Millions to Lose votes

[Pogo]

If anyone needs to "take it like a man" it would be you and the OP.

My work was done when I came in here --- I ain't the one whining.

The OP is a woman, jackass.

Check his profile, dipweed.

 

[francoHFW]

I don't even LIVE IN Georgia, butthead. But I do know me some history and therefore what "carpetbagger" means and doesn't mean.

Same thing here. I saw numbers, smelled bullshit, and fixed it. Done.

But the outcome of elections matters to leftards a great deal regardless of which state they live in because it is perceived as a gauge or pulse on how the electorate is thinking, no? BTW, The term "carpetbagger" can have different definitions to many people. Introducing ideas from a diametrically opposed region into another fits that bill. The fact remains is that leftards sent money from all over the U.S to fund jesuit trained fabian socialist Ossoff's campaign...no?

Wrong, Buttons. Again, I don't live in Georgia at all, let alone that district. I have my own district with my own congresscritter, and that's all I have a say about. Matter of fact, the same applies to you in Dullass Texas or Florida or wherever you claim to live this week.

And on the other point, no you don't get to invent your own language and pass it off as if it's English. Once again, just like a disctrict you don't live in, you're trying to dictate new meanings for a word you don't own. A term that you didn't even bring up in the first place

Yer quite a hands-on little fascist, huh Bugger Boi?

AGAIN....any election matters to leftards and I made that very clear. Me? A fascist? No, that would be the leftard clown posse and their butthurt snowflakes we know as "antifa" that are trying to prevent anyone from saying something that they don't agree with. Get it now????

A tiny number of punk kids in Berkeley blown out of all proportion for the dupes...ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. And Milo the Nazi pervert. Fascism is RW, always has been. No matter the brand new GOP BS...

Left wing fascists have attacked people and shut down free speech. The facts are not on your side.

BTW, Milo and Anne are bomb throwing, ridiculous a-holes. But I say let them talk with a faculty member having a 15 minute rebuttal that everyone istens to. That's all it takes to destroy their fact free BS. Rush and al the other talk show demagogues should have a 1 minute rebuttal every 15 minutes too...Liberal fascism is pure drivel, as well as most of your facts, dupe..

 

[Dale Smith]

Oh, it matters a great deal to you. Leftards spent MILLIONS more than their opponent and still lost.........I simply asked a question. Oh, and believe me on this, you take an ass-whipping all the time which explains as to why you are so butt-hurt.

Hope this helps!!!!

I don't even LIVE IN Georgia, butthead. But I do know me some history and therefore what "carpetbagger" means and doesn't mean.

Same thing here. I saw numbers, smelled bullshit, and fixed it. Done.

But the outcome of elections matters to leftards a great deal regardless of which state they live in because it is perceived as a gauge or pulse on how the electorate is thinking, no? BTW, The term "carpetbagger" can have different definitions to many people. Introducing ideas from a diametrically opposed region into another fits that bill. The fact remains is that leftards sent money from all over the U.S to fund jesuit trained fabian socialist Ossoff's campaign...no?

Wrong, Buttons. Again, I don't live in Georgia at all, let alone that district. I have my own district with my own congresscritter, and that's all I have a say about. Matter of fact, the same applies to you in Dullass Texas or Florida or wherever you claim to live this week.

And on the other point, no you don't get to invent your own language and pass it off as if it's English. Once again, just like a disctrict you don't live in, you're trying to dictate new meanings for a word you don't own. A term that you didn't even bring up in the first place

Yer quite a hands-on little fascist, huh Bugger Boi?

AGAIN....any election matters to leftards and I made that very clear. Me? A fascist? No, that would be the leftard clown posse and their butthurt snowflakes we know as "antifa" that are trying to prevent anyone from saying something that they don't agree with. Get it now????

That''s "fascist" in the sense of über-authoritarian. Get it now????????????????????????????

What Georgia 6 does in its elections is of no consequence to me --- I don't live there. It ain't my place to meddle. The difference between you and me is that I get that and you don't. That's why you're all over the board going on and on and on and on about "Jesuits" and "Butt-stains" and "Fabian", in relation to a politician who isn't even running in your district, let alone your own state. Do you not have a Congressional rep of your own?

So no, it doesn't matter to me -- I don't live there. It can't matter to me. I just came here to correct what I sniffed out as weasel math. I did that, and you're trying to obscure it because your butt hurts.

LOL! The ol "I know you are but what am I" card.......touche', Pogo! ROTFLMAO!!!!

 

[JBond]

One number puts the Democrat loss in Georgia in stunning perspective – TheBlaze

In 2016 Democrats spent zero dollars for the GA06 campaign. They won 124,917 votes.

This year they spent over $23 million and won 124,893 votes.

That's a lot of money to lose 24 votes

That is little bang for your buck

It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.

Did they not have math when you went to school?

The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.

Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?

You miss the point, even though not nearly as many Republicans turned out because they knew they would win, they won with a 7 percent margin.

Your math is just another pipe dream of the shithead party.

Nope, actually I hit the point right on the head.

It isn't. It's 0.001% fewer in an absolute number versus a base that's 21% lower. That translates to ten points higher as a proportion. And proportion is what decides the result. Always has been.

No, you are incorrect. It is not about proportion, it is about the absolute number of votes counted for each candidate, unless you live in Detroit where they just make up the numbers. The polls were wrong, just like you are wrong. Despite all the leftist hype, and money, they failed....again.

 

[Pogo]

One number puts the Democrat loss in Georgia in stunning perspective – TheBlaze

In 2016 Democrats spent zero dollars for the GA06 campaign. They won 124,917 votes.

This year they spent over $23 million and won 124,893 votes.

That's a lot of money to lose 24 votes

That is little bang for your buck

It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.

Did they not have math when you went to school?

The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.

Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?

You miss the point, even though not nearly as many Republicans turned out because they knew they would win, they won with a 7 percent margin.

Your math is just another pipe dream of the shithead party.

Nope, actually I hit the point right on the head.

It isn't. It's 0.001% fewer in an absolute number versus a base that's 21% lower. That translates to ten points higher as a proportion. And proportion is what decides the result. Always has been.

No, you are incorrect. It is not about proportion, it is about the absolute number of votes counted for each candidate, unless you live in Detroit where they just make up the numbers. The polls were wrong, just like you are wrong. Despite all the leftist hype, and money, they failed....again.

No YOU are wrong. Percentage is what wins an election (except of course when an electoral college is involved but that's not in play here). Absolute number means NOTHING without its context. X number of votes might be 51% or it may be 0.51%, depending on what the basis is.

Whelp --- the OP dishonestly omitted that basis and tried to present two absolute numbers as if they compare with each other. THEY CAN NOT. Only if they were taken out of the same whole, could they be compared.

 

[JBond]

But the outcome of elections matters to leftards a great deal regardless of which state they live in because it is perceived as a gauge or pulse on how the electorate is thinking, no? BTW, The term "carpetbagger" can have different definitions to many people. Introducing ideas from a diametrically opposed region into another fits that bill. The fact remains is that leftards sent money from all over the U.S to fund jesuit trained fabian socialist Ossoff's campaign...no?

Wrong, Buttons. Again, I don't live in Georgia at all, let alone that district. I have my own district with my own congresscritter, and that's all I have a say about. Matter of fact, the same applies to you in Dullass Texas or Florida or wherever you claim to live this week.

And on the other point, no you don't get to invent your own language and pass it off as if it's English. Once again, just like a disctrict you don't live in, you're trying to dictate new meanings for a word you don't own. A term that you didn't even bring up in the first place

Yer quite a hands-on little fascist, huh Bugger Boi?

AGAIN....any election matters to leftards and I made that very clear. Me? A fascist? No, that would be the leftard clown posse and their butthurt snowflakes we know as "antifa" that are trying to prevent anyone from saying something that they don't agree with. Get it now????

A tiny number of punk kids in Berkeley blown out of all proportion for the dupes...ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. And Milo the Nazi pervert. Fascism is RW, always has been. No matter the brand new GOP BS...

Left wing fascists have attacked people and shut down free speech. The facts are not on your side.

BTW, Milo and Anne are bomb throwing, ridiculous a-holes. But I say let them talk with a faculty member having a 15 minute rebuttal that everyone istens to. That's all it takes to destroy their fact free BS. Rush and al the other talk show demagogues should have a 1 minute rebuttal every 15 minutes too...Liberal fascism is pure drivel, as well as most of your facts, dupe..

Get your fascist black shirt in line.

One number puts the Democrat loss in Georgia in stunning perspective – TheBlaze

In 2016 Democrats spent zero dollars for the GA06 campaign. They won 124,917 votes.

This year they spent over $23 million and won 124,893 votes.

That's a lot of money to lose 24 votes

That is little bang for your buck

It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.

Did they not have math when you went to school?

The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.

Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?

You miss the point, even though not nearly as many Republicans turned out because they knew they would win, they won with a 7 percent margin.

Your math is just another pipe dream of the shithead party.

Nope, actually I hit the point right on the head.

It isn't. It's 0.001% fewer in an absolute number versus a base that's 21% lower. That translates to ten points higher as a proportion. And proportion is what decides the result. Always has been.

No, you are incorrect. It is not about proportion, it is about the absolute number of votes counted for each candidate, unless you live in Detroit where they just make up the numbers. The polls were wrong, just like you are wrong. Despite all the leftist hype, and money, they failed....again.

No YOU are wrong. Percentage is what wins an election (except of course when an electoral college is involved but that's not in play here). Absolute number means NOTHING without its context. X number of votes might be 51% or it may be 0.51%, depending on what the basis is.

Whelp --- the OP dishonestly omitted that basis and tried to present two absolute numbers as if they compare with each other. THEY CAN NOT. Only if they were taken out of the same whole, could they be compared.

no, it is about the absolute number of votes. If you want to convert them to a percentage, feel free to, but that is not what decides the winner. The vote count is what determines the winner. Despite Trump Derangement Syndrome, the Dems lost ground from the general election. That is a fact. Percentage is all spin. Now I will admit the Republicans also lost ground, but they still pulled out the win, because again for clarity, the absolute number of votes determined the winner.

 

[Pogo]

no, it is about the absolute number of votes. If you want to convert them to a percentage, feel free to, but that is not what decides the winner.

Yer digging yerself deeper and deeper here, Deepak. Percentage is ABSOFUCKINGLUTLEY what determines the winner. There's literally no other way to do it.

Are ya fuggin' stoopid??

Look --- Handel got --- what, 134,000 votes? Suppose another candidate had gotten 731,788 votes. Much higher number. Would have wiped her out, right?

Well that's how many votes Evan McMullin got for President in November. Is Evan McMullin the President? Did he get anywhere near the office?

NO. That's because 731,788 represents 0.54% of the total vote. Because again --- THE BASIS IS DIFFERENT.

Holy SHIT what a maroon.

 

[Cellblock2429]

One number puts the Democrat loss in Georgia in stunning perspective – TheBlaze

In 2016 Democrats spent zero dollars for the GA06 campaign. They won 124,917 votes.

This year they spent over $23 million and won 124,893 votes.

That's a lot of money to lose 24 votes

That is little bang for your buck

/----- And Libs wonder why we don't want them running the economy and healthcare


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Lumpy 1]

One number puts the Democrat loss in Georgia in stunning perspective – TheBlaze

In 2016 Democrats spent zero dollars for the GA06 campaign. They won 124,917 votes.

This year they spent over $23 million and won 124,893 votes.

That's a lot of money to lose 24 votes

That is little bang for your buck

It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.

Did they not have math when you went to school?

The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.

Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?

You miss the point, even though not nearly as many Republicans turned out because they knew they would win, they won with a 7 percent margin.

Your math is just another pipe dream of the shithead party.

Nope, actually I hit the point right on the head.

It isn't. It's 0.001% fewer in an absolute number versus a base that's 21% lower. That translates to ten points higher as a proportion. And proportion is what decides the result. Always has been.

No, you are incorrect. It is not about proportion, it is about the absolute number of votes counted for each candidate, unless you live in Detroit where they just make up the numbers. The polls were wrong, just like you are wrong. Despite all the leftist hype, and money, they failed....again.

No YOU are wrong. Percentage is what wins an election (except of course when an electoral college is involved but that's not in play here). Absolute number means NOTHING without its context. X number of votes might be 51% or it may be 0.51%, depending on what the basis is.

Whelp --- the OP dishonestly omitted that basis and tried to present two absolute numbers as if they compare with each other. THEY CAN NOT. Only if they were taken out of the same whole, could they be compared.

The Op probably didn't consider the possibility of an anal retentive invasion by the left is my guess...

 

[francoHFW]

Wrong, Buttons. Again, I don't live in Georgia at all, let alone that district. I have my own district with my own congresscritter, and that's all I have a say about. Matter of fact, the same applies to you in Dullass Texas or Florida or wherever you claim to live this week.

And on the other point, no you don't get to invent your own language and pass it off as if it's English. Once again, just like a disctrict you don't live in, you're trying to dictate new meanings for a word you don't own. A term that you didn't even bring up in the first place

Yer quite a hands-on little fascist, huh Bugger Boi?

AGAIN....any election matters to leftards and I made that very clear. Me? A fascist? No, that would be the leftard clown posse and their butthurt snowflakes we know as "antifa" that are trying to prevent anyone from saying something that they don't agree with. Get it now????

A tiny number of punk kids in Berkeley blown out of all proportion for the dupes...ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. And Milo the Nazi pervert. Fascism is RW, always has been. No matter the brand new GOP BS...

Left wing fascists have attacked people and shut down free speech. The facts are not on your side.

BTW, Milo and Anne are bomb throwing, ridiculous a-holes. But I say let them talk with a faculty member having a 15 minute rebuttal that everyone istens to. That's all it takes to destroy their fact free BS. Rush and al the other talk show demagogues should have a 1 minute rebuttal every 15 minutes too...Liberal fascism is pure drivel, as well as most of your facts, dupe..

Get your fascist black shirt in line.

It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.

Did they not have math when you went to school?

The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.

Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?

You miss the point, even though not nearly as many Republicans turned out because they knew they would win, they won with a 7 percent margin.

Your math is just another pipe dream of the shithead party.

Nope, actually I hit the point right on the head.

It isn't. It's 0.001% fewer in an absolute number versus a base that's 21% lower. That translates to ten points higher as a proportion. And proportion is what decides the result. Always has been.

No, you are incorrect. It is not about proportion, it is about the absolute number of votes counted for each candidate, unless you live in Detroit where they just make up the numbers. The polls were wrong, just like you are wrong. Despite all the leftist hype, and money, they failed....again.

No YOU are wrong. Percentage is what wins an election (except of course when an electoral college is involved but that's not in play here). Absolute number means NOTHING without its context. X number of votes might be 51% or it may be 0.51%, depending on what the basis is.

Whelp --- the OP dishonestly omitted that basis and tried to present two absolute numbers as if they compare with each other. THEY CAN NOT. Only if they were taken out of the same whole, could they be compared.

no, it is about the absolute number of votes. If you want to convert them to a percentage, feel free to, but that is not what decides the winner. The vote count is what determines the winner. Despite Trump Derangement Syndrome, the Dems lost ground from the general election. That is a fact. Percentage is all spin. Now I will admit the Republicans also lost ground, but they still pulled out the win, because again for clarity, the absolute number of votes determined the winner.

Speaking of bomb throwing a-holes lol...BFD Pubs won their strongholds. All media does is try to keep their ratings up. Who needs journalism or reporters/news offices?

 

[Pogo]

It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.

Did they not have math when you went to school?

The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.

Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?

You miss the point, even though not nearly as many Republicans turned out because they knew they would win, they won with a 7 percent margin.

Your math is just another pipe dream of the shithead party.

Nope, actually I hit the point right on the head.

It isn't. It's 0.001% fewer in an absolute number versus a base that's 21% lower. That translates to ten points higher as a proportion. And proportion is what decides the result. Always has been.

No, you are incorrect. It is not about proportion, it is about the absolute number of votes counted for each candidate, unless you live in Detroit where they just make up the numbers. The polls were wrong, just like you are wrong. Despite all the leftist hype, and money, they failed....again.

No YOU are wrong. Percentage is what wins an election (except of course when an electoral college is involved but that's not in play here). Absolute number means NOTHING without its context. X number of votes might be 51% or it may be 0.51%, depending on what the basis is.

Whelp --- the OP dishonestly omitted that basis and tried to present two absolute numbers as if they compare with each other. THEY CAN NOT. Only if they were taken out of the same whole, could they be compared.

The Op probably didn't consider the possibility of an anal retentive invasion by the left is my guess...

Prolly doesn't have any experience with statistics to make that big a gaffe.

Unfortunately for him I'm a baseball fan.

 

[Cellblock2429]

I would have sold my vote for $1 million. No problem.

/---- I would have taken $950,000


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

 

[boedicca]

Millions for this:

ToXiC PeLoSi... | Zero Hedge

 

[Lumpy 1]

You miss the point, even though not nearly as many Republicans turned out because they knew they would win, they won with a 7 percent margin.

Your math is just another pipe dream of the shithead party.

Nope, actually I hit the point right on the head.

It isn't. It's 0.001% fewer in an absolute number versus a base that's 21% lower. That translates to ten points higher as a proportion. And proportion is what decides the result. Always has been.

No, you are incorrect. It is not about proportion, it is about the absolute number of votes counted for each candidate, unless you live in Detroit where they just make up the numbers. The polls were wrong, just like you are wrong. Despite all the leftist hype, and money, they failed....again.

No YOU are wrong. Percentage is what wins an election (except of course when an electoral college is involved but that's not in play here). Absolute number means NOTHING without its context. X number of votes might be 51% or it may be 0.51%, depending on what the basis is.

Whelp --- the OP dishonestly omitted that basis and tried to present two absolute numbers as if they compare with each other. THEY CAN NOT. Only if they were taken out of the same whole, could they be compared.

The Op probably didn't consider the possibility of an anal retentive invasion by the left is my guess...

Prolly doesn't have any experience with statistics to make that big a gaffe.

Unfortunately for him I'm a baseball fan.

Eh, bottom line .. Democrats/fake media lost yet another election, wasted millions and look ridiculous..

.. I'm happy with that..

 

[Pogo]

Nope, actually I hit the point right on the head.

It isn't. It's 0.001% fewer in an absolute number versus a base that's 21% lower. That translates to ten points higher as a proportion. And proportion is what decides the result. Always has been.

No, you are incorrect. It is not about proportion, it is about the absolute number of votes counted for each candidate, unless you live in Detroit where they just make up the numbers. The polls were wrong, just like you are wrong. Despite all the leftist hype, and money, they failed....again.

No YOU are wrong. Percentage is what wins an election (except of course when an electoral college is involved but that's not in play here). Absolute number means NOTHING without its context. X number of votes might be 51% or it may be 0.51%, depending on what the basis is.

Whelp --- the OP dishonestly omitted that basis and tried to present two absolute numbers as if they compare with each other. THEY CAN NOT. Only if they were taken out of the same whole, could they be compared.

The Op probably didn't consider the possibility of an anal retentive invasion by the left is my guess...

Prolly doesn't have any experience with statistics to make that big a gaffe.

Unfortunately for him I'm a baseball fan.

Eh, bottom line .. Democrats/fake media lost yet another election, wasted millions and look ridiculous.. I'm happy with that..

Whatever --- who cares. I'm here for the weasel math.

Another example --- "Lumpy got five hits, what a great hitter". If it's in a single game, yes. If that's Lumpy's total for the whole year..........not so much.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.

Did they not have math when you went to school?

The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.

Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?

And the GOP spent $33 million doing it!

Where did you get that figure? I saw where the Dems outspent Republicans by a ratio of 5:1. Did libs spend $165 million?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.

Did they not have math when you went to school?

The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.

Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?

Yes. Every school I have been to says 124,917 is greater than 124,893.

Your attempt to spin doesn't change the math

The math doesn't need to change. It needs its context put back after you forgot it.
I covered it, you're welcome.

By the way here's a bit more math: The Republican loss of 66,493 votes is exactly 33,246.5 times the Democrats' loss. If you wanna let me know how much each one spent I can get back to you with exactly how much each spent on "losing votes".

I have my own calculator.

So, give us your analysis of how this bodes well for leftards....was the race close because of the dissatisfaction of the candidate or Trump???? Or because people crave fabian socialism ?????

For a district that is historically so red it's almost maroon, it's quite stunning. And a warning for the midterms in 2018. Trump will continue to do nothing but fail, sign useless executive orders, play golf and tweet. Even morons like you will give up.

I think GA is becoming a new swing state.

That's can't be good news for the GOP.

ROFLMAO!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

One number puts the Democrat loss in Georgia in stunning perspective – TheBlaze

In 2016 Democrats spent zero dollars for the GA06 campaign. They won 124,917 votes.

This year they spent over $23 million and won 124,893 votes.

That's a lot of money to lose 24 votes

That is little bang for your buck

It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.

Did they not have math when you went to school?

The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.

Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?

What do you call the guy who graduated last in his medical school class?

Doctor.

IOW, the Republican is going to be writing, debating, and voting on legislation while the democrat is going to be doing...what again?

Making documentaries about Millenials.

 

[Pogo]

It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.

Did they not have math when you went to school?

The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.

Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?

And the GOP spent $33 million doing it!

Where did you get that figure? I saw where the Dems outspent Republicans by a ratio of 5:1. Did libs spend $165 million?

From the link I posted earlier it was more like 4:3, nowhere near 5:1