Startup Org. to Out Seditious Civil Servants Who Might ‘Resist’ Trump

[dblack]

Not the most important question facing voters but if you vote for a politician that can’t or won’t answer this simple question your a fool who deserves to be deceived.

Well, it's trivial culture war bullshit in my view, and if you vote based on that, you are a fool who deserves to be deceived. In any case, I don't vote for the two shit-parties, so it doesn't matter much to me. I'll vote for a good candidate even if the rest of you refuse.

 

[jc456]

Clearly the most important question facing voters this November!

I believe women don't want men in their washrooms and showers. I do believe it's a main topic today. I see you are for violating women as well as the demofks.

 

[jc456]

Well, it's trivial culture war bullshit in my view, and if you vote based on that, you are a fool who deserves to be deceived. In any case, I don't vote for the two shit-parties, so it doesn't matter much to me. I'll vote for a good candidate even if the rest of you refuse.

it's a violation of women's rights.

 

[scruffy]

Trump loyalists are not rational people

I can't wait to see your head explode when he gets reelected.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

I can't wait to see your head explode when he gets reelected.

Way to prove the point. Magaturds double down on stupid 24/7.

 

[scruffy]

Way to prove the point. Magaturds double down on stupid 24/7.

The only point you have is the one on top of your head.

 

[dblack]

I believe women don't want men in their washrooms and showers. I do believe it's a main topic today. I see you are for violating women as well as the demofks.

I'm for kicking insecure culture warriors to curb. You've jumped the shark.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

The only point you have is the one on top of your head.

And there you go again.

 

[jc456]

Trump loyalists are not rational people

so you want 5.00 a gallon gas? wow. See, I don't see that as rational when trump had it at 2.25. You need to explain how the 5.00 is rational.

 

[jc456]

I'm for kicking insecure culture warriors to curb. You've jumped the shark.

but it's not a concern of americans, I don't think I did. I'd say you are for the same old same old culture warriors.

 

[dblack]

but it's not a concern of americans, I don't think I did. I'd say you are for the same old same old culture warriors.

You say all kinds of jackwad shit. So what?

 

[jc456]

You say all kinds of jackwad shit. So what?

I speak truth. I grow tired of the propagandists like many on here. you flip flop so much, you're too inconsistent to read. However, after saying that, you just admitted women wasn't a topic on the campaign trail. men in women sports is a like one of the hottest topics in the country. To stay so out of touch with america is concerning to me from where you start. If that makes me a jackwad, I'm happy to be that.

 

[dblack]

I speak truth.

No. You masturbate in public. You're an ignorant troll, nothing more.

 

[jc456]

No. You masturbate in public. You're an ignorant troll, nothing more.

when you can't argue the point.

 

[Dragonlady]

Imagine what Trump could have got done if the government was not full of saboteurs in his first term. This is a good start to weed these people out. When a president makes policies they need to be implemented not kneecapped by traitors.

"In a normal workplace, these employees would be fired for insubordination. In the most extreme of circumstances they would be charged with sedition against the government and punished accordingly, with execution not outside the range of possibilities.


Instead, many of these conspirators—some of them dedicated socialists—were celebrated for their efforts by the Trump-Deranged media and the Democrat leaders who egged them on. But the day of reckoning may arrive with a second Trump term that offers the benefit of hindsight, having rooted them out while their guard was down.


From his home office in small-town Kentucky, a seasoned political operative is quietly investigating scores of federal employees suspected of being hostile to Trump’s policies, an effort that dovetails with broader conservative preparations for a new White House.


Tom Jones and his American Accountability Foundation are digging into the backgrounds, social media posts and commentary of key high-ranking government employees, starting with the Department of Homeland Security, where one top official was recently found to harbor Hamas sympathies."

Startup Org. to Out Seditious Civil Servants Who Might 'Resist' Trump | Headline USA

(Headline USA) Perhaps the biggest setback to the first Trump administration was not anything inherently flawed in Republican President Donald Trump’s leadership but the sheer bulk of disloyal individuals embedded within the Washington, D.C., bureaucracy, who were eager to undermine him at every...

headlineusa.com

This is 1984 writ LARGE. There can be no resistance. You will do as you're told. No thinking for yourself. We know better than you what the nation needs.

 

[Foxfyre]

Imagine what Trump could have got done if the government was not full of saboteurs in his first term. This is a good start to weed these people out. When a president makes policies they need to be implemented not kneecapped by traitors.

"In a normal workplace, these employees would be fired for insubordination. In the most extreme of circumstances they would be charged with sedition against the government and punished accordingly, with execution not outside the range of possibilities.


Instead, many of these conspirators—some of them dedicated socialists—were celebrated for their efforts by the Trump-Deranged media and the Democrat leaders who egged them on. But the day of reckoning may arrive with a second Trump term that offers the benefit of hindsight, having rooted them out while their guard was down.


From his home office in small-town Kentucky, a seasoned political operative is quietly investigating scores of federal employees suspected of being hostile to Trump’s policies, an effort that dovetails with broader conservative preparations for a new White House.


Tom Jones and his American Accountability Foundation are digging into the backgrounds, social media posts and commentary of key high-ranking government employees, starting with the Department of Homeland Security, where one top official was recently found to harbor Hamas sympathies."

Startup Org. to Out Seditious Civil Servants Who Might 'Resist' Trump | Headline USA

(Headline USA) Perhaps the biggest setback to the first Trump administration was not anything inherently flawed in Republican President Donald Trump’s leadership but the sheer bulk of disloyal individuals embedded within the Washington, D.C., bureaucracy, who were eager to undermine him at every...

headlineusa.com

So long as their jobs are within the existing law, public employees should always do their jobs impartially regardless of who is the people's choice for mayor or governor or president. They work for the people, not for an elected public figure. If they don't like the policies, rules, regulations in place and are unable to get those changed via LEGAL petition, they should quit and go find something else to do.

Once they go activist and do their jobs differently for a person they like or dislike, they are no longer public servants but operatives. And yes out they should go.

 

[jc456]

So long as their jobs are within the existing law, public employees should always do their jobs impartially regardless of who is the people's choice for mayor or governor or president. They work for the people, not for an elected public figure. If they don't like the policies, rules, regulations in place and are unable to get those changed via LEGAL petition, they should quit and go find something else to do.

Once they go activist and do their jobs differently for a person they like or dislike, they are no longer public servants but operatives. And yes out they should go.

you mean like the existing staffs?

 

[Dragonlady]

Focusing on the loyalty of staff members is just politics as usual. When republican activists do it it's called "outing". Only democrats charge government workers with the antiquated charge of "sedition".

Democrats haven't charged any members of the civil service with "sedition", nor have they fired them.

The members of the civil service aren't "staff members". They are civil servants. They don't work for the President, they work for the nation. Their loyalty is to the Constitution.

No other President in history has asked members of the civil service for a "loyalty oath", and most would refuse to give him one.

 

[jc456]

Democrats haven't charged any members of the civil service with "sedition", nor have they fired them.

The members of the civil service aren't "staff members". They are civil servants. They don't work for the President, they work for the nation. Their loyalty is to the Constitution.

No other President in history has asked members of the civil service for a "loyalty oath", and most would refuse to give him one.

no they fired them for not taking the mandate compliancy test.

 

[BlindBoo]

so you want 5.00 a gallon gas? wow. See, I don't see that as rational when trump had it at 2.25. You need to explain how the 5.00 is rational.

It's been two year since Putin's invasion of Ukraine spiked world oil prices in 2022.