Mississippi governor to sign bill banning abortion at 20 weeks

The baby inside her, is NOT her, completely different DNA!

It is attached to her and it is alive only because of her.

Then why didn't the little harlot take precautions?

Cuz daddy and the tax payers won't buy her rubbers.

$rubbers.jpg
 
Abortion is a barbaric and abhorrent act in an otherwise civilized society.

To cloak it in the rhetoric of "choice" is delusional.
 
Two of my children I consider to be survivors of an intent to abort.
Certainly not my intent.
There should be limits and restrictions, and severe penalties for violating them.

Stop sugar-coating the obvious. This is an issue of convenience, negligence, and ignorance.
 
It is attached to her and it is alive only because of her.

Then why didn't the little harlot take precautions?

You assume that she didn't, and you also assume that women who have abortions are sluts.

Typical male.

What are the chances that if she did take precautions she would be pregnant?.... And yes, most women that end with an unwanted pregnancies are sluts, not all but most!
 
Then why didn't the little harlot take precautions?

You assume that she didn't, and you also assume that women who have abortions are sluts.

Typical male.

What are the chances that if she did take precautions she would be pregnant?.... And yes, most women that end with an unwanted pregnancies are sluts, not all but most!

Stop assuming. Birth control is not 100% effective.
 
Nature intended that a fetus be attached to the woman for nine months while the males sits around on his arse and does nothing. Yet you want to force the woman to endure the pregnancy because she was the whore who spread her legs, but the man gets nothing even though he may have refused to wear a condom.

It all comes back on the ladies, doesn't it?
 
You assume that she didn't, and you also assume that women who have abortions are sluts.

Typical male.

What are the chances that if she did take precautions she would be pregnant?.... And yes, most women that end with an unwanted pregnancies are sluts, not all but most!

Stop assuming. Birth control is not 100% effective.

Neither is your chances of not being killed if riding in a car with a seat belt on!
 
Abortion is a barbaric and abhorrent act in an otherwise civilized society.

To cloak it in the rhetoric of "choice" is delusional.

Now, now, mankind has a genetic need for genocide. At least, historically speaking they seem to have this need.

What I fear is what will happen if we make all genocide illegal and prevent it. Their heads might explode.
 
Nature intended that a fetus be attached to the woman for nine months while the males sits around on his arse and does nothing. Yet you want to force the woman to endure the pregnancy because she was the whore who spread her legs, but the man gets nothing even though he may have refused to wear a condom.

It all comes back on the ladies, doesn't it?

Yes, life's a bitch for you bitches! IF you didn't say, come and get it, the man wouldn't come and get it. If he refuses, and your stupid enough to not protect yourself in other ways, YOU REFUSE! So simple, even a woman can do it!:eusa_clap:
 
Nature intended that a fetus be attached to the woman for nine months while the males sits around on his arse and does nothing. Yet you want to force the woman to endure the pregnancy because she was the whore who spread her legs, but the man gets nothing even though he may have refused to wear a condom.

It all comes back on the ladies, doesn't it?

How about the OP and the 20 week limitation? Any thoughts?
 
Unless you lot are willing to cough up more money to pay for these unwanted kids once they are born, your country is going to head down the tubes. You will have no choice but to raise taxes repeatedly to pay for the care of all these kids - or you can try to forcibly sterilise women, but I don't think that will work.
 
Nature intended that a fetus be attached to the woman for nine months while the males sits around on his arse and does nothing. Yet you want to force the woman to endure the pregnancy because she was the whore who spread her legs, but the man gets nothing even though he may have refused to wear a condom.

It all comes back on the ladies, doesn't it?

How about the OP and the 20 week limitation? Any thoughts?

Don't deprive them of their genocidal outlets. If you do, this is what will happen to progressives around the world.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nature intended that a fetus be attached to the woman for nine months while the males sits around on his arse and does nothing. Yet you want to force the woman to endure the pregnancy because she was the whore who spread her legs, but the man gets nothing even though he may have refused to wear a condom.

It all comes back on the ladies, doesn't it?

How about the OP and the 20 week limitation? Any thoughts?

Over here the limit is 24 weeks, with permission from two doctors needed after that point. Despite the law, there hasn't been any increase in late abortions like the anti choicers thought there would be. The rate of abortion has stayed the same, with more abortions occurring in the first 9-12 weeks of pregnancy.

What does that mean? It means that a law banning abortion after a certain period isn't needed. Unless you had a massive number of late abortions, there is no need for a law that prevents abortions after 20 weeks, if only a small handful of women have had abortions after this stage - and those would likely have been for fetal defect or to save the life of the mother.

Leave the law as it is and women will still have abortions in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy. All this law does is make it that much harder for women to have abortions if the fetus is suffering from a defect - as the law doesn't define how severe the defect must be before abortion is allowed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top