Michael Cohen Gets Destroyed During Cross Examination, Leaving Anderson Cooper Stunned

Ok, so you want the judge to dismiss because you're scared shitless that the jury will convict, you Trump asseating pile of shit.

You're an idiot, you WISH there was no case here.
There is no case, you loons are creating new Trump supporters daily. Because of this trial.
 
As I said a few months back, when Alvin Bragg calls Michael Cohen to testify, he will be suborning perjury.

And Cohen hasn't disappointed. Cohen has committed multiple acts of perjury in his testimony to date.
excalibur is gaslighting yet again.

Cohen did quite well, which almost all reporters admit, against a well-coordinated defense cross onf his credibility.

Everything, though, he said is corroborated by the written record and other witnesses.

Everything.
 
Yup. Something people don’t seem to understand is that the top person of a massive corporation doesn‘t want to be bothered with penne ante problems - and to a billionaire like Trump, some whore who wants $130,000 to keep her mouth shut is something that his “people” will solve without even bugging him about it. That is what he pays staff for.
but back in 2018, Trump admitted to authorizing this payment.

but also this goes along with payments to American Media Inc and Karen Mcdougal
 
excalibur is gaslighting yet again.

Cohen did quite well, which almost all reporters admit, against a well-coordinated defense cross onf his credibility.

Everything, though, he said is corroborated by the written record and other witnesses.

Everything.
THAT'S why Trump and his cult want the trial shut down.
They know, they're dead meat.
Especially................ if Trump testifies.
 
excalibur is gaslighting yet again.

Cohen did quite well, which almost all reporters admit, against a well-coordinated defense cross onf his credibility.

Everything, though, he said is corroborated by the written record and other witnesses.

Everything.
Only problem is the written record is what caught the serial liar in more lies. BTW, perhaps you could post a couple links of these "reporters" that feel Cohen did quite well. And no, The View does not have reporters.
 
Only problem is the written record is what caught the serial liar in more lies. BTW, perhaps you could post a couple links of these "reporters" that feel Cohen did quite well. And no, The View does not have reporters.
There were no more lies, only suggestion on cross ex by Defense.

Review the media. You are wrong, yet again.
 
There is no case, you loons are creating new Trump supporters daily. Because of this trial.
Yes, at this point, a directed verdict would be the best damage control the judge could provide his party. Stop embarrassing themselves, like we knew they would by relying on a man like Michael Cohen to prove their case.

Cohen was caught in a lie, and the jury knows it. The other witnesses were negative character witnesses, to say that Trump was a micro-managing adulterer. Cohen said he called Trump through his bodyguard and talked about the NDA. We know that was a lie.

Absolutely no one saw Trump enter the records in question, and no one claimed that Trump told them to enter them. They have no evidence, now that they have been caught coaching their star witness to lie.
 
I feel bad for Bragg, he literally was pushed to bring this case by Xiden and the demafacist…he’s literally killed his career
Bragg is a corrupt piece of shit. No one forced him to do anything.
 
The defense did a good job with poor material, while Cohen did a good job with poor material.

I wonder if this will come to a jury nullification.

The AZ arraignments today is the announcement that the American center and left intend to throttle the anti[-American MAGAt right.

Trump's defenders are reduced to Fox youtube.
 
The defense did a good job with poor material, while Cohen did a good job with poor material.

I wonder if this will come to a jury nullification.

The AZ arraignments today is the announcement that the American center and left intend to throttle the anti[-American MAGAt right.

Trump's defenders are reduced to Fox youtube.
It might very well come down to jury nullication, as you highlight, the American leftwing is out to throttle their opposition, and this is a NYC jury, they just might ignore the law and facts and simply convict
 
Yes, at this point, a directed verdict would be the best damage control the judge could provide his party. Stop embarrassing themselves, like we knew they would by relying on a man like Michael Cohen to prove their case.

Cohen was caught in a lie, and the jury knows it. The other witnesses were negative character witnesses, to say that Trump was a micro-managing adulterer. Cohen said he called Trump through his bodyguard and talked about the NDA. We know that was a lie.

Absolutely no one saw Trump enter the records in question, and no one claimed that Trump told them to enter them. They have no evidence, now that they have been caught coaching their star witness to lie.
That is a lie: "caught coaching their star witness to lie."

Trump can only hope for a null jury.
 
He doesn't have to be innocent.

He only needs to be "not guilty".

You dorks are constantly pissing about morality when it suites you.

Have a day.
The dems hate our Rights. They think Trump is guilty and must prove his innocence in court. It's the exact opposite, he's innocent until the persecution can prove he is guilty.

I think the goal here by the prosecution is to wink at the jury and say "We know we cannot prove any crime here. But 'come on man,' you hate him, we hate him? Let's use this one and only chance to toss him in prison."
 
"without any crime being committed"??
And the good poste Wapasha's bona fides for asserting such?
Did the poster read all of the impeachment charges?
Did the poster study the evidence?
Don Trump was impeached twice....bi-partisanally.
But, due to jury-nullification (think OJ's murder trial).....the Senate did not convict.
But, Don Trump remains the only twice-impeached President.
Where there's smoke there's fire.
Fine, cite the crime Trump committed.

Don't cite what crime the dems super mind reading powers think Trump secretly thought about maybe, possibly committing.

Don't cite what crime the dems assume he might have wanted to commit, if he had the chance.
 
We will know next week what a jury of peers decide, not you and not me.
The dems hate our Rights. They think Trump is guilty and must prove his innocence in court. It's the exact opposite, he's innocent until the persecution can prove he is guilty.

I think the goal here by the prosecution is to wink at the jury and say "We know we cannot prove any crime here. But 'come on man,' you hate him, we hate him? Let's use this one and only chance to toss him in prison."
 

Forum List

Back
Top