Merrick Garland Does His Election Interference Act by Giving Jack Smith the OK to Re-Indict Trump

[excalibur]

If any had any doubt what a miserable partisan hack Garland is, that doubt was washed away today.

Hell, the DOJ has a 90-day rule, no indictments within 90 days of an election, violated their own rule.

1. Election interference, big time, by Reichsleiter Merrick Garland (who had to approve this). This is so obvious that it will likely gain Trump hundreds of thousands of votes in the next few days (early voting begins in some states next week).

2. Seems to be a violation of the laches doctrine and I expect Trump attorneys to move to dismiss because of laches, and whatever Chutkin does will go to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, then back to SCOTUS.

That is how worried the Democrats are.

 

[rightwinger]

The Supreme Court gave Smith the direction to reindict Trump

 

[EMH]

The definition of fascism and communism includes


having "show trials" of dissidents and political opposition

 

[WelfareQueen]

If any had any doubt what a miserable partisan hack Garland is, that doubt was washed away today.

Hell, the DOJ has a 90-day rule, no indictments within 90 days of an election, violated their own rule.

1. Election interference, big time, by Reichsleiter Merrick Garland (who had to approve this). This is so obvious that it will likely gain Trump hundreds of thousands of votes in the next few days (early voting begins in some states next week).

2. Seems to be a violation of the laches doctrine and I expect Trump attorneys to move to dismiss because of laches, and whatever Chutkin does will go to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, then back to SCOTUS.

That is how worried the Democrats are.

The Dims do hypocrisy really well.

 

[rightwinger]

Hell, the DOJ has a 90-day rule, no indictments within 90 days of an election, violated their own rule.

Then blame the Supreme Court for sitting on the case for so long

 

[excalibur]

Then blame the Supreme Court for sitting on the case for so long

 

[rightwinger]

View attachment 1002419

 

[task0778]

The dems talk about the threat to democracy, well this is it right here. It's total lawfare, let the voters decide.

 

[excalibur]

LOL No. FFS, you can't be serious.

And this proves who you are:

 

[shockedcanadian]

If any had any doubt what a miserable partisan hack Garland is, that doubt was washed away today.

Hell, the DOJ has a 90-day rule, no indictments within 90 days of an election, violated their own rule.

1. Election interference, big time, by Reichsleiter Merrick Garland (who had to approve this). This is so obvious that it will likely gain Trump hundreds of thousands of votes in the next few days (early voting begins in some states next week).

2. Seems to be a violation of the laches doctrine and I expect Trump attorneys to move to dismiss because of laches, and whatever Chutkin does will go to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, then back to SCOTUS.

That is how worried the Democrats are.

They want to give Harris.another. "Im a prosecutor and Trump is a felon" moment before the debate. None of thid is healthy for America.

 

[Rawley]

If any had any doubt what a miserable partisan hack Garland is, that doubt was washed away today.

Hell, the DOJ has a 90-day rule, no indictments within 90 days of an election, violated their own rule.

1. Election interference, big time, by Reichsleiter Merrick Garland (who had to approve this). This is so obvious that it will likely gain Trump hundreds of thousands of votes in the next few days (early voting begins in some states next week).

2. Seems to be a violation of the laches doctrine and I expect Trump attorneys to move to dismiss because of laches, and whatever Chutkin does will go to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, then back to SCOTUS.

That is how worried the Democrats are.

Merrick is hands down the most partisan AG in history.

 

[Rawley]

The Supreme Court gave Smith the direction to reindict Trump

Nope

 

[excalibur]

And remember, this is the same miserable Garland who just threatened to go after people who dispute the 2024 election (of course he didn't mean Democrats, who have a record of disputing elections).

Fascism/Marxism, we are there.

 

[Maxdeath]

They are well aware that Harris can not win. That was apparent the moment they had to let Biden go. So they only have this kind of thing to try and keep it from being a complete blood bath

 

[Rawley]

Then blame the Supreme Court for sitting on the case for so long

?? They accelerated the case.

 

[rightwinger]

?? The accelerated the case.

 

[rightwinger]

They are well aware that Harris can not win. That was apparent the moment they had to let Biden go. So they only have this kind of thing to try and keep it from being a complete blood bath

Keep telling yourself that

Best you start getting your stolen election whining ready

 

[Rawley]

"The case came to the Court on an accelerated basis. In August 2023, a grand jury indicted former President Donald Trump on four charges related to his actions after the 2020 presidential election. On Feb. 6, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that Special Counsel Jack L. Smith could move forward with a trial. On Feb. 28, 2024, the Supreme Court granted a stay of that decision, and accepted review of the case, holding oral arguments in the case on April 25."

Supreme Court tackles history with Trump’s immunity case | Constitution Center

On Thursday, the nine justices on the U.S. Supreme Court tackled a question “for the ages” in the Trump v. United States immunity case arguments. But after nearly two hours and 40 minutes of questioning, the case’s outcome seems uncertain.

constitutioncenter.org

 

[Crepitus]

If any had any doubt what a miserable partisan hack Garland is, that doubt was washed away today.

Hell, the DOJ has a 90-day rule, no indictments within 90 days of an election, violated their own rule.

1. Election interference, big time, by Reichsleiter Merrick Garland (who had to approve this). This is so obvious that it will likely gain Trump hundreds of thousands of votes in the next few days (early voting begins in some states next week).

2. Seems to be a violation of the laches doctrine and I expect Trump attorneys to move to dismiss because of laches, and whatever Chutkin does will go to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, then back to SCOTUS.

That is how worried the Democrats are.

Lolololololol!!!

 

[Crepitus]

Hell, the DOJ has a 90-day rule, no indictments within 90 days of an election, violated their own rule.

60.

DERP