Shusha
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2015
- 13,475
- 2,418
- 290
Someone walking up to a fence, is not a threat to your life.Ah, now you want to wiggle out of your previous claim. Lives have been lost. That makes it a deadly threat. But you want to say it is not a deadly threat because not enough lives have been lost. So how many lives have to be lost then? One? Ten? A hundred? Two thousand? How does a country know that enough lives have been lost that they are permitted to respond to the use of lethal force?
Rockets are a threat. Mortars are a threat. IEDs are threats. Machine guns are threats. Knives are threats. Tunnels are threats. Bombs are threats. Lethal threats all.
You were trying to claim that these threats are not really threats. You are also claiming that even when there are deaths as a direct result of these threats, they are not really threats, because there were not enough dead people for the threat to exist.
How many dead people does it take? Come on, YOU made the claim. Rescind it or own up to it.