320 Years of History
Gold Member
If all my children are "mature" they are no longer dependents now are they?
That would depend on whether they are your dependents or not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If all my children are "mature" they are no longer dependents now are they?
If all my children are "mature" they are no longer dependents now are they?
That would depend on whether they are your dependents or not.
If all my children are "mature" they are no longer dependents now are they?
That would depend on whether they are your dependents or not.
If all my children are "mature" they are no longer dependents now are they?
That would depend on whether they are your dependents or not.
View attachment 73915
If you're insinuating that I hold guardianship over any of them in some form or way I don't.
They are all capable and functioning adults able to make their own decisions in life's grand scheme.
*****SMILE*****
Yeah, not sure he knows what "dependent" means.
So my children, the males and the females, are all over 21 and after my talks with them they've agreed that they'll marry me under platonic conditions because of the benefits it confers to them.
It shouldn't matter nor should it be any of the governments business how people form their marriage groups, much less who's having sex with who, so long as all involved are mature willing companions.
It's time for the government to get out of my families business because we're all mature willing companions and want to form a marriage grouping of our choosing.
*****CHUCKLE*****
So my children, the males and the females, are all over 21 and after my talks with them they've agreed that they'll marry me under platonic conditions because of the benefits it confers to them.
It shouldn't matter nor should it be any of the governments business how people form their marriage groups, much less who's having sex with who, so long as all involved are mature willing companions.
It's time for the government to get out of my families business because we're all mature willing companions and want to form a marriage grouping of our choosing.
*****CHUCKLE*****
Absolutely 100% correct. Now if I have a friend who wants to have a polygamous married relationship, I will try to convince them not to bc I don't think that it's best for them...but that is their choice to make, and no right of the governments to interject in that.
Those who were the #lovewins people. Do you not see a problem in a Supreme Court that ruled against their previous ruling just two years before. They went from saying its a states right issue, to states have no say in the matter?!? In reality #governmentswins-vs-individualliberty
So my children, the males and the females, are all over 21 and after my talks with them they've agreed that they'll marry me under platonic conditions because of the benefits it confers to them.
It shouldn't matter nor should it be any of the governments business how people form their marriage groups, much less who's having sex with who, so long as all involved are mature willing companions.
It's time for the government to get out of my families business because we're all mature willing companions and want to form a marriage grouping of our choosing.
*****CHUCKLE*****
Absolutely 100% correct. Now if I have a friend who wants to have a polygamous married relationship, I will try to convince them not to bc I don't think that it's best for them...but that is their choice to make, and no right of the governments to interject in that.
Those who were the #lovewins people. Do you not see a problem in a Supreme Court that ruled against their previous ruling just two years before. They went from saying its a states right issue, to states have no say in the matter?!? In reality #governmentswins-vs-individualliberty
So my children, the males and the females, are all over 21 and after my talks with them they've agreed that they'll marry me under platonic conditions because of the benefits it confers to them.
It shouldn't matter nor should it be any of the governments business how people form their marriage groups, much less who's having sex with who, so long as all involved are mature willing companions.
It's time for the government to get out of my families business because we're all mature willing companions and want to form a marriage grouping of our choosing.
*****CHUCKLE*****
Absolutely 100% correct. Now if I have a friend who wants to have a polygamous married relationship, I will try to convince them not to bc I don't think that it's best for them...but that is their choice to make, and no right of the governments to interject in that.
Those who were the #lovewins people. Do you not see a problem in a Supreme Court that ruled against their previous ruling just two years before. They went from saying its a states right issue, to states have no say in the matter?!? In reality #governmentswins-vs-individualliberty
Red:
If someone states to me they want to be polygamous, I'll just say, "Okay," because they are free to want that, regardless of whether I think they should or should not, regardless of whether I think it a good thing or not. If they are going to assert that the benefits of polygamy, specifically with their children (platonically or not), outweigh the downsides, well, that's something that their merely thinking so is insufficient to show the merit of their claim to that effect. There are a host of areas they'd need to dialectically address -- social, psychological, legal, political, and economic -- and show that the pros across all those areas dwarf the cons. I have seen no such case presented here or elsewhere.
So my children, the males and the females, are all over 21 and after my talks with them they've agreed that they'll marry me under platonic conditions because of the benefits it confers to them.
It shouldn't matter nor should it be any of the governments business how people form their marriage groups, much less who's having sex with who, so long as all involved are mature willing companions.
It's time for the government to get out of my families business because we're all mature willing companions and want to form a marriage grouping of our choosing.
*****CHUCKLE*****
Absolutely 100% correct. Now if I have a friend who wants to have a polygamous married relationship, I will try to convince them not to bc I don't think that it's best for them...but that is their choice to make, and no right of the governments to interject in that.
Those who were the #lovewins people. Do you not see a problem in a Supreme Court that ruled against their previous ruling just two years before. They went from saying its a states right issue, to states have no say in the matter?!? In reality #governmentswins-vs-individualliberty
Red:
If someone states to me they want to be polygamous, I'll just say, "Okay," because they are free to want that, regardless of whether I think they should or should not, regardless of whether I think it a good thing or not. If they are going to assert that the benefits of polygamy, specifically with their children (platonically or not), outweigh the downsides, well, that's something that their merely thinking so is insufficient to show the merit of their claim to that effect. There are a host of areas they'd need to dialectically address -- social, psychological, legal, political, and economic -- and show that the pros across all those areas dwarf the cons. I have seen no such case presented here or elsewhere.
It is their choice but there is nothing wrong with me giving advice to a friend. The advice would go something like how can this person be fully devoted to you and another person at the same time. I wouldn't recommend polygamy to anyone, just like I wouldn't recommend heroin to anyone. It doesn't mean I take their choice away from them
It is their choice but there is nothing wrong with me giving advice to a friend. The advice would go something like how can this person be fully devoted to you and another person at the same time. I wouldn't recommend polygamy to anyone, just like I wouldn't recommend heroin to anyone. It doesn't mean I take their choice away from them
View attachment 74015
How can a parent be devoted to any more than one child at a time?
******SMILE*****
So now you are stating that it is the governments business to deny mature willing companions the right to form marriages as they choose.