007
Charter Member
- May 8, 2004
- 47,726
- 19,433
Radical islam and america's evangelicals are pretty much the same.
More like... "radical islam and America's racist asshole blacks like you are pretty much the same."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Radical islam and america's evangelicals are pretty much the same.
Radical islam and america's evangelicals are pretty much the same.
More like... "radical islam and America's racist asshole blacks like you are pretty much the same."
No matter how you want to slice it, it's muslims killing muslims, and we ought to let them do it until there isn't one left standing. History has taught us that intervening and trying to help is a pointless, costly endeavor.There's nothing dishonest about it. We are absolutely enabling militant Islamists overthrow Assad.
The FSA has some Islamist factions, but are largely secular in their overarching political ideology.
Al Nusra and the ISI(S), the two Al Qaeda linked groups also aren't part of the "rebel"s that we would be supporting.
Painting intervention in Syria as supporting Al Qaeda is dishonest, and completely ignores very real divides among Syrian opposition groups.
This isn't a two faction conflict.
Right, because obviously you have zero clue why I said that to black_label.Radical islam and america's evangelicals are pretty much the same.
More like... "radical islam and America's racist asshole blacks like you are pretty much the same."
Right. Because bringing skin color into this makes sense. . .
There are maniacs in Washington running the country. Truly insane men. You can't make this shit up.
And for anyone who doesn't like my Brietbart source, go to Fox then and see for yourself or fox off.
On Tuesday, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) suggested that Fox News host Brian Kilmeade was Islamaphobic because he said that Syrian opposition groups shouting Allahu Akhbar! Allahu Akhbar! as rockets hit government offices demonstrated Islamist influence among the opposition.
I have a problem helping those people screaming that after a hit, Kilmeade said.
McCain responded: Would you have a problem with an American or Christians saying thank God? Thank God?
He added, Thats what theyre saying. Come on!
Of course theyre Muslims, but theyre moderates and I guarantee you they are moderates.
Aye carumba! Oh of course McCain, every Baptist, Mormon, Anglican or Catholic screams "Praise the Lord and Thank God" as we are blowing up buildings or cutting someone's head off.
Yeah, yeah that's the ticket John.
McCain: Shouting 'Allahu Akhbar!' Same as Christians Shouting 'Thank God!'
He's right though. It is a pretty common saying sort of like many of us (even those who are non-religious) may use the exclamatory phrase "oh my god" "Thank god" "Jesus Christ" or "holy cow".
It's part of the common vernacular of society. It is also worth noting that it doesn't always express "joy" either.
No matter how you want to slice it, it's muslims killing muslims, and we ought to let them do it until there isn't one left standing. History has taught us that intervening and trying to help is a pointless, costly endeavor.
Right, because obviously you have zero clue why I said that to black_label.More like... "radical islam and America's racist asshole blacks like you are pretty much the same."
Right. Because bringing skin color into this makes sense. . .
Maybe if you stick around long enough and wear off some cherry, you'll understand, and not look so ignorant before you speak.
There's nothing dishonest about it. We are absolutely enabling militant Islamists overthrow Assad.
The FSA has some Islamist factions, but are largely secular in their overarching political ideology.
Al Nusra and the ISI(S), the two Al Qaeda linked groups also aren't part of the "rebel"s that we would be supporting.
Painting intervention in Syria as supporting Al Qaeda is dishonest, and completely ignores very real divides among Syrian opposition groups.
This isn't a two faction conflict.
There are maniacs in Washington running the country. Truly insane men. You can't make this shit up.
And for anyone who doesn't like my Brietbart source, go to Fox then and see for yourself or fox off.
On Tuesday, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) suggested that Fox News host Brian Kilmeade was Islamaphobic because he said that Syrian opposition groups shouting Allahu Akhbar! Allahu Akhbar! as rockets hit government offices demonstrated Islamist influence among the opposition.
I have a problem helping those people screaming that after a hit, Kilmeade said.
McCain responded: Would you have a problem with an American or Christians saying thank God? Thank God?
He added, Thats what theyre saying. Come on!
Of course theyre Muslims, but theyre moderates and I guarantee you they are moderates.
Aye carumba! Oh of course McCain, every Baptist, Mormon, Anglican or Catholic screams "Praise the Lord and Thank God" as we are blowing up buildings or cutting someone's head off.
Yeah, yeah that's the ticket John.
McCain: Shouting 'Allahu Akhbar!' Same as Christians Shouting 'Thank God!'
He's right though. It is a pretty common saying sort of like many of us (even those who are non-religious) may use the exclamatory phrase "oh my god" "Thank god" "Jesus Christ" or "holy cow".
It's part of the common vernacular of society. It is also worth noting that it doesn't always express "joy" either.
The discussion was about the use of "Allahua Akhbar" while blowing up Syrian government buildings.
This was not a discussion about faith in general.
Right, because obviously you have zero clue why I said that to black_label.Right. Because bringing skin color into this makes sense. . .
Maybe if you stick around long enough and wear off some cherry, you'll understand, and not look so ignorant before you speak.
I don't think that any amount of time spent on this forum will in any way make race relevant to your previous post.
"Allahu Akbar" is as generic as and exasperated person yelling "Jesus Christ!"
There's nothing dishonest about it. We are absolutely enabling militant Islamists overthrow Assad.
The FSA has some Islamist factions, but are largely secular in their overarching political ideology.
Al Nusra and the ISI(S), the two Al Qaeda linked groups also aren't part of the "rebel"s that we would be supporting.
Painting intervention in Syria as supporting Al Qaeda is dishonest, and completely ignores very real divides among Syrian opposition groups.
This isn't a two faction conflict.
Do you have a roster that you can pass out to us since you seem to know who all the players are here ?
Syrian rebels pledge loyalty to al-Qaeda
Al-Qaeda Joins the Syrian Rebellion
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/09/w...play-key-role-in-war.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
There's nothing dishonest about it. We are absolutely enabling militant Islamists overthrow Assad.
The FSA has some Islamist factions, but are largely secular in their overarching political ideology.
Al Nusra and the ISI(S), the two Al Qaeda linked groups also aren't part of the "rebel"s that we would be supporting.
Painting intervention in Syria as supporting Al Qaeda is dishonest, and completely ignores very real divides among Syrian opposition groups.
This isn't a two faction conflict.
Right, because obviously you have zero clue why I said that to black_label.
Maybe if you stick around long enough and wear off some cherry, you'll understand, and not look so ignorant before you speak.
I don't think that any amount of time spent on this forum will in any way make race relevant to your previous post.
In fact, you're not thinking at all. Whatever land of lolipops and rainbows you think this board is, you're grossly mistaken.
Wise up, dingbat.
No matter how you want to slice it, it's muslims killing muslims, and we ought to let them do it until there isn't one left standing. History has taught us that intervening and trying to help is a pointless, costly endeavor.
No thanks. I'm not really in the business of dehumanizing another human being simply based on their nationality, geographic region of current location, or religious beliefs.
"Allahu Akbar" is as generic as and exasperated person yelling "Jesus Christ!"
For as long as I worked with Muslims, I don't ever remember one yelling "Allahu Akbar". Definately not as much as I remember Christians and non-Christians yelling "Jesus Christ".
The only time I have heard "Allah Akbar" used is by those who have just killed or was getting ready to kill other humans they disagreed with ... Such as the Terrorists on 9-11, the Fort Hood shootings, the beheading of Daniel Pearl, the beheading of the soldier in London, etc.
Perhaps one of you who agree with McCain can source some linked articles supporting your position?
Actually "death to the Infidels, let God sort it out" would be a closer transliteration.
Not really.
There's nothing dishonest about it. We are absolutely enabling militant Islamists overthrow Assad.
The FSA has some Islamist factions, but are largely secular in their overarching political ideology.
Al Nusra and the ISI(S), the two Al Qaeda linked groups also aren't part of the "rebel"s that we would be supporting.
Painting intervention in Syria as supporting Al Qaeda is dishonest, and completely ignores very real divides among Syrian opposition groups.
This isn't a two faction conflict.
Nice to see somebody here that actually knows about what reality is. I've long believed that a major American propagand campaign has been to convince American's that so called affiliates of al Qaeda are the same as al Qaeda so they can go after the Jihadist in general. The American public supports going after al Qaeda, but might not support going after groups with different goals and only a very loose connection to al Qaeda.