Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I uh, don't think Rump was running.
But I see they picked up ten points in a district they hadn't held since the 1970s.
Whatever, I'm just here to fix the weasel math. That got done.
And the GOP spent $33 million doing it!It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.
Did they not have math when you went to school?
The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.
Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?
80% of the polling had the conservative democrat ahead. Liberals everywhere claimed this election was a referendum on Trump. They shouted it from the rooftops when they thought they were going to win. Take it like a man and stop whining.One number puts the Democrat loss in Georgia in stunning perspective – TheBlaze
In 2016 Democrats spent zero dollars for the GA06 campaign. They won 124,917 votes.
This year they spent over $23 million and won 124,893 votes.
That's a lot of money to lose 24 votes
That is little bang for your buck
It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.
Did they not have math when you went to school?
The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.
Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?
Dems spent $31 million for a "referendum on Trump" and failed.
I uh, don't think Rump was running.
But I see they picked up ten points in a district they hadn't held since the 1970s.
Whatever, I'm just here to fix the weasel math. That got done.
Pogo always takes it; but not like a man.
A tiny number of punk kids in Berkeley blown out of all proportion for the dupes...ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. And Milo the Nazi pervert. Fascism is RW, always has been. No matter the brand new GOP BS...I don't give a fuck what it means for political parties. I just came to correct dishonest math.
Just like the last thread where I corrected the definition of a couple of words and you melted into a babbling puddle going "but ... but.... Fabian! But... Jesuits! But... but.... butt-stains on underwear of life!"
You seem to be severely afflicted with ADHD.
Oh, it matters a great deal to you. Leftards spent MILLIONS more than their opponent and still lost.........I simply asked a question. Oh, and believe me on this, you take an ass-whipping all the time which explains as to why you are so butt-hurt.
Hope this helps!!!!
I don't even LIVE IN Georgia, butthead. But I do know me some history and therefore what "carpetbagger" means and doesn't mean.
Same thing here. I saw numbers, smelled bullshit, and fixed it. Done.
But the outcome of elections matters to leftards a great deal regardless of which state they live in because it is perceived as a gauge or pulse on how the electorate is thinking, no? BTW, The term "carpetbagger" can have different definitions to many people. Introducing ideas from a diametrically opposed region into another fits that bill. The fact remains is that leftards sent money from all over the U.S to fund jesuit trained fabian socialist Ossoff's campaign...no?
Wrong, Buttons. Again, I don't live in Georgia at all, let alone that district. I have my own district with my own congresscritter, and that's all I have a say about. Matter of fact, the same applies to you in Dullass Texas or Florida or wherever you claim to live this week.
And on the other point, no you don't get to invent your own language and pass it off as if it's English. Once again, just like a disctrict you don't live in, you're trying to dictate new meanings for a word you don't own. A term that you didn't even bring up in the first place
Yer quite a hands-on little fascist, huh Bugger Boi?
AGAIN....any election matters to leftards and I made that very clear. Me? A fascist? No, that would be the leftard clown posse and their butthurt snowflakes we know as "antifa" that are trying to prevent anyone from saying something that they don't agree with. Get it now????
I don't give a fuck what it means for political parties. I just came to correct dishonest math.
Just like the last thread where I corrected the definition of a couple of words and you melted into a babbling puddle going "but ... but.... Fabian! But... Jesuits! But... but.... butt-stains on underwear of life!"
You seem to be severely afflicted with ADHD.
Oh, it matters a great deal to you. Leftards spent MILLIONS more than their opponent and still lost.........I simply asked a question. Oh, and believe me on this, you take an ass-whipping all the time which explains as to why you are so butt-hurt.
Hope this helps!!!!
I don't even LIVE IN Georgia, butthead. But I do know me some history and therefore what "carpetbagger" means and doesn't mean.
Same thing here. I saw numbers, smelled bullshit, and fixed it. Done.
But the outcome of elections matters to leftards a great deal regardless of which state they live in because it is perceived as a gauge or pulse on how the electorate is thinking, no? BTW, The term "carpetbagger" can have different definitions to many people. Introducing ideas from a diametrically opposed region into another fits that bill. The fact remains is that leftards sent money from all over the U.S to fund jesuit trained fabian socialist Ossoff's campaign...no?
Wrong, Buttons. Again, I don't live in Georgia at all, let alone that district. I have my own district with my own congresscritter, and that's all I have a say about. Matter of fact, the same applies to you in Dullass Texas or Florida or wherever you claim to live this week.
And on the other point, no you don't get to invent your own language and pass it off as if it's English. Once again, just like a disctrict you don't live in, you're trying to dictate new meanings for a word you don't own. A term that you didn't even bring up in the first place
Yer quite a hands-on little fascist, huh Bugger Boi?
AGAIN....any election matters to leftards and I made that very clear. Me? A fascist? No, that would be the leftard clown posse and their butthurt snowflakes we know as "antifa" that are trying to prevent anyone from saying something that they don't agree with. Get it now????
Left wing fascists have attacked people and shut down free speech. The facts are not on your side.A tiny number of punk kids in Berkeley blown out of all proportion for the dupes...ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ. And Milo the Nazi pervert. Fascism is RW, always has been. No matter the brand new GOP BS...Oh, it matters a great deal to you. Leftards spent MILLIONS more than their opponent and still lost.........I simply asked a question. Oh, and believe me on this, you take an ass-whipping all the time which explains as to why you are so butt-hurt.
Hope this helps!!!!
I don't even LIVE IN Georgia, butthead. But I do know me some history and therefore what "carpetbagger" means and doesn't mean.
Same thing here. I saw numbers, smelled bullshit, and fixed it. Done.
But the outcome of elections matters to leftards a great deal regardless of which state they live in because it is perceived as a gauge or pulse on how the electorate is thinking, no? BTW, The term "carpetbagger" can have different definitions to many people. Introducing ideas from a diametrically opposed region into another fits that bill. The fact remains is that leftards sent money from all over the U.S to fund jesuit trained fabian socialist Ossoff's campaign...no?
Wrong, Buttons. Again, I don't live in Georgia at all, let alone that district. I have my own district with my own congresscritter, and that's all I have a say about. Matter of fact, the same applies to you in Dullass Texas or Florida or wherever you claim to live this week.
And on the other point, no you don't get to invent your own language and pass it off as if it's English. Once again, just like a disctrict you don't live in, you're trying to dictate new meanings for a word you don't own. A term that you didn't even bring up in the first place
Yer quite a hands-on little fascist, huh Bugger Boi?
AGAIN....any election matters to leftards and I made that very clear. Me? A fascist? No, that would be the leftard clown posse and their butthurt snowflakes we know as "antifa" that are trying to prevent anyone from saying something that they don't agree with. Get it now????
One number puts the Democrat loss in Georgia in stunning perspective – TheBlaze
In 2016 Democrats spent zero dollars for the GA06 campaign. They won 124,917 votes.
This year they spent over $23 million and won 124,893 votes.
That's a lot of money to lose 24 votes
That is little bang for your buck
It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.
Did they not have math when you went to school?
The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.
Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?
You miss the point, even though not nearly as many Republicans turned out because they knew they would win, they won with a 7 percent margin.
Your math is just another pipe dream of the shithead party.
80% of the polling had the conservative democrat ahead. Liberals everywhere claimed this election was a referendum on Trump. They shouted it from the rooftops when they thought they were going to win. Take it like a man and stop whining.One number puts the Democrat loss in Georgia in stunning perspective – TheBlaze
In 2016 Democrats spent zero dollars for the GA06 campaign. They won 124,917 votes.
This year they spent over $23 million and won 124,893 votes.
That's a lot of money to lose 24 votes
That is little bang for your buck
It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.
Did they not have math when you went to school?
The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.
Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?
Dems spent $31 million for a "referendum on Trump" and failed.
I uh, don't think Rump was running.
But I see they picked up ten points in a district they hadn't held since the 1970s.
Whatever, I'm just here to fix the weasel math. That got done.
How big is their participation trophy case?Chuck Todd actually spun this as "a moral victory" for the Democrats.
I hope they have many
I uh, don't think Rump was running.
But I see they picked up ten points in a district they hadn't held since the 1970s.
Whatever, I'm just here to fix the weasel math. That got done.
According to your beloved mainstream lying liberal full of shit media it WAS a referendum ON TRUMP. That is how they were prepared to spin it if the republican won, That Trump had lost the support of the people who voted for him. So as usual and as with your goofball math idea, you are WRONG!!!!!.
The OP is a woman, jackass.If anyone needs to "take it like a man" it would be you and the OP.
My work was done when I came in here --- I ain't the one whining.
What do you call the guy who graduated last in his medical school class?One number puts the Democrat loss in Georgia in stunning perspective – TheBlaze
In 2016 Democrats spent zero dollars for the GA06 campaign. They won 124,917 votes.
This year they spent over $23 million and won 124,893 votes.
That's a lot of money to lose 24 votes
That is little bang for your buck
It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.
Did they not have math when you went to school?
The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.
Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?
And the GOP spent $33 million doing it!It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.
Did they not have math when you went to school?
The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.
Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?
What idiot told you that? OH I see you mean the total spent on all of the Republican candidates through the primary by their promoters. All we are interested in is the 8 million spent for the WINNER since there was 31 million spent on the loser. Oh and you analysis is just like gun grabbers, flawed in theory, and also in structure.
So explain what President Trump has "continually failed" at.One number puts the Democrat loss in Georgia in stunning perspective – TheBlaze
In 2016 Democrats spent zero dollars for the GA06 campaign. They won 124,917 votes.
This year they spent over $23 million and won 124,893 votes.
That's a lot of money to lose 24 votes
That is little bang for your buck
It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.
Did they not have math when you went to school?
The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.
Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?
Yes. Every school I have been to says 124,917 is greater than 124,893.
Your attempt to spin doesn't change the math
The math doesn't need to change. It needs its context put back after you forgot it.
I covered it, you're welcome.
By the way here's a bit more math: The Republican loss of 66,493 votes is exactly 33,246.5 times the Democrats' loss. If you wanna let me know how much each one spent I can get back to you with exactly how much each spent on "losing votes".
I have my own calculator.
So, give us your analysis of how this bodes well for leftards....was the race close because of the dissatisfaction of the candidate or Trump???? Or because people crave fabian socialism ?????
For a district that is historically so red it's almost maroon, it's quite stunning. And a warning for the midterms in 2018. Trump will continue to do nothing but fail, sign useless executive orders, play golf and tweet. Even morons like you will give up.
What do you call the guy who graduated last in his medical school class?One number puts the Democrat loss in Georgia in stunning perspective – TheBlaze
In 2016 Democrats spent zero dollars for the GA06 campaign. They won 124,917 votes.
This year they spent over $23 million and won 124,893 votes.
That's a lot of money to lose 24 votes
That is little bang for your buck
It's also weasel math. 2016 (a regular election year) had 326,005 votes, the special election yesterday only 259,488. That means the virtually-same number was worth ten points more in the smaller sample.
Did they not have math when you went to school?
The R candidate meanwhile went from 201,088 votes in '16 to 134595 yesterday, or 66,493 fewer.
Sooooo ..how much did that party spend to lose 66,493 votes? Versus a loss of .... 24?
Doctor.
IOW, the Republican is going to be writing, debating, and voting on legislation while the democrat is going to be doing...what again?
If you look at it rationally the money spent on campaigns isn't lost, it's part of the economy. Radio and T.V. spots cost money and the printers who make the yard signs get paid. The problem is when democrats get free propaganda from the criminal conspiracy in the MSM and fake news and skewed polls are created to influence voters.
