Merrick Garland held in contempt of Congress

[Marener]

I provided you the necessary link to answer your dumbass question, Dumbass.

I suggest you go get educated and stop embarrassing yourself.

A website has no legal authority. Try again loser.

 

[Nostra]

A website has no legal authority. Try again loser.

Wow. Just when I thought you couldn't get any dumber.

 

[Marener]

Wow. Just when I thought you couldn't get any dumber.

Supreme Court precedents matter. Random websites don’t.

 

[Nostra]

Supreme Court precedents matter. Random websites don’t.

My link provided the parameters court rulings have set, moron.

Holy shit, you just got dumber.

 

[Nostra]

Supreme Court precedents matter. Random websites don’t.

Legal challenges have established two general categories of executive privilege: presidential communications and deliberative process.

The presidential communications privilege applies to communications involving the president or his staff that immediately pertain to the president's decision-making process. The idea, according to Mark Rozell, a professor at George Mason University, and author of a book on executive privilege, is that "the president should have the right to candid advice without fear of public disclosure."

Deliberative process involves a broader scope of executive branch activity: discussions involving White House staff or within other agencies on legal or policy decisions that don't necessarily involve the president or his immediate advisers. Again, the argument is that government officials need to feel like they can talk honestly. The deliberative process privilege, Rozell says, is generally easier to challenge than a claim of presidential communications privilege.

 

[Marener]

My link provided the parameters court rulings have set, moron.

You obviously didn’t read the website.

“The Supreme Court has never directly considered the application of executive privilege in the context of a congressional investigation”

So there is no precedent.

 

[Nostra]

You obviously didn’t read the website.

“The Supreme Court has never directly considered the application of executive privilege in the context of a congressional investigation”

So there is no precedent.

How does EP apply?

You have no answer.

 

[Marener]

How does EP apply?

You have no answer.

It’s called law enforcement privilege.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Well you're about 100 years late to the party. This wad "tackled" many times in Congress and in the courts. Executive privilege is well established.

It's the GOP morons and their rube base that act like anytime they hear about something, it must be the first time it has ever happened.

"Who knew healthcare was so complicated?" - Leader of the Rubes

Congress doesn't get the audio. Executive privilege. The end.

Executive privilege was waived the moment the transcript was released. It’s asinine to say you can read the interview we prepared for you but you can’t hear those words for yourself.

We will get that audio and the closer it gets to the election the less time the democrats will have to try and spin it.

 

[skye]

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Executive privilege was waived the moment the transcript was released.

Wrong. Go check. That's the incorrect talking point you have been fed.

It's asinine to say you need the audio for any legislative purpose, when you have the transcript.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Wrong. Go check. That's the incorrect talking point you have been fed.

It's asinine to say you need the audio for any legislative purpose, when you have the transcript.

So he can claim the transcript is 100% accurate. It’s exactly how he conducted the interview. There are no discrepancies between the actual audio and the transcript.

If that’s true then how is there any executive privilege left to stand on to deny the actual audio of the conversation you have already released?

A normal persons first clue they are being lied to should be the refusal to let you hear it in context. Apparently you are unable to process such simple points.

 

[Lesh]

So he can claim the transcript is 100% accurate. It’s exactly how he conducted the interview. There are no discrepancies between the actual audio and the transcript.

If that’s true then how is there any executive privilege left to stand on to deny the actual audio of the conversation you have already released?

A normal persons first clue they are being lied to should be the refusal to let you hear it in context. Apparently you are unable to process such simple points.

Has Hur claimed it was not accurate?

No?

Huh

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Has Hur claimed it was not accurate?

No?

Huh

Why shouldn’t we just listen for ourselves? The transcript has been released, there’s no reason not to hear from the man himself.

 

[Lesh]

Why shouldn’t we just listen for ourselves? The transcript has been released, there’s no reason not to hear from the man himself.

Read the transcript

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Read the transcript

Why can’t we hear him in his own words real time? Does it not match the transcript?

I would think someone with confidence in their abilities would rather you hear from them.

We all know the reason why though don’t we.

 

[Lesh]

Why can’t we hear him in his own words real time? Does it not match the transcript?

I would think someone with confidence in their abilities would rather you hear from them.

We all know the reason why though don’t we.

Why would you need to ? You have the transcript?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Why would you need to ? You have the transcript?

Maybe we could just have the next debate Trump and bidumb just send transcripts of what they would have said. No reason to actually hear them talk right? We have the transcript so that should be good enough.

Maybe the next State of the Union speech should not be televised. They could just give us a transcript afterwords. No reason to actually hear the man giving the speech.

I get your apprehension of releasing the recordings. It’s going to be fucking bad. It’s not only going to be bidumb sounding retarded it’s going to make their doctored transcript a total lie and undermine the tiny fraction of these peoples credibility they had left and flush that down the toilet.

The reason they don’t want this out is it destroys all of their credibility.

 

[Nostra]

It’s called law enforcement privilege.

Link?

 

[Nostra]

Has Hur claimed it was not accurate?

No?

Huh

The DOJ admitted they altered the transcript, Stupid.