LadyGunSlinger
Conservative Babe
- Feb 6, 2011
- 19,589
- 3,348
- 280
- Thread starter
- #121
This reply perfectly illustrates the rabid anti-Obama brigade's confusion.Here kid.. your mom is poor so you only get water and gruel.. Now eat it and like it.
On the one hand, federal funding for lunched should be abolished because it's commie welfare - Obama is a tyrant.
On the other hand the food is awful and shouldn't forced on the poor wee tykes - Obama is a tyrant.
I've always made it clear I lean liberal when it comes to hunger, especially in children.. I never argue against federal welfare programs.. I experienced hunger and so I know what that's like.. it's painful physically and emotionally thus , I champion hunger programs.. Just because a parent is poor doesn't mean her child has to shut the fuck up and eat stinkingazz slop..
should we continue to encourage and enable people who are unwilling or unable to provide for children to breed?
I wouldn't call it breeding but I would enforce rules within the system. If you apply for welfare with one child and you have another while on the taxpayers dime, you just lost the assistance. If you cannot be responsible, the government has no business in subsidizing bad behavior.