the incident described as ever happening in his presence. Get a better news source. This is a lowlife smear campaign orchestrated by the Democrats.

We also live in a nation where circumstantial evidence IS part of investigations. I don't need a better news source because it is all over the place. Feel free to do some of your own research. You Trump supporters on this forum are some of the laziest fucks I've ever seen. You read one paragraph off one article and come here and create a thread without doing ANYMORE research than that... and after 10 minutes when other people present you evidence from all over the place that totally blows up your argument, you ask for them to post their sources... then when they get posted, you don't click on them, you don't read them, and then you attack the source. I could post you 15 links to sources and you wouldn't read a single one of them. Do you have an ounce of self respect?

What "circumstantial evidence?" There is none, dumbfuck. You don't even know what circumstantial evidence is.

 

[OKTexas]

I challenged you to investigate my getting drunk about 40 years ago and sexually harassing my now wife. I want you to tell the rest of the folks exactly where that happened and who witnessed it and exactly what I did, with just the information I provided. That's what this Ford woman is demanding of the FBI with pretty much the same information. Are you too feeble to be up to that task?

.

Unfortunately due to exclusionary laws, your wife can't be forced to cooperate and testify against you.

No such law for witnesses. You want to take up the task?

.

What are you talking about? Married couples can not be forced to cooperate and testify against their wife/husband in an investigation.

Maybe you should go back a few pages and get caught up.

.

And I told you. You asked him to investigate your "sexual harassment" on your now wife from 30 years ago. And I said he couldn't because if she is your wife, she doesn't have to cooperate and she couldn't be forced to testify against you.

What's so hard to understand about that?

Too bad you're too incompetent to come up with a few details accurately, the time frame was about 40 years ago, and I sexually harassed a woman that would LATER be my wife. So run along, grab your mommy by the hand and see if she can explain the discussion to you.

.

 

[Bush92]

Hahahahaha, That is evidence? You go by what is said.....not what hasn't been said.

Yes his testimony is evidence. If he can't deny it happened, that doesn't help Kavanaugh one bit. He's written books about how he was a blackout drunk. You should read and watch more news sources...

By the way, just what books were written by him when we just found out about this? Please source it for me. It might be a good read.,

He wrote in books about his activities as a kid and being a drunk.

"But Mark Judge, now a writer and filmmaker, wrote in his memoir two decades ago that he spent some of his high school years “completely annihilated” on alcohol and trying to “hook up” with girls."

Kavanaugh High School Pal Writes In Memoir Of Being Wild Drunk With Girls | HuffPost

Again, and I've said this numerous times over the last week. You guys that argue pages and pages in threads here need to take more time to actually research wtf you are arguing about instead of posting first, then reading later. You'll look less foolish.

That does not place him at this party, and you can't prove otherwise. So you are the one who is foolish.

He WON'T say he WASN'T at the party... and he WON'T say Kavanaugh is innocent.

He didn’t say a UFO landed and little green men tried to rape her. So now I suppose that happened? This whole thing is shit.

 

[bripat9643]

Of course he doesn't want to testify... it is a lose-lose-lose situation for him. He either takes the chance to get busted for perjury, he goes there and just repeats he doesn't remember anything which hurts Kavanaugh, or he tells the truth and hurts Kavanaugh and his position inside Conservative circles.

So he just sent a letter through his lawyer instead.

The truth doesn't hurt Kavanaugh, moron. The truth is that it never happened, and that is exactly what this "witness" said.

If it never happened then he just has to say under oath it never happened. If he said he doesn't remember, then all he has to do is say under oath that he doesn't remember.

I don't think you get the guy's statement. He literally said he did not put himself into this, someone else did. He is basically saying he does not want to be put under the magnifying glass under oath where there can be no good outcome for him.

No he is not saying that. He said it never happened to his recollection. Why doesn’t this common piece of shit lying bitch testify in public? Because she is part of a smear campaign. She should be subject to a civil suit.

She never said she wouldn't testify in public. She said she wants it to be investigated. Why would she want to get in front of idiots like Hatch who without ever talking to her or hearing her story, already say she is "mixed up?" She wants them to have more FACTS and interviews than just he said/she said... where all the misogynist old white Republicans on the committee are just going to demean her.

In other words, she won't testify in public. The FBI doesn't investigate this kind of shit, moron. It doesn't matter what she wants. A witness doesn't get to dictate the procedure of the Senate Judiciary committee.

This is just another ploy to delay the vote on Kavanaugh. No one is fooled.

 

[Lewdog]

Unfortunately due to exclusionary laws, your wife can't be forced to cooperate and testify against you.

No such law for witnesses. You want to take up the task?

.

What are you talking about? Married couples can not be forced to cooperate and testify against their wife/husband in an investigation.

Maybe you should go back a few pages and get caught up.

.

And I told you. You asked him to investigate your "sexual harassment" on your now wife from 30 years ago. And I said he couldn't because if she is your wife, she doesn't have to cooperate and she couldn't be forced to testify against you.

What's so hard to understand about that?

Too bad you're too incompetent to come up with a few details accurately, the time frame was about 40 years ago, and I sexually harassed a woman that would LATER be my wife. So run along, grab your mommy by the hand and see if she can explain the discussion to you.

.

Doesn't matter that she LATER became your wife. Spousal privilege is still in effect. You have no fucking clue what you are talking about.

"In the common law, spousal privilege (also called marital privilege or husband-wife privilege)[1] is a term used in the law of evidence to describe two separate privileges that apply to spouses: the spousal communications privilege and the spousal testimonial privilege.

Both types of privilege are based on the policy of encouraging spousal harmony and preventing spouses from having to condemn, or be condemned by, their spouses: the spousal communications privilege or confidences privilege is a form of privileged communication that protects the contents of confidential communications between spouses during their marriage from testimonial disclosure, while spousal testimonial privilege (also called spousal incompetency and spousal immunity) protects the individual holding the privilege from being called to testify in proceedings relating to his/her spouse. However, the spousal privileges have their roots in the legal fiction that a husband and wife were one person."

Spousal privilege - Wikipedia

 

[Political Junky]

Judge was a classmate of Kavanaugh’s at Georgetown Prep when Christine Blasey Ford says the incident occurred.

Mark Judge, the man who Christine Blasey Ford has said was in the room while Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh allegedly assaulted her when they were in high school, has declined to speak before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Democrats had called for him to do so. But in a statement to committee chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Judge claimed he had no memory of the incident and declined to speak publicly about the allegation.

More: Mark Judge, Key Witness To Alleged Brett Kavanaugh Assault, Refuses To Testify

It's interesting that Judge has no memory of the incident. Well, Dr. Ford said there were also two more boys downstairs - so why doesn't someone investigate them and their memory of the gathering? Surely all of them aren't deaf and dumb.

He can be forced to.

 

[OKTexas]

Of course he doesn't want to testify... it is a lose-lose-lose situation for him. He either takes the chance to get busted for perjury, he goes there and just repeats he doesn't remember anything which hurts Kavanaugh, or he tells the truth and hurts Kavanaugh and his position inside Conservative circles.

So he just sent a letter through his lawyer instead.

The truth doesn't hurt Kavanaugh, moron. The truth is that it never happened, and that is exactly what this "witness" said.

If it never happened then he just has to say under oath it never happened. If he said he doesn't remember, then all he has to do is say under oath that he doesn't remember.

I don't think you get the guy's statement. He literally said he did not put himself into this, someone else did. He is basically saying he does not want to be put under the magnifying glass under oath where there can be no good outcome for him.

No he is not saying that. He said it never happened to his recollection. Why doesn’t this common piece of shit lying bitch testify in public? Because she is part of a smear campaign. She should be subject to a civil suit.

Kavanaugh hired a private attorney, one that specializes in defamation cases. He's gonna go after this woman when she can't prove anything.

.

 

[Bush92]

Left wing operatives accusations against this good man and next Supreme Court Justice...
Sexy The Walking Dead GIF - Find & Share on GIPHY

 

[Bush92]

Of course he doesn't want to testify... it is a lose-lose-lose situation for him. He either takes the chance to get busted for perjury, he goes there and just repeats he doesn't remember anything which hurts Kavanaugh, or he tells the truth and hurts Kavanaugh and his position inside Conservative circles.

So he just sent a letter through his lawyer instead.

The truth doesn't hurt Kavanaugh, moron. The truth is that it never happened, and that is exactly what this "witness" said.

If it never happened then he just has to say under oath it never happened. If he said he doesn't remember, then all he has to do is say under oath that he doesn't remember.

I don't think you get the guy's statement. He literally said he did not put himself into this, someone else did. He is basically saying he does not want to be put under the magnifying glass under oath where there can be no good outcome for him.

No he is not saying that. He said it never happened to his recollection. Why doesn’t this common piece of shit lying bitch testify in public? Because she is part of a smear campaign. She should be subject to a civil suit.

Kavanaugh hired a private attorney, one that specializes in defamation cases. He's gonna go after this woman when she can't prove anything.

.

Hope he destroys her life after this smear campaign that she is a part of perpetrating.

 

[OKTexas]

Of course he doesn't want to testify... it is a lose-lose-lose situation for him. He either takes the chance to get busted for perjury, he goes there and just repeats he doesn't remember anything which hurts Kavanaugh, or he tells the truth and hurts Kavanaugh and his position inside Conservative circles.

So he just sent a letter through his lawyer instead.

The truth doesn't hurt Kavanaugh, moron. The truth is that it never happened, and that is exactly what this "witness" said.

If it never happened then he just has to say under oath it never happened. If he said he doesn't remember, then all he has to do is say under oath that he doesn't remember.

I don't think you get the guy's statement. He literally said he did not put himself into this, someone else did. He is basically saying he does not want to be put under the magnifying glass under oath where there can be no good outcome for him.

No he is not saying that. He said it never happened to his recollection. Why doesn’t this common piece of shit lying bitch testify in public? Because she is part of a smear campaign. She should be subject to a civil suit.

She never said she wouldn't testify in public. She said she wants it to be investigated. Why would she want to get in front of idiots like Hatch who without ever talking to her or hearing her story, already say she is "mixed up?" She wants them to have more FACTS and interviews than just he said/she said... where all the misogynist old white Republicans on the committee are just going to demean her.

She can't provide essential details that could support an investigation. Tonight she took up the talking points of chuck the smuck schumer, this is a political freak show, nothing else and the republicans should give her till Monday to show up. If she doesn't they should cancel the hearing and move straight to the committee vote, and a floor vote next Thursday. NO MORE DELAYS.

.

 

[Bush92]

Ford should have watched this video before she made false accusations...

 

[OKTexas]

Of course he doesn't want to testify... it is a lose-lose-lose situation for him. He either takes the chance to get busted for perjury, he goes there and just repeats he doesn't remember anything which hurts Kavanaugh, or he tells the truth and hurts Kavanaugh and his position inside Conservative circles.

So he just sent a letter through his lawyer instead.

The truth doesn't hurt Kavanaugh, moron. The truth is that it never happened, and that is exactly what this "witness" said.

If it never happened then he just has to say under oath it never happened. If he said he doesn't remember, then all he has to do is say under oath that he doesn't remember.

I don't think you get the guy's statement. He literally said he did not put himself into this, someone else did. He is basically saying he does not want to be put under the magnifying glass under oath where there can be no good outcome for him.

No he is not saying that. He said it never happened to his recollection. Why doesn’t this common piece of shit lying bitch testify in public? Because she is part of a smear campaign. She should be subject to a civil suit.

She should be subject to arrest for false accusations of someone committing a crime.

It's called interference in governmental actions and yes, if she can't prove her claims, she should be prosecuted. Let her find out how it feels to have the DOJ bankrupt her and her family.

.

 

[francoHFW]

View attachment 217257

Times up!

 

[francoHFW]

Ford should have watched this video before she made false accusations...

Well at least You Dupes would give her A fair hearing LOL deplorable...

 

[frigidweirdo]

Judge was a classmate of Kavanaugh’s at Georgetown Prep when Christine Blasey Ford says the incident occurred.

Mark Judge, the man who Christine Blasey Ford has said was in the room while Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh allegedly assaulted her when they were in high school, has declined to speak before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Democrats had called for him to do so. But in a statement to committee chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Judge claimed he had no memory of the incident and declined to speak publicly about the allegation.

More: Mark Judge, Key Witness To Alleged Brett Kavanaugh Assault, Refuses To Testify

It's interesting that Judge has no memory of the incident. Well, Dr. Ford said there were also two more boys downstairs - so why doesn't someone investigate them and their memory of the gathering? Surely all of them aren't deaf and dumb.

Ah, what happens in the room, stays in the room.

Prep boys..... that he "doesn't remember" is evidence that he knows something happened.

 

[OKTexas]

No such law for witnesses. You want to take up the task?

.

What are you talking about? Married couples can not be forced to cooperate and testify against their wife/husband in an investigation.

Maybe you should go back a few pages and get caught up.

.

And I told you. You asked him to investigate your "sexual harassment" on your now wife from 30 years ago. And I said he couldn't because if she is your wife, she doesn't have to cooperate and she couldn't be forced to testify against you.

What's so hard to understand about that?

Too bad you're too incompetent to come up with a few details accurately, the time frame was about 40 years ago, and I sexually harassed a woman that would LATER be my wife. So run along, grab your mommy by the hand and see if she can explain the discussion to you.

.

Doesn't matter that she LATER became your wife. Spousal privilege is still in effect. You have no fucking clue what you are talking about.

"In the common law, spousal privilege (also called marital privilege or husband-wife privilege)[1] is a term used in the law of evidence to describe two separate privileges that apply to spouses: the spousal communications privilege and the spousal testimonial privilege.

Both types of privilege are based on the policy of encouraging spousal harmony and preventing spouses from having to condemn, or be condemned by, their spouses: the spousal communications privilege or confidences privilege is a form of privileged communication that protects the contents of confidential communications between spouses during their marriage from testimonial disclosure, while spousal testimonial privilege (also called spousal incompetency and spousal immunity) protects the individual holding the privilege from being called to testify in proceedings relating to his/her spouse. However, the spousal privileges have their roots in the legal fiction that a husband and wife were one person."

Spousal privilege - Wikipedia

God you're such a pathetic little flake. You can be convicted of raping your girlfriend today and still marry her after you get out of jail, that won't vacate the conviction. But also a man or woman can be convicted of sexual assault of their spouse while they are married and one spouse can testify against the other.

But as usual you're trying to deflect from the the point of the exercise, that's not having enough information about an event or the legal jurisdiction to conduct an adequate investigation. You can't investigate a party without knowing when or where the party was or who was in attendance. Now even Feinstein is saying she can't say everything in Fords story is truthful.

.

 

[Bush92]

Judge was a classmate of Kavanaugh’s at Georgetown Prep when Christine Blasey Ford says the incident occurred.

Mark Judge, the man who Christine Blasey Ford has said was in the room while Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh allegedly assaulted her when they were in high school, has declined to speak before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Democrats had called for him to do so. But in a statement to committee chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Judge claimed he had no memory of the incident and declined to speak publicly about the allegation.

More: Mark Judge, Key Witness To Alleged Brett Kavanaugh Assault, Refuses To Testify

It's interesting that Judge has no memory of the incident. Well, Dr. Ford said there were also two more boys downstairs - so why doesn't someone investigate them and their memory of the gathering? Surely all of them aren't deaf and dumb.

Ah, what happens in the room, stays in the room.

Prep boys..... that he "doesn't remember" is evidence that he knows something happened.

 

[Bush92]

Ford should have watched this video before she made false accusations...

Well at least You Dupes would give her A fair hearing LOL deplorable...

Why...she is a kook?