The warmers need to explain the Arctic Circle's ice pattern, and how Co2 is responsible...

[EMH]

The reply you made to the annoying poster only gives him joy. He knows you are correct.

This guy, dagosa, has ZERO understanding of anything. He is just a spazzed out mental case science invalid.

 

[Dagosa]

Yet you can't solve the problem.

The problem is your incessant lying. HTF can anyone keep up with it.

You are not quoting me. All I said was thanks for your lies. A joke in fact.

The difference is, I’ve posted no lies, you do all the time.

 

[Dagosa]

This guy, dagosa, has ZERO understanding of anything. He is just a spazzed out mental case science invalid.

You’re incapable of posting any real facts. You still claim the ENTIRE SCIENCE community is wrong, and you are right. Tell us again why you know more than MIT and NASA. Speak.

I don’t understand how a bunch of fools think they know more about climate science than every climate research facility in the world. Tell us again why you are delusional.

 

[EMH]

You’re incapable of posting any real facts. You still claim the ENTIRE SCIENCE community is wrong, and you are right. Tell us again why you know more than MIT and NASA. Speak.

I don’t understand how a b7nch if fools think they know mire about climate science than every climate research facility in the world. Tell us again why you are delusional.

At least I can answer basic climate questions that they not only cannot answer, but censor.... and fund you to shout down...


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?

 

[Dagosa]

At least I can answer basic climate questions that they not only cannot answer, but censor.... and fund you to shout down...


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?

You keep posting the same stupid questions…

 

[EMH]

a piece of land is not “ in an ice age” just because it’s ice covered

This is the most hilarious part of the Co2 FRAUD's bullshit on "ice ages." What do we really know about ice ages? We know there was 2.5 mile thick ice on Chicago as recently as 5 million years ago, and that is what dug out the Great Lakes as it FLOWED SOUTH. We know that Greenland was completely green 2 million years ago and that its ice sheet moves south, only recently covering the southern tip.

Yet somehow, a continent like Antarctica, covered in 2+ mile thick ice, with no liquid water, is like.... NOT an "ice age..."

because, well, it is IDENTICAL to what was covering Chicago and Canada 5 million years ago.


Their position is

a continent covered with 2+ mile thick ice is not an ice age, because to admit it is would OBLITERATE OUR $20 trillion FRAUD....

 

[EMH]

You keep posting the same stupid questions…

And you and your MIT heroes continue to AVOID ANSWERING THEM

 

[Dagosa]

And you and your MIT heroes continue to AVOID ANSWERING THEM

I’ve avoided nothing nor has MIT . You’re just too illiterate. As is Trump. You don’t even know what a map legend is do you ?

 

[Dagosa]

This is the most hilarious part of the Co2 FRAUD's bullshit on "ice ages." What do we really know about ice ages? We know there was 2.5 mile thick ice on Chicago as recently as 5 million years ago, and that is what dug out the Great Lakes as it FLOWED SOUTH. We know that Greenland was completely green 2 million years ago and that its ice sheet moves south, only recently covering the southern tip.

Yet somehow, a continent like Antarctica, covered in 2+ mile thick ice, with no liquid water, is like.... NOT an "ice age..."

because, well, it is IDENTICAL to what was covering Chicago and Canada 5 million years ago.


Their position is

a continent covered with 2+ mile thick ice is not an ice age, because to admit it is would OBLITERATE OUR $20 trillion FRAUD....

Foolish, we as a planet are coming out of an ice age. The planet has ice ages, not plots of land. Get a dictionary.

 

[Dagosa]

Yet somehow, a continent like Antarctica, covered in 2+ mile thick ice, with no liquid water, is like.... NOT an "ice age..."

Another uninformed post. There are hundreds of liquified lakes embedded in the SNOW ICE in Antartica.
Do you need pictures ?

https://external-preview.redd.it/A8jl3hSPWPy4CjcOOpXgAHPTXZFESB-9pki_G1txo4I.jpg?auto=webp&s=bd80f234d4cd9598f44c6ea7919c6e3530bab5cb

 

[Dagosa]

And you and your MIT heroes continue to AVOID ANSWERING THEM

No, they just avoid illiterates who can read. They post the answers on thier websites. Just because you have a reading disability…..

 

[Dagosa]

This is the most hilarious part of the Co2 FRAUD's bullshit on "ice ages." What do we really know about ice ages? We know there was 2.5 mile thick ice on Chicago as recently as 5 million years ago, and that is what dug out the Great Lakes as it FLOWED SOUTH. We know that Greenland was completely green 2 million years ago and that its ice sheet moves south, only recently covering the southern tip.

Yet somehow, a continent like Antarctica, covered in 2+ mile thick ice, with no liquid water, is like.... NOT an "ice age..."

because, well, it is IDENTICAL to what was covering Chicago and Canada 5 million years ago.


Their position is

a continent covered with 2+ mile thick ice is not an ice age, because to admit it is would OBLITERATE OUR $20 trillion FRAUD....

Foolish, 5 million years ago no one lived in Chicago nor was anyone burning fossil fuels.

 

[EMH]

Another uninformed post. There are hundreds of liquified lakes embedded in the SNOW ICE in Antartica.
Do you need pictures ?

https://external-preview.redd.it/A8jl3hSPWPy4CjcOOpXgAHPTXZFESB-9pki_G1txo4I.jpg?auto=webp&s=bd80f234d4cd9598f44c6ea7919c6e3530bab5cb

That's Greenland not Antarctica, nice try liar....

 

[EMH]

Foolish, 5 million years ago no one lived in Chicago nor was anyone burning fossil fuels.

So why did that ice melt? If there was no additional man made Co2, should Chicago still be under that ice?

 

[EMH]

I’ve avoided nothing nor has MIT

THEN where are the Co2 FRAUD's answers to those questions....