Marxist Pelosi Fixing Law to Eliminate God from Oath in House. Vote!

[22lcidw]

FIne, Pelosi should put it up to a vote. If she doesn't think it is an offense against the 1st Amendment, the courts will decide after the lawsuit.

Dood you are a complete retard.

WHO THE FUCK would file a "lawsuit"? "God"? And on what basis?

Don't bother to answer that, I already know you'll ignore this question so you can wallow in the sewer of your own ignorance.

The lawsuit will be filed on the grounds by people who believe this is one nation under God, and Pelosi was overstepping her bounds.

nothing is stopping people from saying those 4 words at the end of their oath, even if this new rule passed you could say those 4 words that your Lord and Savior told you not to if you feel that strongly about it

"Nothing is stopping people" -- EXACTLY. On the other hand something is forcing people TO say them. But the Fascisti like the idea of forcing their will on others.

The be all like

Authoritarians give me the urge to regurge.

Notice how not a single one of them will address that such an oath is against the very commands of Jesus Himself...

You have used the Jesus angle to the point men are wearing dresses and using little girls bathrooms and there will be pedophile legality legislation and beastiality after that. Life is getting harder and harder for a small minority. I do not disagree because of ignorance of some. But ph uk getting married and raising kids.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You have used the Jesus angle to the point men are wearing dresses and using little girls bathrooms and there will be pedophile legality legislation and beastiality after that. Life is getting harder and harder for a small minority. I do not disagree because of ignorance of some. But ph uk getting married and raising kids.

what the fuck are you talking about?

Are you drunk?

How is Jesus connected to men wearing dresses?

 

[Redfish]

I have no issue with muslims using Allah, Buddhists using Buddha, Hindus using Vishnu, or pagans using "the earth". Atheists can use "so help me nothing".

and yes, it would keep me from lying, I cant speak for others, how about you?

No, those 4 words would not have any impact on me. If one believes in God then they know that God does not like us to lie and that God is always watching so adding those words changes nothing.

Do you feel it is ok to lie if you have not used those 4 words?

never ok to lie, but the oath has legal implications. bill Clinton lied under oath, so did Comey, Hillary, and several others. The legal significance is more important than the religions significance. I guess it could be legally significant without the last 4 words, but why are they offensive? Who do they harm?

so you would lie under oath? and if found out are you ready for jail time for perjury?

The oath has the same legal implications with or without the last 4 words. In many places those 4 words have been optional for years and years.

legal, maybe. morally, not the same to anyone of any religion. Adding "so help me God" adds something for anyone who believes in a higher power.
You can disagree, rant and rave, but you will not convince me or any other believer that it has the same meaning either way.

If it means that much to you, you will still be free to add it. Those 4 words are not part of the Presidential Oath of Office yet many presidents add the words themselves.

I have to ask, do you consider yourself a Christian? Do you follow the teachings and commands from Jesus?

We just disagree on this, and that's OK. Yes, I am a Christian and I do my best to follow Christian doctrine, but like all humans I am far from perfect in that regard.

Please don't come up with some scripture that you think justifies your position on this. I am done with this discussion

 

[Seawytch]

I have no issue with muslims using Allah, Buddhists using Buddha, Hindus using Vishnu, or pagans using "the earth". Atheists can use "so help me nothing".

and yes, it would keep me from lying, I cant speak for others, how about you?

No, those 4 words would not have any impact on me. If one believes in God then they know that God does not like us to lie and that God is always watching so adding those words changes nothing.

Do you feel it is ok to lie if you have not used those 4 words?

never ok to lie, but the oath has legal implications. bill Clinton lied under oath, so did Comey, Hillary, and several others. The legal significance is more important than the religions significance. I guess it could be legally significant without the last 4 words, but why are they offensive? Who do they harm?

so you would lie under oath? and if found out are you ready for jail time for perjury?

The oath has the same legal implications with or without the last 4 words. In many places those 4 words have been optional for years and years.

legal, maybe. morally, not the same to anyone of any religion. Adding "so help me God" adds something for anyone who believes in a higher power.
You can disagree, rant and rave, but you will not convince me or any other believer that it has the same meaning either way.

If it means that much to you, you will still be free to add it. Those 4 words are not part of the Presidential Oath of Office yet many presidents add the words themselves.

I have to ask, do you consider yourself a Christian? Do you follow the teachings and commands from Jesus?

They don't care that Jesus said not to pray in public or not to swear to god. If they can equate it to libruls bad, Pelosi evil, Jesus doesn't matter.

And if you continue to provide those liberal leaning facts, well Mister, you'll find yourself on fake ignore!

 

[Synthaholic]

Atheism isn't protected by the First Amendment

Neither is Christianity, over Islam or any other religion.

 

[Ambivalent1]

You have used the Jesus angle to the point men are wearing dresses and using little girls bathrooms and there will be pedophile legality legislation and beastiality after that. Life is getting harder and harder for a small minority. I do not disagree because of ignorance of some. But ph uk getting married and raising kids.

what the fuck are you talking about?

Are you drunk?

How is Jesus connected to men wearing dresses?

Oh my, just LOOK how "godly" gator is.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

We just disagree on this, and that's OK. Yes, I am a Christian and I do my best to follow Christian doctrine, but like all humans I am far from perfect in that regard.

Please don't come up with some scripture that you think justifies your position on this. I am done with this discussion

you do not have to reply, but I do find it odd that you do your best to follow Christian doctrine but at the same time fight to have the government force people to go against an explicit command from Jesus.

Perhaps instead of following Christian doctrine you might try and follow Jesus

 

[Ambivalent1]

We just disagree on this, and that's OK. Yes, I am a Christian and I do my best to follow Christian doctrine, but like all humans I am far from perfect in that regard.

Please don't come up with some scripture that you think justifies your position on this. I am done with this discussion

you do not have to reply, but I do find it odd that you do your best to follow Christian doctrine but at the same time fight to have the government force people to go against an explicit command from Jesus.

Perhaps instead of following Christian doctrine you might try and follow Jesus

You're no Christian boy. You're hell spahn and nothing more. Nancy represents you plain and simple.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Let us first ask why those words were ever included. Anybody got any ideas, because they are not in the Presidential Oath or any other required of government employees.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

We just disagree on this, and that's OK. Yes, I am a Christian and I do my best to follow Christian doctrine, but like all humans I am far from perfect in that regard.

Please don't come up with some scripture that you think justifies your position on this. I am done with this discussion

you do not have to reply, but I do find it odd that you do your best to follow Christian doctrine but at the same time fight to have the government force people to go against an explicit command from Jesus.

Perhaps instead of following Christian doctrine you might try and follow Jesus

You're no Christian boy. You're hell spahn and nothing more. Nancy represents you plain and simple.

Spawn...not spahn...

fuck you are stupid.

 

[Ambivalent1]

We just disagree on this, and that's OK. Yes, I am a Christian and I do my best to follow Christian doctrine, but like all humans I am far from perfect in that regard.

Please don't come up with some scripture that you think justifies your position on this. I am done with this discussion

you do not have to reply, but I do find it odd that you do your best to follow Christian doctrine but at the same time fight to have the government force people to go against an explicit command from Jesus.

Perhaps instead of following Christian doctrine you might try and follow Jesus

You're no Christian boy. You're hell spahn and nothing more. Nancy represents you plain and simple.

Spawn...not spahn...

fuck you are stupid.

LOL, you're no "Christian" son. You are just a pretender. God what an idiot.

 

[Ambivalent1]

You have used the Jesus angle to the point men are wearing dresses and using little girls bathrooms and there will be pedophile legality legislation and beastiality after that. Life is getting harder and harder for a small minority. I do not disagree because of ignorance of some. But ph uk getting married and raising kids.

what the fuck are you talking about?

Are you drunk?

How is Jesus connected to men wearing dresses?

What a "godly" man you are…..

 

[Ambivalent1]

We just disagree on this, and that's OK. Yes, I am a Christian and I do my best to follow Christian doctrine, but like all humans I am far from perfect in that regard.

Please don't come up with some scripture that you think justifies your position on this. I am done with this discussion

you do not have to reply, but I do find it odd that you do your best to follow Christian doctrine but at the same time fight to have the government force people to go against an explicit command from Jesus.

Perhaps instead of following Christian doctrine you might try and follow Jesus

You're no Christian boy. You're hell spahn and nothing more. Nancy represents you plain and simple.

Spawn...not spahn...

fuck you are stupid.

(smile) Check the spelling and google it

 

[Harpy Eagle]

We just disagree on this, and that's OK. Yes, I am a Christian and I do my best to follow Christian doctrine, but like all humans I am far from perfect in that regard.

Please don't come up with some scripture that you think justifies your position on this. I am done with this discussion

you do not have to reply, but I do find it odd that you do your best to follow Christian doctrine but at the same time fight to have the government force people to go against an explicit command from Jesus.

Perhaps instead of following Christian doctrine you might try and follow Jesus

You're no Christian boy. You're hell spahn and nothing more. Nancy represents you plain and simple.

Spawn...not spahn...

fuck you are stupid.

(smile) Check the spelling and google it

nope, I am not warren spahn.

keep on being a fucking idiot.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

We just disagree on this, and that's OK. Yes, I am a Christian and I do my best to follow Christian doctrine, but like all humans I am far from perfect in that regard.

Please don't come up with some scripture that you think justifies your position on this. I am done with this discussion

you do not have to reply, but I do find it odd that you do your best to follow Christian doctrine but at the same time fight to have the government force people to go against an explicit command from Jesus.

Perhaps instead of following Christian doctrine you might try and follow Jesus

You're no Christian boy. You're hell spahn and nothing more. Nancy represents you plain and simple.

Spawn...not spahn...

fuck you are stupid.

LOL, you're no "Christian" son. You are just a pretender. God what an idiot.

I will pay you 100 bucks if you can find a post of me saying that I am a Christian.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Let us first ask why those words were ever included. Anybody got any ideas, because they are not in the Presidential Oath or any other required of government employees.

They are in the Marine Corps (and I assume other services) Oath of Enlistment...though they are optional.

 

[Ambivalent1]

We just disagree on this, and that's OK. Yes, I am a Christian and I do my best to follow Christian doctrine, but like all humans I am far from perfect in that regard.

Please don't come up with some scripture that you think justifies your position on this. I am done with this discussion

you do not have to reply, but I do find it odd that you do your best to follow Christian doctrine but at the same time fight to have the government force people to go against an explicit command from Jesus.

Perhaps instead of following Christian doctrine you might try and follow Jesus

You're no Christian boy. You're hell spahn and nothing more. Nancy represents you plain and simple.

Spawn...not spahn...

fuck you are stupid.

LOL, you're no "Christian" son. You are just a pretender. God what an idiot.

I will pay you 100 bucks if you can find a post of me saying that I am a Christian.

LOL, more word games. You're a punk bitch kid. Watchu gon do boi?

 

[Ambivalent1]

We just disagree on this, and that's OK. Yes, I am a Christian and I do my best to follow Christian doctrine, but like all humans I am far from perfect in that regard.

Please don't come up with some scripture that you think justifies your position on this. I am done with this discussion

you do not have to reply, but I do find it odd that you do your best to follow Christian doctrine but at the same time fight to have the government force people to go against an explicit command from Jesus.

Perhaps instead of following Christian doctrine you might try and follow Jesus

You're no Christian boy. You're hell spahn and nothing more. Nancy represents you plain and simple.

Spawn...not spahn...

fuck you are stupid.

(smile) Check the spelling and google it

nope, I am not warren spahn.

keep on being a fucking idiot.

You're a punk kid. I own you. Watchu gon do?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

you do not have to reply, but I do find it odd that you do your best to follow Christian doctrine but at the same time fight to have the government force people to go against an explicit command from Jesus.

Perhaps instead of following Christian doctrine you might try and follow Jesus

You're no Christian boy. You're hell spahn and nothing more. Nancy represents you plain and simple.

Spawn...not spahn...

fuck you are stupid.

LOL, you're no "Christian" son. You are just a pretender. God what an idiot.

I will pay you 100 bucks if you can find a post of me saying that I am a Christian.

LOL, more word games. You're a punk bitch kid. Watchu gon do boi?

And you still have nothing but lies about me as I have utterly destroyed you so you resort to lie after lie.

What am I going to do? Keep laughing at your pathetic ass like I have been for all 8 or 9 of your accounts.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[sparky]

I voted NO

PeLousy can not and will not eliminate

GOD from the house vote

she is another piece of Satanist ....like her sister Hillary Clinton

both will burn in Hell!

BOTH.

And you really expect me to respect that opinion?

You get as much respect as a lunatic deserves.

George Washington and every single person who signed the Declaration were as or were more radical than Ms. Skye. Your homework is to read every scrap of paper President Washington ever signed if you don't believe it. In God We Trust.

Washington was not very religious in his writings or speeches

I read it all a few years back, sir, and all of it contained references to God like this below:

Here's his inaugural address of 1789. I will try to highlight his references to God for you, which you must have missed before:

Fellow-Citizens of the Senate and of the House of Representatives:

AMONG the vicissitudes incident to life no event could have filled me with greater anxieties than that of which the notification was transmitted by your order, and received on the 14th day of the present month. On the one hand, I was summoned by my country, whose voice I can never hear but with veneration and love, from a retreat which I had chosen with the fondest predilection, and, in my flattering hopes, with an immutable decision, as the asylum of my declining years—a retreat which was rendered every day more necessary as well as more dear to me by the addition of habit to inclination, and of frequent interruptions in my health to the gradual waste committed on it by time. On the other hand, the magnitude and difficulty of the trust to which the voice of my country called me, being sufficient to awaken in the wisest and most experienced of her citizens a distrustful scrutiny into his qualifications, could not but overwhelm with despondence one who (inheriting inferior endowments from nature and unpracticed in the duties of civil administration) ought to be peculiarly conscious of his own deficiencies. In this conflict of emotions all I dare aver is that it has been my faithful study to collect my duty from a just appreciation of every circumstance by which it might be affected. All I dare hope is that if, in executing this task, I have been too much swayed by a grateful remembrance of former instances, or by an affectionate sensibility to this transcendent proof of the confidence of my fellow-citizens, and have thence too little consulted my incapacity as well as disinclination for the weighty and untried cares before me, my error will be palliated by the motives which mislead me, and its consequences be judged by my country with some share of the partiality in which they originated. 1
Such being the impressions under which I have, in obedience to the public summons, repaired to the present station, it would be peculiarly improper to omit in this first official act my fervent supplications to that Almighty Being who rules over the universe, who presides in the councils of nations, and whose providential aids can supply every human defect, that His benediction may consecrate to the liberties and happiness of the people of the United States a Government instituted by themselves for these essential purposes, and may enable every instrument employed in its administration to execute with success the functions allotted to his charge. In tendering this homage to the Great Author of every public and private good, I assure myself that it expresses your sentiments not less than my own, nor those of my fellow-citizens at large less than either. No people can be bound to acknowledge and adore the Invisible Hand which conducts the affairs of men more than those of the United States. Every step by which they have advanced to the character of an independent nation seems to have been distinguished by some token of providential agency; and in the important revolution just accomplished in the system of their united government the tranquil deliberations and voluntary consent of so many distinct communities from which the event has resulted can not be compared with the means by which most governments have been established without some return of pious gratitude, along with an humble anticipation of the future blessings which the past seem to presage. These reflections, arising out of the present crisis, have forced themselves too strongly on my mind to be suppressed. You will join with me, I trust, in thinking that there are none under the influence of which the proceedings of a new and free government can more auspiciously commence. 2
By the article establishing the executive department it is made the duty of the President "to recommend to your consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient." The circumstances under which I now meet you will acquit me from entering into that subject further than to refer to the great constitutional charter under which you are assembled, and which, in defining your powers, designates the objects to which your attention is to be given. It will be more consistent with those circumstances, and far more congenial with the feelings which actuate me, to substitute, in place of a recommendation of particular measures, the tribute that is due to the talents, the rectitude, and the patriotism which adorn the characters selected to devise and adopt them. In these honorable qualifications I behold the surest pledges that as on one side no local prejudices or attachments, no separate views nor party animosities, will misdirect the comprehensive and equal eye which ought to watch over this great assemblage of communities and interests, so, on another, that the foundation of our national policy will be laid in the pure and immutable principles of private morality, and the preeminence of free government be exemplified by all the attributes which can win the affections of its citizens and command the respect of the world. I dwell on this prospect with every satisfaction which an ardent love for my country can inspire, since there is no truth more thoroughly established than that there exists in the economy and course of nature an indissoluble union between virtue and happiness; between duty and advantage; between the genuine maxims of an honest and magnanimous policy and the solid rewards of public prosperity and felicity; since we ought to be no less persuaded that the propitious smiles of Heaven can never be expected on a nation that disregards the eternal rules of order and right which Heaven itself has ordained; and since the preservation of the sacred fire of liberty and the destiny of the republican model of government are justly considered, perhaps, as deeply, as finally, staked on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people. 3
Besides the ordinary objects submitted to your care, it will remain with your judgment to decide how far an exercise of the occasional power delegated by the fifth article of the Constitution is rendered expedient at the present juncture by the nature of objections which have been urged against the system, or by the degree of inquietude which has given birth to them. Instead of undertaking particular recommendations on this subject, in which I could be guided by no lights derived from official opportunities, I shall again give way to my entire confidence in your discernment and pursuit of the public good; for I assure myself that whilst you carefully avoid every alteration which might endanger the benefits of an united and effective government, or which ought to await the future lessons of experience, a reverence for the characteristic rights of freemen and a regard for the public harmony will sufficiently influence your deliberations on the question how far the former can be impregnably fortified or the latter be safely and advantageously promoted. 4
To the foregoing observations I have one to add, which will be most properly addressed to the House of Representatives. It concerns myself, and will therefore be as brief as possible. When I was first honored with a call into the service of my country, then on the eve of an arduous struggle for its liberties, the light in which I contemplated my duty required that I should renounce every pecuniary compensation. From this resolution I have in no instance departed; and being still under the impressions which produced it, I must decline as inapplicable to myself any share in the personal emoluments which may be indispensably included in a permanent provision for the executive department, and must accordingly pray that the pecuniary estimates for the station in which I am placed may during my continuance in it be limited to such actual expenditures as the public good may be thought to require. 5
Having thus imparted to you my sentiments as they have been awakened by the occasion which brings us together, I shall take my present leave; but not without resorting once more to the benign Parent of the Human Race in humble supplication that, since He has been pleased to favor the American people with opportunities for deliberating in perfect tranquillity, and dispositions for deciding with unparalleled unanimity on a form of government for the security of their union and the advancement of their happiness, so His divine blessing may be equally conspicuous in the enlarged views, the temperate consultations, and the wise measures on which the success of this Government must depend

I love this man's Lord, his life, his faith, His sensibilities, his selflessness, his gifts, and his knowledge of who God is.​

References to God do not prove that Washington wanted America RUN by God, or his followers.....~S~