Merrick Garland held in contempt of Congress

[Missouri_Mike]

They also said why. How about you tackle that.

Tell us why Congress deserves to be exempt from rules of executive privilege in this case, and why they need the audio when they have the transcript.


And, go.

Seems like something everyone would want to tackle. I’m sure you’ll get worked up when Trumps next guy at the DOJ says that. Then it will be the end of democracy and shit.

LMAO! Have you not read the cleaned up Bidumb transcripts then watched the video of that moron mumbling like a knob?

 

[Nostra]

Since the DOJ has admitted altering the transcript from the audio, we need to be able to hear it to see what all they edited out.

 

[Doc7505]

There is no reason TO release it.

~~~~~~
What is so frightening and telling, that must be hidden from the People that presumably elected Joe Biden?
The very reason that this is with held from the public makes it recording suspect

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The Propaganda arm of the GOP will selectively edit the video to besmirch the President in election ads for the upcoming election. If they question the accuracy of the transcript the DOJ provided of the voluntary interview, then appoint a special master who can examine both and report on that.

Or just release the tapes!

The coverup is worse than the crime (of altering the transcripts)

 

[Lesh]

Or just release the tapes!

The coverup is worse than the crime (of altering the transcripts)

When Hur claims that the transcripts have been altered you have a complaint.

He has not

 

[Nostra]

When Hur claims that the transcripts have been altered you have a complaint.

He has not

The DOJ admitted they altered the transcript, Simp.

Why are you afraid to hear your Vegetable Messiah?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Seems like something everyone would want to tackle.

Well you're about 100 years late to the party. This wad "tackled" many times in Congress and in the courts. Executive privilege is well established.

It's the GOP morons and their rube base that act like anytime they hear about something, it must be the first time it has ever happened.

"Who knew healthcare was so complicated?" - Leader of the Rubes

Congress doesn't get the audio. Executive privilege. The end.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Fuck Garland. Send him to prison like he is doing to BANNON.

SAME CRIME, SAME TIME.

GARLAND=HIMLER

 

[BlindBoo]

Fuck Garland. Send him to prison like he is doing to BANNON.

SAME CRIME, SAME TIME.

GARLAND=HIMLER

Bannon refused to appear and refused to provide any documents to the Committee. Garland both appeared and provided many documents to the committee.

 

[Marener]

Fuck Garland. Send him to prison like he is doing to BANNON.

SAME CRIME, SAME TIME.

GARLAND=HIMLER

You don’t prosecute government officials who are operating under executive privilege.

Bannon was just a schmuck who didn’t think the rules applied to him.

 

[Nostra]

You don’t prosecute government officials who are operating under executive privilege.

Bannon was just a schmuck who didn’t think the rules applied to him.

Executive privilege doesn’t apply, Simp.

 

[WEATHER53]

It is a firm disparagement of his actions for the thinking world to take in

 

[Marener]

Executive privilege doesn’t apply, Simp.

Says who?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Fuck Garland. Send him to prison like he is doing to BANNON.

SAME CRIME, SAME TIME.

GARLAND=HIMLER

Unhinged

 

[BlindBoo]

As expected, the DOJ will not bring any charges.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

When Hur claims that the transcripts have been altered you have a complaint.

He has not

So release the tapes, right?

 

[Lesh]

So release the tapes, right?

When Hur claims the transcripts are not accurate

 

[Nostra]

Says who?

The doctrine of executive privilege, Simp.

Testimony in front of a special counsel regarding your crimes doesn't fall under his advisors freely discussing issues and expressing their opinions on policy, Dumbass.



The doctrine of executive privilege defines the authority of the President to withhold documents or information in his possession or in the possession of the Executive Branch from the Legislative or Judicial Branch of the government. While the Constitution does not expressly confer upon the Executive Branch any such privilege, the Supreme Court has held that executive privilege derives from the constitutional separation of powers and from a necessary and proper concept respecting the carrying out of the duties of the presidency imposed by the Constitution.1 Although there are various and distinct components to executive privilege,2 the privilege’s foundation lies in the proposition that in making judgments and reaching decisions, the President and his advisors must be free to discuss issues candidly, express opinions, and explore options without fear that those deliberations will later be made public.3

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S3-4-1/ALDE_00013377/

 

[Marener]

The doctrine of executive privilege, Simp.

Who determined what the “doctrine of executive privilege” entails?

 

[Nostra]

Who determined what the “doctrine of executive privilege” entails?

I provided you the necessary link to answer your dumbass question, Dumbass.

I suggest you go get educated and stop embarrassing yourself.